Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


"Trust the Process"

"Suck for Luck"

"Patrick Ewing Sweepstakes"

Of the four big US sports, all four generally acquire talent through an amateur draft process, with a draft seed based on ypur previous year's record. This has lead some teams to decide on a metastrategy of "tanking," or losing on purpose to secure a better draft seed and, because these drafts are not serpentine (meaning you pick the same spot every round), secure the best talent available each round (this matters more in the NBA which has far fewer rounds)

However, sports are a specialized sort of live entertainment industry. The goal is to put the best product on the field/court/ice as possible, and tell fans -who spent a LOT of money on tickets- that you are at least trying to spoil someone else's season. Obviously you can have rebuilding years when you know you dont have the personnel for a title run - but stranger things have happened and it aint over till any given Sunday and all that.

Tanking is just miserable though. It's knowing not only is this a rebuilding year, but the team is consciously designed to be bad just to get to hope a rookie will end the tailspin.

You wouldn't accept going to a Metallica concert with some 9 year old on a recorder replacing James Hetfield so Metallica can save some money on this tour so the next tour can hire a badass guitarist!

So I put it to SAS: what processes can we Institute to stop tanking and compel teams, even rebuilding ones, to at least attempt to put a watchable product in front of fans?

Contrarian take: with the success of the Astros and nets after a tanking process, should tanking be dealt with?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


Feels Villeneuve posted:

relegate teams to the minor leagues thanks everyone

I mean, yes promotion/relegation solves this nicely, but how do teams deal with payroll? Or do they just not become eligible for postseason play ? I dont know enough about how soccer handles it.

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


DJExile posted:

Minor league relegation would never work with any north american league.

E: part of that is because there's no minor league for the NFL (no the AAF doesn't count and it's about to die anyway), and the gaps in talent between even the worst NHL/MLB/NBA/NFL teams and the top AHL/AA/G-league/college teams are gargantuan.
OK, so what can we do to encourage teams to compete every year? Or is it actually desirable for dynasties (both successful ones like the St Louis Cardinals and unsuccessful ones like the Cleveland Browns) to exist?

G-Hawk posted:

as an astros fans, i'm happy they tanked and see no reason to try to stop it.
Astros were a weird case because the front office were very vocal about what they were doing and were clearly taking steps to actually get better, and when it was time to make a run, they went out and actually spent on Verlander to secure a pennant.

I just don't know that saying "hey fans, we're gonna be bad for this year and probably next year" works in all situations. Again, they are (at their core) entertainment ventures, so they need to be entertaining to watch. A bunch of AAAA-guys hacking at ML pitches for two years while you sandbag prospects isn't "fun"

Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 20:23 on Feb 27, 2019

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


rare Magic card l00k posted:

Eliminate the draft.

If there's no benefit to sucking, then it'll stop.

This is actually a pretty compelling argument, and makes a lot of sense from a labor rights standpoint too. The only concern is MLB, which has no salary cap so smaller-market teams literally could have no cost-controlled talent ever - although that itself may be desirable after the Yanks/Sawks pay $100m upfront for "The Next Mike Trout" a couple times and end up with four years of "The Next Matt Weiters"

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


fisting by many posted:

the NPB's (Japanese baseball) draft system
gently caress it, at that point just put a #1 overall pick on the fifty yard line and have each team send a guy for a footrace scramble to get it.

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


DJExile posted:

Yeah nixing the draft would be a good start.

How would nixing the draft affect player salaries? Would anyone sign a FA contract with rookie pay #s? Someone already mentioned how its impossible to put a championship NHL team on the ice at fair market value; would overall salaries go down or would the players bargain for an expanded cap?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


Tanking has tangible effect on sales

quote:

There are of course other ways to explain such a drop in attendance, but those are topics Manfred doesn’t really want to broach in public. One issue is that more teams than ever are more willing than ever to put a non-competitive product on the field.

The Astros did it "the right way" by broadcasting that they were intentionally tanking, and doing fan events like cheap hot dogs or whatever. But teams that do not explicitly state their tanking, and do not take steps to improve the fan experience in other ways, are going to suffer.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply