|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLLM78R76sI George: What could it be? Paul? Something in the way she moves... Something like that? X: It's 3 v 1 I think John: ...in your head each time. Just say what comes into your head each time, 'Attracts me like a cauliflower,' until you get the word, you know. George: Yeah but I been through this one for like six months. John: You haven't had people joining in though, right? George: No. I mean just that line... I couldn't think of anything like uh... (starts playing) But it's not as easy to say like... (drums and music start coming in from band)
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 02:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 20:45 |
|
|
Please don't give George any hints he'll get there.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 02:30
|
|
|
the beatles loving suck
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 02:33
|
|
|
DiggityDoink posted:the beatles loving suck No they are v good
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:34
|
|
|
DiggityDoink posted:the beatles loving suck Diarrhea shelf
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:38
|
|
|
raton posted:Diarrhea shelf I think diarrhea shelf is a great idea I am sorry your thread got gassed by jealous mods.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:41
|
|
|
Linux Pirate posted:I think diarrhea shelf is a great idea I am sorry your thread got gassed by jealous mods. I agree and thank you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:42
|
|
|
Explain why Beatles were good from technical, objective standpoint.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:44
|
|
|
the video is actually pretty self evident on that front, dennis
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:46
|
|
|
The Dennis System posted:Explain why Beatles were good from technical, objective standpoint. Watch this: https://youtu.be/ZQS91wVdvYc
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:48
|
|
|
The Dennis System posted:Explain why Beatles were good from technical, objective standpoint. We know apriori that you're wrong about everything. You think they are not good. Therefore they must be good.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:54
|
|
|
Mllleeep compu ter. Ex plain human music object ively bzzzzrrt.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:55
|
|
|
The Walrus posted:the video is actually pretty self evident on that front, dennis Cosmik Slop posted:Watch this: OK. I'll try to watch those videos when I have more time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:55
|
|
|
I mean after you watch the video in the op you should listen to the actual finished product too
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 03:58
|
|
|
The Dennis System posted:Explain why Beatles were good from technical, objective standpoint. Every thread about the beatles on the internet starts with someone jumping out of the woodwork to say they're bad because they are so opposed to people liking the group that they just cannot keep it contained in their little lungs, which means they are good because being so divisive that people do that consistently means they really had somethin going for them, it just wasn't for everybody's taste
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 04:00
|
|
|
I don't even like the beatles really I'm just saying that the way to defeat the "explain why they are good" argument is to point out the hypocrisy. You wouldn't dive in to say they suck and the people who like them are wrong if there weren't five decades of people who liked them
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 04:01
|
|
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa. I never said the Beatles sucked. I don't see what all the fuss is about with them, but I know nothing about music. Like zero. So I really was curious if there was some sort of technical explanation as to why so many people like them so much.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 04:11
|
|
|
DiggityDoink posted:the beatles loving suck you tell 'em, doink
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 04:27
|
|
|
The Beatles realized you could shout on records and they wouldnt catch fire and since then people have been doing shout music because it’s cool. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 04:44
|
|
|
The Dennis System posted:Whoa, whoa, whoa. I never said the Beatles sucked. I don't see what all the fuss is about with them, but I know nothing about music. Like zero. So I really was curious if there was some sort of technical explanation as to why so many people like them so much. I wasn't saying you were one of those people snorkeling on in to say the beatles are bad, I meant the general 'you'. It's like how people always pop up out of trash cans and your sink to say DID YOU KNOW HP LOVECRAFT WAS RACIST? any time anyone mentions his name
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 04:46
|
|
|
Cosmik Slop posted:Watch this: This is a pro click btw
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 04:47
|
|
|
The Dennis System posted:Whoa, whoa, whoa. I never said the Beatles sucked. I don't see what all the fuss is about with them, but I know nothing about music. Like zero. So I really was curious if there was some sort of technical explanation as to why so many people like them so much. The Beatles aren't good for technical or objective reasons. They got good playing like eight hours a day together as basically a strip club band in Germany and this gave them an almost unparalleled level of group cohesion compared to any other band in history. They leveraged this by writing most of their songs as a sort of hive mind. Usually John or Paul would come in with basically a nothing idea, Ringo is retarded but he was always ready to just lay down a steady drum background, George would add eccentricty at usually the right time (although he bright in ideas too), and by the end of this they'd have a song that no single person could have written but that also suffers less from group oriented flaws than stuff like that usually produces. Their early songs are basically very tight boy band stuff but their ability to write based on a stream of ideas rather than a structure or plan synergized hugely with the rapid change in thought and music in the 1960s. They ended up creating a series of legendary albums perfectly in tune with the times that all had a fine quality of being deeply connected to humanity but also always new. People used to look forward to every new Beatles album like people liked forward to OK Computer when it first came out (if you remember that), it was never what you expected, many people were blown away each time they bought a new Beatles album and took it home, and the music grew on them over time. In short the Beatles were absolute monsters when it came to actual profound musical creation (but simultaneously didn't go into the deep end of weird Zappa/Cooder poo poo / nonlistenability). They're not objectively or technically amazing, they're great because of their humungous, driving and careful humanity at both the individual and group levels, and for the incredible degree to which they were able to manifest this directly in their music (rather than as some background notion). My favorite song of theirs is A Day In The Life. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usNsCeOV4GM
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 04:47
|
|
|
raton posted:The Beatles aren't good for technical or objective reasons. They got good playing like eight hours a day together as basically a strip club band in Germany and this gave them an almost unparalleled level of group cohesion compared to any other band in history. They leveraged this by writing most of their songs as a sort of hive mind. Usually John or Paul would come in with basically a nothing idea, Ringo is retarded but he was always ready to just lay down a steady drum background, George would add eccentricty at usually the right time (although he bright in ideas too), and by the end of this they'd have a song that no single person could have written but that also suffers less from group oriented flaws than stuff like that usually produces. My favorite as well^^
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 05:19
|
|
|
raton posted:
The first time I listened to Sgt. Pepper’s (only about a year ago) I was listening to their stuff in order. I had really been into Rubber Soul and Revolver so I was excited to hear their famous weird one. I got super high, turned it up on the home theater system, and turned the lights down. It was genuinely the best thing I ever heard. Like, it’s weird how easily I can still point to the best experience I’ve ever had listening to music. A Day in the Life especially, no song has ever affected me like that one and it can still give me chills.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 05:21
|
|
|
This is really good, OP, thanks!
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 05:27
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1ONJQLdZrk
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 05:29
|
|
|
Cosmik Slop posted:Watch this: This seems good Lot of good content on the Beatles off of that link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl9188EPdLI
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 05:33
|
|
|
DiggityDoink posted:the beatles loving suck
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 06:29
|
|
|
raton posted:The Beatles aren't good for technical or objective reasons. They got good playing like eight hours a day together as basically a strip club band in Germany and this gave them an almost unparalleled level of group cohesion compared to any other band in history. They leveraged this by writing most of their songs as a sort of hive mind. Usually John or Paul would come in with basically a nothing idea, Ringo is retarded but he was always ready to just lay down a steady drum background, George would add eccentricty at usually the right time (although he bright in ideas too), and by the end of this they'd have a song that no single person could have written but that also suffers less from group oriented flaws than stuff like that usually produces. p good post imo
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 06:42
|
|
|
This guy here had some videos from way back when where he illustrated Lennon's and Harrison's guitar playing better than anyone else I've ever heard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRZDf3FryLw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWmTv9yMygw
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 06:46
|
|
|
DiggityDoink posted:the beatles loving suck
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 06:53
|
|
|
Ringo Starr is going to live to be 120 years old and he's still going to look younger than me when he dies
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 06:59
|
|
|
I've noticed people who claim the Beatles suck usually have Zappa as their sneering rear end in a top hat saint, a guy famous for writing music as hard to play as it was easy to forget
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 07:00
|
|
|
Cosmik Slop posted:I've noticed people who claim the Beatles suck usually have Zappa as their sneering rear end in a top hat saint, a guy famous for writing music as hard to play as it was easy to forget Well the Beatles only have like a hundred memorable songs that everyone knows, while Frank Zappa has uh
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 07:03
|
|
|
Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:Well the Beatles only have like a hundred memorable songs that everyone knows, while Frank Zappa has uh https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKYGaEafv4g It's not his most well known but it's on Hot Rats and Hot Rats is loving golden.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 08:33
|
|
|
Cosmik Slop posted:a guy famous for writing music as hard to play as it was easy to forget 
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 09:33
|
|
|
I'm not sure if you're joking or just a big dummy, op, but that whole video is trying to come up with the words after "Something in the way she moves, attracts me like ____" and they don't figure it out in the whole 9 minutes. Everything else George had written in the past 6 months. I mean he just couldn't figure out that one line.
Schweinhund fucked around with this message at 10:23 on Oct 22, 2018 |
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 10:20
|
|
|
The Dennis System posted:Explain why Beatles were good from technical, objective standpoint. The piccolo bass made Paul McCartney look giant which scared away the second moon that imprisoned his wife, Athena
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 10:36
|
|
|
I like both Zappa and The Beatles. The truth is in the middle!
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 11:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 20:45 |
|
|
i liked them when they were the Silver Beetles
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2018 14:02
|
|
