|
I really liked the movie and the animation style was unique and interesting, but I had to go to the front desk twice to make sure I wasn't in a 3d showing without glasses. I was literally the only one there, so I couldn't just look around. If I could change one thing about the film, I would tell the people in charge of the look that horizontal separation of the image to express depth is bad. Up until it was over, I was questioning if it was 3D despite being told no twice.
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2018 13:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 23, 2024 17:58 |
|
|
Autechresaint posted:Yeah there were a couple of scenes that looked exactly like what 3d looks when you take off the glasses, I was wondering if they messed up or something too. AlBorlantern Corps posted:My wife had the same problem I'm glad it wasn't just me. I mean, it was just me in the theater.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2018 17:01
|
|
|
hiddenriverninja posted:In an interview, one of the directors (Peter Ramsey, i think?) says that there is no focus blur in the movie, but that they used CMYK color separation to the same effect. That matches up with what I was seeing. I think it is an interesting choice in theory, but in practice it makes certain scenes look like you should be wearing 3D glasses. I found it really distracting. It didn't bother me in terms of eye strain or headaches or anything, just on a creative level.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2018 03:32
|
|