|
Dang. I missed the vote. Not that it would've changed much other than plop another tick on Bloodthirsty Gods since all of my other choices were the top ones.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2019 04:46 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 16:52 |
|
HereticMIND posted:This is why we needed the Bloodthirsty Gods facet—so we could become even more of a monster in the dueling ring. Also because sacrificing people is fun and gives us some pretty sweet stat bonuses. With the sacrificing we've been doing before, it would've seemed fitting to take Bloodthirsty Gods an integrate it into our system.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2019 12:57 |
|
I hope the great Warrior Queen finds some adequate disciples to bestow her own martial wisdom and experience. Alternatively Tse bestows her knowledge of diplomacy to a devout young scholar. Edit: The biggest shame is that they didn't adopt a child or more and teach them both the Queen's martial skill and the High Priestess's diplomatic skill Xelkelvos fucked around with this message at 00:44 on Jun 19, 2019 |
# ¿ Jun 18, 2019 23:50 |
|
Tse probably channeled more than a bit of her wife.
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2019 14:29 |
|
I predict this Chinese princess is gonna inherit the will of Gyalyum
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2019 16:40 |
|
habeasdorkus posted:Until the revenant ghost of Tse murders her. Don't you mean Possess her?
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2019 04:49 |
|
Pacho posted:If we have any say in the set up for EU4, I propose that instead of a monolithic and huge Inca Empire we get a loose confederacy of kingdoms, like the HRE. In our timeline the Incas were most likely aymara (there's a theory that the ruling houses -panacas- spoke an aymaran language between them) lording over a vast, recently conquered/vassalized quechua and aymara territory. For this scenario we can have that the eurasian plague still wrecks Cusco and gives the regional powers more autonomy. I think this will give the are more dinamism, variety and intercontinental colonial situations. Also, if we are playing with the Sunset Invasion notion, please, let's have Naylamp as a leader of an advanced polynesian empire https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naylamp What would be more interesting a Mayan conquest of Polynesia or a Polynesian conquest of South America? Or Both?
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2019 21:21 |
|
B
|
# ¿ Oct 26, 2019 16:27 |
|
A Why would we ever chose the boring option?
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2019 04:49 |
|
Ferrovanadium posted:So is Catholicism just slowly devolving into a cannibal cult...? The cannibalistic corpse of Catholicism.
|
# ¿ Nov 7, 2019 05:15 |
|
No. Not yet.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2019 17:11 |
|
Showing how close the vote was really spurred a push by the No faction it looks like
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2019 04:20 |
|
Tse could've prevented this
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2019 11:49 |
|
Traits: Brilliant Strategist, Genius, Strong, Uncouth, Craven, Stubborn, Cruel, Zealous, Erudite, Deceitful, Patient, Lustful and Possessed.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2019 08:55 |
|
The time is Now. YES
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2019 23:43 |
|
i81icu812 posted:Love how Asia is rapidly dividing into megablobs, China/Mongolia/Tibet + Timor The China-Tibet Megablob will be something, but I'd wager the space unseen on the CK2 map is either a mess or more blobs courtesy of the preoccupation of the Chinese with Tibet and the Mongols.
|
# ¿ Dec 21, 2019 03:24 |
|
the Americas are gonna be wild though. I hope Australia is already colonized by the Inca or Maya or something or they were invaded by some Polynesian group who also decided to follow the Sun
|
# ¿ Dec 21, 2019 05:09 |
|
Kangxi posted:I will have votes on potential outcomes for the rest of the world. What kind of flags?
|
# ¿ Dec 21, 2019 17:08 |
|
Obviously, we should take a look at the leader of the Jerusalem Raj in honor of the Legislative LP going on atm.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2019 03:27 |
|
My personal interests are Iceland, Sapmi, and Portugal. The Bulgarian Company is in an interesting place too. Who's controlling those isles North of the British Isles?
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2019 03:51 |
|
Rody One Half posted:As far as giving Tibet vassals goes, that'd be an idea except the arc of the last couple of rulers was the increasing centralization of power. There are already two giant blobs on the map sitting right next to each other, with a few smaller blobs that we know of. Three of them: the two in Africa and China, are basically of indeterminate size and could theoretically be bigger than what we'd assume.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2019 21:32 |
|
Snipee posted:Perhaps we could create another major schism within the Bon faith to make religious conflict in Tibet even more crippling? I’m not sure what’s the best way to make sure that we don’t steamroll everyone besides various events to encourage revolts and regular hellwars against China. A new Bon Reformation ala the Protestant one would wreak havoc in Tibet and Mongolia. Giving Mongolia something to match Tibet economically would also do a lot to keep us in check (unless we team up to eat the rest of Eurasia and the world)
|
# ¿ Dec 30, 2019 22:53 |
|
1 - B 2 - A 3 - A 4 - C 5 - C 6 - A 7 - C 8 - B 9 - C 10 - C 11 - C
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2019 22:40 |
|
Ibblebibble posted:Question, is the Far West Europe and the Southwest Africa?
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2020 00:30 |
|
Tulip posted:I spent my new years with somebody I'd never met doing an unsolicited rune and tarot reading on me between shots, so I'm feeling augury-friendly. I need to know more augurs irl
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2020 05:47 |
|
HereticMIND posted:...wait, is this one of those exams where ALL choices are the wrong answer? There's no right answer. There's no wrong answer. Whether they're good or bad is a mystery though. Xelkelvos fucked around with this message at 08:35 on Jan 2, 2020 |
# ¿ Jan 2, 2020 08:17 |
|
I have a preliminary tally done, but in the interest of not tilting the vote, I wont reveal the tabulations (you can do the work if you want). Instead, I'll give out some useless bits. Popularity: C appears most on answers. Not by more than 10 though. Unpopularity: The least popular answer is behind the middle one by more than 10 though. The gap between the largest and the smallest is not more than 20. Dead Heats: There's currently 3 ties, but only one is nominally relevant. ACAB: One person did ACAB other than the person who did only ACAB Favorite Letter: 7 was the highest number of one letter in a single person's answer set Button Mashing: 5 was the largest amount in a row of a single letter. They didn't belong to the above person. Unoriginality: 4 people have the same set of responses.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2020 09:13 |
|
Kangxi posted:At my current count, we have two ties, and two more within two votes. With the amount of entries and such, there's likely a possibility for error somewhere in someone's data so comparing notes will probably be helpful. I have 39 entries with the latest posts and only one tie for first with one other w/i 2 votes.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2020 03:13 |
|
Congrats on being number 50
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2020 06:06 |
|
Some more dumb statistics since the vote is over (note: I think I literally one question off from Kangxi's results, but it affects nothing. There's an A in my results in Q5 that should be a C but idk where it is and gently caress looking for it. Gross favoritism: Here's the gross totals of A/B/C choices: A - 196 B - 167 C - 198 (should be 195/199 instead) C was pretty much the favorite response of everyone except for very early on and for a period of 5 votes near the end. Efficiency: Counting the tie for each response, A won 5 times with an average of 39.2 votes per victory. C won the same amount, but needed 39.6 votes per victory. B won thrice with 55.7 votes per victory making it a failure in multiple ways. Unquestionable: Q5 had the largest gap between 1st and 3rd with a 29 person difference (should be 28). Q5 also had the largest gap between 1st and 2nd. As the vote progressed, Q5 flew ahead early and never stopped. Highly Contentious: Otoh, Q3 was always in a tight race and the biggest gap was 3 points between. There were 8 points throughout the vote where they were in a 3-way tie. Less contentious: Besides the Tie, Q1 had its 1st and 2nd choices off by 1 vote Q6, 9, and 11 were next closest with a 2 vote difference. Q9 and Q11's choices were all 2 votes apart from each other while Q6 was more a two way race between B and C. Personal Biases: Two people picked the same letter 7 times. One of those was for B, one was for A.12 people picked the same letter 6 times. Everyone voted for every letter at least once Who to blame? Throughout the vote, there were a number of two way ties, but the very end eliminated all of them and restored the 3 way tie. Chatrapti broke a tie for Q1 but restored the 3 way tie. If there's any dumb stats things people want to ask, I can try to answer it.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2020 04:38 |
|
habeasdorkus posted:Could also include Korea and Manchuria. Should be fun. Gonna turn out the Ainu defeated the Yamato and then invaded the Korean Peninsula and are in the middle of trying to square their circle of conquest through Sakhalin to claim all territory around the Sea of Japan
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2020 20:21 |
|
Technowolf posted:There's another Pacific island that we dare not, yet must, contemplate. Island? Why not an entire continent?
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2020 22:09 |
|
I did just discover a mod where you can play in Japan but there's likely issues with it and idk what years it runs though. Also no Korea.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2020 23:15 |
|
Kangxi posted:
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2020 21:11 |
|
So now that things are starting to get into gear, what did all of the voting mean?
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2020 02:12 |
|
I'm mostly curious what the alternatives would have been.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2020 03:33 |
|
It is sometimes said that less is more, but for the great Tibet, the land of plenty, more is more. Quantity
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2020 21:58 |
|
I'll root for Min. Not because they have Edit: I'm dumb Xelkelvos fucked around with this message at 23:04 on Apr 25, 2020 |
# ¿ Apr 25, 2020 20:58 |
|
Turns out I don't know my Chinese geography all that well and always thought that big island was Hong Kong and not some place I hadn't really heard of before
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2020 23:04 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 16:52 |
|
Reiterating my vote for Quantity Ideas. Greatness depends on what the empire can generate and provide and more of each will ensure Tibet continues even if the most incompetent of rulers sits upon the throne. The people should be heard, but to hand them the reigns of power would be ill-advised. Letting them all be heard and not just the nobles or the priests or the common rabble, is necessary. But ultimately, the power should remain in the hands of the line that have steered Tibet for centuries, but having the people be present in their satisfaction or in their rage may at least make the King or Queen a more direct awareness of their moods. General Estates Xelkelvos fucked around with this message at 02:00 on May 18, 2020 |
# ¿ May 18, 2020 01:27 |