Aaaaa dammit, Eccogames are too much fun but I'm in too many games. Like Twin and Gene, put me on the reserve list, I'll say something if I drop in one of my other games.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2018 20:04 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2024 07:53 |
Monathin posted:Aaaaa dammit, Eccogames are too much fun but I'm in too many games. Slamburger's game is over so let's do this! Put me in coach.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2018 21:29 |
Atomic Soda posted:ew monathin what happened? sgdq thread give it a month
|
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2018 08:02 |
I might actually change it back sooner than that just because even if I like this av my other one fits my playstyle more and was an art gift from a friend.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2018 08:06 |
Aw poo poo boys, the GMV's here. We better play it cool.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2018 20:27 |
Ah right. I Understand That If I Do Not Unvote The Mod Will Not count A Revote Unless I Am A Doublevoter
|
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2018 21:24 |
Atomic Soda posted:good plan im pgo deathmiller what, again?
|
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2018 21:38 |
Atomic Soda posted:in my heart i'll forever be a pgo deathmiller checks out
|
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2018 21:46 |
Anpu posted:Who should I trust and why; let he who would be judged step forward, let them weigh their heart and I will see the truth in them. you can trust me because i'm very bad at mafia and openly so
|
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2018 01:38 |
Atomic Soda posted:i don't agree with mona but which game are you talking about moat? I was a 3p in Heat Mafia where RF scumslipped and then Hal and binus hosed up covering for them, it kinda owned I'm not good at Mafia tho.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2018 03:14 |
The Ninth Layer posted:Smoking a cigar, I casually recline back in my seat. Coppers shaking up a game is nothing new, everyone needs their take after all. Granted they don't usually make a scene at the bosses' game, but as far as I'm concerned the only change in this game is that the stakes have been raised. "Still at it, huh?" He shakes his head, rapping his knuckles on the nearest surface as if hoping it's superstitiously ward off the trouble we were in. "That's just like you, cool as can be, still wagering as if we aren't in the midst of a shakedown. Guess I can't blame you, though." Anpu posted:What do you think are your greatest weaknesses playing mafia? "I ain't good a good grip at holding onto my suspicions. If I had to be honest." A drink was nearby, one which he took a gracious sip from. "Either I bite in too hard when I should shake off, or I shake off to easy when the alarm bells should be ringing." "That being said." He stops. "I consider myself good at putting together pieces and unravelling the initial moment. I've caught people lying to me enough times before, I just need the wherewithawl to know whether that lie's important."
|
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2018 06:37 |
A scorpion fight, is it? Well, let's see Max put up his best creature. I got this beaut right here named Gerrard. ##vote Max C'mon, Max. Don't be a buzzkill. Live a little.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2018 16:47 |
Oh, let's put... twenty and five on Gerrard. Why not.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2018 16:47 |
Max posted:Drugs are my vice, not gambling Hm. ##unvote Alright.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2018 19:58 |
I notice that the games have taken a backseat to the discussions, and nod along - I think Max has a point that Murmur would be all over our games of chance, but on the other hand... the back and forth between Soda and Slamburger has been interesting. Slamburger posted:Anpu and AS casing I don't think I agree with you about our friend Soda. Soda isn't engaging in the same way but is engaging in a way that hints at scumsearching. Anpu I think had a much worse reaction, one that came shortly before your own claims: Anpu posted:Ive been mafia-ing the whole time. My friends, I'm never a fan of a case that calls into question how one should act early on - I trust everyone's heard my spiel on this by now, yes? Anpu here seems to be feigning outrage over the casing on Murmur. I don't really get where they get the idea Max is trying to "look like they're participating", do you? Especially after they declined the games for their own tonic of choice. I think Anpu is trying to generate heat on Max in a way that isn't justifiable.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2018 19:26 |
Murmur Twin posted:This post gives the impression of content but doesn't really say anything. Quick top three: 1: Anpu - their thing about framing Max's case on you in bad faith doesn't sit right with me at all and I think the fact that it didn't get any traction is part and parcel of why Anpu dropped it. 2: IcePhoenix - Unlike other people who haven't shown up (IS, Moat to some degree), IcePhoenix has been around but has made little contributions outside of engaging in the game itself and hasn't made any real reads, or any content that reads like a cursory attempt to find scum. 3: GeneX - Meta read, but Gene's usually more speculative as town. The idea of them dropping a Lurker vote D1 doesn't sit right with me at all.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2018 21:24 |
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I'd still rather dunk Anpu, I feel like that lumpen of middling reads is significantly more suspicious than a lurker who hasn't made their reads yet. I nod my head solemnly. 'AA' and I don't always get along - hells, more often than not we're at each other's throats - but I find them talking sense here, strangely enough. "I think Anpu's list is real wishy-washy - how do I seem muddled? What posts identify some of their other reads? Feels like it was one without a lot of commitment build up behind it. A lot of them reads are hedged at best, too, I feel like." I look about at the others - Sober's finally speakin up, which is nice. "At any rate, I'm not about to turn on someone who's been speaking up right off the bat. Think that way's a bad route. If scum were gonna ingratiate themselves, Day 1 is the easiest day to do it." I motion for someone to put a tally mark next to Anpu's name. ##vote Anpu "We better start figuring out who to turn on, though, and soon."
|
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2018 18:45 |
b-minus1 posted:No. Maybe actually just case instead of doing the same thing you do every loving game where you're like "no [person with most votes] is town you're all bad lmfao" I don't really want to vote MMT but having vanished again after being called out by Max does look pretty bad. Also how would it make flerp look bad when flerp was the one who called out that MMT went back to vanishing?
|
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2018 21:27 |
Max posted:Please stop doing this thing where you just make a statement as if it's fact. Explain your reasons.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2018 21:50 |
Anpu posted:And yet, you too leave your vote on me. I think it's funny that you think you're going to pressgang me to remove my vote on you just cause we haven't settled on someone new, just because you softclaimed a PR. I'll remove it in due time, in the meanwhile why don't you answer some other questions. Like, for example: Max posted:Who do you think should be lunched, right now?
|
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2018 22:06 |
##unvote
|
|
# ¿ Jul 13, 2018 02:59 |
Yeah, okay. ##vote genex
|
|
# ¿ Jul 13, 2018 03:24 |
Dancer posted:##vote bee I don't like this reasoning even if I hate bee's posting
|
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2018 10:01 |
Beetphyxious posted:lol on my read back that person was you anpu. christ your posting on day 1 was bad and if i was here i would have been pushing hard for your lynch. to be honest the fact anpu claimed a PR to avoid being duned and scum didn't kill them is mad fishy to me, personally
|
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2018 12:38 |
##vote anpu
|
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2018 13:05 |
The fact that you're quickly associating me with Beet while trying to say I'm scum because I've been pointing out the logical fallacy in your posts. How is what I said "foolish"? You outted a PR, which essentially painted a target on your back - the fact a kill went through regardless means you didn't bait out any protective roles (if there are, indeed, any to speak of). Scum won't hesitate to kill anyone who claims a PR very very quickly.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2018 13:07 |
Beetphyxious posted:Super happy with my anpu vote.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2018 22:01 |
I don't like the Beet vote. If people don't want to vote Anpu I think we should vote B-, his content has been lacking even for a B- game and what little casing he has actually has been doing has been shoddy. In addition to that I'm willing to buy Flerp's own callout which I think is somethine people should look at again.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 18:22 |
Slamburger posted:Nah, b-minus is town source?
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 18:29 |
b-minus1 posted:why don't you like the beet vote? seems like a slam dunk to me. With that said, I don't like how quiet Anpu has been today. Well I mean part of it is the idea Anpu was conflating me and Beet together. I know my alignment and I also at least agreed with Beet that the way Anpu was coming off was weird and cagey even by the stands of "someone who has a PR and doesn't want to share it". imo if Anpu is going to continue to hide behind it being belligerent when cased of suspicious posts (of which he had a number on day 1, in case you've forgotten), the least he could do is actually claim some sort of result, which unless I missed it he has failed to do today. He basically just called me and Beet scum for even suspecting he might in fact be trying to hide a fakeclaim by being cagey and then peaced tf out. Slamburger posted:Its a meta read, based on how many town calls he made D1. Scum bminus is averse to those types of reads because it brings heat on him. I disagree with this personally but I think arguing the point would just lead to WIFOM about meta which is the worst kind of casing, so I'll drop it for now.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 18:48 |
I mean of course I can be wrong and Beet could be scum but I absolutely 100% detest that we're just giving Anpu some free pass because he's softclaiming a PR, didn't die on N1, didn't report any result from a Night Action that I can see, and has overall had really lovely casing.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 18:49 |
the gently caress do you think I'm trying to do right now, Max
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 18:51 |
Max posted:Complaining that we arent voting him. While my vote is on him, yes. And hasn't moved since he made an rear end of himself earlier. Hey, Anpu, you have a PR, report something.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 18:54 |
b-minus1 posted:My take is that Anpu has some result on Beet that implicates him as scum. IMO the only reason that Anpu should claim his role and/or result is if Beet claims first. > Has a result that implicates him as scum ? "he should only claim it if Beet claims first" I... what. I mean no I get that if he has an actual result that would make him a scum target but if Anpu is trying to be coy about a result he's being really loving bad at it and should try to be more honest so that town can actually look at that, instead of doing whatever the gently caress he's been doing.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 19:04 |
And even then it's always in town's favor to trade a town for a scum if they have to.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 19:05 |
Alright, fine, we wanna test this? Sure. Fine, whatever, I'll vote Beet. This is so loving stupid.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 19:07 |
Max posted:Wanna test what? Bee money's whole theory that "no anpu totally has a result on beet implicating scum which is why he's being a deliberate douchecanoe" at this point I'm acquiescing because this argument is legitimately pissing me off.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 19:08 |
Unless you're just poking me for the sake of being obstinant in which case politely and with all due respect go gently caress yourself
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 19:09 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2024 07:53 |
b-minus1 posted:mona i honestly have no idea why you are so angry right now bee i swear here and now, god as my witness, if you're scum this game 1. okay good work 2. i will attempt to kill you in every game we play from now until the new year because right now i'm willing to switch my vote to you over anpu and i must be taking loving crazy pills or something i guess if no one else sees it
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 19:13 |