|
why not
|
# ¿ May 5, 2018 08:22 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 18:40 |
|
PMush Perfect posted:everyone tell me who your favorite president is and why Kennedy. Catholics are cool.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2018 01:26 |
|
So... voting in a chancellor and getting to the card part is what we want here yes?
|
# ¿ May 6, 2018 23:21 |
|
##vote yes Do good by us Mister Byers
|
# ¿ May 7, 2018 01:22 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:##vote yes and Pmush!
|
# ¿ May 7, 2018 01:34 |
|
kumba posted:Did I miss the part about how the assassination works great question. I think what your missing is a fascist policy. That's not what you want.... is it?
|
# ¿ May 8, 2018 03:21 |
|
if kumba is fascist, then receiving two lib policies is a great way to hide.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2018 03:30 |
|
CapnAndy posted:I disagree with the idea that we'd gain any more information if I'd given him a lib and fasc to choose from, though. Like I said, I would expect both a liberal and a fascist to pick the liberal policy at this point in the game. That makes sense. I agree knowing the numbers of discarded libs is important. There are 2 or 3 lib policies left. 18-27% chance of getting at least one lib policy drawn by the next pres.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2018 14:00 |
|
kumba posted:agreed, it seems like this kind of game really doesn't get rolling until the first fascist policy gets passed How would you employ the benefit of the first fascist policy and why?
|
# ¿ May 8, 2018 14:02 |
|
I didn't know it was pre arranged either, good to know.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2018 15:28 |
|
I trust KB's choices so far and trust the employment of the first presidential power if it comes to that. ##vote yes
|
# ¿ May 9, 2018 15:58 |
|
if I had refresh the page before I voted maybe I would have seen tmm's last post but unfortunately I didn't and I do apologize.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2018 18:07 |
|
Tmm you still backing a investigation of kumba?
|
# ¿ May 9, 2018 18:12 |
|
CapitalistPig posted:I feel like this is probably safer. I support this as well. Any one of those four I think would help us sort out when the right time to by pass a govt', I'd say the earlier they are to the presidency the better.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2018 18:36 |
|
King Burgundy posted:Looks like the cucu strategy on the rules link would have me investigating DB this time, so that he could pick me as a chancellor if I investigate him as liberal. I'm not opposed to this.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2018 19:09 |
|
I follow your logic tmm
|
# ¿ May 10, 2018 15:31 |
|
King Burgundy posted:For what it's worth, what I've taken from this conversation thus far is I should probably be investigating RF. He seems like the closest to a consensus choice between the various possibilities. I think kumba would be my first choice but concur with this as well.
|
# ¿ May 10, 2018 19:37 |
|
Wouldn't it be hilarious if kb and kumba were both fascists?
|
# ¿ May 11, 2018 20:02 |
|
kumba posted:..i guess? that's awfully random, did you just decide to pick two names out of a hat to cast shade at or what King Burgundy posted:Is this two people in a row both not reading and somehow thinking there is a Kumba/KB disagreement in this game?
|
# ¿ May 11, 2018 23:58 |
|
I said kumba but I meant CaptAndy, jokes on me this time.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2018 23:58 |
|
fwiw I think it unlikley both KB and CaptAndy are fascist hence the joke, but either alone could be. I just don't think a back and forth like that would make sense between two fascists. The idea is comical to me.
|
# ¿ May 12, 2018 00:47 |
|
No clue why I typed kumba though. Perhaps subconsciously I think kumba is facist so I had a Freudian slip. I don't actually have any real sense of kumba's alignment however.
|
# ¿ May 12, 2018 00:51 |
|
I say nominate AA. If tmm's senario comes to pass, I think getting info on AA now would make that tough choice a little less tough.
|
# ¿ May 13, 2018 00:43 |
|
Happy moms day ##vote yes
|
# ¿ May 13, 2018 17:32 |
|
PMush Perfect posted:Can we quarantine both of them for a while? DB picks someone, we deny RF a government, Kumba gets a turn, we deny AA a government? Right now I like you and Byers for a nomination.
|
# ¿ May 13, 2018 21:12 |
|
TMMadman posted:Got something against me? The only strike against you is that you were part of a gov't that passed a fascist policy.
|
# ¿ May 13, 2018 21:25 |
|
The reason I didn't put CaptAndy in that group is because his presidency comes after pmush and Byers
|
# ¿ May 13, 2018 21:35 |
|
TMMadman posted:Yeah, but I wasn't given a choice. And it'd be nice to prove myself before I'm up for President. If there are still 2 liberal cards left in the deck then you will almost certainly pick one and presuming you are a liberal, you will pass it on. I took into consideration the possibility that you and KB both are fascist and lying about the numbers of policies.
|
# ¿ May 13, 2018 21:40 |
|
Byers2142 posted:You trust Andy more than TMM? Not necessarily, no. But going by the policies passed, CaptAndy looks slightly better I would say.
|
# ¿ May 13, 2018 22:54 |
|
I have no qualms with a KB investigation for the reason given.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2018 01:07 |
|
CapitalistPig posted:If KB is the consensus I will investigate him. Great news! I'm not fascist. I still don't know what to make of you or AA yet. I understand and would agree with AA's statment in the case that AA is not lying about being liberal, but I also wondered myself as pmush has already pointed out, that putting that analysis of Cpig's hypothetical investigation result out there does sort of become moot because of WIFOM. Would it be a strategic blunder to have Cpig investigate someone we can agree to nominate for this current admin and then judge both Cpig and nominee after the policy result?
|
# ¿ May 14, 2018 05:02 |
|
I should have formatted that last post better. The third sentence onward was more of an address to all players.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2018 05:08 |
|
Honestly I was leaning toward nominating Byers. I'm gonna sleep on it though, it's late where I am now and I'm tired. If any strong arguments can be made for another choice, I am listening. Obviously I'm interested in Cpig's say as well as Pmush, or anyone else for that matter, but those two particularly if we are to go with the investigate/nominate combo. I don't think I'd like to nominate anyone that's in the lockout zone (KB, RF, AA, Cpig).
|
# ¿ May 14, 2018 06:45 |
|
CapitalistPig posted:I am torn between investigating KB and Byers. Investigate KB if you want to, but I'm standing by what I said about not nominating lockouts.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2018 22:51 |
|
KB, would you be in favor of a kumba nomination? Anyone else have a say in that as well? I am prepared to nominate kumba, if most agree. Personally I think this would be a good test for kumba. The only way I could see a fascist kumba to remain hidden is in the very unlikely scenario that I draw three fascist policies.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2018 17:18 |
|
PMush Perfect posted:I still really don't like the idea of the possibility of having three locked-out players in a row. Right now, if he's a fascist, he pushes us up to 3, then we're essentially forced into getting one from the top, which will probably push us up to 4. If he's fascist and we don't nominate him now, we minimize the damage we do, or at least break even on the worst case scenario for both (new chancellor is fascist and/or three fascist cards, vs. three fascist cards and/or fascist kumba). And if he's liberal, great, we get a liberal president in between the lockouts. Do you have an alternative for chancellor?
|
# ¿ May 15, 2018 17:32 |
|
I agree that RF and AA are probably fash. Not sure about pmush and CapAnd, but could see Cap as secret hitler between the two.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2018 17:37 |
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Nominate byers Although I agree with this, I'll nominate the whomever majority favorite is and I think it's kumba at this point.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2018 17:40 |
|
ok, here goes. ##nominate kumba going back to work, check y'all nerds later oh yeah, also ##vote yes ok, bye
|
# ¿ May 15, 2018 17:45 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 18:40 |
|
Byers2142 posted:Wait, "I wish you were fascist?" Nice catch lol
|
# ¿ May 15, 2018 19:24 |