Despite the...interesting...revelations about a poster from the last thread, there are plenty more elf and spaceship books to be subjected to a critical lens. We never did finish that review of The Way of Kings, for instance. In an effort to continue the literary discussions - and maybe find some elf and spaceship books with some actual literary value that don't make us sad - I'm opening up a new thread so we can continue mocking "terrible, nonconsensual things" and other literary clunkers. I'm gonna lay down some ground rules. Don't get mad about criticism This is a literature forum, discussion of literature is to be expected. We're going to be talking about prose and themes, not "worldbuilding", "magic systems", or any of the arbitrary criteria fantasy and sci-fi has created to excuse being in its own separate section of the bookstore. If you think we've treated a book unfairly, feel free to come in and point out some good prose - just don't expect us to take you seriously if you explain that the prose and characterization is bad but the worldbuilding is top notch. Don't touch the poop The last thread devolved into people invading the Brandon Sanderson thread to post literary masterpieces like "penis". Just don't. Yea, it's funny most of the discussion in that thread is surface level, or that Brandon Sanderson is supposedly writing this great saga about divinity while removing all mystery and wonder from any depiction of gods, but we really don't need to be in there. Take chats about users and banning to QCS You know why. Have fun! Somebody fucked around with this message at 16:06 on Mar 16, 2019 |
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 01:35 |
|
|
# ? Dec 7, 2024 04:31 |
|
the videophone chapter of infinite jest is a legit good piece of sci-fi imo Does anyone have a view on Adam Roberts? He's an english lit academic and teacher who is also an SF novelist. I have one of his shortly in my pile but I find writing criticism excruciatingly difficult.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 08:48 |
|
lol nobody wants to come anywhere near this thread. i wonder how many are silently bookmarking like i did.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 22:35 |
Awww. Would people prefer a Dune review or an essay on divinity in Sanderson?
|
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 22:36 |
|
feel free to effortpost, man. personally i have a headache from all the you-know-who drama, so i think people are distancing (at least judging by the post/views ratio here so far)
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 22:39 |
|
I liked the last thread for the most part. Can this thread have NWS images tagged properly, or do I have to keep certain users on ignore?
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 22:56 |
|
TheGreatEvilKing posted:Awww. Yes. Either sounds wonderful. I liked the effort posts from the last thread and hope we can do/see more of those.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 23:07 |
|
TheGreatEvilKing posted:Awww. I’m voting for Sanderson divinity essay
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 23:18 |
The Gardenator posted:I liked the last thread for the most part. Can this thread have NWS images tagged properly, or do I have to keep certain users on ignore? How do I enforce this? It's a good idea and I approve.
|
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 23:22 |
The Gardenator posted:I liked the last thread for the most part. Can this thread have NWS images tagged properly, or do I have to keep certain users on ignore? If you see a NWS image, use the report function or send me a PM.
|
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 23:24 |
|
I posted this in the main SFF thread last week when Neil Stephenson's The Rise and Fall of D.O.D.O. came up. Nobody felt like defending it there so I might as well repost it here. Even for Stephenson it's bad.somebody in the SFF thread posted:I liked The Rise and Fall of D.O.D.O.. I thought that book was unreadable and just skimmed over the first couple chapters to remember why. quote:“What’s your pleasure?” asked the barista, a young Asian-American woman with interesting piercings, tattoos in place of eyebrows, and a demeanor that blended I’m sooo interesting and this job sucks with I have a really cool secret life and this job is an awesome front. Her nametag read “Julie Lee: Professional 聪明的驴子•双簧管” (which I understood, roughly, as “Smart-rear end Oboist”). The narrator's voice is constantly jumping back and forth like this from a horny teenager to a bitter boomer complaining about kids nowadays. quote:"We have a bunch of very old documents—cuneiform, in one case—and we need them translated, at least roughly, by the same person. You’ll be paid very well. But I can’t tell you where we got the documents, or how we got them, or why we’re interested in them. And you cannot ever tell anyone about this. You can’t even say to your friends, ‘Oh, yeah, I did some classified translating for the government.’ Even if we publish your translation of it, you can’t take ownership of it. If you learn something extraordinary from translating the material, you can’t share it with the world. You’re a cog in a piece of machinery. An anonymous cog. You’d have to agree to that before I say another word.” Yes, that strikeout "going LOL on" is in the original. The narrator makes a lot of asides to the reader like that. This is supposed to be a young post-graduate lecturer in the classics department. The book tries so hard like this all the time. Later on, a old lady turns out to be a time travelling witch and proves it by transforming into a hot young woman. The narrator is jealous, or something: quote:Tristan, eyes glued to Erszebet’s face (and curves, I am sure), released me so I could unzip myself from the snowsuit. But even wearing civvies, I felt doltish while this elegant creature held us all entranced. Entranced is not the right word, though—that conjures a sense of a doe-eyed fairy-tale princess, and Erszebet was not that. She was fierce. Not deliberately, not like the Alpha Girl in a high school clique . . . it was effortless on her part, elemental. And she seemed amused by how her transformation distracted the rest of us. Just a miserable slog for me.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 23:27 |
|
Oh my God, those strikethroughs should be a criminal offense. I've always found Stephenson a little cloyingly over-clever, but this is a new loving level.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 23:38 |
|
ho. lee. poo poo. i think i'm far more forgiving of "quirky" narrators than most, but this is downright painful to read. and i loved what i read of his historical novels. it's disappointing because the plot seems genuinely fun. wacky conspiracy fiction is always a good time. then again, we already have the Illuminatus trilogy, which does what D.O.D.O seems to be attempting, except is actually fun to read. (as a side note: i havent finished it yet but i believe it has the potential to be my favorite piece of satire)
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 00:12 |
|
That prose is obnoxious. Ban genre fiction.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 00:14 |
TheGreatEvilKing posted:Awww. Either. I love the first four Dune books and would be interested in a critical take, but the Sanderson divinity stuff feels far more in keeping with this thread. I may give a brief take on Warcross, which felt like one of the most cynical, market-driven YA books I've ever read. I read it because I was curious about some of these YA books that I've seen recommended around the place. It was pretty bad, which is no surprise, but it absolutely felt like it was written to market which was the most interesting thing about it.
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 01:31 |
|
yo is this where the Lamp cultists are? I am totally fine with eating a punishment here cuz I guess this could be interpreted as 'helping to avoid a ban' tho if it helps I promise to not post any more messages from BotL, I just feel this situation warrants it plus I gave him my word that I would and as a dopey canuck I know you never break your bond with a vicious finn, the russians know it and now you know itFrom that realm of hungry ghosts known as discord posted:
I'll my own thoughts on the whole kerfuffle in qcs, in case anyone wants the ammo to burn me in the future (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 01:41 |
|
Shut up about things that aren't books, not-book-talker.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 01:43 |
|
suggestion: add a rule to the OP that this is not a thread for talking about you-know-who.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 01:43 |
|
onsetOutsider posted:suggestion: add a rule to the OP that this is not a thread for talking about you-know-who.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 01:46 |
old thread is re-opened. we stick with this one, orrrr?
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 01:48 |
|
just gas the old thread tbh
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 01:52 |
|
Personally I think goldmine the old thread and treat this as a clean break.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 01:52 |
|
Zoracle Zed posted:I posted this in the main SFF thread last week when Neil Stephenson's The Rise and Fall of D.O.D.O. came up. Nobody felt like defending it there so I might as well repost it here. Even for Stephenson it's bad. There's no rhythm in that prose. It hurts to read.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 02:24 |
|
Because this thread is for being specific with critiques, lets go over everything I hate about the D.O.D.O excerpted text. (I have absolutely no desire to read more)quote:sooo quote:Julie Lee: Professional 聪明的驴子•双簧管 You're not allowed to put non-Roman characters in your story unless your initials are MZD. quote:a complicated something-latte-something with lots of buzzwords I picked out at random from the menu I know you know how to be funny, Neal. Why are you resorting to a bottom-of-the-barrel "coffee is too confusing" joke? Also, the use of the word "buzzwords" here just makes me shake my head and sigh. quote:...to pursue his offer. (Also he was rather handsome, which made me jittery a bit, so I decided to hide behind an affected eccentricity.) I hate to be pedantic about this, but the parenthesis punctuation is extremely wrong here. quote:We have a bunch of very old documents—cuneiform, in one case—and we need them translated, at least roughly, by the same person. The word "roughly" in this sentence, contrary to Mr. Stephenson's intentions (probably), very much wants to be attributed to "by the same person" and is barely, barely hanging on to "translated". It still confuses the heck out of me and I've read it over like 5 times. Somehow I feel this case is kind of weak, so to defend against people who might attack me for not knowing how appositives work, think about how you'd interpret the sentence "We need them translated, at least for the time being, by the same person." And this isn't even taking into account how "We need them translated by the same person" is a confusing sentence on its own, because "same" is not usually used as a solo adjective like that with no context to compare to. Even adding a simple "We need them all translated" would make it much clearer by emphasizing the plurality of the documents. quote:But I can't tell you ... And you cannot ever tell anyone about this. You can’t even say to your friends ... you can't take ownership ... you can't share it ... Why is there a single "cannot" when he says "can't" four times in the same dialogue? quote:You’d have to agree to that before I say another word. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure this either has to be "You'll have to agree to that before I say another word" or "You'd have to agree to that before I said another word." Tense agreement still applies in conditionals. Compare these example sentences from the guidetogrammar.org page on conditionals (yes I'm obnoxious enough to do research about this): "If I become president, I will change the social security system." (Said by a presidential candidate) "If I became president, I would change the social security system." (Said by a schoolboy) Now if we reword Stephenson's line slightly (and awkwardly), we can illustrate the tense problem: "If I am to say another word, you will have to agree to that." compared to... "If I were to say another word, you would have to agree to that." Personally, I think the first is closer to what he was going for, so my change would be to switch the you'd to you'll. Neal, hire me as your editor. quote:Dear reader, give me credit for not ... quote:I felt doltish while this elegant creature held us all entranced. Entranced is not the right word, though—that conjures a sense of a doe-eyed fairy-tale princess, and Erszebet was not that. She was fierce. I have a huge problem with the logical flow of these sentences. The MC and Tristan (and others, but idk the context) are described with the adjective "entranced," right? Presumably what Stephenson was going for with this hyphen-paranthetical is that the concept of being entranced by someone makes you think that the cause of the entrancement is something akin to a "fairy-tale princess". But as written, it's the group of main characters being compared to the fairy-tale princess, and the following clause makes absolutely no sense. quote:Not deliberately, not like the Alpha Girl in a high school clique . . . it was effortless on her part, elemental. 1) An ellipsis is not a semicolon. 2) Yes, you can stick adjectives on the end of sentences like that. No it does not always sound good. Here is exhibit A. quote:...she continued to Tristan, in a so-there tone. That is not a thing for hyphens, it is a thing for quotes. I get that it's in a dialogue attribution so that would be confusing, but here's an idea: write normally for one loving sentence. (the last paragraph is too abysmal for me to even comment on. refer to my comment on the previous strike-through, but with extra silence at the horniness) WOW, that was a pretty dense loving slog. Are you sure you didn't just cherrypick the worst bits? I'm sure I had an annoyance with every single loving sentence you quoted. And I super regret doing this. So thanks. gently caress.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 03:57 |
|
Does anyone have some examples of genre fiction that does a good job with descriptive language? I've always been frustrated by the inability of a lot of authors to describe these worlds they're trying to create. It's especially bad in fantasy - I see too many authors rely on either suggestion or some Lovecraft-style "the thing was too horrible to describe but hoo boy, believe me when I say it sucked" prose - but I know there have to be some that are decent at it. I remember Bradbury's prose being strong but it's been so long since I read any of his work that I can't say whether or not it actually was.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 10:40 |
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Does anyone have some examples of genre fiction that does a good job with descriptive language? I've always been frustrated by the inability of a lot of authors to describe these worlds they're trying to create. It's especially bad in fantasy - I see too many authors rely on either suggestion or some Lovecraft-style "the thing was too horrible to describe but hoo boy, believe me when I say it sucked" prose - but I know there have to be some that are decent at it. I remember Bradbury's prose being strong but it's been so long since I read any of his work that I can't say whether or not it actually was. Mervyn Peake's stuff isn't an easy read, but his Gormenghast books have a lot of really great descriptive/tone work.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 11:18 |
|
Glad to be following this thread. I'm almost done reading D.O.D.O. right now, and I don't hate it, but I agree that the strike-through stuff in Melisande's sections is a detriment to the book and I'm always thankful when someone else takes over, which happens with increasing frequency once the time travel actually starts.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 11:33 |
FactsAreUseless posted:Does anyone have some examples of genre fiction that does a good job with descriptive language? I've always been frustrated by the inability of a lot of authors to describe these worlds they're trying to create. It's especially bad in fantasy - I see too many authors rely on either suggestion or some Lovecraft-style "the thing was too horrible to describe but hoo boy, believe me when I say it sucked" prose - but I know there have to be some that are decent at it. I remember Bradbury's prose being strong but it's been so long since I read any of his work that I can't say whether or not it actually was. Just the examples I have in the forefront of my brain, but you often find great prose in mystery fiction, especially noir-based mystery. Tolkien's descriptions are often quite good despite being non-concrete. LeGuin. Actually yeah let me toss out Idle Days on the Yann as the perennial example of Good Fantasy Writing: quote:So I came down through the wood to the bank of Yann and found, as had been prophesied, the ship Bird of the River about to loose her cable. Read the whole story, it's short and one of Dunsany's best: http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/dun/swld/swld09.htm Hieronymous Alloy fucked around with this message at 11:52 on Mar 16, 2019 |
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 11:43 |
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Does anyone have some examples of genre fiction that does a good job with descriptive language? I've always been frustrated by the inability of a lot of authors to describe these worlds they're trying to create. It's especially bad in fantasy - I see too many authors rely on either suggestion or some Lovecraft-style "the thing was too horrible to describe but hoo boy, believe me when I say it sucked" prose - but I know there have to be some that are decent at it. I remember Bradbury's prose being strong but it's been so long since I read any of his work that I can't say whether or not it actually was. ive heard extremely good things about the vorrh but its still in my big pile of cool looking books
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 11:51 |
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Does anyone have some examples of genre fiction that does a good job with descriptive language? I've always been frustrated by the inability of a lot of authors to describe these worlds they're trying to create. It's especially bad in fantasy - I see too many authors rely on either suggestion or some Lovecraft-style "the thing was too horrible to describe but hoo boy, believe me when I say it sucked" prose - but I know there have to be some that are decent at it. I remember Bradbury's prose being strong but it's been so long since I read any of his work that I can't say whether or not it actually was. Mervyn Peake is basically exactly what you want, botl had a good writeup in the other thread. Jack Vance’s Dying Earth stories as well, though his “descriptive language” works less to describe an exact world than it does to spark your imagination. Also a writeup in the other thread.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 14:09 |
|
Link the old thread in the OP so all the old reviews are easily accessible. https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3833655&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=1 Ccs fucked around with this message at 15:47 on Mar 16, 2019 |
# ? Mar 16, 2019 15:42 |
Ccs posted:Link the old thread in the OP so all the old reviews are easily accessible. done
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 16:06 |
|
I'd echo Hieronymous in saying that the best genre writing by far is found in the mystery field, especially the hardboiled and noir areas. Raymond Chandler is wonderful to read. I'm particuarly fond of John D MacDonald; been thinking about doing an effort post on him, though I'm dissuaded by the idea that maybe three or four people here have read him and that I think most people in this thread want to read about fantasy writers it seems.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 17:49 |
|
I would like to see posts from other genres if you have the time and I expect I'm not alone.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 18:37 |
|
I'm all for talking mystery and related. Ellroy is my favorite author there. I keep meaning to get around to reading Perfidia before This Storm shows up.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 21:02 |
|
Western as well would be neat to look at. I always forget that "genre" isn't just sci-fi, fantasy, and Clancy-style thrillers.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 21:06 |
We have a good mystery thread that's just getting rolling -- the knox's rules one. At the moment my plan for next months BotM is to pick a genre mystery to help that thread get.kickstarted -- it has great potential but almost went to archives.
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 21:31 |
|
Good genre fiction is an oxymoron. The term in itself means it's not good enough to be real fiction.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 21:53 |
Flesnolk posted:Good genre fiction is an oxymoron. The term in itself means it's not good enough to be real fiction. The word "genre" only has so much meaning. It's either a critical term or a marketing one. It doesn't really have much use as a marker of merit or quality because for any genre you can almost always find a work of fiction that has literary merit and fits the markers of the genre (e.g., fantasy : Tolkien (or The Tempest), mystery : Maltese Falcon, etc.)
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 22:24 |
|
|
# ? Dec 7, 2024 04:31 |
|
Oh, hey, just noticed that this new thread started up. I'll get back to Way of Kings tomorrow. Since it's been established that Sanderson sucks at the technical aspects of writing, I'll move on to discussing characters and plot.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2019 22:43 |