|
Yeah, QI vs search and seizure, but regardless the general status quo is that cops are allowed to gently caress up the law, but citizens cannot use ignorance or misunderstanding of the law as a legal defense.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2020 15:52 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 14:14 |
|
No good deed. https://eji.org/news/man-who-saved-three-prison-guards-executed-by-tennessee/ quote:Man Who Saved Three Prison Guards Executed by Tennessee
|
# ? Feb 24, 2020 05:09 |
|
mlmp08 posted:I was thinking specifically of Heien v North Carolina. That’s partially wrong. In this case, the evidence could be thrown out since there’s no probable cause for the initial stop that led to the discovery, BUT the officer can’t be held legally liable for stopping the person in the first place, regardless of how bad his PC was short of something like saying in court “I believe his race is not allowed to drive cars because I don’t believe in the bill of rights and thus I stopped him” that demonstrates he knew at the time he was violating the person’s constitutional rights. It’s actually quite common for judges to throw out evidence in most decent court systems due to police errors but overcoming qualifed immunity is an insane legal standard and there’s a reason most Western and Northern EU countries instead go the route of “pay cops more and train them better while holding them more accountable to a specific standard” rather than the comedy option we have.
|
# ? Feb 24, 2020 05:31 |
|
"Chief Justice Roberts authored the majority opinion, with Justice Kagan filing a concurring opinion in which Justice Ginsburg joined, and Justice Sotomayor filing a dissenting opinion. The majority held that a police officer's reasonable mistake of law can indeed provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to justify a traffic stop based upon that understanding. In her concurring opinion, Kagan wrote that the full text of North Carolina's law "poses a quite difficult question of interpretation, and Sergeant Darisse’s judgment, although overturned, had much to recommend it". In her dissent, Sotomayor argued that the reasonableness of a search or seizure should instead be determined by evaluating "an officer's understanding of the facts against the actual state of the law."[5][6]" Potentially this applies only to traffic stops? But the general judgment is there that police "reasonable mistake of law" can provide probable cause for a stop. What probably screws the defendant here more is that after the traffic stop, they consented to search. That and the SCOTUS general deference to cops being good to go as long as they don't publicly state that they're ignoring the law deliberately.
|
# ? Feb 24, 2020 15:44 |
|
This....does not look like a good shoot. A man who was shot by a Chicago police officer during a confrontation Friday afternoon at the CTA Grand Red Line station was initially stopped by officers for crossing between train cars, police said. https://twitter.com/FreeRangeCritic/status/1233536447749201921 Edit: As an aside, I cannot imagine how loving loud that shot must have been at a subway station surrounded by tile with no earpro.
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 19:40 |
|
Jesus gently caress what is wrong with that lady. Like yeah it can be hard to handcuff drunks but worst case scenario were trained to dig a knee or strike a limb until they decide it’s not worth it. Like at no point did that guy attempt to do anything besides be a drunk rear end in a top hat, he never reached for their guns. You don’t get to loving shoot people because you (and your partner!) suck at your job. Wait this is America, nv. Butter Activities fucked around with this message at 19:56 on Feb 29, 2020 |
# ? Feb 29, 2020 19:51 |
|
Ultimately she took the shot, but it sure sounds like her partner yells at her to shoot him far before she actually does. So whaddaya know, both cops bad.
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 21:01 |
|
mlmp08 posted:Ultimately she took the shot, but it sure sounds like her partner yells at her to shoot him far before she actually does. So whaddaya know, both cops bad. He did. He was calling for her to shoot him because he couldn't make the guy comply.
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 21:03 |
|
mlmp08 posted:Ultimately she took the shot, but it sure sounds like her partner yells at her to shoot him far before she actually does. So whaddaya know, both cops bad. Yeah, that was loving stupid.
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 21:07 |
|
Shooting Blanks posted:This....does not look like a good shoot. gently caress's sake. That guy would've gone unshot if either cop had been remotely in the physical shape to do their job and exercised any level of forethought at all. I mean gently caress, there's edit: two tazers just getting pushed around on the floor in front of the dude uncontrolled for most of a minute. Liquid Communism fucked around with this message at 11:55 on Mar 2, 2020 |
# ? Mar 2, 2020 11:52 |
|
How are cops handling routine traffic stops and face to face interactions during COVID?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2020 12:53 |
|
pantslesswithwolves posted:How are cops handling routine traffic stops and face to face interactions during COVID? Good question. Many areas have already stated that they are NOT going to respond to certain calls. I would suspect that traffic stops are over all down, since there are fewer cars on the road. I have heard that there is a spike with major crashes due to people speeding on the almost empty roads.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2020 13:00 |
|
pantslesswithwolves posted:How are cops handling routine traffic stops and face to face interactions during COVID? https://www.facebook.com/105699370864584/posts/198649934902860/
|
# ? Mar 30, 2020 13:10 |
|
pantslesswithwolves posted:How are cops handling routine traffic stops and face to face interactions during COVID? I would expect you have to do something exceptionally dumb and/or dangerous on the roads to get pulled over right now.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2020 20:41 |
|
Shooting Blanks posted:I would expect you have to do something exceptionally dumb and/or dangerous on the roads to get pulled over right now. Cough cough, sniffs audibly through nose, "oh hello officer, yes here's my license and registration sorry it's kind of damp"
|
# ? Mar 31, 2020 03:37 |
|
pantslesswithwolves posted:How are cops handling routine traffic stops and face to face interactions during COVID? https://twitter.com/nick_w_estes/status/1244795542695116800 Edit: Full story to go with the tweet: quote:At least one Albuquerque Police Department officer shot and fatally injured a man after being called to conduct a welfare check in a house east of Downtown on Monday afternoon.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2020 09:19 |
|
Can’t wait for the cops to charge the guy who called in with murder charges for making those cops go to that guys house and putting them in that scary position of murdering an unarmed man in his own place of residence.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2020 01:12 |
|
I'm expecting a police shooting at some point where the cops then refuse to render aid due to social distancing.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2020 01:56 |
|
They already don’t render aid to those they just shot. If anything, this will curb them desecrating the corpses by putting them in handcuffs while they’re dead/bleeding out.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2020 02:09 |
|
ruddiger posted:They already don’t render aid to those they just shot. If anything, this will curb them desecrating the corpses by putting them in handcuffs while they’re dead/bleeding out. But then how will they laugh and take photos with the bodies
|
# ? Apr 1, 2020 04:08 |
|
No days off. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZL2y4xmuoE
|
# ? Apr 8, 2020 21:33 |
|
This thread is kinda poo poo
|
# ? Apr 8, 2020 22:12 |
|
Hezzy posted:This thread is kinda poo poo Was it ever going to be anything but?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2020 22:16 |
|
McNally posted:Was it ever going to be anything but? Honestly man, the difference between a good thread and a poo poo thread on a controversial topic usually is more about its moderation than anything else. Your experience may differ, but I feel like with the right amount of thought and effort from a blue star or an IK, this thread and others could be made good. I understand why you don’t expend the effort on it, just look at some of these assholes posts.. so please don’t take my post as being a dick. Just imho moderation is the key, here and elsewhere. Look how well the CE thread runs with all the traffic and posters it see’s. That’s a result of good moderation.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2020 22:31 |
|
Bro you gotta cover your mouth AND nose with the mask
|
# ? Apr 8, 2020 22:36 |
|
LtCol J. Krusinski posted:Honestly man, the difference between a good thread and a poo poo thread on a controversial topic usually is more about its moderation than anything else. No, you're absolutely right. This thread has never been a priority for me and it shows.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2020 23:22 |
|
Hezzy posted:This thread is kinda poo poo we could post some stuff about british police if you want something more local
|
# ? Apr 8, 2020 23:37 |
|
LtCol J. Krusinski posted:Honestly man, the difference between a good thread and a poo poo thread on a controversial topic usually is more about its moderation than anything else. Tried a cop thread in TFR, where I think we had fairly level-headed, well intentioned, and active moderation. No offense intended, McNally. Don't remember it lasting two days. People who had talked for years telling each other off in the worst ways. That dog got taken behind the shed before folks started biting the children.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2020 03:59 |
|
madeintaipei posted:Tried a cop thread in TFR, where I think we had fairly level-headed, well intentioned, and active moderation. No offense intended, McNally. Don't remember it lasting two days. People who had talked for years telling each other off in the worst ways. That dog got taken behind the shed before folks started biting the children. TFR cop-threads are extra bonkers because it's a mix of hardcore rightwing assholes, generic conservatives who buy hard into just world fallacy, SA-style liberals, SA-style leftists, and then the anti-authority mix of either rightwing anti-cop and also left-wing anti-cop, and they're sometimes unified by voting against everything ever except more guns, and it gets very stupid very fast.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2020 04:17 |
|
mlmp08 posted:TFR cop-threads are extra bonkers because it's a mix of hardcore rightwing assholes, generic conservatives who buy hard into just world fallacy, SA-style liberals, SA-style leftists, and then the anti-authority mix of either rightwing anti-cop and also left-wing anti-cop, and they're sometimes unified by voting against everything ever except more guns, and it gets very stupid very fast. That's just, like, Tuesday in TFR. Crew-served weapons, but everyone tries to work it from in front of the barrel. e: Lest you get the wrong idea, I appreciate you, muhlump.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2020 04:22 |
|
The TFR cop thread died because a cop came in and started accusing somebody who was the victim of police misconduct of actually being guilty and deserving that misconduct because otherwise why else would a cop have treated them that way
|
# ? Apr 9, 2020 13:25 |
|
Yeah...thats some serious history revision going on in here
|
# ? Apr 9, 2020 14:03 |
|
The problem is that you can't really have a discussion with cops because when you bring up widespread abuse of power they either are for it or they are nominally against it but fundamentally don't care enough to do anything about it. When there was an article about a cop was found drunk and passed out in his car the cops here defended the decision to not fire the guy instead of simply saying thats hosed up PookBear fucked around with this message at 14:26 on Apr 9, 2020 |
# ? Apr 9, 2020 14:10 |
|
Stravag posted:Yeah...thats some serious history revision going on in here You're right I left out the part where the same cop started claiming that calling out cops is basically racism against cops Here, check it out yourself https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3903047&userid=158613 GreglFaggins starts out by responding to Shooting Blanks's story by claiming Shooting Blanks is lying in each of his responses, says the cops were justified in their misconduct because maybe he actually was lying and deserved it, and then drops quote:Ill give it a try. You shouldnt be ACAB as gently caress because in doing so youre marginalizing and/or vilifying an entire segment of society based upon their profession based and on X number of interactions, personal or read/seen YouTube videos about. Replace profession with race/religion/creed in my previous sentence and you have the makings of a hate crime. Youre essentially doing the same thing to that segment of society that you perceive them to be doing to you. I promise you that you can be a better human being than that. quote:The thought process is shockingly similar. I hate this person because theyre a/an X. And you can choose religion or creed.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2020 15:46 |
|
LtCol J. Krusinski posted:Just imho moderation is the key, here and elsewhere. Look how well the CE thread runs with all the traffic and posters it see’s. That’s a result of good moderation. Part of why CE functions us these peripheral threads where you can tell people to take it outside so they dont mess up the furniture.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2020 16:47 |
|
piL posted:CE functions Well that's an interesting take. Nah, CE's really not too bad these days
|
# ? Apr 9, 2020 17:28 |
|
Internet Wizard posted:You're right I left out the part where the same cop started claiming that calling out cops is basically racism against cops I was agreeing with you lol
|
# ? Apr 9, 2020 19:05 |
|
Stravag posted:Yeah...thats some serious history revision going on in here Almost like they cant help it even in their off time.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2020 05:52 |
|
here's psychotic philly transit cops throwing a black guy off a bus for not wearing a mask. now your question is, "does have to wear a mask?" and the answer is no one knows for certain. either way, they could have just given the guy a mask instead. https://twitter.com/phillyTRU/status/1248653656733495301?s=20
|
# ? Apr 10, 2020 19:24 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 14:14 |
|
How come the cop’s not wearing one while he’s on the bus then
|
# ? Apr 10, 2020 19:58 |