Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


My methodology is basically "How many people did you genocide or ethnically cleanse" combined with "How much did you existing gently caress up all of the fuckin' world you jackasses". Applying this to 15 historical and modern empires A Computer gave me the following output.

#1. British Empire (For like, 8 gorillion genocides and birthing the US, the current Great Satan)
#2. Roman Empire (See above)
#3. Neo-Assyrian Empire (Absolute Fuckers)
#4. Meiji-Showa Imperial Japan (Anime Creating Absolute Fuckers)
#5. The Literal Nazis (Literally Nazis)
#6. The Spanish Empire (The Entire Columbian Exchange and also sort of by-proxy the US existing)
#7. The USA (The Great Satan)
#8. Russian Empire (LOL LET'S ETHNICALLY CLEANSE SIBERIA AND CENTRAL ASIA AND ALSO gently caress OVER RUSSIA)
#9. French Empire (Fuckin' Over Africa, 1890s-Ongoing)
#10. USSR (For making the US go absolutely apeshit for like, 1945-Ongoing)
#11. The Mongol Empire (They Liked Killin' A Bit Too Much)
#12. The Ottoman Empire (Some hosed Up poo poo on Smaller Scales)
#13. Tawantinsuyu (Ethnically Cleansed Chimor)
#14. The Aztec Triple Alliance (That whole human sacrifice thing and hosed up tax system that involved human sacrifice poo poo)
#15. Shi Huang Di's China (Great Wall and his Palace contain the bodies of thousands who died building poo poo for his rear end)

Somehow motherfuckin' Adolf Hitler was punchin' way below his weight with his 1000 year Reich, and the British seized #1 spot from da Romans. I forgot like 500 other fuckers though so this poo poo is open to revision from ya'all.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rhukatah
Feb 26, 2013

by Nyc_Tattoo
Finally a thread for genocide whataboutism.

What about the Tang Dynasty and the An Lushan rebellion?

What about Temur?

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
you know the Armenian Genocide started in the Ottoman days, right?

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Mongols are easy #1, wtf r u smoking

KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


rudatron posted:

Mongols are easy #1, wtf r u smoking

Somehow it seems like Rome was even worse with like, the genocide thing. Somehow.

It scared the gently caress out of me when I realized it but like, between the Samnites, Gaul, Judea, Carthage, Campania and their Middle East poo poo, they somehow came out worse.

And yeah I totally forgot that about the Armenian Genocide, I was like, thinking that was after the war for some reason. Put them at like, #6.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
HOW ARE THE ROMANS #2

that's way too loving high, does french colonialism not count now? portugal? spain isn't as bad as Assyria? what?

Lawman 0
Aug 17, 2010

rudatron posted:

HOW ARE THE ROMANS #2

that's way too loving high, does french colonialism not count now? portugal? spain isn't as bad as Assyria? what?

*ahem* eurocentrism

KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


rudatron posted:

HOW ARE THE ROMANS #2

that's way too loving high, does french colonialism not count now? portugal? spain isn't as bad as Assyria? what?

Neo-Assyria did some poo poo that was like, somehow beyond Spain. I am dead serious. Like, genocides on everyone around them, flaying thousands and displaying the skins, mass murder of children in multiple cities sort of poo poo.

And yes, the Romans really were that bad. Again, genocide after genocide, against anyone who acted up, including other Latins, inspired a bunch of shitheads in Spain, Britain, France and the US centuries later. They fuckin' sucked and we're still dealing with their bullshit.

The French are in there, and yeah, totally forgot Portugal.

Also, the only reason the Mongols aren't higher is because once they won a war, they usually just hosed off as long as you paid taxes, whereas like, the British would find a way to engineer a famine on your rear end like India and Ireland got to experience and Rome would usually genocide/ethnically cleanse/enslave you.

KiteAuraan has issued a correction as of 15:51 on May 8, 2018

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

at last, a working Paradox Interactive tier list

though I'd have to say the Mongols are definitely S+ tier

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
the mongols killed about 5 million people when genghis khan was alive (the global pop was only ~500 mill), putting romans above them is nuts.

assyria was stuck in one corner of the world. there's absolutely no way they top spain.

jBrereton
May 30, 2013
Grimey Drawer
that feel when the Qing kill 30 million people in the Taiping Rebellion alone and don't even make the list because the OP read a cracked.com article about the Neo-Assyrians 2 years ago.

P-Mack
Nov 10, 2007

Rhukatah posted:

What about the Tang Dynasty and the An Lushan rebellion?


Disastrous, but the ~50% of the population death toll is based on simple comparison of before and after census numbers and is definitely not accurate.

KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


rudatron posted:

the mongols killed about 5 million people when genghis khan was alive (the global pop was only ~500 mill), putting romans above them is nuts.

assyria was stuck in one corner of the world. there's absolutely no way they top spain.

I'll give you Spain, for essentially being Global Neo-Assyria. I cannot cede Rome though. Like, I get that the Mongols killed more, but lookin' at HOW they both ran their empires and like, what they did after a war and how they administered poo poo internally and treated their own citizens, Rome still comes out lookin' shittier.

Mongols definitely best KDR though.

Also it wasn't a Cracked article, it was reading some books about Southwest Asia in the period and like, actual university level Egypt poo poo where they kept poppin' up being assholes. I'll admit not knowing much about China beyond the Qin and Han.

The Dipshit
Dec 21, 2005

by FactsAreUseless

rudatron posted:

the mongols killed about 5 million people when genghis khan was alive (the global pop was only ~500 mill), putting romans above them is nuts.

assyria was stuck in one corner of the world. there's absolutely no way they top spain.

Julius Caesar did ~million killed/enslaved in just Gaul. The Roman Empire just straight up had more time to pull poo poo.

C-Euro
Mar 20, 2010

:science:
Soiled Meat
I liked Age of Empires 1 more than AoE 2 but both games are pretty great.

jBrereton
May 30, 2013
Grimey Drawer

KiteAuraan posted:

Also, the only reason the Mongols aren't higher is because once they won a war, they usually just hosed off as long as you paid taxes, whereas like, the British would find a way to engineer a famine on your rear end like India and Ireland got to experience and Rome would usually genocide/ethnically cleanse/enslave you.
They ruled China for a century as the Yuan dynasty and were unseated after a fifteen year long civil war whose principle cause was famine and the arrogance of the ruling class.

KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


C-Euro posted:

I liked Age of Empires 1 more than AoE 2 but both games are pretty great.

This makes you the true historical monster.

Stairmaster
Jun 8, 2012

I think you need to account for time as well op. Nazi germany only existed for 12 years and all the deaths in the european theater should be considered their responsibility.

the bitcoin of weed
Nov 1, 2014

the ottomans should definitely at least be higher than the USSR

KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


Stairmaster posted:

I think you need to account for time as well op. Nazi germany only existed for 12 years and all the deaths in the european theater should be considered their responsibility.

Yeah I should, especially since for Rome, I am counting time as an imperial power, not just when they called themselves an empire, and including the Eastern Empire in poo poo. So they got like, 2000 years to be fuckheads. Everyone else gets like, 500 years tops.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Okay, so how are we doing this, is it

a) total killed
b) total killed relative to the time period
c) total killed relative to the time period & place (here, *place* being *areas it could access*)
d) total killed, relative to the length of empire
e) total killed, relative to the length, time period
f) total killed, relative to the length, time period & place

if we go a), nazis are top.
if we go b) ...I'm not sure. maybe a toss up between nazis and the british.
if we go c) maybe romans
if we go d) still probably nazis
if we go e) mongols
if we go f) ...not sure, but I think triple alliance takes it.

1994 Toyota Celica
Sep 11, 2008

by Nyc_Tattoo
the vast majority of the deaths attributable to the spanish empire were due to disease responses they neither anticipated nor controlled. the neo-assyrians accomplished their genocides by hand, with iron and bronze, and reinforced their rule with such a severe combination of public cruelty and religious totalitarianism that cyrus the great was able to win whole regions with minimum conflict on the simple promise of "i'll let you organize your own local government and follow your local religion unmodified, i'm not the assyrians"

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

C-Euro posted:

I liked Age of Empires 1 more than AoE 2 but both games are pretty great.
the simple fact that aoe 2 has the mill & farm queueing means ur opinion is objectively wrong

KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


rudatron posted:

Okay, so how are we doing this, is it

a) total killed
b) total killed relative to the time period
c) total killed relative to the time period & place (here, *place* being *areas it could access*)
d) total killed, relative to the length of empire
e) total killed, relative to the length, time period
f) total killed, relative to the length, time period & place

if we go a), nazis are top.
if we go b) ...I'm not sure. maybe a toss up between nazis and the british.
if we go c) maybe romans
if we go d) still probably nazis
if we go e) mongols
if we go f) ...not sure, but I think triple alliance takes it.

Nah, not just total killed, but also administrative policies and effects beyond their own borders they have had historically. Who they inspired, who got to exist because of them, poo poo like that. So like, the British Empire leads into the US existing, as well as Mandate Palestine and that shitshow, as well as the India/Pakistan conflict and poo poo, so that gets counted against them, and by inspiring every European empire after them, as well as stamping out people who were doing better things, even if not through killing, Rome runs up their score.

Also, there is 0 archaeological evidence that the Triple Alliance killed more than like, at absolute most, 10 million in about 300 years. They amateur hour in KDR and the totals given in history are made up Spanish bullshit to justify their murder rampage.

But I am gonna bump the Mongols up like, 10 slots once this poo poo is revised.

1994 Toyota Celica
Sep 11, 2008

by Nyc_Tattoo
the neo-assyrians would've really appreciated all the horrible drama the pizarro brothers got up to in the incan imperial palace at cuzco though. demanding royal princesses as concubines and swapping the women between them would only be more neo-assyrian if they'd beheaded manco inca yupanqui and hung the severed skull from the rafters to watch while they went to town on his sister- and cousin-wives

gucci bane
Oct 27, 2008



wrong answer idiots; number 1 : capitalism

C-Euro
Mar 20, 2010

:science:
Soiled Meat

rudatron posted:

the simple fact that aoe 2 has the mill & farm queueing means ur opinion is objectively wrong

Don't get me wrong, AoE 2 is definitely the better game if only for the QoL improvements. I just enjoyed the simplicity of 1 a whole hell of a lot for whatever reason (but gently caress the 50 unit population cap).

1994 Toyota Celica
Sep 11, 2008

by Nyc_Tattoo
capitalism isn't an empire it's a disease

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
so if we're including 'influence', then I feel you're still far over-rating the neo-assyrians, because i doubt they were that influential. the same can be said for other bronze age civs.

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
You guys have such a narrow perspective. I nominate one of those Argentine ant super colonies that can span literal thousands of miles. They've probably slaughtered countless more billions of rivals and exterminated more enemy societies than every human empire combined.

KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


Helsing posted:

You guys have such a narrow perspective. I nominate one of those Argentine ant super colonies that can span literal thousands of miles. They've probably slaughtered countless more billions of rivals and exterminated more enemy societies than every human empire combined.

Yeah but like, they probably all just view themselves as one entity anyways so like, they've killed maybe hundreds of other hive-minds, but not like, millions or anything.

The real answer is probably some space bastards that we never want to meet.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

#1 Finno-Ugric Empire
#2 Worldwide Gangster Communist Computer God
#3 Ancient Slovenian Empire

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
#0 Greater Serbia

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

one thing Frank Herbert never thought to include, not once, was the fact that the Slavic peoples of the former Yugoslavia had in fact survived intact into the tens of thousands of years in the future

not once do we get to visit the planet of New Serbia

Wheeee
Mar 11, 2001

When a tree grows, it is soft and pliable. But when it's dry and hard, it dies.

Hardness and strength are death's companions. Flexibility and softness are the embodiment of life.

That which has become hard shall not triumph.

the nazis had to recruit traitors among conquered populations to assist in the mass murdering since they knew that poo poo was hosed up and that it would drive German soldiers mad to be constantly butchering civilians

if you ignore the scale of atrocity permitted by industrial technology the nazis were fuckin amateur hour, people used to torture entire cities to death for funsies

That Robot
Sep 16, 2004

ask me anything about robots
Buglord
you forgot the Japanese Empire op

also I'd rank the original Age of Empires as number one

KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


That Robot posted:

you forgot the Japanese Empire op

also I'd rank the original Age of Empires as number one

They in there. Meiji-Showa Imperial Japan. The only time that the Emperor really mattered for poo poo and they got up to hardcore imperialism that didn't fail miserably because Toyotomi's son/nephew/whatever was a fuckup and Tokugawa wasn't helping invade Korea (because he was gettin' ready to overthrow Toyotomi).

Edit: Also, they were basically assholes that entire time. Like, they didn't just jump China in like, 1930 or some poo poo. Once they got the government settled they invaded China, fought Russia over who got to gently caress up Korea and won and helped the US and Britain gently caress over China a few times. They got busy fuckin' fast.

KiteAuraan has issued a correction as of 17:17 on May 8, 2018

gucci bane
Oct 27, 2008



I’m changing my vote to the weather

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

gucci bane posted:

I’m changing my vote to the weather

the dominion of nature. that's a pretty good one

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
Where's The Maurya Empire?

  • Locked thread