|
They overpaid for the hammer imo.
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 18:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 02:01 |
|
|
Truga posted:any onion site is still technically private, as long as you understand that at this point most of the tor endpoints are NSA/CIA Does this mean they know all about my darkweb weed purchases but do nothing about it because I'm just a nobody?
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 18:50
|
|
|
Trainee PornStar posted:Does this mean they know all about my darkweb weed purchases but do nothing about it because I'm just a nobody? it means they know when you accessed something in the onion network, they just can't tell what because it's end to end encrypted, unless they also run your weed shop
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 19:09
|
|
|
they can tell because they’ve broken or created all the encryption algorithms you’re allowed to use and because they ordered all American and European companies to back door all their hardware and software layers for the NSA https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/1433451378391883782?s=20 there is epic QQ now from the MIC about how draconian and unsportsmanlike China is being by exploiting American-made holes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 19:28
|
|
|
Cold on a Cob posted:idk, this says it's more like <3:1 Right, for the EROEI for energy entering the economy (EROEIext) as opposed to the EROEI that's typically investigated at the power source itself (EROEIst). For EROEIst they found that wind is in line with the literature. What's interesting here is their EROEIext figure for fossil fuels is ~4:1, with about 75% of the production being usable. According to their plot of discretionary energy sources onshore wind only slightly worse with 65-70% being usable, which is frankly phenomenal. Photovoltaics are worse by quite a bit at just over 40%, but still offer enough discretionary energy to make them worth it. Rime posted:Full supply chain considerations result in an EROEI of 3:1, mega big-time LOL at the suggestion that wind has the same EROEI of Oil. The paper Cold on a Cob posted makes the comparison between wind and fossil fuels pretty decent given that fossil fuels only have EROEIext of 4:1.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 19:41
|
|
|
Trainee PornStar posted:Does this mean they know all about my darkweb weed purchases but do nothing about it because I'm just a nobody? Pretty much, they're not going to blow their load on nobody drug doers and scare people off
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 19:42
|
|
|
Hexigrammus posted:
well??
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 19:50
|
|
|
Climate impact of a transatlantic flight could cost global economy $3,000 A return flight from the UK to New York could cost the global economy more than $3,000 (Ł2,170) in the long run, owing to the effects of the climate crisis, according to a report. Researchers examined the economic cost of the climate crisis and found it would cut about 37% from global GDP this century, more than twice the drop experienced in the Great Depression. A British Airways Boeing 747 aircraft makes a flypast over London Heathrow airport Airlines need to do more than plant trees to hit net zero, MPs told For every tonne of carbon dioxide emitted, the global economy would be $3,000 worse off by the end of the century, they estimated.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:06
|
|
|
Jel Shaker posted:Climate impact of a transatlantic flight could cost global economy $3,000 Oh, the global economy would be $3000 dollars worst off? I better cancel my flight, that sounds awful!!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:13
|
|
|
Sure, the global economy will be $3000 poorer per flight, but have you considered that the finest neoliberal economists assure us that the global economy will also be orders of magnitude larger than it is today and much better able to handle such costs?
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:25
|
|
|
Blockade posted:Pretty much, they're not going to blow their load on nobody drug doers and scare people off I'd always assumed that to be the case, I'm glad it's not just me being paranoid.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:26
|
|
|
Complications posted:siberia's even more on fire than we are welp! Lopez Island, WA ?
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:26
|
|
|
someone post the paper about how the best economists in the world don't think climate change will impact any company whose employees have climate controlled work spaces
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:27
|
|
|
Complications posted:Sure, the global economy will be $3000 poorer per flight, but have you considered that the finest neoliberal economists assure us that the global economy will also be orders of magnitude larger than it is today and much better able to handle such costs? read this as “the finest neoliberal economists will be orders of magnitude larger than they are today” and had to change my trousers
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:29
|
|
|
Jel Shaker posted:Climate impact of a transatlantic flight could cost global economy $3,000 What's a round trip New York - London flight in economy pricing out to these days? A quarter of what it's stealing from the world? Less?
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:29
|
|
|
kater posted:well?? Spreading the wealth: typhlosole.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:29
|
|
|
Jel Shaker posted:Climate impact of a transatlantic flight could cost global economy $3,000 By these numbers, every ten litres of gasoline does $69 of damage to the world economy. A quarter-pound burger does $10 of damage.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 20:58
|
|
|
Chamale posted:$69 of damage to the world economy 
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 21:00
|
|
|
Jel Shaker posted:Climate impact of a transatlantic flight could cost global economy $3,000 quote:The research was conducted by experts from Cambridge University, University College London and Imperial College London, as well as international partners from Switzerland, Germany, the US and Austria.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 21:55
|
|
|
mawarannahr posted:read this as “the finest neoliberal economists will be orders of magnitude larger than they are today” and had to change my trousers
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 21:56
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:lol. lmao its literally just "how much more expensive is air conditioning at ambient + 2 C? we are very smart!"
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:00
|
|
|
there is another much cited report out there addressing the economic effects of climate change where the author discounted all the outcomes of climate change as occurring "outside" and so were irrelevant to "inside" economic activities
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:03
|
|
|
Admiral Ray posted:Oh drat, alright. Hmm, I've gotta go on a hunt for the most corrosive energy drinks then. Wasn't there a suit against Mountain Dew where someone claimed they found a mouse in their can and MD's defense was "nah, a mouse would have completely dissolved by the time you bought it so you're lying"?
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:19
|
|
|
bedpan posted:there is another much cited report out there addressing the economic effects of climate change where the author discounted all the outcomes of climate change as occurring "outside" and so were irrelevant to "inside" economic activities William Nordhaus. He also regarded the average increase in temperature like a diurnal temperature change. They gave him that fake Nobel for it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:29
|
|
|
SplitSoul posted:William Nordhaus. He also regarded the average increase in temperature like a diurnal temperature change. They gave him that fake Nobel for it. how there isn’t an ig nobel for just dumb economists, rather than fun and quirky studies, i have no idea
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:33
|
|
|
bedpan posted:there is another much cited report out there addressing the economic effects of climate change where the author discounted all the outcomes of climate change as occurring "outside" and so were irrelevant to "inside" economic activities 80% reduction in agricultural output was projected to have no impact on other economic sectors
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:40
|
|
|
bag em and tag em posted:Wasn't there a suit against Mountain Dew where someone claimed they found a mouse in their can and MD's defense was "nah, a mouse would have completely dissolved by the time you bought it so you're lying"? Lmao, I sure hope so!
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:42
|
|
|
Truga posted:it means they know when you accessed something in the onion network, they just can't tell what because it's end to end encrypted, unless they also run your weed shop they run everything on onion guaranteed its all ops
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:47
|
|
|
Chamale posted:80% reduction in agricultural output was projected to have no impact on other economic sectors That report was the most hilarious thing. Right at the start it assumed that 80% of the economy wasn't vulnerable to climate change, then after a bunch of blah blah blah justifying that and making up numbers the conclusion spat out that they expected something like a 16% total reduction of economic output which wasn't bad due to the assumed intervening number growth and just completely ignored the obvious hole in losing 16/20 of things like agriculture and fishing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:48
|
|
|
Jel Shaker posted:how there isn’t an ig nobel for just dumb economists, rather than fun and quirky studies, i have no idea Pretty sure you're just describing the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:52
|
|
|
Truga posted:it means they know when you accessed something in the onion network, they just can't tell what because it's end to end encrypted, unless they also run your weed shop If the service happens to control the entry and exit node, it would absolutely know what server you're accessing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 22:53
|
|
|
now that everyone appears to be sufficiently broke-brained enough to have a conversation about our future energy reality without shrieking and pissing themselves about ecofascist malthusianism, i will now ask the most important question of all: did everyone have a good labor day weekend?
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 23:14
|
|
|
Hubbert posted:now that everyone appears to be sufficiently broke-brained enough to have a conversation about our future energy reality without shrieking and pissing themselves about ecofascist malthusianism, i will now ask the most important question of all: This is a very Malthusian question, IMO
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 23:16
|
|
|
Hubbert posted:now that everyone appears to be sufficiently broke-brained enough to have a conversation about our future energy reality without shrieking and pissing themselves about ecofascist malthusianism, i will now ask the most important question of all: I'm mad at everyone patting themselves on the back over how great their mutual aid is going which couldn't function/need without the waste and opulence of the system..
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 23:18
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:are liberal economists capable of analyzing socio-economic relations based on physical inputs and outputs like labor and raw metals or is it all Number Any real economist knows that Financial Services are the only part of the economy that matters.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 23:35
|
|
|
lol what's a wheat???? you mean that thing I shorted twelve thousand tons of yesterday, bro, those are just numbers on a screen. lol look at this bitch acting like """"wheat"""" is a real thing
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 23:36
|
|
|
how much for one oat? thinking of getting into commodity trading.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2021 23:44
|
|
|
bag em and tag em posted:Wasn't there a suit against Mountain Dew where someone claimed they found a mouse in their can and MD's defense was "nah, a mouse would have completely dissolved by the time you bought it so you're lying"? there have been a few of these. the guy that taught my electron microscopy course was used as an expert witness fairly often, and he told us about one such case where a woman said she stopped to get a soda on the way home from work. the machine gave her diet instead of regular coke/pepsi. she drank some and thought it tasted funny but “chalked it up” to it being diet instead of regular, as she rarely drank diet. she drank some more and couldn’t get past the flavour so she dumped it out and quelle horreur there was a dead mouse inside. as it turns out he found nearly invisible scratchings on the edge of the drinking hole and corresponding shavings in the mouse’s stomach contents, which meant the woman had stuffed the poor creature into the soda can while it was still alive
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2021 00:27
|
|
|
Hubbert posted:now that everyone appears to be sufficiently broke-brained enough to have a conversation about our future energy reality without shrieking and pissing themselves about ecofascist malthusianism, i will now ask the most important question of all: I spent it alternately grinding fiberglass and arguing about that paper with Liberals who claim it is an imperialist attempt to perpetuate western civilization at the expense of the developing world - because of the line about a one child policy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2021 01:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 02:01 |
|
|
that's crazy especially when you consider that the economy is 92% indoors and thus unaffected by climate change!! wow flights must be REALLY bad
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2021 01:24
|
|