|
are they intending to codify typescript's type notation? seems bad
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 02:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 12:38 |
|
|
pep-582 has been rejected, interesting https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-582-python-local-packages-directory/963/430
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 08:02
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:anyway i think we need to stop all non-security-patch development on web browsers for a while until we figure out what's going on good thing js is a fast moving, innovative ecosystem and temporal is going to be released any day now. right?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 08:28
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:pep-582 has been rejected, interesting quote:This is similar to the npm node_modules directory, which is popular in the Javascript community, and something that developers familiar with that ecosystem often ask for from Python. I want to know who is saying “man, what I really wish I had was node_modules”
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 08:59
|
|
|
my homie dhall posted:I want to know who is saying “man, what I really wish I had was node_modules” Idiots. Nobody wants that, and they can already do that if they want by running the program with PYTHONPATH if they so wish. There’s also venv and containers for 99% of the projects. It’s a solution looking for a problem.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 09:36
|
|
|
the problem with npm isn't node_modules
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 10:50
|
|
|
fucks sake I'm trying to call this idiot exe from c# as another because of the dogshit way authentication is handled by our org (you have to call the exe to get a token but it can only be certain types of account that do this), and impersonation doesn't work and the exe gets called as the main process user. so I'm trying Process.Start and passing a username and password and now I get a bare Access Denied error fffffffffuckkk
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 12:26
|
|
|
oh lol I was calling the process start from inside an impersonating thread for the same account and I guess trying to do a startprocessas for yourself doesn't work!
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 13:27
|
|
|
my homie dhall posted:I want to know who is saying “man, what I really wish I had was node_modules” anything would be better than the current state of FlapYoJacks posted:Idiots. Nobody wants that, and they can already do that if they want by running the program with PYTHONPATH if they so wish. There’s also venv and containers for 99% of the projects. It’s a solution looking for a problem. I mean pretty much every other programming language can handle having a load of packages and you just specifying which to use for a given project.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 21:02
|
|
|
champagne posting posted:anything would be better than the current state of And next you'll be telling me that there are artifact repositories that don't allow re-uploads?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 21:04
|
|
|
MrQueasy posted:And next you'll be telling me that there are artifact repositories that don't allow re-uploads? i don't get this joke
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 21:05
|
|
|
champagne posting posted:i don't get this joke Rereading it, neither do I. I think the covid is finally taking hold.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 21:10
|
|
|
champagne posting posted:anything would be better than the current state of yes, including python.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 21:27
|
|
|
champagne posting posted:i don't get this joke I think it’s in reference to the NPM package author(s) that overwrote old versions to break them. This happened with uWebSockets,
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 21:49
|
|
|
MrQueasy posted:Rereading it, neither do I. I think the covid is finally taking hold. lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 22:48
|
|
|
redleader posted:the problem with npm isn't node_modules You don't say. quote:More than half of all new packages that are currently (29 Mar 2023) being submitted to npm are SEO spam. That is - empty packages, with just a single README file that contains links to various malicious websites.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2023 23:58
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:javascript programming is great because every error is "cannot read property fart of undefined" Even better now because you have optional chaining so you just replace butt.fart with butt?.fart and you're done and JavaScript never has errors.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 00:29
|
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:Even better now because you have optional chaining so you just replace butt.fart with butt?.fart and you're done and JavaScript never has errors. fuckitjs is 11 years old, errors have been optional for a long time
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 00:30
|
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:Even better now because you have optional chaining so you just replace butt.fart with butt?.fart and you're done and JavaScript never has errors. this is the way
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 02:05
|
|
|
on error resume next
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 09:28
|
|
|
compromise idea: gather all execution errors and then attempt to raise them all at once in a multithread map at the end of the program's execition, to keep track of things
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 09:56
|
|
|
I'm gonna be glad that I can stop touching JavaScript because my new job is not computer touching it's making the life of computer touches miserable by saying "here's what we're gonna build functionally, go do it and don't gently caress with me because I've done this before " 3 months left of this one though and I guess I'll do some hobby project to waste my time to keep my hand in a bit, but with as little js as possible
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 10:55
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:compromise idea: gather all execution errors and then attempt to raise them all at once in a multithread map at the end of the program's execition, to keep track of things AWS bill optimisation: persist the errors to throw immediately at start of next execution
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 11:58
|
|
|
champagne posting posted:anything would be better than the current state of i thought this was a great writeup of the current annoyingness of python dev and packaging, in contrast with other popular tooling https://chriswarrick.com/blog/2023/01/15/how-to-improve-python-packaging/ you pretty much need a silo-ed python but also a way to control or use that siloed python that doesnt link back to the system python docker, hatch, and conda have worked well for this so far, leaning towards hatch and docker depending on deployment story
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 15:30
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:i thought this was a great writeup of the current annoyingness of python dev and packaging https://bitecode.substack.com/p/why-not-tell-people-to-simply-use colleagues were discussing this recently
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 15:32
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:https://bitecode.substack.com/p/why-not-tell-people-to-simply-use colleagues were discussing this recently that's great and i agree with the core tenet, its what i also wrote in the pypi dev survey about why python packaging sucks quote:provide a single procedure that will let most people do their job and have the highest possible rate of success.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 15:42
|
|
|
any .net peeps have opinions on nuke
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 23:21
|
|
|
Bloody posted:any .net peeps have opinions on nuke yeah. nuke .net
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 23:39
|
|
|
(i don't know what nuke is)
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 23:39
|
|
|
winnuke?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2023 23:40
|
|
|
Bloody posted:any .net peeps have opinions on nuke not much, what's nuke with you?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 00:11
|
|
|
Bloody posted:any .net peeps have opinions on nuke not a .net peep, but it was hardly my favourite map
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 00:12
|
|
|
there's a good ios image fetch transform cache display library called nuke
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 00:23
|
|
|
pokeyman posted:there's a good ios image fetch transform cache display library called nuke can you string some more words together? I don’t think this technology sounds enterprise-y enough.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 04:24
|
|
|
efficient persistent async loading processor pipeline
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 04:45
|
|
|
Bloody posted:any .net peeps have opinions on nuke i have a nuclear hot .net take: classes should have implicit interfaces you can access with ClassName.Interface
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 09:15
|
|
|
champagne posting posted:i have a nuclear hot .net take: classes should have implicit interfaces you can access with ClassName.Interface drat this is a good idea
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 10:14
|
|
|
champagne posting posted:i have a nuclear hot .net take: classes should have implicit interfaces you can access with ClassName.Interface i think i agree but it should be opt-in or opt-out with a keyword, like sealed for sealing classes
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 13:08
|
|
|
Bloody posted:any .net peeps have opinions on nuke if you're talking about the cms... some coworkers have to manage an app using an older version and hate it all. the successor project is written in angular + netcore
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 13:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 12:38 |
|
|
champagne posting posted:i have a nuclear hot .net take: classes should have implicit interfaces you can access with ClassName.Interface Cold on a Cob posted:i think i agree but it should be opt-in or opt-out with a keyword, like sealed for sealing classes enable it in csproj like nullable / implicit usings. that would own hard
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 13:50
|
|