Tom Gorman posted:

All you keto people it's just about counting calories. Realize that keto made you look at the calories you ate the previous day and plan and be aware.

You can eat a nacho, or a potato! Just don't eat so many calories! Keto helps you get motivated to watch your calories, that's why you're dropping chonk.

You can eat a piece of toast it's basically ok to do that

Resting Lich Face posted:

Yup. Just don't eat too loving much and it's easy to maintain a healthy weight.

Biohazard posted:

I've been making some lettuce wrap burger and sort of taco things. The key is butter lettuce. Is it as good as a bun or tortilla? No. But it also helps me be not such a fatty so no OP, they are in fact not bullshit. HTH.

Big Beef City posted:

The fish sandwiches aren't even that gross.
It's just the long fake horse rides that bum you out and you're doing it because the other person is a loving poser and you both know it.

You're going to therapy for it and your dad is paying for it.

Look we all know what this.

Kharnifex posted:

Cabbage superiority

Kharnifex posted:

Cabbage superiority

interwhat posted:

Kak posted:

Up until last week, I hadn't eaten a fish sandwich from a fast food restaurant in approximately two months. More often than not, when I do order a fish sandwich from a fast food restaurant, it is a Filet- O- Fish (R) sandwich from McDonald's(R). Last Friday however, I was at the Burger King (R) restaurant located close to my apartment, when I remembered that as part of a summer promotion, their fish sandwiches were "Buy one, get one free" on Fridays. I had never eaten a Burger King (R) BK Big Fish (R) sandwich before, in fact, I had never even seen one. But, because I love a bargain and was in the mood for something besides burgers, I decided to order the fish sandwich(es) "to- go". As soon as the friendly counterperson handed me the bag containing the two fish sandwiches, I was surprised at how heavy the bag was. As I walked away from the counter, I peered into the bag and saw that the Burger King (R) fish sandwiches were quite large. In fact, they appeared to be huge. I looked- up the BK Big Fish (R) sandwich on the wall- mounted nutrition chart in the restaurant and read that this fish sandwich weighs over four ounces.

When I got home, I wasted no tme in opening one of the BK Big Fish (R) sandwiches. I was very impressed and amazed at what I saw. Compared to the McDonald's (R) Filet- O- Fish (R), the Burger King (R) sandwich looked humongous. To me, the circumference of the BK Big Fish (R) easily appeared to be as large as a Burger King (R) Whopper (R). The sandwich contains a sizeable golden- brown, breaded fish filet nestled in a large flavorful bun. Accented by crisp, green lettuce and very tasty Tartar Sauce, this fish sandwich means business. Upon taking my first bite of the sandwich, I thought to myself "This sandwich is awesome". The fish filet possesses a clean taste of the ocean that is mild, yet very authentic and pleasing. I was being as objective as possible, regarding my opinion of the sandwich. After all, I'm still a big fan of McDonald's (R) Filet- O- Fish (R). Something that I noticed immediately was that there was no cheese on the Burger King (R) fish sandwich. Although the sandwich tasted great, I think that the addition of some cheese would put it over- the- top. The BK Big Fish (R) sandwich is so big, that I only ate 3/4 of one sandwich and refrigerated the remainder, to be microwaved later, along with the other sandwich..

Two days ago, I was in downtown Hartford, Connecticut and passed a McDonald's (R) restaurant. I was fairly hungry, so I went in, remembering the Burger King (R) fish sandwiches that I had consumed a few days earlier. I ordered a Filet- O- Fish and ate it at the restaurant. As I sat and ate, I examined the sandwich closely, mentally comparing the two varieties of fish sandwiches. No question, that the BK Big Fish (R) was bigger, but the Filet- O- Fish is no slouch of a sandwich, either. The question was; Which sandwich was more satisfying ? Strictly from a quantity point of view, the BK Big Fish (R) is more filling. From a flavor, or taste perspective, it's close to a draw, or tie. Each of these fish sandwiches possesses its own attributes. The Burger King (R) sandwich, to me, has more of a "seafood", or real fish taste. The McDonald's (R) Filet- O- Fish maintains more of a "fast food" taste, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. With its delicious yellowish- orange cheese and top- rate Tartar Sauce, the Filet- O- Fish (R) is a classic American product that I absolutely love. To be quite honest about it, I'm very glad that I tried the Burger King (R) BK Big Fish (R) sandwich. In the future, I would like to continue eating both types of fish sandwiches. These sandwiches are similarly- priced and are regular menu items. Nutritionally, the McDonald's (R) Filet- O- Fish contains 380 calories, with 18 grams of total fat. The Burger King (R) BK Big Fish (R) contains 640 calories, with 32 grams of total fat.

numberoneposter posted:

interwhat posted:

I mean honestly, a green leaf lettuce leaf is dark green, has pointy frills on it, and you see the same thing in your poop, frills and all, are you at least absorbing the iron and other vitamins out of it? Seriousnquestion

Big Beef City posted:

What if...

Get this


You didn't do some gimmick bullshit and just didn't eat garbage 24/7

Big Beef City posted:

What if...

Get this


You didn't do some gimmick bullshit and just didn't eat garbage 24/7

bomb posted:

Who can resist french fries, pizza, moz sticks, or calamari?