|
I'm in two other games. When I die in both this is my next planned sign up if it hasn't opened.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2018 00:04 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2024 13:07 |
|
Ok, one game over. I'll go ahead and sign up since this one will probably not start for a bit yet.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2018 03:23 |
|
Wow, that was fast.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2018 03:23 |
|
Votefinder in OP please.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2018 03:24 |
|
Asphyxious posted:If you were to randomly shoot anyone you should definitely randomly shoot king burgundy Especially if it ends the day.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2018 03:26 |
|
Dancer posted:Hey so I have something to reveal. I don't want to dominate the conversation for the entire day, so I won't reveal it yet (but I will later today). To make sure bad things don't happen to me: there is a particular person who I am quite certain is scum. And they might have a vig. If someone vigs me today, before I get to say my thing please lynch them tia. Exciting.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2018 16:22 |
|
merk posted:I watched Buffy but didn’t watch Angel. Please read my horoscope based on this information. You missed out.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2018 16:47 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gISEekxuEgk
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2018 18:49 |
|
Atomic Soda posted:that post felt dismissive to the thoughts of a new player and discouraging them from posting imo. i agree with you about dancer. I disagree that this was happening.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2018 18:50 |
|
Toalpaz posted:There's nothing to be sorry about, we're just playing a game. It's all WIFOM when it gets right down to it. If you could shoot anyone right now, who would it be and why?
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2018 19:04 |
|
CapitalistPig posted:You should know better than to click on anything imgay links.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2018 21:56 |
|
Since Dancer was told he can quote the discord, I want to see the actual conversation. Dancer and Ecco have described two different things at this point, so the actual convo will be enlightening.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2018 03:35 |
|
##vote imgay
|
# ¿ Oct 13, 2018 00:46 |
|
CapitalistPig posted:I copped b-, he scum. ##vote bminus
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2018 01:19 |
|
jimmydalad posted:Coolio. Apologies if I have a very hard time believing you at this moment. What in particular do you find unbelievable?
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2018 01:24 |
|
willie_dee posted:Right, but surely a better tactic would be to wait for scum to post a bit, see who b- goes for, then reveal it. Maybe breadcrumb a bit so you can show that you had this pegged from the start of the day? I agree with this. But it's Pig, he's gonna do his own thing.
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2018 01:31 |
|
jimmydalad posted:You know what, I’ll come out and say it. I’m also an investigative role and I got a scum read for Toalpaz. That’s another reason I’m suspicious of cpig’s claim. Interesting! CapitalistPig posted:NOOOO dammit jimmy WHYYYYY. ##vote Toal
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2018 01:37 |
|
Asphyxious posted:Oh right jimmy WAS doing what I thought he was. Cool! Naw. Doubt that was his intent. It's just Pig.
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2018 01:41 |
|
jimmydalad posted:With this claim, I know you’re full of poo poo.
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2018 01:43 |
|
Asphyxious posted:Mm. But that plus the “ugh jimmy whyyyy” stuff feels very hamfisted. Everything that played out today only worked to out a cop. Not sweeping that under a meta read any time soon. Fair.
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2018 01:43 |
|
I feel good that Jimmy is town.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 01:08 |
|
Toal talks a great game, but I think Toal is scum.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 01:08 |
|
hambeet posted:well i was hoping they flipped something more exciting Bowmore is rarely exciting these days.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 01:14 |
|
b-minus1 posted:yeah I guess. maybe i'm wrong about gaspy. I was actually gonna quote a few toalpaz posts, but after rereading his posts it seems like he's operating with extra information. No, I always look good.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 03:13 |
|
##unvote Shouldn't end the day before lurker rules kick in at 12 hours before deadline.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 03:18 |
|
b-minus1 posted:why does it matter I mean, it's pretty obvious Toal is trying to self hammer and end the day early.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 03:28 |
|
Dancer posted:As for other scum reads. Feel free to continue to expect things.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 16:50 |
|
Dancer posted:Are you gonna act like I'm the only one to ever make a meta argument/that meta arguments are universally meaningless because if yes then lol. I'm not sure how you get that from my response.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 17:09 |
|
Dancer posted:I made a meta argument. I explained how I believe your meta works, and how you behave, and what I expect that behaviour to look like. I presented a hypothesis. You're like "lol nice try". Didn't bother engaging, just "yeah what you're saying has zero value to me". Nope. Didn't even engage with your meta argument, other than to say your expectations for me are not going to be met. None of that has anything to do with whatever it is you said I was saying the first time, nor what you are saying this time. People keep telling me not to talk about my meta, so I'm not going to.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 17:29 |
|
Dancer posted:Responding to someone in a way that has nothing to do with the thing they said is not a productive way to communicate. Which might be useful in, you know, mafia. Where town communicate with each other to figure out things they don't know, because they are at an information disadvantage. This is silly, but I'll do you the favor of snipping out what I was responding to, which maybe will help you read it. I thought it was pretty obvious already given the words I said, but hey. Dancer posted:I absolutely expect him to comment a great deal more in early days King Burgundy posted:Feel free to continue to expect things. Like I even re-used the same word you used, which is a signal for what I was responding to. But somehow you turned that into me saying meta arguments are bad. Like, where would that even come from? You've now made me type way too many words for D2. I hope you are ashamed of yourself.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 17:38 |
|
Dancer posted:Are you actually implying that you weren't saying my argument (which is a meta argument) was wrong (I.e. That I see your expected behaviour as X, your behaviour in this game as Y, there's a mismatche, ergo I'm suspect of you)? No, you didn't literally say the words "that argument is wrong", but when you use the tone you did there, it's hard not to infer it. No, THIS is a correct interpretation. I said feel free to expect me to post more in the early game, regardless of your expectations, it is generally not going to happen. So yes, that translates as, you are wrong. But what you responded with initially made it sound like you thought I was saying meta arguments are bad. Which is something I disagree with entirely and I don't even see how you'd get there. Look again at what you said. It doesn't match up at all: Dancer posted:Are you gonna act like I'm the only one to ever make a meta argument/that meta arguments are universally meaningless because if yes then lol. Dropping it here. No more words from me on this.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 18:03 |
|
I kinda miss when I posted enough to get lurker guns handed to me.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 22:41 |
|
jimmydalad posted:Also, it looked like scum targeted the person that Toal copped yesterday iirc. Do SK JOATs have coping abilities? No, that is pretty unlikely. Toal would have been lying about AS.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 22:51 |
|
CapitalistPig posted:Godfathers, traditionally, are only exempt from actual cop investigations. I really don't agree on Dancer. I can't imagine a scum doing what he did. I agree on AA though. ##vote AA
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2018 23:58 |
|
EccoRaven posted:oh no kb are you scum, say it isn't so it isn't so
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2018 00:02 |
|
jimmydalad posted:Looking back at KB’s posts, most of them have only been one or two lines either expressing agreement or disagreement without really contributing anything of his own and only expanding when he was put under suspicion by Dancer and was dismissive of his arguments. I can honestly see this as him trying appear somewhat active while not really putting his own thoughts out there and somewhat lurking to try and take attention off himself. While not enough for me to be as suspicious of him as AA, I still have him on my radar as more likely scum than most people in game. Cool.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2018 00:10 |
|
hambeet posted:yeah i'm open to peoples opinions on this. i'd like to here from kit first, they might have something interesting to say. if i dont like what's happening after they appear (or they don't appear) i still will probably shoot because it's pointless having a lurker mechanic if it's not used. FWIW, Kit is unlikely to be much of a poster and that isn't alignment specific.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2018 00:12 |
|
EccoRaven posted:I'm struggling. Yes. These are fair observations.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2018 00:16 |
|
EccoRaven posted:yay alright so Eh, given we almost got imgay voted out, I think your list is flawed. Since I was on that vote. Unless you are suggesting I was so confident it wouldn't happen that I bussed him with that vote. But I'd still vote imgay.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2018 00:38 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2024 13:07 |
|
Kitiara posted:I was actually thinking, but wouldn't it make sense for everyone to name their characters? Scum wouldn't really know people's skills (see Willow having 0 powers), but we could get an idea of whether someone is likely to be innocent. We can, it probably is no big deal. But something to keep in mind is a decent mod will seed important/main characters/etc onto the scum team as well, to prevent just mass claiming being a game over scenario. So just because someone claims someone you think is good, it shouldn't matter for their alignment.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2018 00:57 |