|
B The NRWR is playing possum by reviving some old periphery states. Presumably they are still out there but don't want to muddy the picture.
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2018 10:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 20:39 |
|
|
C Twice the toys.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2018 04:16
|
|
|
B
|
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2018 00:56
|
|
|
B
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2019 23:19
|
|
|
When did Panthers become Zakus?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 28, 2019 05:23
|
|
|
The first thing that comes to mind when I hear Super Prototype that actually works is the Monitor. Almost impenetrable iron armor, a 360 degree turret, and a whole ton of tradeoffs. But nothing else would be ready in time to fight the enemy's equivalent ironclad. And the mass production model kept getting delayed due to people finding new problems to fix and safety features to add.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2019 20:27
|
|
|
B
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2019 09:34
|
|
|
1B 2A 3A 4A 5A 6B 7C 8B
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2019 23:40
|
|
|
D My second choice is A, but I have but one vote to give for my thread.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 11, 2019 06:03
|
|
|
1A 2C 3D 4B 5B 6B
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2019 08:45
|
|
|
C
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2019 08:31
|
|
|
D
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2019 06:18
|
|
|
Seems like the sort of thing the Marksman would radio to the new arrivals.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2020 23:25
|
|
|
DivineCoffeeBinge posted:1A Reinvestment, in Battletech!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2020 10:04
|
|
|
C
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2020 07:29
|
|
|
A Transporting these folks is probably the biggest problem this plan has. Unless option C results in 3 regiments, one from each power. B B
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2021 09:18
|
|
|
A Deniable shock troops have always been a good time.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2021 08:39
|
|
|
Really want to see a Prism Armor variant that lets folks combine their output for actual damage. But this isn't red alert.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2021 21:02
|
|
|
Venom From the instant kill to the nailbiting extraction. Jump Platoon For nearly grabbing victory from the jaws of defeat.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2021 01:40
|
|
|
A
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2021 06:35
|
|
|
C
|
|
#
¿
Jul 29, 2021 08:35
|
|
|
Now to review my old emails so I don't make the old mistake of incompletely labeling orders.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 5, 2021 02:36
|
|
|
Not in decent range of either this turn, but I would like to challenge either the Cross Dog or Tepegoz. I think endurance armor will hold up well against ATMs.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2021 07:38
|
|
|
Okay, I am pretty sure I have a shot on the Tepegoz now. Or at least an invocation of the 50-50 LOS rule from hex 2822. And all it might cost is my supercharger.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 23, 2021 08:45
|
|
|
Makes it a lot easier to plan turns anyway. Planning on hoofing it to 2015 for a classic backstab. Apologies for the bump Pattonesque. Edit: Almost classic: actually a torso twist too far to bring everything to bear. habituallyred fucked around with this message at 08:11 on Sep 6, 2021 |
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2021 08:01
|
|
|
Going to note that I lack good battlearmor weapons, and that hex 1616 might see a practically air mobile assault next turn.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2021 08:36
|
|
|
Never going to be a good time to shoot the enemy fast movers. But I am going to try anyway. I am not well equipped for clearing elementals off of other mechs anyway. Also: drat, never thought that would be a headshot.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2021 06:11
|
|
|
The Bruin isn't a great matchup for me, but I'll move south to hit them anyway. Darn Kinetic Resistant Armor.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2021 07:50
|
|
|
Lancer ahoy! The only question is what level the lancers are at. LL0 Generics, LL2 Custom Mechs, or the experimental play as grunt rules?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2021 03:55
|
|
|
dis astranagant posted:So, do I plink the primary on 11s or attempt to delete one of the provoking armor jerks on 7s? Go for the Provokers. Getting our newest opponents outside of the 11-12 range as soon as possible will save a lot of headaches. I am going to take a swing at the Vapor Eagle's backside next turn.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2021 10:54
|
|
|
That was embarrassing. At least my lack of secondary targets didn't matter!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2021 04:34
|
|
|
More Lancer is my vote. A Madden memorial play by play might help if we see any esoteric new enemies.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2021 00:59
|
|
|
TheParadigm posted:More lancer, please! I think for a game based around attrition, it doesn't make sens to stop now! An AI that can think or do anything is illegal in Lancer's setting. Trying to make one is in the same ballpark as trying to become immortal, destroying FTL Node Gates, or making hypercoms without a license. Stuff that has been illegal long before the current government, the third directorate. Notably this is the third directorate. One of the reforms they have implemented is to treat the artificial life that runs their factories and such as people, Non-Human Persons. This should make it a lot clearer as to whether people are talking about a legal entity with proper restrictions or some wild experiment. A good example of the NHP restrictions is the Sekhmet included on the Blackbeard: It grapples and punches people exceptionally well and for free 1/turn. But that is all it does, you will grapple and punch somebody every turn until your mech explodes or you manually lock it out of the system. habituallyred fucked around with this message at 04:22 on Dec 30, 2021 |
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2021 04:10
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 20:39 |
|
|
Thank you. Two excellent rides. And what would be innumerable good reads, if it weren't for the table of contents.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 2, 2022 06:54
|
|