|
Chillbro Baggins posted:CF Desert Storm: They weren't shooting at B-52s because Baghdad was only hit by F-117s and cruise missiles. But let me put it this way: you're a AA gunner in the military of a ruthless dictator and the capital is under attack, are you going to want to be the guy with a full load of ammunition in the morning? Aesop Poprock posted:Don’t know about B-52s in particular but ground-to-air assault brought down a total of 54 coalition aircraft in the gulf war after doing the math with the vast majority of that being American aircraft The majority of coalition aircraft damaged or lost were hit by missiles fired by ground batteries. The handful of losses to AAA were ground attack aircraft attacking Iraqi military positions, and even then MANPADS were a much greater threat. In the jet age, anti-aircraft guns, especially ones without radar or infrared fire control, are largely ineffective against anything other than point-defense against helicopters and ground attack aircraft, since the gunner will only have a extremely short amount of time to fire at an aircraft if it even comes inside his weapon's engagement envelope. 3 days after the above video a large daylight strike was attempted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Package_Q_Strike https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uh4yMAx2UA "fuuuuuuck there's another one!" People tend to forget that in 1991, the Iraqi army was like the fourth or fifth largest in the world, had modern Soviet equipment, and had a ton of actual combat experience against Iran, and that their equipment and experience hadn't atrophied from decades of doing nothing but oppressing regional ethnic/religious/political minorities and "my cousin will make the perfect general" stuff. They also tend to forget that the coalition victory was the result of decades of preparing to take on a certain imperialist evil empire in Europe, and clear, well-defined goals, instead of decades of bombing goat herders in wars with no real goals while slashing budgets and procurement because "lol Russia isn't a threat to world peace any more so we don't need F-22s!"
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2018 08:34 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 14:32 |
|
Aesop Poprock posted:World War I was so loving horrifying I’m pretty sure the entire world just did a “nope nope nope” and erased it from their memories which is how WWII managed to happen so soon after. Like a worldwide bleaching of how absolutely horrific it was that they wiped out an entire generation because it would have crippled the entire human species Nah, a good portion of the anti-war/appeasement ideology before WWII was publicly popular and was motivated by a desire to avoid the horrors of WWI again. France had been bled dry and the UK wasn't in a much better state. In the 30s the British had students doing mass pledges that "they'd never fight for the king" and a big "peace ballot" poll of the public where most of the respondents (something like 1/3rd of the voting population IIRC) were pro-disarmament and only lukewarm on the prospects of declaring war on Nation X that had attacked Nation Y and couldn't be dissuaded politically. Labor had their pacifist party leader resign in 1935 because the party voted to support sanctions against Italy, and he was replaced by a guy who wanted to disband national armies entirely and thought that rearmament was some kind of plot by militarists who secretly wanted to join Hitler in a war against communism. Even in 1938 Chamberlain's "Peace for our time" and so on was popular with the British public, partially because he'd been having the BBC suppress and censor information coming out of Germany (denounced as "Jewish-Communist propaganda") in an attempt to keep people from thinking that maybe Hitler needed to get the boot.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2018 08:15 |
|
Shrapnig posted:There are about 30 people in the second picture. A battalion contains between 3-800 soldiers. It's a photoshop. And according to some stuff in the military history thread a few days ago, it would actually represent the casualties in a shorter period of time between August and the end of 1914, with 27 soldiers and 1 officer remaining from the original force of 1,000 soldiers and 27 officers. https://twitter.com/I_W_M/status/1059760307332112384
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2018 06:30 |
|
Ernest Junger posted:It's an easier matter to describe these sounds than to endure them, because one cannot but associate every single sound of flying steel with the idea of death, and so I huddled in my hole in the ground with my hand in front of my face, imagining all the possible variants of being hit. I think I have found a comparison that captures the situation in which I and all the other soldiers who took part in this war so often found ourselves: you must imagine you are securely tied to a post, being menaced by a man swinging a heavy hammer. Now the hammer has been taken back over his head, ready to be swung, now it's cleaving the air towards you, on the point of touching Ernest Junger posted:Through the splintered shutters, the view was of a square furrowed by bombs, under the boughs of a ragged linden. This confusion of impressions was further darkened by the incessant artillery fire that was raging round the town. From time to time, the gigantic impact of a fifteen-inch shell drowned out all other noise. Clouds of shards washed through Combles, splattering against the branches of the trees, or striking the few intact roofs, sending the slates slithering down.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2018 23:05 |
|
Zudgemud posted:Because the Soviet Union was not out to kill everyone and send the remaining ones to Siberia. Except for all the times they did.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2019 19:06 |
|
quote:Portrait of a young Soviet prisoner of war in a steel breastplate SN-42, made of 2mm steel (.08″) and weighing 3.5 kg (7.7 lbs), captured by Finnish troops during the Finnish-Soviet Continuation War. A testament to the breastplate’s effectiveness, the young soldier had been shot three times in the chest and left unharmed. Image taken near Syskyjärvi, Karelia, Finland (now, Syuskyuyarvi, Republic of Karelia, Russia), July 15, 1944. http://www.tankarchives.ca/2013/10/soviet-infantry-protection.html quote:CAMD RF 81-12040-109
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2020 10:49 |
|
SA-Kuva posted:Suomalaiset ovat naamioineet noi 10 km rajalta Raatteen tiellä maantien, ilmassa roikkuvilla kuusilla sillä aivan rajalla on venäläisten pystyttämä tähystystorni. Google Translate posted:The Finns have camouflaged about 10 km from the border on Raate Road, with spruce trees hanging in the air, because there is a lookout tower erected by the Russians right on the border.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2021 05:47 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 14:32 |
|
On the other side of things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbSjD_ov_Wo
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2023 10:02 |