SolusLunes posted:

Anomalous Amalgam posted:

What are your favorite cyberpunk stories?

Admittedly, it's a genre I've not read much of, and since the technological dystopia of the future is going to be grim dark and not neon infused I've not delved much into it beyond hopeful, awe-struck interest in video and roleplaying games which portray it as such.

hambeet posted:

My friend argues ready player one is cyberpunk. discuss.

imgay posted:

It's wired how Jimmy and monathin have the same avatar.

hambeet posted:

Lucky I didn't start bad mouthing aa. That would have been totes awks

got some chores tonight posted:

day 1 arguments are always based on inane nonsense or meta cases and scum mmt hates posting especially d1 her first post was a generic excuse post and then shes going to be working tonight and use that as her excuse tomorrow if she were town she always makes snippy jokes and im on my phone but if she hasnt done that shes scum

Monathin posted:

As a reminder, you need 10 substantial posts, as decreed by me, before the end of the game day, or you will be put ON NOTICE going forward!

Gulag and ASF, being replacements, will not be subject to this rule today, but will be going forward.

Enjoy the game!

A Sometimes Food posted:

Second thought on reading the thread. imgay is probably scum. They flat out said they aren't keeping it 100 this time. Admitting that poo poo is absolutely what imgay would do.

Also side eying Jimmy floating a lurker lynch. This is a surprisingly active day 1.

Toalpaz posted:

5 scum out of 18 players isn't that unlikely, even if one is SK

King Burgundy posted:

So be specific. Who would you cuddle for lurking at this point?

Murmur Twin posted:

Not a fan of this. What's the logic in saving your vote?

jimmydalad posted:

I’m in a similar sort of mind. Quick votes, in my history, tend to be really bad for Town and I want to hear the other side before we get lynch crazy. Plus having more things to pull from is always good. Don’t want one person fully controlling the narrative.

Max posted:

Not a fan of this vote.

GulagDolls posted:

he's not even lurking

Max posted:

Content lurking maybe but the "I'm not happy with how people are coming to the conclusion that he's scum but may as well vote for him" is a bad take.

imgay posted:

I'm going to stay away from my keeping it 100 meta this game and try to perform to the best of my abilities, this means I will not reference keeping it 100. Now as a disclaimer I'm not saything this because I rolled scum or anything, but because it would be better for me as a player to not confirm myself as town every game because I'm town every game. In fact I don't even remember how to play as scum. Getting to the point:

GGN don't be so paranoid about AA's shitposting, 's good 2 be king

Max posted:

Though if that's your reasoning, how do you feel about Fisk?

Hal Incandenza posted:

Yeah that's true. Jimmy's posts while I was writing that up were decent too, I'd be mad if I was town in Buffy. I'm good with Jimmy.

GenericGirlName posted:

I almost wanted to go and read Buffy Mafia but it sounds like hell

GenericGirlName posted:

The world's worst ending to a good book, dang.

jimmydalad posted:

I will not like that this game has burned me and is influencing my opinion. I liked the game, but man.

hambeet posted:

What do you think of eccos posting?

Do you think it's a distraction?

What about those posters who are keenly engaging with ecco?

Max posted:

He unironically used “snowflake”

Jonathan Fisk posted:

For every person that votes imgay today, I will haunt you until you die

If you doubt either my capacity or sincerity, consider my posting record

GulagDolls posted:

let's no lynch so we can do this again tomorrow

Jonathan Fisk posted:

both ecco and ggn are better votes with more foundation than an imgay one

got some chores tonight posted:

btw i would like to request that rebecco be considered for being placed on notice tonight for failing to make ten substantial posts today

hambeet posted:

the case is ggn's response to aa's good girl thing was just confected emoting. i think chores is taking that line too.

others are saying it's not really a game thing and therefore a neutral read based on that alone.

EccoRaven posted:

code:

> Main Menu
>> 2. Submit user: Hambeet
>> . 
>> Processing...
>> ...
>> ...
>> ...
>> Done.
>> Town, 26% confidence
>> Scum, 16% confidence
>> Lots of posts, mostly filler but more posting is better than less
>> Tone isn't coming off as insincere and contributing to conversations and cases more often than not
>> Australian, confusing.

1. Modify search
2. Main Menu

hambeet posted:

kitiara has forgotten to post in this thread today.
mmt allegedly is doing that thing they do when they're scum
db is dicking around
cpig is allegedly catching up
solus i tried engaging with earlier and they did kind of pick up, but i feel they're skirting around the edges of engagement.
ecco it started off funny, it's still slightly interesting but if it continues tomorrow that'll be raising flags. it generated content and because of that i'm actually more interested in the people who wanted to keep engaging ecco.
just under a third of toalpaz's posts are just engaging with ecco.


would swing to toalpaz. happy with imgay still though. curious what others think on solus

got some chores tonight posted:

i would not be surprised if ggn's reaction to aa is 100% sincere. i also dont think it matters in a mafia sense in any way

if our game is going to have an undertone of "well certain posters (me, jfisk, aa) have posted problematically and we cannot stand for problematic posting in the mafia game" then we arent actually playing mafia because now theres an aspect of id politics in the game

and given that i assume literally everyone in this game identifies with a leftist point of view at some degree (minus robecco) i dont think its going to be contribute to the game in anyway

im sorry that saying s n o w f l a k e and following it with a handout joke triggered so many people in this game who are very sensitive to certain bad words being typed (e.g. kek, good girl, snowflake, handout). i didnt actually expect such a visceral response but it probably shouldnt have been too surprising

i dont think it contributes to scumhunting in any way (other than the way jfisk employs it) and im ok with moving on from it but i somehow have suspicions it actually will

EccoRaven posted:

code:

> Main Menu
>> 2. Submit user: jimmydalad
>> . 
>> Processing...
>> ...
>> ...
>> ...
>> Done.
>> Town, 17% confidence
>> Scum, 33% confidence
>> Dislike the recurring "I don't disagree that X is scummy, but I won't vote now, but if TIME happens, I'll happily lynch them."
>> But you did that a lot in Buffy too and so I think it's just how you hedge on your reads
>> English, confusing.

1. Modify search
2. Main Menu