|
You know which franchise could stand to use the funko "look" and make next to nothing on the designs? The Mother/EarthBound franchise.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2020 23:01 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 16:01 |
|
Xelkelvos posted:That's practically all Funkos yeah give you that
|
# ? Sep 15, 2020 01:03 |
|
Nick Rekieta is planning on filing an amicus brief (and yes the deadline for filing briefs has passed.) If you don't know what that means the replies to the tweet should provide ample context. https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1308431730475438083
|
# ? Sep 22, 2020 18:12 |
|
Did it ever come out how much law Nick actually practiced? I know he had his office in the strip mall, but it seemed to be very hard to get actual results of the stuff he'd done in court.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2020 17:02 |
|
Someone who's way more plugged into this can probably confirm this, but Nick is a real estate lawyer.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2020 17:10 |
|
Dawgstar posted:Did it ever come out how much law Nick actually practiced? I know he had his office in the strip mall, but it seemed to be very hard to get actual results of the stuff he'd done in court. His court record was posted in the threadnaught a long while back. He had 8 that went to trial over a 3 year period. Most of the cases were traffic tickets. lol Wark Say posted:Someone who's way more plugged into this can probably confirm this, but Nick is a real estate lawyer. That's Vic's main lawyer Ty Beard.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2020 17:52 |
|
I forgot. Two real winners, for realsies.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2020 18:49 |
|
Estates as in trust funds, not real estate (properties)
|
# ? Sep 25, 2020 19:18 |
|
The amicus brief was filed. https://twitter.com/questauthority/status/1310759486701948929
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 23:21 |
|
Can Of Worms posted:The amicus brief was filed. So Ty's incompetence is recorded for all time and now so is Nick's. Unless the court just tosses it out for being late. Nice.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 01:49 |
|
This was Nick's master stroke, right? Not mentioning something every lawyer knows about thinking if he didn't mention it they would all forget they could do it, except clearly nobody thought they needed to do it because honestly look at this case.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 03:33 |
|
Correct on all points. *Effort* for literally nothing.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 09:15 |
|
Jack Forge posted:Correct on all points. *Effort* for literally nothing.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 09:22 |
|
I mean, Nick has got to realize that even, if by the grace of God, the Appeals courts punts it back down to the District Court to decide the sole issue raised in his brief on the worth of the 2nd Amended Petition, he... has to realize that he even admitted the Amended Petition has no new information to consider really. So cool, you sent it back down to the lower court just so Chupp can render the exact same judgment as before and probably have a good reason for quadrupling the fees and penalties Vic is on the hook for to get him the gently caress out of court with this nonsense
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 13:35 |
|
MechaX posted:I mean, Nick has got to realize that even, if by the grace of God, the Appeals courts punts it back down to the District Court to decide the sole issue raised in his brief on the worth of the 2nd Amended Petition, he... has to realize that he even admitted the Amended Petition has no new information to consider really. Self reflection is not a vaunted quality in the conservative sphere. Self reflection = weakness. It is possible that he has never been forced to actually examine his actions and their potential consequences because he has never faced consequences. Toxic masculinity is a motherfucker.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 13:40 |
|
mallratcal posted:His court record was posted in the threadnaught a long while back. He had 8 that went to trial over a 3 year period. Most of the cases were traffic tickets. lol Not to defend anyone involved in this (because lol), but unless someone's a criminal lawyer most lawyers spend very, very little time in trial.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 19:38 |
|
Skwirl posted:Not to defend anyone involved in this (because lol), but unless someone's a criminal lawyer most lawyers spend very, very little time in trial. yeah but Rekieta is a crimnal, lawyer
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 19:41 |
|
Piell posted:yeah but Rekieta is a crimnal, lawyer I wonder if in his town he has billboard advertisements with things like "Fell 'cause the floor too slick? Make the first number you call Lawyer Nick!"
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 20:59 |
|
Piell posted:yeah but Rekieta is a crimnal, lawyer oh, nevermind.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 21:03 |
|
his amicus brief was probably not that great an idea either. Somehow he found one of the few options that would both let him file his useless brief and also be an instance of unlicensed practice of law Because Amicus is Rekieta Media, a texas based company, and Rekieta is the attorney for Rekieta Media filing this amicus brief in Texas...without being a licensed lawyer in Texas. Good job, rekieta.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2020 22:51 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Self reflection is not a vaunted quality in the conservative sphere. Self reflection = weakness. It is possible that he has never been forced to actually examine his actions and their potential consequences because he has never faced consequences. Toxic masculinity is a motherfucker. I dunno why I'm reeling from this particular form of legal incompetence given that I see it frequently with much bigger ramifications for their clients on a daily basis, but this is just... fascinating to me that he's even doing any of this. Like, notwithstanding the damage he does to himself by filing this brief at all (last I checked, pro hac vic is something that requires a process in every state simply so the Bar can actually be able to keep tabs on you and hold you accountable if you put the client in a worse situation, and Nick has not done any of this, and this is a legit ethical problem across two State bars and something that should have been drilled into him for his MPREs, and Nick saying he's a Texas LLC is essentially submitting to personal jurisdiction in loving Texas for no reason), it is pretty loving depressing that he hasn't even thought through the damage that this would do to the person he's trying to protect even if he's successful (him being successful in his argument doesn't magically make the proceedings skip a step; it bunts it back down to the lower court to consider the arguments he says the district court Judge missed in the 2nd petition; it's not going to suddenly revive all of Vic's causes of action, and I know if this does get reversed on a technicality that a superfluous petition should have been explicitly considered, that Judge is going to be pissed). The grift-urge is just too powerful MechaX fucked around with this message at 01:19 on Oct 1, 2020 |
# ? Oct 1, 2020 01:17 |
|
Can Of Worms posted:The amicus brief was filed. https://twitter.com/questauthority/status/1311678668738093057
|
# ? Oct 1, 2020 15:59 |
|
We have not reached the bottom yet Nick is going to have Ty file the brief
|
# ? Oct 1, 2020 16:11 |
|
We have them where we want them! We are going to totally own the libs! But we can't do it, without your support! Please send more cash!
|
# ? Oct 1, 2020 16:15 |
|
Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:and it's gooooooooooooone: nice
|
# ? Oct 1, 2020 18:53 |
|
Its back on! https://twitter.com/questauthority/status/1311735714003013632?s=20
|
# ? Oct 1, 2020 20:05 |
|
How dumb can you be?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2020 20:26 |
|
Covok posted:How dumb can you be?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2020 20:31 |
|
Ty Beard: "Late Fourth Quarter, down 66-0. 16 to first down."
|
# ? Oct 1, 2020 21:32 |
|
Earlier today I was polishing off the cannabis collection and I had a random thought: When these legal shenanigans are over I could totally see Vic pulling an OJ Simpson and going off getting himself into major trouble again years down the line. Like he opens his own recording studio as someone speculated, and sooner or later young ladies come in, Vic sees them around his place, one thing leads to another...prison!
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 01:58 |
|
Agent Escalus posted:Earlier today I was polishing off the cannabis collection and I had a random thought: Nah, he's totally gonna pull a gun on some hapless dude that bought his prototype bootleg Funko in some Vegas hotel room.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 04:46 |
|
So when does this end and how much harder can the courts smack them? They lost a SLAPP motion right? I thought that ended things pretty quick, but I guess the appeals process is as slow as they say.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 05:00 |
|
Captain Stalin posted:So when does this end and how much harder can the courts smack them? i think it all depends on how many times they appeal. this nonsense is almost certainly going to bring attourney fees/sanctions past a mil.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 05:23 |
|
I'm just waiting for Rekieta to make the claim they're taking this to the Supreme Court
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 05:33 |
|
Agent Escalus posted:Earlier today I was polishing off the cannabis collection and I had a random thought: How? I would like to note for the record that Vic has zero business skills, he's too lazy to learn, he didn't even spearhead his even legal proceedings, he did his own thing and let a bunch of internet jackasses take over it to prosecute the kulturkampf. He's not a uniquely marketable product, and no one wants to buy his poo poo. Suing his previous employer has made him toxic in the eyes of everyone who would otherwise work with him.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 08:08 |
|
If he’s bored and still has access to mommy’s money then he could conceivably try to do something besides lie low after the current legal engagements conclude. I don’t have any idea what he would do.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 08:11 |
|
In case anybody missed it Nicky got thrown out for the second time today for violating Rule 19 https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1311772628810637312?s=20 Kinda mystifying that Beard and Nick don't know any other TX lawyers to sponsor the PHV or file Nick's garbage for him so he can get thrown out for lateness but I guess I can understand not wanting to touch this ridiculous mess. Hub Cat fucked around with this message at 11:27 on Oct 2, 2020 |
# ? Oct 2, 2020 10:24 |
|
oh there's plenty of texas barred lawyers willing to file it on his behalf...
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 10:30 |
|
Captain Stalin posted:So when does this end and how much harder can the courts smack them? The anti-SLAPP motions came down in July '19. The hearing on those motions was september '19. The order dismissing all claims was october '19. Since then we've been in appeals, because unlike an anti-slapp motion which does indeed end things pretty quick, appeals are slooooow.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 17:09 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 16:01 |
|
Exercu posted:The anti-SLAPP motions came down in July '19. Yea, I just feel bad for those defendants who're having this nightmare dragged out. Hopefully it does get kicked back down so the fees and penalties can be adjusted up.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2020 17:24 |