|
I am ALWAYS down for heists.
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2018 20:24
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 01:52 |
|
|
Hello fellow crimes, I too, enjoy crimeAnonymousNarcotics posted:##vote keane this is hella forced, just saying
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 20:27
|
|
|
Like even as a Jokephase vote (which we are not in, because keane killed jokephase (rip)) that vote is pretty Not Great.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 20:30
|
|
|
Dick Bastardly posted:This is all bad. unfortunately being very bad at Mafia is alignment-neutral for AA in particular
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 20:35
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Yeah this is a crock of poo poo. I may do dumb things, but I'm fairly good at this game overall. false, no one is ever good at mafia.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 21:10
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:This is a bad callout lol it really isn't. it's a continuation of a "joke" "vote". doubling down on it as an attempt to play off suspicion when keane naturally called suspicion to it. or, in one word. forced.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 21:14
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Normally, I'd say I find your behavior more suspicious mona I didn't put down a vote because I don't feel particularly compelled by it, but I think someone playing off joke phase nervously is one of the first hints of insincerity. insincerity = scum play. I called it out exactly as much as it should be, in my honest opinion, your mileage may vary, et cetera.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 22:09
|
|
|
Dick Bastardly posted:First post since start of game. By contrast: This is a bad Dickie B post, but I feel as if it is a very townie bad Dickie B post.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 22:10
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I hate this half-jokephase-phase. 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 22:22
|
|
|
I'm just here to have some fun and ride the high.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 22:30
|
|
|
Anyone calling for a scum team this early is dumb.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 01:01
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Merk is tunneling me on the case that I sounded awkward. Check any game I've been town in and you'll see the exact same poo poo. People think I'm scummy. They lynch me. I flip town. Or maybe merk is just wrong, and you're town, but if you're immediately saying M-M-MAYBE MERK IS A 3P TRYING TO PLAY TO WINCON on day 1 I think you're desperately trying to deflect and it's not looking good for you either. I actually don't think that's as scummy as everyone else thinks you do, precisely because this seems like too dumb a move for scum to make in any reasonable capacity on Day 1. Anomalous Amalgam posted:This looks bad. If you deflected in some other way I think I'd believe you, but what leads you to believe his wincon is tied to yours. That seems like a stretch unless you have a similar role or reason to believe such a mechanic exists in this game. This post, however, I like less, because unlike Anon, who is kinda flailing around and retailiating on merk's case, AA is kind of saying HM YES THIS MAKES YOU LOOK PRETTY SCUMMY FRIENDO, but hasn't actually decided to change his vote. It's a sort of white noise post meant to throw a "me too" on a clearly suspicious target and make them easier to push. In fact. ##vote AA
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 21:04
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:And none of you actually voted anarc for that, content to snipe about bad posting oh hey i didn't even see this while I was writing my reply, good to see someone else is on the same page
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 21:04
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I call out new evidence in the thread. That's not white noise, anarc is low-key accusing merk of being an executioner. Can you address, simply, for the sake of the thread, why a scum would accuse anyone of being a 3P this early in the game and deliberately draw attention to themselves in such a way?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 21:44
|
|
|
Like, accusing people of being 3Ps is the easiest way to fake scumhunting as scum is an easy out, sure, but the idea anarch would invoke that day 1 is absolutely madness-inducing. Also, willingness to vote does not equate the sameness of putting a vote down, especially on deadline day. Don't be obtuse, you know that.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 21:46
|
|
|
To address you post in plain and simple terms, you are equating the idea of calling merk a 3P executioner to the idea that they most know something about the game state that town does not. Let me flip this on its head for you, in a very simple question. Why would Anarc ever hint at this information as scum, to the point of all but making an alignment declaration, especially this early, when all scum have to do is lie low and execute a townie based on a bad case?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 21:52
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:That's what I'm trying to figure out, don't be dense. You're not trying to figure anything out. Your post smacks of opportunity and you're trying to push a target a lot of people are already suspicious of.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 21:57
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I generally find that people making up insane theories like ANarc are almost always town That is, in effect, the crux of my argument, and I think AA knows that, and is now latching onto the fact that I called out their pile onto ANarc as obviously false by trying to extrapolate specific wording. When my case is intrinsically AA is not actually, in good faith, examining why a scum would stick their neck out like that on that post. Just basically going "yep tag 'em and bag 'em boys this guy knows more than we do, gotta be scum." merk posted:Youre right. Hes being too scummy to be scum. There is obviously WIFOM to be had but I feel like if you follow the actual argument that happened there's no reason in the world a scum ANarc would have made that post with suspicion already on them, and AA's OMGUS on me calling out their reaction as bad is the icing on the cake.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 22:45
|
|
|
I would love to here more linguistic analysis from you, AA. I'm sure it is very insightful.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 22:47
|
|
|
Also, extremely lol at the idea that they commented they were fine voting ANarc as their only defense, then when given sufficient additional evidence to vote them, did not, in fact, vote them. Instead, they vote me, for calling out the fact that they didn't vote. Which lends credence to the fact that AA was waiting to see more people pile on ANarc before dropping a vote.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 22:49
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:##vote mona It's almost as if I don't call you out for what was obviously a bad comment on a target who you could push for an easy execute, you'll get away with it. Even if the thread turns on me I've raised enough stink to be sure people are going to be looking at you twice over. Dunk me if you want, I'll even claim before hammer if it looks like vote swings that way. I'm pretty drat positive you're scum by your now constant attempts to lash out defensively (including two OMGUS votes, nice), plus your attempt to say I'm wrong because I called it a me too, maybe I should have called it dogpiling, then? They mean the same thing, in my eyes, it's still scum trying to get an easy dunk, and you aren't arguing in good faith with anyone here. I don't know what Asiina sees, but you're scum and I'm 100% willing to put myself on the chopping block today if it means seeing that out.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 23:12
|
|
|
Also if we wanna get really technical your post was also rolefishing as in "YOU MUST HAVE SOMETHING THAT TELLS YOU THAT'S WHAT MERK IS", instead of what it clearly was to anyone with half a brain: blatant speculation.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 23:14
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:So now you ridicule my intelligence, trying to further provoke an emotional response and apply whatever sticks to secure your mislynch on me. I could say the same thing about you banging your war drum about a small part of my overall case that you keep yelling about as if you'll get the thread to rally to your side if you say it loud enough. But I don't need to convince scum they're scum.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 23:19
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  Anomalous Amalgam (5): Captain Foo, CCKeane, Monathin, merk, Retro Futurist CCKeane (4): AnonymousNarcotics, King Burgundy, Retro Futurist (3): b-minus1, Moatillata, Dick Bastardly Monathin (1): Anomalous Amalgam, Dancer (1): Dancer, Hal Incandenza, Moatillata (0): Dancer, Retro Futurist, King Burgundy (0): CCKeane, merk, Dick Bastardly (0): Moatillata, Anomalous Amalgam, Retro Futurist, merk (0): King Burgundy, Hal Incandenza, AnonymousNarcotics (0): merk, b-minus1, Not Voting (0): With 14 alive, it's 8 votes to execute. The current deadline is June 23rd, 2018 at 11 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 1 hour, 58 minutes.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 02:02
|
|
|
I feel satisfied with my AA vote today, and think it's the proper vote for today. I am notably weirdly not very suspicious of Keane, and would rather not change my vote to him.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 02:14
|
|
|
That puts AA at -2, ftr.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 03:08
|
|
|
I would very much prefer if we did not have a no-execute. 30 minutes to deadline.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 03:30
|
|
|
Moatillata posted:Literally hiding in the bathroom to make deadline You're a hero and a scholar, Moat.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 03:33
|
|
|
Anyway that's -1, still need a hammer vote.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 03:34
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Im here I can do it if no one has anything to add bring it home, Hal.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 03:38
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 03:42
|
|
|
Hm. Well. That's interesting.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 20:10
|
|
|
So quick note, either there's also a scum roleblocker or a 3p Amnesiac picked up AA's role. I say this, because, naturally, I got roleblocked.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 20:32
|
|
|
I also would like to say that I'm a liability for Heists, and that only Alan or Neil should pick me to run with them. Everyone else is better off passing me over.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 20:36
|
|
|
merk posted:Maybe we should see who was pushing the AA lynch? 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 23:10
|
|
|
Dick Bastardly posted:I have gut feels about Keane and merk. why would asiina need to agree with you about whether I look suspicious or not 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2018 23:48
|
|
|
Yeah in light of my information about a second roleblocker I would say Asiina's read on me is kinda extremely hedgey, but on the other hand, Asiina was one of the few people staying off the AA vote.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 25, 2018 06:32
|
|
|
Catching up now.Captain Foo posted:yeah those are some strangely specific causes for an action failing, monathin My PM said I was "prevented", not that my action failed. Hence my assumption at Amnesiac or a secondary roleblocker.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2018 20:03
|
|
|
merk posted:Both of these posts stick out to me. 1) I would never claim that I was Roleblocked as town unless it had a clear purpose, but I could see myself claiming it as scum to appear helpful; and 2) How is this second post helpful at all? This first post I felt was important to note specifically because AA flipped town Roleblocker. Operating on the assumption I had, I felt it good for people to know in the thread. I'm keeping the 3P Amnesiac angle open because I've seen it in at least one game so it's something I could see Slamburger including if the flavor made sense (I haven't seen Heat, so.) The second post serves a purpose only to the person doing the Heist mechanic tonight, as I present a substantial risk to town due to my loose cannon nature without those factors in play. It is also a bit self-serving in that I have reason to want to be on the Heists.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2018 20:10
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 01:52 |
|
|
Keane, buddy, I'm doing a read, and I'm starting to think that... you might be scum.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2018 01:46
|
|