|
It is time for my penance.
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2019 01:22 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 17:03 |
|
I'm just here to have a good time.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2019 03:25 |
|
Lumpen posted:I didn't do anything N0. Why make that statement?
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2019 18:03 |
|
Lumpen posted:Xavier, do not ever flavorclaim your identity please. Lumpen posted:Good question, it is quite notable for me to warn Xavier to absolutely keep his identity hidden and for Town to not claim flavor names, even after the mod called flavor a "rabbithole" that would "not solve the game". Nothing unintentional, I make moves. In case you die early this game, are you confirming "Xavier" is town here or just being generic just-in-case? I mean, it only goes against everything the mod said, but let's not let that stop us.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2019 21:42 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Looking forward to not meeting up w Lumpen and merk again when I’m back in chi next month would get beer with merk again A+++++ Will say that, as a 6'4" person, looking up at someone during conversation was unusual. merk tall.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2019 21:44 |
|
George Kansas posted:i'm glad lumpen is so diligently setting the parameters of this game for us ##vote george kansas Sass feels feigned.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2019 21:46 |
|
b-minus1 posted:i signed up to dunk some scum
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2019 22:34 |
|
The Ninth Layer posted:Whoa hey Pander's in this game! ##vote Pander I am! The Ninth Layer posted:No and the identity of who was is a secret I will carry to my grave. I feel like I'm missing something.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2019 23:15 |
|
Lumpen posted:There's not even one person on the roster who I think the game would be better without. It's probably the finest roster I've ever seen! Needs Keane posting as a dwarf.
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2019 00:32 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Yeah and that's kind of why his weird unprompted claim to have done nothing stood out, it's not in step with his normal game which is fairly predictable. Worth keeping an eye on for sure. "Worth keeping an eye on" is some lukewarm broth, too. This doesn't feel like much of a read, Hal.
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2019 07:15 |
|
Little Mac posted:I assumed he was doing things to bait out people who had obviously not read the OP. Or am I misinterpreting the amazing phrase "bait out people"? Or that it was a defense?
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2019 07:44 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:If you think both Ard and myself have our votes down just to generate content then why aren’t you asking him to change his vote too? "Please look at someone else and not me." I really like Ernie's point. You admit you thought of ards post as early game pot stirring after making a pretty heavy case against him for this early D1, moreso than just "generating content".
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2019 07:50 |
|
Ugh it's really hard to read multiple posts and go back through histories on the phone. Feels so disjointed. Hates it.
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2019 07:53 |
|
Little Mac posted:I'm wondering about Ernie's thought process
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2019 08:10 |
|
Captain Foo posted:you're calling his post fake but also explaining why it could be okay? meh ##vote f_v Where does FV do that in the post you quoted? I don't see that.
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2019 08:24 |
|
Lumpen posted:I have been forbidden by the mod from truthfully claiming my role, alignment, or win condition. This has made me grouchy, as you might imagine. I am permitted to lie but I judge that in order to maximize my chances of winning, I will not tell a lie. I don't gambit. I play to my win condition in every game. If I were allowed my optimal move would be a 1st post of game fullclaim.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2019 23:02 |
|
Just caught up. Gonna claim my role because it's effectively an indirect vig and it's somewhat pertinent to today's lynch. I must visit someone and recruit them into a masonry with me. If one of us dies, we both die. (I just asked taste what happens if I don't, cause there aren't consequences listed in my role PM). I visited someone N0 and it failed, and I was told they were too spiritually self-reflective to join me. I thought it might have been Xavier, but after Ernie's claim I'm thinking it's more likely to be a member of that zealot's group. I can name this person if it helps at some point, but for now I don't think it does. So I then visited Lumpen N0, and it failed. Different reason entirely (Just a flat out refusal, nothing to do with zealotry). I kinda questioned him about his N0 statement cause it meant he was either lying or couldn't join my masonry. I'm just trying to weigh his "I can't reveal anything about myself" claim which seems super sketchy, with the idea of a helpful 3P, a concept I'm sympathetic toward. Him being 3P makes sense, cause I don't think my role would be be balanced at all if scum were immune from being brought into my masonry. I'm not saying that's impossible, it just doesn't feel likely. On N0 I was just going for fun with it, but after those results I figured I could use it a bit more strategically. My plan is to openly recruit the most worthless/lurky white noise poster in the thread, so I either doom a scum or help reduce the number of bad townies if I die. GK or got some chores tonight are high on my list.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 00:08 |
|
I wrote that post over about 15 minutes (work is making it harder to mafia than I'd hoped) so it looks out of date already. I'm fine with not lynching Lumpen, provided he eases up on PRs and hunts scum this game. I'm good with GK, something bugged me in his early stuff and his post with a vote on FV looks forced. If we don't lynch him I'll probably make him my mason partner. George Kansas posted:Ardulac's thoughts track to me, and I think it's pretty reasonable logic. Too much wifom for me to want to vote mac, but I don't think it's scummy. I'll try to read some folks now.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 00:28 |
|
Ernie. posted:Since I was pushing F_V when she was casing you and then she disappeared I re-read her earlier today and she came off a lot like someone who was trying to draw out bad cases than anything else. I know she was mostly casing you so you might have a different perspective, but she came off as townie to me on a re-read. Plus, this way if there are, say, 3 deaths in a night, this way you'll know which are because of me vs some other killing action. I can see pros and cons each way, but this way feels more fun and WIFOMy. Lumpen posted:I got no notification of being visited by Pander but I find his claim plausible. If you're a survivor, it would be really unfair in my opinion to let me just recruit you and get us both killed if I goof up no matter how well you were playing.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 00:36 |
|
I could vote b-minus based on these back to back posts. Latter read seems to only be provided out of necessity after the first jokey post, not because it's genuine.b-minus1 posted:Toal is a liability and we cannot let them anywhere near endgame. Even with a confirmed town investigative result. Sorry toal but your scum game is too good, I can’t trust you ever again haha. b-minus1 posted:Correct. FWIW I have a town read of toal at the moment, Which is why I’m not voting them today. Related, noticed this reading bminus' history: Bifauxnen posted:this is actually a very active D1 for binus, I distinctly remember him making a content post yesterday that made me go "wow, I wonder if it is a good or bad sign that binus is actually doing something besides saying lol, or how much he hates D1"
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 01:04 |
|
Lumpen posted:Pander can you attempt and fail to recruit me every night? I've held it back since then to treat it like a vig rather than risky-secret-mason-buddy-scum-hunting-fun-time like it would have been if I got you or the other person.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 01:12 |
|
Lumpen posted:Pander please withhold, you could get Xavier killed and there's no upside that outweighs that to your action as far as I can see. Yeah I'm pretty sure I'm playing this role wrong and now am just trying to find the silver lining. It's been fun so far, I like feeling like I'm solving stuff already on D1. Usually I hate D1. Not 100% yet but leaning toward masoning with Ixt. He's not completely absent, but he's also not saying much pertinent. I'd rather lynch GK than mason with him. got some chores tonight posted:and it also looks like his scum play in asinina;s grad school mafia d1
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 01:19 |
|
Mills posted:Boy! I would reconsider your current course! Okay.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 01:21 |
|
got some chores tonight posted:i bet if i look up some pander games id find that youre a big idiot gotta go get dinner for wifey, I don't think I'll be back after this, and it doesn't look like anyone's looking at GK right now, so ##vote b-minus
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 01:46 |
|
##vote George kansas Making magic happen in the last ten seconds I have to myself
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 02:14 |
|
The Ninth Layer posted:This is a very dressed up way of saying that lurking is scummy. I don't at all buy the idea that it's somehow worse to lurk if you had three votes on you when you stopped posting. Didn't you just say youd vote gk because he's been absent? On phone so quoting sucks but it was like five posts ago
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 21:45 |
|
So either escapee or lynchbomb maybe? Escapee seems less likely given governor in play. I'll be happy to hammer, or at least try to given the vote fuckery going on. I've come to the conclusion I'm too risky to keep around if the scum can just make it instant plurality, votesteal, and make people hated. Assuming those weren't ALL Lumpen. If my lover is scum it's a good thing I die, and if the lover isn't then it's at least better for us to die soon than anywhere near lylo. I'd ask people to hold off on any early hammering Lumpen, so I can get some analysis of D1. I'm out in the field this week walking down transformers and poles from 7am to 5pm, so if like at least tonight and tomorrow night if possible. So maybe don't pile on him please?
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 01:31 |
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:Mills, Xavier, Town Inquisitor, was killed N1 kaschei posted:My vote was stolen Pinterest Mom posted:obnoxious that the universe of possible zealots has been reduced by so much, that exposes the town prs a lot CCKeane posted:Hello friends. Ernie. posted:what is wrong with you? Bifauxnen posted:are you for real Ernie. posted:##vote bifauxnen i'm just taking a shortcut here instead of engaging with you any further because it's obvious you're not arguing in good faith Pinterest Mom posted:In bifs defence I didn't notice Xavier was dead plus also i don't think it matters Pinterest Mom posted:it says he was telling the truth about being a zealot, which, sure, could still be scum but I'm not sure it's the most productive avenue today fiery_valkyrie posted:Ernie, now that the zealots have lost a town player, is there a majority opinion on who might be the scum/s in your group?
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 02:19 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:I’m expecting that town players in that group should be sharing at least a degree of what is going on in their private chat with the thread. There is almost definitely a scum in that group so everything they say would be known to scum. The people lacking information are the non-Zealot town members. They post in masonchat "hey who among us is scummy", and then all give answers, then ernie translates them for the thread? Just seems like it'd be awkward. Ixtlilton posted:I wanna kill Lumpen, even as pro-scum wincon he almost always plays for town if he can. Should kill. What you think? Also how's life been?
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 02:48 |
|
got some chores tonight posted:i hope town's play this entire game is predicated off flavour arguments you should probably read your role PM to be sure and get back to us.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 02:49 |
|
Where did the pressure on Ard go? This game seems pretty heavy on vote adjustment. Given that, I'm not sold that the plurality-causer was necessarily scum and governing was necessarily town yesterday. Ard's play from the first half the day was hilariously bad. If I didn't suck at mafia I would have keyed in on him after his nonsensical vote on LM and his insistence that a refusal to engage was scummy. Bifauxnen posted:now see, you recognised it as a jokepost, but Ernie was like, "what's that, fellow town? How could you dare appear happy that a townie has died?? I question your townie attitude because of this, alleged fellow townie!!" You also escalated, but in the context your reaction makes more sense than his.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 03:12 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Do you really think an unconfirmed masonry hasn’t already had that conversation before? And that town players aren’t also scum hunting in that chat? I'm in an unconfirmed masonry, I somewhat had that chat, it's just the act of distributing the results to chat is kinda awkward. It's like a mini-lynch, where a few people with privileged information make a call. In this case, it's entirely filtered through ernie unless they out themselves. So Ernie has to break down what they privately discussed publicly. And if they're not outed, and he says "we thing one of us might be scum", we...what? Demand they out the person so we can lynch them? What is the actual end result that happens here? You're appealing to a group as though they'll have an answer for you, some direction you can turn to. You're really really focused on the mason group. Maybe pretend there is no zealot group for a moment and read folks?
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 03:18 |
|
Lumpen posted:Ardulac is obviously Town dude shut up. I took that kinda for granted D1 cause I didn't really focus on him until he did his governing thing, but when I was re-reading some folks last night I started alphabetically and it took me forever to get past him because his play was really really really scummy the first half of D1. He looks like he got to use his role to finally get away from that. (lol I just now noticed it was you posting, I thought it was keane's av for some reason so I was responding in earnest instead of "lol eat poo poo")
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 03:22 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:You're imagining the conversation going in a way that I hadn't and making assumptions based on that. I didn't ask for a play-by-play recap. The members of the masonry have information that is not freely available. I want to know if any of that information is important for town to know. fiery_valkyrie posted:Ernie. right next to this one fiery_valkyrie posted:Ernie, now that the zealots have lost a town player, is there a majority opinion on who might be the scum/s in your group? I still think you're really fixated on the mason group. If you're town, let it go.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 03:46 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Happy to stop talking about the masonry now. Did you see my ???'s in that other post of mine? I've had a hunch or two on Pmom for a while that I've been trying to tease out.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 03:51 |
|
Ernie. posted:i've done some biostatistics and have a master's in biochem - good memory
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 03:59 |
|
Captain Foo posted:##vote pander Cool. Wait for tomorrow big guy.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 05:58 |
|
kaschei posted:someone vig toalpaz svp What's your case on him? I read your history and I can't discern anything. Like, wifom about having your vote stolen because he's worried about you voting him is absurd. I've had a generally positive feel about him this game.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 07:09 |
|
kaschei posted:Toalpaz, Pinterest mom, Little Mac, Lumpen were voting for both Ardulac and GK at hammer Did you count this yourself or use the last votefinder? That was probably wrong sure to the governor. I don't think for players can double vote this game.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 07:11 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 17:03 |
|
merk posted:I’d also vote Pmom. I know who I picked for my lover and I (think) I know two zealots besides Ernie. Didn't think of any benefit of revealing either. Is there one I'm not seeing? LM: good pickup there. I didn't like his refusal to claim either. Bif: I did a brief search of your history and couldn't find a single reason you've FoSed Pmom consistently the last half the game. Why's he on there? A Lumpen list isn't a substitute for content, by the way. Speaking of, what were your intentions vis a vis lynching lumpen today? Time to go out in 30 degree weather for 9 hrs. I'll try to check in around lunch.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2019 15:00 |