|
its acceptable for writing tiny little lovely scripts. its bad for anything bigger than a single file. use a statically typed language
|
# ¿ May 17, 2019 10:12 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 19:11 |
|
Stereotype posted:python is deterministically typed so if you don't know what type something is it is because you hosed up, which isn't python's fault. yes, that's correct. I gently caress up all the time, because I'm an idiot. in a statically typed language the compiler helps me to gently caress up less. me loving up is not python's fault, nevertheless I fault python for not providing that safety net.
|
# ¿ May 17, 2019 12:30 |
|
Shaggar posted:python, like all p-langs, is bad and should be avoided in favor of better languages like c# or java.
|
# ¿ May 17, 2019 15:01 |
|
once i thought that python was good, but now i have seen the truth and i know that shaggar was right
|
# ¿ May 17, 2019 15:17 |
|
echinopsis posted:this doesn’t make sense oic. youre the tiny bug child of python.
|
# ¿ May 17, 2019 23:16 |
|
Skim Milk posted:it's me, the colossal idiot adding type hints to my code as though my coworkers even know what mypy is yeah idk what the point of adding that poo poo to python is. if you find yourself wanting that, it is a sign that you need to switch to a statically typed language yesterday.
|
# ¿ May 18, 2019 23:56 |
|
Origin posted:i'm using python 3 right now for a data analysis project and it works very well for me. it is at least better than the excel disasterscapes i've seen in the past. this mcdonalds burger is considerably tastier than the bucket full of pig poo poo i ate last week
|
# ¿ May 23, 2019 13:55 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 19:11 |
|
latest opinion re: Python: It is still Bad
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2019 14:51 |