Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Colonel Cancer
Sep 26, 2015

Tune into the fireplace channel, you absolute buffoon
And frankly this whole "but planet killer asteroid! Or a total nuclear war!" talk is just unhealthy and stinks of unreasonable attachment to the status quo. There are plenty of things out there that could fry Earth and the whole solar system drat near instanteously and with no recourse and so what? You can't control everything. (Wandering black holes and massive bursts of radiation from some far away star are pretty sick)

Also let's face it a total nuclear war wouldn't even kill the whole human race. Collapse nations and possibly ecosystems on a large scale and cause untold misery for the survivors, sure! But we are already on that path without any nukes exploding lmao.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Supreme Allah
Oct 6, 2004

everybody relax, i'm here
Nap Ghost
I welcome spontanous global destruction

But it would also be nice to reach Mars in my lifetime

Shibawanko
Feb 13, 2013

It'll never happen because there's almost nothing concrete to be gained

Trumps Baby Hands
Mar 27, 2016

Silent white light filled the world. And the righteous and unrighteous alike were consumed in that holy fire.

Colonel Cancer posted:

And frankly this whole "but planet killer asteroid! Or a total nuclear war!" talk is just unhealthy and stinks of unreasonable attachment to the status quo. There are plenty of things out there that could fry Earth and the whole solar system drat near instanteously and with no recourse and so what? You can't control everything. (Wandering black holes and massive bursts of radiation from some far away star are pretty sick)

Also let's face it a total nuclear war wouldn't even kill the whole human race. Collapse nations and possibly ecosystems on a large scale and cause untold misery for the survivors, sure! But we are already on that path without any nukes exploding lmao.

"stinks of unreasonable attachment to the status quo" is how i would describe the lame assholes itt who don't want boldly reach out into to the one place untouched by capitalism

Shibawanko
Feb 13, 2013

CJacobs posted:

Realistic but not optimistic: Moon civilization is not going to happen until humanity is on the brink of death or Earth is uninhabitable because the process of getting it livable is a more enormous money sink than anything else in history and nobody's willing to put up the cash.

No other planet or moon will ever be more livable than the Earth itself, even after complete endgame global warming or nuclear war or both combined, the Earth will still be more habitable than any other place outside of Earth.

Ideas about terraforming the moon or mars or sending people there against "overpopulation" or to create a "multi planet species" or whatever is all part of Muskism. None of that poo poo is possible, nor would any of it matter even if it were.

The only two reasons to go into space are for scientific purposes, or maybe maybe maybe to extract specific heavy metals at high cost and risk.

SniperWoreConverse
Mar 20, 2010



Gun Saliva

Colonel Cancer posted:

Like a bright eyed scifi dork in me thinks that artificial space stations are the best bet for actually living off world (artificial gravity through spin, radiation shielding is simple once you have industry not down a gravity well and complete control over ecosystem) but none of that is going to happen for a variety of reasons.

Also I really don't envy those brave first martians who get the news that killer asteroid carrying like a thousand nukes crashes into Earth and kills everyone so they all starve to death or succumb to the environment.

obviously you just make a cylinder. Split it longways -- half of it will be water, half will be land. The ocean doubles as a window so when sunlight comes in the rads will be eventually filtered out, and also you won't get gross slimes living on the glass if it's getting pummeled by raw photons

You can prob grind up moon rocks or something for the land and just catch a comet for the ocean. Bam, done. Do a few rockets that have seeds and baby crabs or w/e, this thing will be kicked in in maybe a week, month tops.

Relayer
Sep 18, 2002
Houston we have an problem!

Colonel Cancer
Sep 26, 2015

Tune into the fireplace channel, you absolute buffoon
Status quo i was referring to is the naive assumption that humanity will survive forever and ever and that it's inherently a good thing to begin with.

It's like some lame secular version of afterlife.

Things end and it's fine. Don't pretend that you particularly care about some hypothetical human beings who will live 5000 years from now or that their culture will be in any way compatible to yours.

Shibawanko
Feb 13, 2013

interwhat posted:

Human salvation is off-planet. Any hesitation now, spells doom for millions in the future.

How do people even end up thinking stuff like this? What do you imagine space travel involves, and what do you imagine will happen on Earth that makes people buy into the Musk poo poo about colonizing another world?

cardiacarrest123
Apr 10, 2016
People eat poo poo on tall mountains on this planet and you think humanity can survive in the void? Lmao

Colonel Cancer
Sep 26, 2015

Tune into the fireplace channel, you absolute buffoon
drat why is a digital copy of Man After Man never around when you need it!

Trumps Baby Hands
Mar 27, 2016

Silent white light filled the world. And the righteous and unrighteous alike were consumed in that holy fire.

Shibawanko posted:

How do people even end up thinking stuff like this? What do you imagine space travel involves, and what do you imagine will happen on Earth that makes people buy into the Musk poo poo about colonizing another world?

Every planet is doomed on long enough of a timeline. One way or another the earth is going to become uninhabitable for humanity, probably by our own hand. Escaping that requires us to make baby steps out into the solar system over many centuries. The tech that makes that possible won’t spontaneously appear when we make a certain level of terrestrial progress: it’ll only come about with another space race for resources.

That space race will also produce tech that we haven’t imagined yet that’ll also have other applications on earth

And on the most basic level it’s safer for our long term survival to not all be clustered in the same place

It’s the right thing for us to do as a species. What the next few generations do will decide if we all die here or if we populate the galaxy.

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

Colonel Cancer posted:

Also I really don't envy those brave first martians who get the news that killer asteroid carrying like a thousand nukes crashes into Earth and kills everyone so they all starve to death or succumb to the environment.

I always wanted to write a story about this, like The Martian x1000. A little grim for me to actually want to get around to it though.

Colonel Cancer
Sep 26, 2015

Tune into the fireplace channel, you absolute buffoon
This "human race seeds the galaxy' is just manifest destiny bullshit and you should know better.

marijuanamancer
Sep 11, 2001

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
space fervor does help rally stupid people towards the cause of science tho

Jesustheastronaut!
Mar 9, 2014




Lipstick Apathy
Look, I don't have a PHD, but I read several pages of the Chernobyl GBS thread so I think I know what I'm talking about when I say that you guys are really overcomplicating this stuff. We just go to the moon and build The Gateway. That all. After construction of the Gateway is completed, we can start to build a Cybernetics Core and use that technology to convert our Gateway into a Warpgate. At that point, there isn't really any additional overhead to worry about and we can start colonizing pretty much any planet we want.

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011

Exploring the hollow earth should be a priority IMO, even before exploring the moon

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Opferwurst posted:

Exploring the hollow earth should be a priority IMO, even before exploring the moon

yeah and what's the plan when we breach Hell smart guy?

Zippy the Bummer
Dec 14, 2008

Silent Majority
The Don
LORD COMMANDER OF THE UKRAINIAN ARMED FORCES
it would be cool if we had a moon base, so i'm in favor of it

nullEntityRNG
Jun 23, 2010

Mostly pseudo-random.
You think if NASA opens up a kickstarter and patreon it would help funding chances?

Look I really want to go to space one day, stop being all pessimistic about it.

Helical Nightmares
Apr 30, 2009

Fojar38 posted:

yeah and what's the plan when we breach Hell smart guy?



Anyway NASA released more information about Project Gateway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m9u_pjnI44

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-awards-artemis-contract-for-lunar-gateway-power-propulsion

quote:

In one of the first steps of the agency’s Artemis lunar exploration plans, NASA announced on Thursday the selection of Maxar Technologies, formerly SSL, in Westminster, Colorado, to develop and demonstrate power, propulsion and communications capabilities for NASA’s lunar Gateway.

“The power and propulsion element is the foundation of Gateway and a fine example of how partnerships with U.S. companies can help expedite NASA’s return to the Moon with the first woman and next man by 2024,” said NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine. “It will be the key component upon which we will build our lunar Gateway outpost, the cornerstone of NASA’s sustainable and reusable Artemis exploration architecture on and around the Moon.”

The power and propulsion element is a high-power, 50-kilowatt solar electric propulsion spacecraft – three times more powerful than current capabilities. As a mobile command and service module, the Gateway provides a communications relay for human and robotic expeditions to the lunar surface, starting at the Moon’s South Pole.

This firm-fixed price award includes an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity portion and carries a maximum total value of $375 million. The contract begins with a 12-month base period of performance and is followed by a 26-month option, a 14-month option and two 12-month options.

Spacecraft design will be completed during the base period, after which the exercise of options will provide for the development, launch, and in-space flight demonstration. The flight demonstration will last as long as one year, during which the spacecraft will be fully owned and operated by Maxar. Following a successful demonstration, NASA will have the option to acquire the spacecraft for use as the first element of the Gateway. NASA is targeting launch of the power and propulsion element on a commercial rocket in late 2022.

“We’re excited to demonstrate our newest technology on the power and propulsion element. Solar electric propulsion is extremely efficient, making it perfect for the Gateway,” said Mike Barrett, power and propulsion element project manager at NASA’s Glenn Research Center in Cleveland. “This system requires much less propellant than traditional chemical systems, which will allow the Gateway to move more mass around the Moon, like a human landing system and large modules for living and working in orbit.”

Charged with returning to the Moon within five years, NASA’s lunar exploration plans are based on a two-phase approach: the first is focused on speed – landing on the Moon by 2024 – while the second will establish a sustained human presence on and around the Moon by 2028. We then will use what we learn on the Moon to prepare to send astronauts to Mars.

For more information about NASA’s Moon to Mars exploration plans, visit:

https://www.nasa.gov/moontomars

Who are these "Maxar Technologies" guys?

http://investor.maxar.com/investor-...A-lunar-gateway

quote:

As a global leader of advanced space technology solutions, Maxar is at the nexus of the new space economy, developing and sustaining the infrastructure and delivering the information, services, and systems that unlock the promise of space for commercial and government markets. The operations of DigitalGlobe, SSL (Space Systems Loral) and Radiant Solutions were unified under the Maxar brand in February; MDA continues to operate as an independent business unit within the Maxar organization. As a trusted partner with 5,900 employees in over 30 global locations, Maxar provides vertically integrated capabilities and expertise including satellites, Earth imagery, robotics, geospatial data and analytics to help customers anticipate and address their most complex mission-critical challenges with confidence. Every day, billions of people rely on Maxar to communicate, share information and data, and deliver insights that Build a Better World. Maxar trades on the New York Stock Exchange and Toronto Stock Exchange as MAXR.

Maxar also works on satellites contracted by the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency to develop realtime analytics and 'living maps.'

So the Maxar guys appear to be established players in the space game, though whether they can deliver the power and propulsion element of Gateway remains to be seen.

What are other countries doing?

China: https://www.wsj.com/video/china-makes-historic-moon-landing-boosting-rivalry-with-us/2F611BA4-1FBD-4CF2-BD71-99E3A0B5B437.html

China landed on the far side of the moon this past January. They also claim to want to build a "lunar palace."

https://qz.com/1262581/china-lays-out-its-ambitions-to-colonize-the-moon-and-build-a-lunar-palace/

quote:

Inspired by the thousand-year-old fairy tale, China has ambitions to build a real-life lunar palace on the moon, according to its space agency. The China National Space Administration released a video (link in Chinese) on April 24, the country’s third space day, laying out its plans to build a scientific outpost on the moon.

“China’s dream of residing in a lunar palace will soon become a reality,” said the video, which recapped the country’s achievements and plans in space.

The proposed lunar outpost would be made of multiple tube-shaped cabins where scientists would live and conduct their research. The agency didn’t provide a specific timeframe, but Wu Weiren, the chief designer of China’s moon-exploration project, told state broadcaster CCTV in March that it could happen by 2030 (link in Chinese). The ideal location would be the moon’s south pole, which might have water and enough sunlight, he added.

quote:

China has already built a prototype for its lunar palace on earth. A project, known as Yuegong-1 or Lunar Palace 1, has student researchers living in a moon-like environment and subsisting on mealworms and crops they cultivate using fertilizer made from their own waste. The experiment is expected to finish next month.

Still, China’s first colonizers to the moon won’t be human. Instead, seeds of potatoes and arabidopsis—a small flowering plant belonging to the mustard family—along with silkworm cocoons, will hitch a ride with the Chang’e-4 lunar probe.


Europe

Inspirational Video based on landing on a comet:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32vlOgN_3QQ

http://exploration.esa.int/moon/60261-back-to-the-moon-the-sustainable-way/

quote:


BACK TO THE MOON THE SUSTAINABLE WAY

09 May 2018

To live and work on the Moon, humans need oxygen, water and other consumables for life support, propellant production and building habitats. Making use of local resources may be the key to a truly sustainable stay on the lunar surface.

ESA is looking for the technology that can turn indigenous material into oxygen and water as these are critical resources for sustaining long-term human operations in deep space. Engineers and scientists are also investigating ways to produce construction materials on the Moon.

The extraction and processing of local resources into useful products and services on another celestial body is often referred to as In-Situ Resource Utilisation or ISRU.

ESA is currently preparing a lunar surface mission to demonstrate technologies needed for in-situ resource utilisation on the Moon. One goal is to show by 2025, that it is possible to produce water or oxygen on the Moon. The mission may also create the opportunity to deliver scientific payloads directly to the lunar surface.

ESA aims to foster new models of doing space business. Rather than developing a complete lunar mission from scratch, this new approach contemplates the possibility of buying a ride on a lander developed by the private sector to deliver European payloads safely to the lunar surface.

Working together with commercial partners may open the door for new ESA mission concepts.

Likely the above will be done with robots. There is no mention of a manned European mission to the moon.

The ESA (European Space Agency) is also collaborating with the Chinese National Space Administration (CNSA).
http://exploration.esa.int/moon/60958-joint-request-for-information-from-cnsa-and-esa/

quote:

29 November 2018

The purpose of the present Joint Request For Information (RFI) is to identify and map existing scientific activities and opportunities for cooperation between European and Chinese scientific teams to support the missions of both agencies, enhance the overall scientific return and to prepare for an international lunar research station.

So do we have a second international space race on our hands?

Helical Nightmares
Apr 30, 2009

Moridin920 posted:

lol let me tell you about California's rail project

lol I was tempted to make a thread on this but it might be just too sad.

Shibawanko
Feb 13, 2013

Trumps Baby Hands posted:

Every planet is doomed on long enough of a timeline. One way or another the earth is going to become uninhabitable for humanity, probably by our own hand. Escaping that requires us to make baby steps out into the solar system over many centuries.

That's clearly bullshit though, it's only true in the abstract sense that all life on Earth will eventually die because of a few possible causes, but the causes that fall under "probably by our own hand" are either better simply prevented, or simply don't warrant going into space because there's no environment there that can support human life better than Earth can even if things get really bad here. A ruined, irradiated, warmed up Earth is still more habitable than the moon or mars by a very, very long stretch, so going to those other places and tediously try to make them habitable does nothing meaningful to prevent extinction if that's your goal for some reason. Earth is simply always the best bet, unless we're talking ridiculously long term things like the sun going red giant, in which case being on Mars probably won't help you that much, and by which point there is probably no meaningful sense that you can talk about "humanity" anymore.

quote:

The tech that makes that possible won’t spontaneously appear when we make a certain level of terrestrial progress: it’ll only come about with another space race for resources.

That space race will also produce tech that we haven’t imagined yet that’ll also have other applications on earth

And on the most basic level it’s safer for our long term survival to not all be clustered in the same place

It’s the right thing for us to do as a species. What the next few generations do will decide if we all die here or if we populate the galaxy.

Life doesn't work like Civilization. There's no linear "tech tree" that you can climb without diminishing returns. There are no "tech levels". There are no "civilizations" that progress in this way. New technologies are invented all the time, but there are engineering and energy constraints that cannot be simply overcome by that. Terraforming, at least on the scale Musk & co like to talk about, is almost impossibly difficult when you actually look at what it would take: importing a huge mass of buffer gases, heat and somehow establishing a magnetic field shielding an entire planet or moon. Just because something is possible theoretically does not mean it will ever be materially possible.

Julius CSAR
Oct 3, 2007

by sebmojo
Tom Hanks never got to walk on the moon in Apollo 13 but Forest Gump did in the book.

Makes u think

Deadbeat Poetry
Mar 6, 2004

Sorry if my costume scared you

Colonel Cancer posted:

This "human race seeds the galaxy' is just manifest destiny bullshit and you should know better.

Dumb


Shibawanko posted:

Space is cold we're better off staying here forever

Also dumb


Hell yeah brother let's go to loving SPACE

cardiacarrest123
Apr 10, 2016
im pretty sure humanity opened a gateway to the hell dimension a long time ago ,if you smell what im cookin

SniperWoreConverse
Mar 20, 2010



Gun Saliva

Zippy the Bummer posted:

it would be cool if we had a moon base, so i'm in favor of it

Lord Frankenstyle
Dec 3, 2005

Mmmm,
You smell like Lysol Wipes.

basic hitler posted:

That downer assessment completely ignores the finite nature of so many resources we are burning thru and wasting that can't be replenished or recycled. We're probably gonna have to bring stuff back or go offworld to get more stuff

As a species can't even figure out the whole Don't poo poo Where You Eat thing. By the time we're desperate enough that mining asteroids for resources is cost effective we won't have the resources to go do it.

SniperWoreConverse
Mar 20, 2010



Gun Saliva
Pff me am use fire, me think me know where it good to poo poo.

Colonel Cancer
Sep 26, 2015

Tune into the fireplace channel, you absolute buffoon
Now that I've read about Chinese astronauts surviving on a diet of pooworms, I think I'm ready to revise my opinion.

Whooping Crabs
Apr 13, 2010

Sorry for the derail but I fuckin love me some racoons
Why are we going to the moon if there's no oil there?

dew worm
Apr 20, 2019

The James Webb telescope was supposed to launch like literally 10 years ago lmao

Colonel Cancer
Sep 26, 2015

Tune into the fireplace channel, you absolute buffoon
We will go the the moon and my god we'll make oil there. Every dead colonist - and there will be many- will go into the tanks and be transformed into the purest hydrocarbon fluids.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
I can't wait to go see this next month when it's released to the UK. Only uses original footage and interviews that were restored and then new music


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSTucPDS0-8

Moridin920
Nov 15, 2007

by FactsAreUseless
There's 0 reason to not at least have an early warning system for incoming meteors coupled with a means to be able to do something about it. Yeah there's other poo poo that could kill us that we couldn't prevent at all but that doesn't mean we should just say gently caress it and do nothing ever.

NASA was supposed to be working on a mission that could land on an asteroid for study and to possibly test viability of such a landing in case maybe they need to redirect something in the future but idk what ended up happening with that. Probably dead because of funding.

Moridin920
Nov 15, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Colonel Cancer posted:

And frankly this whole "but planet killer asteroid! Or a total nuclear war!" talk is just unhealthy and stinks of unreasonable attachment to the status quo. There are plenty of things out there that could fry Earth and the whole solar system drat near instanteously and with no recourse and so what? You can't control everything. (Wandering black holes and massive bursts of radiation from some far away star are pretty sick)

Like this line of argument is just odd? Yeah you can't control everything but you still wear a seatbelt. It's still a good idea to wear a helmet when doing dangerous sports.

Mitigating risk is a Thing, it's not like well we can't be perfectly safe so there's no reason to bother at all.

Besides the odds of a meteor/comet going through the keyhole and loving us are way higher than some random neutron star frying us.

Moridin920 fucked around with this message at 21:19 on May 28, 2019

Salt Fish
Sep 11, 2003

Cybernetic Crumb
My ideal of the coolest future is one where you're born in a 30 cubic meter spaceship, live your entire life in it, have kids, then die never having seen a plant or animal, and 3000 generations pass by and your descendants finally arrive at a habitale planet, only to land and be eaten by the native equilvent of bears.

Colonel Cancer
Sep 26, 2015

Tune into the fireplace channel, you absolute buffoon
Who then die from earthborne disease, causing a planetwide pandemic that wipes out large animal life and it takes millenia for the ecosystem to recover

Woden
May 6, 2006

Moridin920 posted:

NASA was supposed to be working on a mission that could land on an asteroid for study and to possibly test viability of such a landing in case maybe they need to redirect something in the future but idk what ended up happening with that. Probably dead because of funding.

Think it was just some bullshit mission idea to try and justify the SLS. No idea why you'd need to send people to an asteroid when we've got robots.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Damo
Nov 8, 2002

The second-generation Pontiac Sunbird, introduced by the automaker for the 1982 model year as the J2000, was built to be an inexpensive and fuel-efficient front-wheel-drive commuter car capable of seating five.

Offensive Clock

Jose posted:

I can't wait to go see this next month when it's released to the UK. Only uses original footage and interviews that were restored and then new music


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSTucPDS0-8

i saw it a while back. it was really good you will enjoy it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply