|
Aka the Something Awful forums. Yes, the SA forums does have a mobile layout option, but you have to go into your profile and enable it first. Then it goes around and implements it like this:
Korthal fucked around with this message at 18:43 on Apr 29, 2019 |
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 17:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 17:39 |
|
|
The android app is really good.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 17:16
|
|
|
nice link OP!
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 17:16
|
|
|
I still had a flip phone.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 17:17
|
|
|
Lowtax can barely afford to keep the lights on around here let alone fund a bunch of new development
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 17:19
|
|
|
The reader app is great though
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 17:21
|
|
|
Chinatown, I can't edit the post because the edit button got cut off by the mobilizer I also can't quote you for the same reason.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 17:55
|
|
|
At least half of the mobile website layouts used today are still garbage that function so poorly that you have to load the desktop page anyway.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:05
|
|
|
I'd love to read the restaurant's menu but its in Flash.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:05
|
|
|
Visiting any website on a tiny phone screen sucks, OP. Use the app. Really. It's perfect. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ferg.awfulapp&hl=en
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:07
|
|
|
Why the gently caress did they get rid of flash Some loving rear end in a top hat literally just went no more flash, and it was gone
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:15
|
|
|
Everything about the internet is over designed and broken now
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:31
|
|
|
Oh they had mobile websites, they just sucked
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
There, I downloaded the app. I didn't want to because I don't want to have to use an app for every website, but since I've already spent money on this site, I guess it's ok.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:42
|
|
|
Now I can edit the OP too.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:43
|
|
|
File attachments! That's how I can show you what the mobile website looks like on my phone. Nvm lmbo the site only supports 1280x1024 attached pictures.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
Julius CSAR posted:Oh they had mobile websites, they just sucked How are you supposed to look at porn? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:46
|
|
|
Korthal posted:File attachments! That's how I can show you what the mobile website looks like on my phone. Goes to show you how stupid website browsing on a phone is. How big's the screen, 5, 6 inches? And it's beyond 1280x1024 pixels. Yet you can't see the whole site. Yeah, the app is great.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:47
|
|
|
"mobile layouts" are loving garbage and i can't think of a site i use where i'd rather use the mobile version than the real one on my phone. gently caress designers for thinking scrolling is a sin and that it's good to blow font sizes up 300x so that one third of a sentence fits on the screen at once
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:50
|
|
|
looks fine to me
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:51
|
|
|
Bronze Fonz posted:Visiting any website on a tiny phone screen sucks, OP. seriously look at how poo poo this is. the subforum list has like three forums on the screen at once and meanwhile the plain old desktop site shows me everything under "main" and half the subforums under "discussion" at once. look at how it can only fit like three one-sentence shitposts on the screen. why do people like this
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:52
|
|
|
crazy eyes mustafa posted:Why the gently caress did they get rid of flash That rear end in a top hat was Steve Jobs  Adobe probably wanted royalties for the rights to use flash and he more likely went no way, I'll make YOU obsolete so that's what happened.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:53
|
|
|
gey muckle mowser posted:looks fine to me That's exactly it, thanks
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:54
|
|
|
crazy eyes mustafa posted:Why the gently caress did they get rid of flash i can almost understand whining about apple killing flash when it was actually happening, and thus a new and scary change, but at this point we're like a decade out from the death of flash having been clearly demonstrated to be an unambiguously good thing for the internet
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:57
|
|
|
Just get the app and shut the hell up OP.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 18:57
|
|
|
When I searched "awful app" in the playstore, the first two things that showed up were dating apps heh
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 19:01
|
|
|
Post from a proper computer. Telephones are for txting and calling sex numbers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 19:07
|
|
|
Icochet posted:Post from a proper computer. Telephones are for txting and calling sex numbers. Something Awful is blacklisted on the company firewall. Thanks to jerks like you
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 19:21
|
|
|
Awful app is great OP, you should try it!crazy eyes mustafa posted:Why the gently caress did they get rid of flash Probably because it is constantly being exploited by hackers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 19:22
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:Just get the app and shut the hell up OP.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 19:27
|
|
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:i can almost understand whining about apple killing flash when it was actually happening, and thus a new and scary change, but at this point we're like a decade out from the death of flash having been clearly demonstrated to be an unambiguously good thing for the internet we still have autoplay sounds, we still have autoforwarding bullshit, only now we also have focus-stealing ads, full-page interstitials, and countdown timers, and they take up more resources and more screen real estate, and they're harder to block. when flash was malicious all you had to do was block a single .swf file, now it's this loving arms race to make ads harder and harder to extricate from content, and you never know when your plug-in is going to cut some kind of shady backroom deal to whitelist certain companies the other problem was security and that was always more just something that people agreed was true than a problem I ever had to actually deal with
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 19:30
|
|
|
ClamdestineBoyster posted:How are you supposed to look at porn? Kids these days. We could only read erotica on our phones.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 19:34
|
|
|
i still have the old awful app in a folder that i copied from itunes just incase i want to use my iphone 3gs again
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 19:59
|
|
|
The point I'm making is the SA mobile site is poopoo and I shouldn't have to use an app to browse a website on my phone in 2019.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 20:08
|
|
|
Even Fark.com has a good mobile site. Let that sink in.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 20:09
|
|
|
Mobile layout was what Lowtax was hoping his new spine would help him do
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 20:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 20:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 17:39 |
|
|
Cubone posted:we still have autoplay sounds, we still have autoforwarding bullshit, only now we also have focus-stealing ads, full-page interstitials, and countdown timers, and they take up more resources and more screen real estate, and they're harder to block. when flash was malicious all you had to do was block a single .swf file, now it's this loving arms race to make ads harder and harder to extricate from content, and you never know when your plug-in is going to cut some kind of shady backroom deal to whitelist certain companies this does not match my experience at all. umatrix makes poo poo-blocking about as simple as it can be and usually keeps sites from deploying "whitelist us in your adblocker" modals too. saying ads are harder to extricate from content now seems just factually wrong when you used to be able to embed your garbage content in a .swf and have it be literally inseparable from the ads. all you have to do now is stop the ad javascript from running. also flash security was an enormous problem whether you ignored it or not
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2019 20:18
|
|