|
Anshu posted:I'm pretty sure she means a filial sort of love. I wouldn't put it past Weber to not mean romantically, especially considering her eventual husband was around the same age, maybe even older, when she married him.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 01:12 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 07:18 |
|
Raoul is 52 years older than Honor (96 to her 44 in this book) where Hamish is only 39 years older. That 13 years may not seem like all that much of a difference between the two men, but you should also consider the contexts in which they meet Honor. Raoul met Honor when she was at Saganami, presumably sometime during her initial Cadet training from the ages of 14 to 18, while Hamish never meets Honor until the end of this book, at which point she's a grown woman. By the time Hamish has his epiphany ten years down the line at the age of 93, Honor herself is 54 – and neither of them perform their attraction to the other until ~8 years later, when they're 101 and 62, respectively.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 02:18 |
|
Anshu posted:Raoul is 52 years older than Honor (96 to her 44 in this book) where Hamish is only 39 years older. That 13 years may not seem like all that much of a difference between the two men, but you should also consider the contexts in which they meet Honor. Raoul met Honor when she was at Saganami, presumably sometime during her initial Cadet training from the ages of 14 to 18, while Hamish never meets Honor until the end of this book, at which point she's a grown woman. By the time Hamish has his epiphany ten years down the line at the age of 93, Honor herself is 54 – and neither of them perform their attraction to the other until ~8 years later, when they're 101 and 62, respectively. You type all that out like it really matters as to whether or not Weber likes 20-30 year old women hooking up with much older men. Especially since the age difference is the same through all of that and Honor still looks 40 years younger than him no matter what.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 03:06 |
|
Kchama posted:You type all that out like it really matters as to whether or not Weber likes 20-30 year old women hooking up with much older men. Especially since the age difference is the same through all of that and Honor still looks 40 years younger than him no matter what. Look if Weber's going to crystallize everything else about 19th-21st century Earth (quotations, famous people, etc.) as the standard everyone's culture is based off of, why not the "half your age plus seven" rule of thumb? (I agree it's dumb)
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 04:09 |
|
I never got that vibe about Honor and that particular admiral in that book, though. Is your opinion coloured by having read the later books?
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 04:12 |
|
Kchama posted:You type all that out like it really matters as to whether or not Weber likes 20-30 year old women hooking up with much older men. Especially since the age difference is the same through all of that and Honor still looks 40 years younger than him no matter what. The age difference stays the same (that's how time works), but as a fraction of their respective ages it decreases. A 30yo with a 20yo is iffy, but a 40yo with a 30yo much less so, and a 60yo with a 50yo barely merits mention. This is a more extreme example, both in terms of the size of the gap and the lifespans involved, but the principle still applies. As for your accusation regarding Weber's taste for pairing younger women with older men, the only other examples springing to my mind are from The Apocalypse Troll and (God help me) the Empire of Man series he did with John Ringo. I can't recall any similar age gaps portrayed with similar levels of okay-ness in the Honorverse spinoffs and short stories, or Dahak, or the Multiverse. Safehold could maybe count depending on how you want to judge a theoretically immortal 1000-year-old-but-has-only-been-awake-for-about-30-years male-passing/identifying robot with the uploaded mind and memories of a long-dead female space naval officer getting together with a 50-plus-year-old spymistress/madam. What I'm saying is, you're trying to make out like this is some skeevy urge Weber habitually expresses through his writing, but the evidence for that assertion is pretty thin on the ground as far as I can remember.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 04:42 |
|
Wibla posted:I never got that vibe about Honor and that particular admiral in that book, though. Is your opinion coloured by having read the later books? Funnily I never would have thought of it except for how it's written, because this is exactly the kind of writing you use for when unadmitted romantic feelings, right down to the 'I never got to tell him that I loved him'. Anshu posted:The age difference stays the same (that's how time works), but as a fraction of their respective ages it decreases. A 30yo with a 20yo is iffy, but a 40yo with a 30yo much less so, and a 60yo with a 50yo barely merits mention. This is a more extreme example, both in terms of the size of the gap and the lifespans involved, but the principle still applies. I mean it was an off-hand joke because Honor absolutely has a canon thing for older men, so it's not like you can't claim she doesn't.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 05:03 |
|
Kchama posted:I mean it was an off-hand joke because Honor absolutely has a canon thing for older men, so it's not like you can't claim she doesn't. [citation needed] Counterpoints: throughout the entire series she has had only three romantic/sexual relationships. 1. as a student at Saganami Island, with another student 2. in the next two books, with someone of a similar age (or at least not so distant as to be commented on) 3. White Haven, the only one with an actual significant age gap and mainly remarkable because he physically looked twice her age at the time it went public. I'm not seeing a clear age preference here.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 05:19 |
|
Aerdan posted:[citation needed] ... you do realize that you can have a thing for multiple types at once, right? Gosh, she likes both old dudes and dudes who I presume are about her age. (I actually couldn't find anything on how old Paul is, because Weber completely skimped out on any kind of details about him, despite him being very important to Honor. Can anyone tell me what he looks like without resorting to a book cover?)
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 05:24 |
|
...and? My point was that you can't conclusively say that she has a thing for older men because the sample size of older men she is romantically & sexually attracted to is one. Not two. One. Later books make it clear that there was no romantic or sexual attraction involved in her relationship with Courvosier.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 05:28 |
|
Aerdan posted:...and? My point was that you can't conclusively say that she has a thing for older men because the sample size of older men she is romantically & sexually attracted to is one. Not two. One. Later books make it clear that there was no romantic or sexual attraction involved in her relationship with Courvosier. What part of 'it was an off-hand joke' did you not read? Weber was just writing really shittily there and I was making fun of him for it, especially considering she really DOES marry a much older man.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 05:47 |
Kchama posted:So despite getting a basically point-blank direct hit on the Troubadour, the Troubadour's combat capability is only minorly impaired and only a minimal amount of sacrific--- I mean crew were lost. You know, I wonder if the actual reason why ships in these books have such over-bloated crews is because he was replicating how Age of Sail ships had massive crews because they were more or less expected to lose them (and with how the crew were constantly dicked over, probably were intended to be lost). Even without detailed context, that's not really "light" damage. Going to the wiki, Troubador is a Chanson-class ship, with 3 missile tubes and three lasers in each broadside. This means that one hit took it down to one missile and two lasers working perfectly, with another missile and laser working very poorly. That's crippling until the damage is fixed, and not exactly "light" damage even once repairs are made. The ship's details are not explicitly given in this book, but the ship loses a radar (which explicitly cripples anti-missile capability), has a missile launcher destroyed outright, loses a magazine and (presumably, given the "total loss" statement) everything in it, cripples two other weapons (one laser and one missile tube are controlled by the on mount backup crews, which is one of the reasons for large crews in the first place), and the engine is significantly damaged. When they talk about the damage not being "as bad as it could have been", that is comparing it to "the ship blew up with all hands" or "we have no offensive capacity remaining". All from a pair of hits from a totally obsolete unit. The engine damage, of course, has pretty severe repercussions later. quote:Pushing that lame catchphrase, I see. I don't even know how Weber fans came to love it, as it's just so bland. Personally it wouldn't be so bad except that Weber simply can not resist calling it out and shoehorning it in. As before, I contrast it with Jean Luc Picard's trademark "Make It So" - which is only used to confirm orders. If "Let's be about it" was only used in appropriate contexts, and if he didn't have other officers not only use it but constantly call Honor out as the source, it would not be nearly as grating. quote:Decorated Marine Officer... so that must be why he's a good guy and not a snivelling coward or Just Plain Wrong. Turning retired military into diplomats is one of Manticore's hats in this series. No explanation is given except for Raoul (who was explicitly chosen in part because Grayson has a navy fetish), but there's several others in the series, and it isn't hard to manufacture one if you need it.
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 06:15 |
|
Gnoman posted:Going to the wiki, Troubador is a Chanson-class ship, with 3 missile tubes and three lasers in each broadside. This means that one hit took it down to one missile and two lasers working perfectly, with another missile and laser working very poorly. That's crippling until the damage is fixed, and not exactly "light" damage even once repairs are made. Oh I was mostly just going by what Honor said as to how it didn't reduce their combat power by much. I kind of wonder if he didn't have the specifications in place. Since it does point out that indeed it's defensive capability was hosed, but that it didn't have serious combat power loss except for the ammo destruction. And yeah that's how I feel about 'Let's be about it' exactly. Yeah it just seems kind of weird as military -> diplomat seems like a very odd career move. I didn't mention it with Raoul since yeah, as you said it was an intentional move to appeal to Grayson.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 07:11 |
|
Kchama posted:Oh I was mostly just going by what Honor said as to how it didn't reduce their combat power by much. I kind of wonder if he didn't have the specifications in place. Since it does point out that indeed it's defensive capability was hosed, but that it didn't have serious combat power loss except for the ammo destruction. The damage was overstated by Gnoman. They have one intact broadside, have lost a good chunk of their missile magazines, and are blind in one arc. Honor orders them to tie in with Fearless to cover that gap in sensor coverage. It's really only the engine and magazine hits that were particularly damaging.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 07:23 |
Most authors wouldn't have nailed down the details at this point, but Weber's background is in wargaming. Wargamers (and note that I count myself in this) are an odd lot, highly focused on detail. I think this is a "shading" issue - let me pull up the whole quote.quote:His voice was harsh with pain, and Honor's eyes were dark as she nodded, but for all that, they both knew Troubadour had been incredibly lucky. The loss of one of her forward missile tubes and an entire magazine had hurt her offensive capability, and Radar Three's destruction left a dangerous chink in her anti-missile defenses. But her combat power was far less impaired than it might have been, and the casualties could have been much, much worse. She'd been lamed, and until the alpha node was replaced she couldn't generate a forward Warshawski sail, but she could still maneuver and fight. The bolded parts can be read, entirely reasonably, as meaning anything from "it is more than a scratch, but we'll deal with it" to "the ship is still a ship and not a burning wreck or a cloud of vapor, so this isn't a worst-case scenario". Weber probably meant it to be about the middle of that spectrum, while you're reading it somewhere in the lower parts. The ship has one broadside completely untouched, so she can fight on pretty well, but is practically crippled on the other. EDIT: mllaneza posted:The damage was overstated by Gnoman. This is a fair statement. I was almost certainly overstating things in reaction, but it was not deliberate.
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 07:24 |
|
Gnoman posted:Most authors wouldn't have nailed down the details at this point, but Weber's background is in wargaming. Wargamers (and note that I count myself in this) are an odd lot, highly focused on detail. I think this is a "shading" issue - let me pull up the whole quote. I genuinely didn't think it was deliberate in any case. That's why I asked if Weber didn't think about the details. You bring up that he does have a background in wargaming and thinks about the details, but one of the big things in the Honorverse is that there's a LOT of issues with the details. The actual wargame had to change a lot because of the contradictions in details.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 07:33 |
Kchama posted:I genuinely didn't think it was deliberate in any case. That's why I asked if Weber didn't think about the details. You bring up that he does have a background in wargaming and thinks about the details, but one of the big things in the Honorverse is that there's a LOT of issues with the details. The actual wargame had to change a lot because of the contradictions in details. The major screwup was a wargamer screwup through-and-through. He used one unit of measurement as the one that mattered, and just used "this sounds about right" for the ones that contribute to volume. The other changes to the wargame are more of the "these battles take place in a vacuum, without any long-term considerations that would normally constrain the captains - so we've modified things a bit to reflect those constraints" type* that are common wargame fodder.
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 07:42 |
|
Gnoman posted:The major screwup was a wargamer screwup through-and-through. He used one unit of measurement as the one that mattered, and just used "this sounds about right" for the ones that contribute to volume. The other changes to the wargame are more of the "these battles take place in a vacuum, without any long-term considerations that would normally constrain the captains - so we've modified things a bit to reflect those constraints" type* that are common wargame fodder. Actually, there was stories about how they'd look up descriptions of the ships and they wouldn't actually match what Weber gave them as their loadouts. Like, for example, one ship was described as 'lightly armed for its class' but by Weber's stats was the most heavily armed ship of its class.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 08:24 |
Kchama posted:Actually, there was stories about how they'd look up descriptions of the ships and they wouldn't actually match what Weber gave them as their loadouts. Like, for example, one ship was described as 'lightly armed for its class' but by Weber's stats was the most heavily armed ship of its class. Those I haven't heard, and are probably a result of shifting ideas in his head - he nailed down *that* ship, but only had a vague notion about where it sat in the "galaxy's fighting warships" rankings. At this point, though, we're trying to mindread somebody from thirty years ago, and that's probably going to be a fruitless endavour.
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 08:27 |
|
Kchama posted:Actually, there was stories about how they'd look up descriptions of the ships and they wouldn't actually match what Weber gave them as their loadouts. Like, for example, one ship was described as 'lightly armed for its class' but by Weber's stats was the most heavily armed ship of its class. The work done for the wargame and related fan projects found its way back into the books. The "Great Resizing" which reconciled his tonnages with his ship dimensions for example. The wargame project needed hard numbers for every ship, and those pretty much kept on as references for the books. And then it just didn't loving matter with six figures of missiles in a single salvo.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 08:28 |
|
Gnoman posted:Those I haven't heard, and are probably a result of shifting ideas in his head - he nailed down *that* ship, but only had a vague notion about where it sat in the "galaxy's fighting warships" rankings. Yeah. But it's just why I figure the difference between the stats and what the book says, because the book was written before he bothered too much with specifics. mllaneza posted:The work done for the wargame and related fan projects found its way back into the books. The "Great Resizing" which reconciled his tonnages with his ship dimensions for example. The wargame project needed hard numbers for every ship, and those pretty much kept on as references for the books. And then it just didn't loving matter with six figures of missiles in a single salvo. Yep that's indeed correct. He just didn't rewrite the old books to fit that, so they still have some pretty amazing things there. Though one thing he forgot to change was crew number and missiles/etc, so after the Great Resizing (and maybe even before I dunno) he has ships that have 120% of their mass in missiles.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 09:07 |
|
90s Cringe Rock posted:In 2010 David Betz, a senior lecturer in war studies at King's College, London, cited Singularity Sky as a model for a proposal to undermine the Taliban's hold over Afghanistan, and strengthen the country's legitimate government, by giving every resident of the country a free mobile phone. He said it would "create a real communications space and 'let ideas find their own levels'". In Stross's novel, he noted, "the contact of the lesser developed culture with the advanced one is utterly devastating for the status quo of the former. The parallels are pretty obvious." Why are all these people so stupid? What good does he think this will do? Does he think the poppy growers are phoning each other on rotary Bakelite antiques?
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 10:40 |
|
There is nothing old dudes love more than writing old dudes getting with young women so while it was a silly argument back there I could totally see it
|
# ? Jun 11, 2020 14:28 |
|
was thinking recently about how to articulate the difference between john ringo and tom kratman, two men who can sorta easily become congealed together in one's brain both men have written an extended series that can be summarized as "here's how I would do the Global War on Terror if I was in charge, instead of those liberal cucks in the CIA", both deploying fundamentally identical assumptions about the origin and parameters of that conflict however: in ringo's War on Terror power fantasy, a lot of time is spent on the logistics of building an incredibly awful and creepy sex harem out of "rescued" child sex-trafficking victims, or on just stuff Ringo thinks is cool, like celtic music and beer in kratman's War on Terror power fantasy, most of the libidinal urges (at least for the author insert protagonist) all center on torture and killing, with normal fulfillment possible only through the lens of secondary and tertiary characters, the overall intent remains laser-focused on retributive violence. Whenever kratman does include something you'd expect to be a sex pervert subplot, it usually ends up being merely an opportunity to soapbox about Women In Combat or somesuch. so both men share the attributes of "hideous fascist" and "pervert", but I posit that the difference is that john ringo is a pervert who is a nazi, whereas tom kratman is a nazi who is a pervert also, ringo is a former infantry grunt whose author-insert character is a big-dicked SEAL from the super extra special SEAL team civilians don't know about, whereas kratman is a former infantry officer whose author-insert character is a former infantry officer, so in a sense we could say kratman is more self-confident and/or more delusional Kchama posted:I wouldn't put it past Weber to not mean romantically, especially considering her eventual husband was around the same age, maybe even older, when she married him. you're reaching here there is no indication of anything untoward between honor and courvosier at any point you and I just agreed on the "huh, weber's books are weirdly non-horny" point a short while ago, so idk why you're pursuing this. However, while I don't think there is a pattern of older man/younger woman relationships in weber's work, I would note that there is a pattern of superior/subordinate relationships with dubious power dynamics, which is maybe worth examining if you want to get into this PupsOfWar fucked around with this message at 03:40 on Jun 13, 2020 |
# ? Jun 13, 2020 03:33 |
|
PupsOfWar posted:you're reaching here Like I said, I was making fun of how he and wrote it poorly wrote Honor's reaction to his death and used wording that you'd see for someone talking about their love interest, and even pointed out that before then I never thought anything between them.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 03:46 |
|
Kchama posted:Like I said, I was making fun of how he and wrote it poorly wrote Honor's reaction to his death and used wording that you'd see for someone talking about their love interest, and even pointed out that before then I never thought anything between them. In your first response, you dig in your heels on the romantic interpretation. Here you start shifting blame onto Weber's use of language, but continue to insist on the romantic angle. It's not until this post that you introduce the idea that the joke was about the mismatch between the language and the emotion Weber is attempting to portray. We can see you moving the goalposts in real time.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 04:52 |
|
I don't like David Weber as an author, but I don't know of a pattern of age inappropriate romances in his books. In the Safehold books, which I know better than the Honor Harrington books, the characters who are in romantic relationships are with people near their own age, and while, sure, in the Honor books, Hamish is a lot older than Honor, this is also a series where a 101 year old and a 62 year old can have a child (and still be functional members of society, which isn't true of a lot of 101 year olds nowadays) , which suggests a certain kind of flattening of the aging process which maybe makes that sort of an age gap less remarkable than otherwise. And they're both consenting adults, and even pass the "half your age plus seven" rule, so other than the possibility of jokes about cradle robbing, I don't see the relationship as icky on age grounds.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 05:12 |
|
Epicurius posted:I don't like David Weber as an author, but I don't know of a pattern of age inappropriate romances in his books. In the Safehold books, which I know better than the Honor Harrington books, the characters who are in romantic relationships are with people near their own age, and while, sure, in the Honor books, Hamish is a lot older than Honor, this is also a series where a 101 year old and a 62 year old can have a child (and still be functional members of society, which isn't true of a lot of 101 year olds nowadays) , which suggests a certain kind of flattening of the aging process which maybe makes that sort of an age gap less remarkable than otherwise. And they're both consenting adults, and even pass the "half your age plus seven" rule, so other than the possibility of jokes about cradle robbing, I don't see the relationship as icky on age grounds. I know he has a couple in his fantasy stories, plus Honor marrying a much older man physically, hence the joke. There's nothing actually scandalous about it, it was just a poke. The whole Hamish thing is bad for other reasons. Give it a loving rest gently caress off.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 05:30 |
|
I think the Honor/Hamish thing happened because Honor is supposed to be like Nelson who had a genuinely scandalous relationship with some guy's wife. But Honor is too pure and morally upstanding to actually do anything that interesting.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 05:39 |
|
General Battuta posted:I think the Honor/Hamish thing happened because Honor is supposed to be like Nelson who had a genuinely scandalous relationship with some guy's wife. But Honor is too pure and morally upstanding to actually do anything that interesting. Yeah it's suppose to be Honor's version of Hornblower's affair with Lady Barbara Wellesley or however it's spelled while he's married to Maria Mason. In Horatio's case, both Maria and Barbara's husband both die so they're free to get together, and then he cheats on HER with a French lady he was having an affair with when he was with Maria. Honestly, Honor having an affair with a Havenite would have done a lot to put her more into the big Haven plot instead of all of the critical stuff happening off-screen for some reason. HONOR OF THE QUEEN CHAPTER SEVENTEEN Anyways, back to how Honor is really hot about old men. No wait, this is a Masada/Haven chapter, sorry. My bad. quote:Commander Manning paused outside the briefing room and drew a deep breath. CAPTAIN YU IS A GOOD GUY WHO NEVER HAD ACCEPTED WELFARE OR ANY OTHER ACT OF PURE EVIL blah blah blah I don't really like Captain Yu purely because of stuff like this. It's only here because Captain Yu is going to defect and become a good guy before this is all over. Yanakov and Raoul are better characters. quote:And if the Captain had ever had reason to feel out of sorts, now was certainly the time, Manning thought as he pressed the admittance button. What's a flux core, anyways? No judgement, I just dunno what it is but I assume it's something somebody knows. quote:"Goddamn it." Yu ran a hand through his hair in a harried gesture he never let a Masadan see, and then his free hand suddenly slammed the table top. They sure are. Though Yu doesn't exactly have room to talk since Haven is just as dumb. quote:This time Manning was tactfully silent. Anything he said could only make it worse at this point. So a destroyer was able completely stop a Light Cruiser and Battlecruiser with their anti-missile and only suffered at all because it was trying to cover an entire fleet at the same time. This bodes really ill for Haven, who basically cannot expect to win a real fight right now as a result. The destroyer would have lost eventually but would have been, ironically, a lot bigger threat if it had been alone and not needed to protect a bunch of idiots in bad ships. quote:That had smarted badly enough for the "immigrants" in Thunder's crew—it had been their hardware that showed up so poorly, after all—but it had more than smarted for the Masadans. Sword Simonds had been livid as Madrigal and the two surviving Graysons raced out of their missile envelope. Manning was still astonished the Captain had managed to hang onto his temper as the sword ranted and railed at him, and despite his outward calm, Manning knew he'd been as close to murder as the exec had ever seen him when Simonds refused to order Franks to bypass Madrigal and pursue the Grayson survivors. This is fair, since, actually. The Madrigal had outperformed by a ton so Simonds has every right to be afraid of a ship that the two bigger ships he had been told were more advanced and were supposedly easily capable of defeated had trouble against, even if it was for only a surprise volley. But it was still a surprise volley and by that nature should have been a good deal more dangerous than a regular volley, and had been, as stated above, swatted down. quote:Well, of course they would have been, but the Sword's response to the threat had proven once and for all that he was no tactician. If his ships had dispersed, he might have had to write off one or two cruisers to Madrigal's missiles, but the others would have been outside the destroyer's effective engagement range. She simply wouldn't have had the reach to hit that many targets. But he'd insisted on backing Franks' decision to go in together for mutual support—and paid the price hesitant tactics almost always exacted. The Masadan ships had actually decelerated to meet Madrigal in an effort to bring their own weapons into effective range and keep them there! I'm not sure WHY this was such a 'no tactician' move, to be honest. Madrigal had been shown to be a much bigger threat than the two fleeing ships and getting rid of it was a very valid manuever considering if the two cruisers weren't able to defeat it quickly enough it would have a good feast on the ships since as a destroyer, much less a Manticorean destroyer, it would have had a good chance to catch them and pick them off from behind, whereas at least focusing the Madrigal down took out the only real threat to their ambitions in the system. If they hadn't sat on their hands afterwards they could have easily just completed all of their objectives and gone home happy. quote:It had been like a mob armed with clubs charging a man with a pulser. Madrigal's missiles had blown the cruisers Samson and Noah and the destroyer Throne right out of space as they closed, and then the Masadans entered her energy range and it only got worse. The cruiser David had survived, but she was little more than a hulk, and the destroyers Cherubim and Seraphim had been crippled before they ever got into their energy range. I mean, the Thunder struggled to hit the single destroyer that was having to protect an entire fleet at the same time, so maybe that's why he was so hesitant. The destroyer seemed relatively superior. quote:"Do you know what that insufferable little prick said to me?" Yu whirled to face his exec, one finger pointed like a pistol, and his eyes blazed. "He told me—told me, drat him!—that if I hadn't lied to him about my ship's capabilities, he might be more inclined to listen to me now!" A snarl quivered in the Captain's throat. "What the gently caress does he expect is going to happen when his frigging 'admirals' have their heads so far up their asses they have to pipe in air through their navels?!" Oh Yu. Your ships got shown up so of course he's doubting you. quote:Manning maintained his silence and concentrated on looking properly sympathetic, and Yu's lips worked as if he wanted to spit on the decksole. Then his shoulders slumped, and he sank back into his chair. quote:They'd flatly refused to attack Grayson with their remaining combat strength in Yeltsin. As near as Yu could figure out, they were afraid Manticore might have slipped some sort of superweapon to the Graysons. That was the stupidest idea they'd had yet, but perhaps it shouldn't be so easy to blame them for it. They'd never seen a modern warship in action before, and what Madrigal had done to their antiquated fleet terrified them. Intellectually, they had to know Thunder and Principality were many times as powerful as Madrigal had been, but they'd never seen "their" two modern ships in action. Their capabilities weren't quite real to them . . . and Yu's credibility had been damaged by Madrigal's escape from the ambush, anyway. quote:For one whole day, Simonds had been adamant about the need to suspend all operations and seek a negotiated settlement. Yu didn't think Masada had a hope in hell of pulling that off after their sneak attack and Madrigal's destruction, but the sword had dug his heels in and insisted he simply didn't have the tonnage in Yeltsin to continue. quote:Valentine had pointed out that both Thunder and Principality had far more powerful hyper generators than any Masadan starship. In fact, their generators were powerful enough to extend their translation fields over six kilometers beyond their own hulls if he redlined them. That meant that if they translated from rest, they could take anything within six kilometers with them when they did. And that meant that if Masadan LACs clustered closely enough around them, they could boost the lighter vessels into hyper space. Kept those people from dying horribly too, so that was a pretty good idea in the end. quote:Of course, the towing ships had been crowded almost beyond endurance by packing in the crews who couldn't survive aboard their own ships and, as Manning had said, the strain on their tractors had been enormous. But it had worked—and Yu had found Thunder and Principality playing tugboat back and forth between Endicott and Yeltsin's Star. Of course, the real need for this is to delay the bad guys so that Honor can return and not find Grayson already defeated, but at least it's a better excuse than normal. quote:"I need to talk to the Ambassador," he said suddenly, and Manning's eyebrows rose at the apparent non sequitur. "About getting out from under Simonds' thumb," Yu clarified. "I know we have to maintain the fiction that this is a purely Masadan operation, but if I can give them a good, hard push just once, we can tie this whole thing up in a couple of hours." Theisman by the way is another Good Guy important character. He's just stuck with Haven. quote:Sword of the Faithful Matthew Simonds knocked on the door and walked through it into the palatially furnished room. His brother, Chief Elder Thomas Simonds of the Faithful of the Church of Humanity Unchained, looked up, and his wizened face was not encouraging. Senior Elder Huggins was seated beside Thomas, and he looked even less encouraging. A pretext to what? This is basically conquest either way. Did you guys seriously think that the Graysons would roll over to Masada? Like the moment this Maccabeus reveals that he's in cahoots with Masada he's dead, no matter how highly ranked he is, and it's going to be obvious if Masada is going to get anything of value out of this dumb operation. Conquest is basically all they have at this point. quote:"With all respect, Elder Huggins," Matthew began hotly, "that—" You mean 'because of your attacks' as nothing solidifies a regime's hold one obvious enemies. quote:"Do you concur, Deacon Sands?" Why didn't they have this conversation like two days ago when the ferrying was still going on? Whatever. It's not a bad chapter. Stuff doesn't really happen and it's all entirely exposition but it's at useful exposition. Though it kind of is entirely just "Masadans are idiots".
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 10:17 |
Kchama posted:
This is pretty obviously technobabble that's just specific enough not to sound like meaningless nonsense but vague enough that you aren't accidentally calling something out. quote:So a destroyer was able completely stop a Light Cruiser and Battlecruiser with their anti-missile and only suffered at all because it was trying to cover an entire fleet at the same time. This bodes really ill for Haven, who basically cannot expect to win a real fight right now as a result. The destroyer would have lost eventually but would have been, ironically, a lot bigger threat if it had been alone and not needed to protect a bunch of idiots in bad ships. The text is clear about why this happens, but the why of the why isn't fully explained. This is one of those areas where Weber just assumed the audience would follow it. The short of it is, in a one-on-one fight with Madrigal, either Havenite ship would have won handily. The only reason they did not do so was because of the exact scenario of the ambush - they were able to fire a single salvo (albeit one that was twice the size of what they'd throw in a standard engagement) against an entire fleet. They did so in almost complete ignorance of the capabilities of the only ship in that fleet that mattered - none of the Grayson ships had a chance of stopping any of the fire. They know Manticore's ahead of them, but they don't know how much. So they assume what looks like a reasonable margin of inferiority, and assign their missiles based on that. Unfortunately, Madrigal's better than they thought, and is able to blunt a lot of their fire. They'd have crippled or killed her if they'd only targeted her, but they don't want to shoot only at Madrigal, because that wastes their advantage. If they don't maul the Graysons, then it turns into a straight up Grayson-Masada naval fight where the Masadans (who Haven wants to win) have only marginal advantage. So the ambush is less successful than they hoped, but the Grayson fleet is damaged, and Madrigal's crippled enough that the Masadans can evade most of her weapons range. This means that the Masadans can go around Madrigal, defeat the Grayson Navy in detail, and then watch the two "immigrant" ships eventually move around and take Madrigal out. War's over - Masadan victory. Instead, they ignore the fleet they can kill to bum rush the ship they're mad at, and which outclasses them massively. They manage to kill her, but only after taking losses that eliminate their ability to destroy the fleet that was their objective in the first place. quote:I dunno why they didn't just make the two Haven ships do the fighting if they were so convinced there's a Manticorean ship out there. Leaving the Masadans at home and fighting with just the "immigrant" ships would be a massive slap in Masada's face, and destroy any plausible deniability that Haven's not directly involved. It would immediately become a "Haven has attacked and destroyed Manticoran ships in time of peace during the conquest of a neutral star system", which is the worst of all possible worlds for Haven. quote:A pretext to what? This is basically conquest either way. Did you guys seriously think that the Graysons would roll over to Masada? Like the moment this Maccabeus reveals that he's in cahoots with Masada he's dead, no matter how highly ranked he is, and it's going to be obvious if Masada is going to get anything of value out of this dumb operation. Conquest is basically all they have at this point. Masada's plan here is actually very good. Maccabeus isn't going to simply announce "HA! I AM MASADAN SPY. I SURRENDER GRAYSON IN THE NAME OF MASADA. HA!". He's going to somehow take over the government, "solve" the impending crisis and get rid of the Masadan invaders, pull out of the Manticoran alliance, and then turn Grayson into Masada by slow "reform". This not only gives them their holy planet, but does so in a way that makes it all but impossible for Manticore (or any other Grayson allies) to dispute said conquest without looking like a conquistador - the legitimate head of the planet considering alliance will have rejected said alliance with the support of Grayson's people. This is explicit in this chapter's text, even though it doesn't yet say who Maccabeus is or how he's going to take power. For ways to take over the planet and get away with it, this one is hard to beat. It is Haven who has the lovely plan here. Their plausible deniability isn't anywhere close to plausible enough, and they think Masada's going for simple military conquest. Even without a formal treaty, Manticore wouldn't look like a conqueror intervening in that scenario - rather, they'd be heroically riding to the rescue -, and nobody would doubt that Haven was involved in the conquest in the first place. Even if that doesn't lead immediately to war because Manticore isn't ready, it still gives Manticore a ton of ammunition in the all-important propaganda war. If war does break out immediately, all you're doing is effectively guaranteeing that you start it out with a resounding defeat.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 11:04 |
|
General Battuta posted:I think the Honor/Hamish thing happened because Honor is supposed to be like Nelson who had a genuinely scandalous relationship with some guy's wife. But Honor is too pure and morally upstanding to actually do anything that interesting. Nelson was bonking one Lady Emma Hamilton, including living with her and her husband, leaving his wife for her, and doctoring their daughter's birth certificate so they could pretend he was only the godfather. Haven't read any Weber but I doubt Honor dies anything half so entertaining.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 11:15 |
|
Gnoman posted:This is pretty obviously technobabble that's just specific enough not to sound like meaningless nonsense but vague enough that you aren't accidentally calling something out. quote:The text is clear about why this happens, but the why of the why isn't fully explained. This is one of those areas where Weber just assumed the audience would follow it. The Graysons only had a heavily damaged Light Cruiser and an undamaged Destroyer, versus a mildly damaged Light Cruiser and a mildly damaged Destroyer. If the 'immigrants' had helped more the Graysons should have been much more screwed. I mean, I don't think they helped any with the Madrigal after the first salvos and it doesn't specify why. Maybe Simonds refused to let them help? No idea. Also another issue is if they had tried to avoid the Madrigal to attack the fleeing ships, if the 'immigrants' didn't help out immediately the Madrigal would have gotten to them before they could catch the fleeing Graysons and it would have been extremely over for them, which seems to be the rationale for why they decided to smash the Madrigal first, because they were afraid of what it could do if they didn't. They might not have been wrong. The real tactical blunder was not letting the immigrant ships help more, as the Graysons already had the information that the Masadans had at least a heavy cruiser, so you'd want to shoot the messenger very quickly. So without the 'immigrant ships' helping, it does seem suicidal not to wipe out the Madrigal first. But with the 'immigrants' helping the Madrigal would have been quickly destroyed and the Graysons would have been able to be run down before they could pass news along. quote:Leaving the Masadans at home and fighting with just the "immigrant" ships would be a massive slap in Masada's face, and destroy any plausible deniability that Haven's not directly involved. It would immediately become a "Haven has attacked and destroyed Manticoran ships in time of peace during the conquest of a neutral star system", which is the worst of all possible worlds for Haven. Oh, I didn't actually mean 'leave the Masadans home'. I just meant have them be a bigger part of the ambush instead of sticking to the shadows because it seems pretty clear that they're out in the sticks enough that there's not going to be any clarity, and the moment they helped in the ambush it became instantly clear that Masada somehow got its hands on modern cruisers anyways, so it'd be more of a 'in for a penny, in for a pound' situation. quote:Masada's plan here is actually very good. Maccabeus isn't going to simply announce "HA! I AM MASADAN SPY. I SURRENDER GRAYSON IN THE NAME OF MASADA. HA!". He's going to somehow take over the government, "solve" the impending crisis and get rid of the Masadan invaders, pull out of the Manticoran alliance, and then turn Grayson into Masada by slow "reform". This not only gives them their holy planet, but does so in a way that makes it all but impossible for Manticore (or any other Grayson allies) to dispute said conquest without looking like a conquistador - the legitimate head of the planet considering alliance will have rejected said alliance with the support of Grayson's people. This is explicit in this chapter's text, even though it doesn't yet say who Maccabeus is or how he's going to take power. For ways to take over the planet and get away with it, this one is hard to beat. I feel like the issue of the plan is how much it relies on a lot of 'somehows'. Even if Maccabeus was high up in the government, 'somehow' take over the government is never a plan that you can rely on. And looking up the actual plan, Masada's invasion doesn't really seem SUPER relevant to it, or could have been better timed. quote:It is Haven who has the lovely plan here. Their plausible deniability isn't anywhere close to plausible enough, and they think Masada's going for simple military conquest. Even without a formal treaty, Manticore wouldn't look like a conqueror intervening in that scenario - rather, they'd be heroically riding to the rescue -, and nobody would doubt that Haven was involved in the conquest in the first place. Even if that doesn't lead immediately to war because Manticore isn't ready, it still gives Manticore a ton of ammunition in the all-important propaganda war. If war does break out immediately, all you're doing is effectively guaranteeing that you start it out with a resounding defeat. To be totally fair to Haven, they think Masada wants a military conquest because they've been trying for one forever and, to boot, that's what they told Haven the plan is. So I can't actually fault Haven for doing things in accordance to what they were told the plan was, and Yu makes it clear that Haven's actually trying to be good allies here and help Masada with their stated objective, and Masada completely refusing to actually commit out of what looks like fear completely pisses him off. Safety Biscuits posted:Nelson was bonking one Lady Emma Hamilton, including living with her and her husband, leaving his wife for her, and doctoring their daughter's birth certificate so they could pretend he was only the godfather. Haven't read any Weber but I doubt Honor dies anything half so entertaining. Spoilers I guess but no Honor is super pure so Hamish's wife gives the go ahead for them to have an affair with her permission and this is fine until Honor becomes pregnant by accident so Honor's mom convinces Emily to have a child too to try and hide this or something. But then someone leaked the news of the double pregnancy and then the queen carves out a polygamy exception for Honor so Honor can marry Hamish while his wife is still alive and there's no negative feelings or anything and everyone is happy and there's no scandal. And then in the last book Hamish dies (he didn't) and Emily immediately dies from sorrow upon hearing the news.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 21:02 |
Kchama posted:The Graysons only had a heavily damaged Light Cruiser and an undamaged Destroyer, versus a mildly damaged Light Cruiser and a mildly damaged Destroyer. If the 'immigrants' had helped more the Graysons should have been much more screwed. I mean, I don't think they helped any with the Madrigal after the first salvos and it doesn't specify why. Maybe Simonds refused to let them help? No idea. I'm not sure if the issue here is Weber's sparse descriptions or that this sort of Newtonian movement can be really tricky to visualize from text alone. Let me try to break it down more clearly. The plan is to use the main Masadan fleet to draw the Graysons straight into the fire of the ambushing battlecruiser and destroyer. This is such a classic tactic that it has a name - feigned retreat into L-shaped ambush. The Masadan fleet, sans the "immigrant" ships, is heading in one direction at an acceleration of at least 4.9 kilometers per second per second and a velocity of over .46c. The Grayson fleet is on a chasing course (they "turned and ran" when they picked up the intercepting fleet) at unstated acceleration, but they're explicitly going to be going at over .5c at the ambush point. The two immigrant ships are sitting three million kilometers from the Grayson fleet at the time of ambush with zero acceleration and zero velocity. This allows the two ambushing units to avoid detection, but it means that they are effectively out of the fight once they get their one punch in - maximum acceleration for a Sultan-class battlecruiser (according to the Wiki, I know it is in this book somewhere but I don't feel like digging for it) is 489 gravities which translates to 4.7 kilometers per second per second (acceleration in this universe is restricted by size, and Thunder is far larger than the Masadan ships, which makes it slower despite being much more modern). So getting to the same speed the Graysons are already going would take almost 32000 seconds, or almost eight hours, and that's ignoring the fact that the ships are also accelerating. THey'd catch the Grayson cripples eventually, but there's no chance that they can get there in time to affect the battle unless the rest of the Masadan fleet goes full evasive. So they're effectively out of the fight - exisitng velocity alone will have carried the other ships far away. Now, we look at Madrigal. Damage reduces her to 4.6 kp/s/s, while the mostly undamaged Masadans can do at least 4.9. At this point, the Grayson ships are headed directly away from the Masadans, and Madrigal is turning to engage. This means that the Masadans are faster by a signficiant margin. This is why Yu estimates that Madrigal would only be able to engage one cruiser, or possibly 2, out of the 4 cruisers and 6 destroyers present, leaving the other 2 and 6 to engage the Graysons with crushing superiority - because Madrigal's now in effectively the same position that Thunder and Principality were for the ambush. Instead, the Masadans slow down to engage, allowing Madrigal to destroy two cruisers and two destroyers while crippling 1 cruiser and 3 destroyers. Meanwhile, slowing down to fight gave the Graysons time to get under cover of the orbital defenses, which are explicitly stated to be quite formidable for the tech base. This should not matter, because the two "immigrant" ships can still take them, but the Masadans are faking panic to stall for their real plan. quote:Oh, I didn't actually mean 'leave the Masadans home'. I just meant have them be a bigger part of the ambush instead of sticking to the shadows because it seems pretty clear that they're out in the sticks enough that there's not going to be any clarity, and the moment they helped in the ambush it became instantly clear that Masada somehow got its hands on modern cruisers anyways, so it'd be more of a 'in for a penny, in for a pound' situation. You're right - that would have made the ambush more effective. However, remember that Yu was lying his rear end off when he told the Masadans he thought Madrigal would keep out - he fully expected Raoul to intervene. Also remember that they know Manticore's sensors are better than they thought, but have no idea how much better. They had every reason to believe that Madrigal might have picked up on the trap in time to avoid it - which would allow Yanakov and Raoul to turn the fight into a cat-and-mouse game instead of the single knockout blow he was counting on. quote:I feel like the issue of the plan is how much it relies on a lot of 'somehows'. Even if Maccabeus was high up in the government, 'somehow' take over the government is never a plan that you can rely on. And looking up the actual plan, Masada's invasion doesn't really seem SUPER relevant to it, or could have been better timed. I'll leave further discussion of this until we see who Maccabeus is and how he intends to take over (I ask people to be constrained in my LR thread if any discussion ever happens there, only right to apply the same standard here), but for now remember that these are religious zealots who literally expect God to provide. quote:To be totally fair to Haven, they think Masada wants a military conquest because they've been trying for one forever and, to boot, that's what they told Haven the plan is. So I can't actually fault Haven for doing things in accordance to what they were told the plan was, and Yu makes it clear that Haven's actually trying to be good allies here and help Masada with their stated objective, and Masada completely refusing to actually commit out of what looks like fear completely pisses him off. My point was that Haven has no endgame here. I literally cannot see a scenario where they triumph and Manticore doesn't simply roll in, blow everybody out of space, conquer both planets, and blast "Haven Did It!" through every media outlet in the galaxy. Maybe this is supposed to be a case of Haven underestimating Manticore's resolve as in last book, but at this point that feels like a stupid mistake to make.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2020 23:49 |
|
Gnoman posted:I'm not sure if the issue here is Weber's sparse descriptions or that this sort of Newtonian movement can be really tricky to visualize from text alone. Let me try to break it down more clearly. That's true, though the moment they caught the Madrigal in the trap they should have taken advantage of it. At the same time, Yu was tsking at Simonds for being hesitant when he didn't even bother getting into the fight to help out and save the rest. Also I'm not sure how winning here would have messed up the Masadan plan. Unless they were always going to let the Grayson Navy go. Like, Yu's not wrong that they're acting like total idiots. They really should not be telling Haven one thing and wanting something else completely. Hmm looking at it one thing does Yu erver try to commit his ships to it? It's depicted as there being a decent amount of time between the Madrigal stopping and the actual fight happening, as there's enough time for them to have a discussion on what to do and it doesn't seem like sending the Havenite ships in with the Masadan ships would have caused any issues, since they were all stopped at the time anyways and, unless I'm misreading, the Grayson fleet + Madrigal got out of the Masadan fleet missile range. So unless it's just leaving out Simonds refusing Yu's help at all, then.... I dunno. Simonds's entire secret plan just kind of makes everything difficult because not even this was a fatal mistake if it wasn't for Simonds demanding delays. They had a very weird window of opportunity for anything if they wanted to get it done before the Manticorean alliance happened. quote:I'll leave further discussion of this until we see who Maccabeus is and how he intends to take over (I ask people to be constrained in my LR thread if any discussion ever happens there, only right to apply the same standard here), but for now remember that these are religious zealots who literally expect God to provide. Yeah that is fair. They really are the weak link in Masada's plan. I'm not actually sure why Masada decided on this two-sided plan where they tell Haven one thing and thus can't trust them have any sort of initiative to actually fulfill the plan correctly, which is I guess why they've demanded things set up so they can obviously take over the 'immigrant' ships the moment they're ready for Maccabeus's takeover. Haven just seems to be going "Well this is what Masada wants *shrug*", which is a bit short-sighted of them.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2020 02:01 |
Kchama posted:That's true, though the moment they caught the Madrigal in the trap they should have taken advantage of it. At the same time, Yu was tsking at Simonds for being hesitant when he didn't even bother getting into the fight to help out and save the rest. quote:Also I'm not sure how winning here would have messed up the Masadan plan. Unless they were always going to let the Grayson Navy go. Like, Yu's not wrong that they're acting like total idiots. They really should not be telling Haven one thing and wanting something else completely. From what we've seen so far, the Masadan plan is "crush the Grayson navy to create a panic so our puppet can take over", with "should our puppet fail to take over, or prove faithless, we simply conquer". The brutal losses they took give an excuse to hang back, but what they wanted was the crisis. As for why the Masadans are telling Haven one thing and doing another, this is because the Masadans are trying to exploit and scam Haven. They're allowing Haven to think that Masada is the tool, when they're convinced that Masada is actually in control and Haven is the tool. More of that "God Almighty is in our corner, we cannot fail" arrogance, but it feels really real. quote:Hmm looking at it one thing does Yu erver try to commit his ships to it? It's depicted as there being a decent amount of time between the Madrigal stopping and the actual fight happening, as there's enough time for them to have a discussion on what to do and it doesn't seem like sending the Havenite ships in with the Masadan ships would have caused any issues, since they were all stopped at the time anyways and, unless I'm misreading, the Grayson fleet + Madrigal got out of the Masadan fleet missile range. So unless it's just leaving out Simonds refusing Yu's help at all, then.... I dunno. Simonds's entire secret plan just kind of makes everything difficult because not even this was a fatal mistake if it wasn't for Simonds demanding delays. They had a very weird window of opportunity for anything if they wanted to get it done before the Manticorean alliance happened. The Havenite ships and the Masadan ships, after the ambush, are very far away from each other. It is implied that there's enough time for radio consult, but that's still far less than the probably hours that actually joining up would take. As for why this isn't discussed on the page, I think Weber was really enamored of the image of Madrigal turning around to make her last stand, then giving us an entire chapter waiting to see how that turned out. This is another reason why having Harrington get in contact with Grayson in the last chapter was an error - not only does it (as you mentioned) remove the tension of her attacking the wrong target, not including it would have heightened the tension by making it possible that they'd already lost the war.
|
|
# ? Jun 14, 2020 02:19 |
|
Gnoman posted:The point is that intervening after the ambush would have been physically impossible for Yu's ships. The described geometry means that there's no way for them to get to the fight before it is all over. quote:From what we've seen so far, the Masadan plan is "crush the Grayson navy to create a panic so our puppet can take over", with "should our puppet fail to take over, or prove faithless, we simply conquer". The brutal losses they took give an excuse to hang back, but what they wanted was the crisis. As for why the Masadans are telling Haven one thing and doing another, this is because the Masadans are trying to exploit and scam Haven. They're allowing Haven to think that Masada is the tool, when they're convinced that Masada is actually in control and Haven is the tool. More of that "God Almighty is in our corner, we cannot fail" arrogance, but it feels really real. Yeah I mentioned that they are very obviously planning to take over the ships, which I guess isn't the dumbest plan ever if they pull it off right but there's a roughly 0% chance that they can, and Haven wouldn't look fondly onto Masada if they did it and Haven found out. YOu are right that they're dumb fanatics who think that everything will go their way though. quote:The Havenite ships and the Masadan ships, after the ambush, are very far away from each other. It is implied that there's enough time for radio consult, but that's still far less than the probably hours that actually joining up would take. As for why this isn't discussed on the page, I think Weber was really enamored of the image of Madrigal turning around to make her last stand, then giving us an entire chapter waiting to see how that turned out. This is another reason why having Harrington get in contact with Grayson in the last chapter was an error - not only does it (as you mentioned) remove the tension of her attacking the wrong target, not including it would have heightened the tension by making it possible that they'd already lost the war. Well I can't find anything to say that this is wrong, so you must be right. It's why I asked if I was misreading as the description of it is pretty vague, but I can't say you're wrong. Kchama fucked around with this message at 02:36 on Jun 14, 2020 |
# ? Jun 14, 2020 02:33 |
Broke a quote tag in there. As I said earlier, I'm not sure if this is Weber's fault for being really bad at describing it, or just a consequence of "this is 3d vector mechanics on a huge field, and humans tend not to be good at it". It is quite possibly both.
|
|
# ? Jun 14, 2020 02:38 |
|
Gnoman posted:Broke a quote tag in there. I ninja editted it so hah! Thanks for setting me straight.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2020 03:15 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 07:18 |
|
So I have a little time for work and I was thinking how I'd rewrite this book to be better. And I here's what I've come up with: The idea that Graysons are as big jerks as Masadans is a much better one than them being Manticore's best pals forever. Manticore's stuck with them and has to keep them but is forced to do it through clenched teeth instead of everyone being Yanakov. So don't ignore the sexual assault, and instead have it be the reason why Honor returns, pissed beyond all belief. Also, get rid of the chapters that make it clear that the Masadans are the assailants. The actual battle is omitted because Honor isn't there to witness it. She comes back and there's no message from the Admiral telling her anything. Maybe he doesn't trust the Graysons fully as they did just leave with the Manticorean destroyer and admiral and came back with neither. Plus, the ships that came around destroying everything fit the Grayson's ship data (like the LACs did) so a civil war is suspected. The ambassador perhaps left a message saying to beware the Graysons, as some are undoubtedly hostile, and that they somehow have gotten ahold of cruisers, if the ones who came back were telling the truth. Perhaps say that the admiral is MIA to give Honor reason to go hunt. The main thing this does is give tension back to the book and make things unclear as they should be, instead of knowing literally everything that happened immediately. You could even have the Admiral's Final Stand show up as a recording she gains somehow lets him have that scene he so badly wanted. Might not be the best but it'd be better.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2020 17:54 |