Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Pf. Hikikomoriarty
Feb 15, 2003

RO YNSHO


Slippery Tilde
the new testament is actually very cspam because its a collection of documents written by a group of people who thought their society was hosed and that the world would end within a generation

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

504
Feb 2, 2016

by R. Guyovich

Mel Mudkiper posted:

christianity has never been more than the severely malleable principles needed to keep the ruling classes in power op

That's not true, it's just a coincedance that the leaders of the faith have always been the ruling class throughout all human history.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth
Every slave owning white southerner was a Christian. Coincidence?

MizPiz
May 29, 2013

by Athanatos
Mysticism is really the only spiritual tradition that can not just thrive, but be useful to a leftist society.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth
If you arent going to cut out a chud's heart on top of a ziggurat to please the sun and stop global warming then your religion has no place in polite society.

Muscle Wizard
Jul 28, 2011

by sebmojo

power word- Jeb! posted:

that passage gets misread a lot. it was explicitly a trap question and so his answer is ambiguous.

'you should pay caesar back in his own coin'

it was an obvious trap but its pretty clear from other parts of scripture that jesus considered divine politics and earthly politics to be two different spheres. jesus is the original proponent of separation of church and state lol.

Moridin920
Nov 15, 2007

by FactsAreUseless
That's some Council of Nicea poo poo right there because the messiah King of Israel was supposed to be a king here on Earth too so... Like that's the entire point he is the deliverer come to free them from Rome.

Otherwise why would the Romans mock him with a "king of the Jews" sign or whatever it'd make 0 sense. Why would the Romans even care if he was 100% just talking about some spiritual afterlife stuff? Why would Herod care?

If you didn't gently caress with Roman rule they basically let you get up to whatever. They only cared about Israel for its trade and strategic positioning anyway. It's kind of impossible to separate out Christianity in the Roman Empire from secular politics.

Moridin920 has issued a correction as of 09:08 on Dec 8, 2018

Moridin920
Nov 15, 2007

by FactsAreUseless
Anyway yeah he says "why are you trying to trap me" when he is asked should we pay taxes so that much at least should be clear.

Uncle Wemus
Mar 4, 2004

chicktracts taught me that america is full of christians who have never actually heard of jesus

Muscle Wizard
Jul 28, 2011

by sebmojo

Moridin920 posted:

That's some Council of Nicea poo poo right there because the messiah King of Israel was supposed to be a king here on Earth too so...

Otherwise why would the Romans mock him with a "king of the Jews" sign or whatever it'd make 0 sense. Why would the Romans even care if he was 100% just talking about some spiritual afterlife stuff? Why would Herod care?

If you didn't gently caress with Roman rule they basically let you get up to whatever. They only cared about Israel for its trade and strategic positioning anyway. It's kind of impossible to separate out Christianity in the Roman Empire from secular politics.

the romans cared about jesus because they cared purely about political stability in the region so they cared when other entities saw him as a threat because of his radical and blasphemous ideology. pilate didnt think he was a threat, obviously, because he tried to let him go. the religious leaders wouldnt have it though, as their political power was tied to their status in religious hierarchy, which jesus definitely threatened by being a major challenger on the spiritual front (and he talked major poo poo about them). the romans wanted to avoid unrest and had jesus killed bc of that. so jesus was called the king of jews by those condemning him, because it (claiming a title of royalty) represented a clear threat to local political structures existent at the time; the romans basically only recognized rulers in their pocket as legitimate, and anyone else was an enemy of the state. that's why they put the sign on him, it displayed the charge for which he was being put to death. jesus, for his part, didn't dispute it because he did consider himself the spiritual king of jews as the son of god and knew it would result in his martyrdom.

this is all basic, basic stuff, hardly 'council of nicea'.

Moridin920
Nov 15, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Muscle Wizard posted:

it was an obvious trap but its pretty clear from other parts of scripture that jesus considered divine politics and earthly politics to be two different spheres. jesus is the original proponent of separation of church and state lol.

Muscle Wizard posted:

this is all basic, basic stuff, hardly 'council of nicea'.

well alright then which parts

e: not trying to be snarky

ee: I say council of Nicea because there's a lot of other people saying what Christianity is or quoting Jesus in there and poo poo tons of it is directly contradictory. Like you could read Romans as to be all "divine right of kings is good" but then Corinthians says " “All things are lawful for me,” but not all things are helpful. “All things are lawful for me,” but I will not be enslaved by anything." which is nearly anarchist.

eee: Also this is all ignoring the history of the anti-Roman groups such as the Zealots who very much were about an independent kingdom from Rome? Simon the Apostle was a Zealot, probably Paul also?

quote:

The Zealots were a political movement in 1st-century Second Temple Judaism, which sought to incite the people of Judea Province to rebel against the Roman Empire and expel it from the Holy Land by force of arms, most notably during the First Jewish–Roman War (66–70).

quote:

in the year 6 CE against Quirinius' tax reform, shortly after the Roman Empire declared what had most recently been the tetrarchy of Herod Archelaus to be a Roman province, and that they "agree in all other things with the Pharisaic notions; but they have an inviolable attachment to liberty, and say that God is to be their only Ruler and Lord." (18.1.6)

(which Corinthians basically affirms in the bit I quoted)

quote:

the religious leaders wouldnt have it though, as their political power was tied to their status in religious hierarchy

This is kinda my point actually though - you can't really separate out Jesus from secular politics and by "kingdom of heaven" his supporters very much meant a secular kingdom free from Roman rule?

Moridin920 has issued a correction as of 10:30 on Dec 8, 2018

Muscle Wizard
Jul 28, 2011

by sebmojo

Moridin920 posted:

well alright then which parts

e: not trying to be snarky

ee: I say council of Nicea because there's a lot of other people saying what Christianity is or quoting Jesus in there and poo poo tons of it is directly contradictory. Like you could read Romans as to be all "divine right of kings is good" but then Corinthians says " “All things are lawful for me,” but not all things are helpful. “All things are lawful for me,” but I will not be enslaved by anything." which is nearly anarchist.

eee: Also this is all ignoring the history of the anti-Roman groups such as the Zealots who very much were secular? Simon the Apostle was a Zealot, probably Paul also?



(which Corinthians basically affirms)

i think your understanding of biblical literature is fundamentally flawed, because you dont seem to know that jesus didnt actually say anything to anyone after acts. corinthians and romans are both letters from paul the apostle to his followers. theres nothing from jesus in them, just interpretation from paul. they carry biblical authority but personally i take what jesus said more seriously than what paul said. if you wanna say paul is kinda screwy, well, no argument there. im not trying to be mean but i honestly dont know where to begin in addressing what you're saying. how are the zealots being ignored?

Muscle Wizard
Jul 28, 2011

by sebmojo

Moridin920 posted:

This is kinda my point actually though - you can't really separate out Jesus from secular politics and by "kingdom of heaven" his supporters very much meant a secular kingdom free from Roman rule?

didnt see this edit. i don't see how followers of jesus wanting to be free of roman rule implies that jesus himself said that.

Moridin920
Nov 15, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Muscle Wizard posted:

i think your understanding of biblical literature is fundamentally flawed

you're probably right

Muscle Wizard posted:

how are the zealots being ignored?

What I'm getting at is if people very important in Jesus' organization are Zealots then I don't see how it can be possible that Jesus' followers didn't care about secular matters at all.

e:

Muscle Wizard posted:

didnt see this edit. i don't see how followers of jesus wanting to be free of roman rule implies that jesus himself said that.

Ahh okay. Well yeah ok.

Muscle Wizard
Jul 28, 2011

by sebmojo

Moridin920 posted:

you're probably right


What I'm getting at is if people very important in Jesus' organization are Zealots then I don't see how it can be possible that Jesus' followers didn't care about secular matters at all.

i don't think i ever made the argument that jesus's followers don't care about secular matters. jesus himself absolutely did say that they shouldn't give a gently caress about secular stuff though.

Muscle Wizard
Jul 28, 2011

by sebmojo
you are killing me with these edits

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!
The thing is that religion is effectively just cultural glue. In the end, everyone will just go quote poo poo out of context to make it sound like their religion supports their point of view.

Moridin920
Nov 15, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Muscle Wizard posted:

you are killing me with these edits

sorry it's a bad habit

Muscle Wizard
Jul 28, 2011

by sebmojo

Moridin920 posted:

sorry it's a bad habit

well i appreciate the discussion

Muscle Wizard
Jul 28, 2011

by sebmojo

suck my woke dick posted:

The thing is that religion is effectively just cultural glue. In the end, everyone will just go quote poo poo out of context to make it sound like their religion supports their point of view.

people use all sorts of crap from the bible to justify their lovely actions, but jesus didn't actually say and do that much relative to the size of the book. what he did say was basically, treat people good, share your poo poo, and gently caress the people that would take advantage of others. this is, of course, completely incompatible with capitalism.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Muscle Wizard posted:

people use all sorts of crap from the bible to justify their lovely actions, but jesus didn't actually say and do that much relative to the size of the book. what he did say was basically, treat people good, share your poo poo, and gently caress the people that would take advantage of others. this is, of course, completely incompatible with capitalism.

Jesus also said that it's good to be victimized and you should not seek to better your situation because the suffering will be rewarded in heaven, that thought-crimes are equal to real crimes, and that divorce is a sin. This is, of course, completely incompatible with leftism.

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008
Probation
Can't post for 2 hours!
i think christian socialism is pretty cool but the title of this thread is blatantly false, history shows us that Christianity is in fact insanely compatible with capitalism

its a monotheist religion with a spiritual reward system so it meshes well with "keep your head down and do what the loving king says. dont worry about the real world, you'll get to do everything you want after you die"

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

Who What Now posted:

Jesus also said that it's good to be victimized and you should not seek to better your situation because the suffering will be rewarded in heaven, that thought-crimes are equal to real crimes, and that divorce is a sin. This is, of course, completely incompatible with leftism.

it's almost like a 2000 year old belief system isn't a 100% fit for a modern society

olives black
Nov 24, 2017


LENIN.
STILL.
WON'T.
FUCK.
ME.

Taintrunner posted:

hail Satan, though

olives black
Nov 24, 2017


LENIN.
STILL.
WON'T.
FUCK.
ME.
sorry Jesus you had your chance bro, we all know you meant well

Blazing Ownager
Jun 2, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Feldegast42 posted:

:same:, which is why the left needs to push a set of morals and values that aren't the worship of wealth and power. Christianity can be a part of that.

Bullshit mythology of the Abrahamic religions is incompatible with bullshit philosophy of full socialism? Oh no, that's horrib... wait, why do I care again?

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"
Christianity is a historically reactionary movement.

Pf. Hikikomoriarty
Feb 15, 2003

RO YNSHO


Slippery Tilde

Muscle Wizard posted:

people use all sorts of crap from the bible to justify their lovely actions, but jesus didn't actually say and do that much relative to the size of the book. what he did say was basically, treat people good, share your poo poo, and gently caress the people that would take advantage of others. this is, of course, completely incompatible with capitalism.

this is ignoring two major things about jesus:

his preaching is apocalyptic, everything is about an event that will come soon and sweep away current society

he was crucified for trying to start a riot

of course people can use a text however they wish but if you ignore these facts a bunch of his parables just straight up make no sense

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.
I wonder how much the presence of churches in the Civil Rights movement was due to some essential element of faith as much as the fact that churches were one of the few forms of social organization open to black people in the south

fabergay egg
Mar 1, 2012

it's not a rhetorical question, for politely saying 'you are an idiot, you don't know what you are talking about'


Muscle Wizard posted:

you are killing me with these edits

edit: sad, low energy, a total waste
:justpost: beautiful, flawless, much greater than you would understand

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

suck my woke dick posted:

it's almost like a 2000 year old belief system isn't a 100% fit for a modern society

Well, yeah, that's why it needs to be violently purged.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Mel Mudkiper posted:

I wonder how much the presence of churches in the Civil Rights movement was due to some essential element of faith as much as the fact that churches were one of the few forms of social organization open to black people in the south

The latter, African churches were literally the only place black people could congregate and speak freely without provoking a race riot

Muscle Wizard
Jul 28, 2011

by sebmojo

Who What Now posted:

Jesus also said that it's good to be victimized and you should not seek to better your situation because the suffering will be rewarded in heaven, that thought-crimes are equal to real crimes, and that divorce is a sin. This is, of course, completely incompatible with leftism.

yeah pretty much

double negative
Jul 7, 2003


Mel Mudkiper posted:

I wonder how much the presence of churches in the Civil Rights movement was due to some essential element of faith as much as the fact that churches were one of the few forms of social organization open to black people in the south

not sure if i know what you mean by essential element of faith, but i'm pretty sure it's the latter. the church is still the dominant form of social organization for black people in the south but that speaks more to its historical embeddedness and a continual lack of viable alternatives that don't result in you getting murdered

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

double negative posted:

not sure if i know what you mean by essential element of faith, but i'm pretty sure it's the latter. the church is still the dominant form of social organization for black people in the south but that speaks more to its historical embeddedness and a continual lack of viable alternatives that don't result in you getting murdered

I wonder how much longer that'll remain true as social media makes it easier to organize not only locally but also nationally or globally.

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

double negative posted:

not sure if i know what you mean by essential element of faith,

someone earlier was arguing that faith can lead to progressive action and pointed to the civil rights movement and I was basically pointing out it wasn't the faith of the church that made it a powerful tool, it was the organizing.

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
Jesus is good, the Sermon on The Mount is beautiful in a lot of ways, and people emulating Jesus and the New testament teachings would be a good start honestly

it's the fuckres in charge with all the land who want to cherry pick old covenant poo poo who commodify faith and crystallize religion into a system of various oppression enablers

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth
The sermon on the mount actually sucks rear end.

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
aside from the sex stuff*

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

double negative
Jul 7, 2003


Who What Now posted:

I wonder how much longer that'll remain true as social media makes it easier to organize not only locally but also nationally or globally.

social media provides a means to organize and communicate but it doesn’t substitute as an actual irl social organization or community like the church or the divine nine or something, so it might be a while. it’s really entrenched

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply