|
I haven't played mafia in a couple years but have been getting into town of salem lately so thought i'd give it a go again. looking forward to being killed d1 so i can leave for another year or 2.
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2019 17:37
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 23:35 |
|
|
Hello, I'm a good guy. A carrier pigeon told me hal is a filthy capitalist tho
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2019 02:49
|
|
|
Capitalism sucks and all but how are we going to find scum with everyone talking like this
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2019 16:40
|
|
|
Can't say for sure if the scum are capitalists but capitalists are definitely scum
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2019 17:32
|
|
|
Hello, I am ready to post. the weekends are bad days for posting.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 16:22
|
|
|
In my careful reading of this pathetic thread of single sentence (or single word) effortless joke posts, I found one comment only that stands out as suspicious in this day one crapshoot. Toalpaz posted:I think we need to kill everyone who says scum are capitalists because there's no evidence they aren't imperialists (czarists?) What is the meaning of this post? Imagine yourself from this poster's pov. As town, one would take it for granted that the scum are a non-communist, and the most obvious incarnation of a non-communist is a capitalist. However, a scum would think "oh god, should I know if the scum is capitalists or not? should I say something, or not? OH GOD" and then go google for other opponents of communism and post with sweaty palms this awkward 'reminder' that 'maybe it's not capitalists, because we townies wouldn't know that, right guys??' in conclusion, with a lovely, lazy day as usual in mafia, kill this person for having a slightly questionable post: ##vote toalpaz
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 16:28
|
|
|
who is burgerman
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 16:45
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:They are the vote leaders with less than 12 hours to go and I am already voting Toalpaz hahha have you played mafia before? "less than 12 hours" that's an eternity man. no reason to try to segregate it to whoever happens to have votes on them right now. what are your thoughts? is there a case against binus that people are just keeping in their heads and not talking about?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 17:13
|
|
|
also i missed your follow up posts, i can understand that
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 17:14
|
|
|
this kind of attitude is pretty much why i quit mafia. no matter the content, the post leader gets killed, thus encouraging the lurky boring games of flat-line thoughtless jokey discussion with everyone afraid to give a sincere opinion or TRY to do ANYthing because if they do they get jumped on with this kind of bullshit.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 17:58
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:moreover, Someone has to die D1? your vote on yoalpaz is based on one jokey post, how is that any better or worse than my binus case because none of your quoted binus posts come along with any reasoning why the posts are scummy.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 18:27
|
|
|
it just reads like 'he's saying things!!1!!'
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 18:27
|
|
|
not really. masonries are pointless to hide if they are unconfirmed. i'm in an unconfirmed masonry too. why hide it?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 18:45
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:
hahahah
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 18:46
|
|
|
well i wish you would have elaborated more in your original post cause now i read that again and it is kind of weird.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 18:49
|
|
|
it reads like 'i know there are masonries in this game and i want to know who else is in one, but I don't want to say that i am in one for some reason' which is weird, but what is the pov of this kind of weird reasoning? because town can have weird/dumb reasoning very easily. does scum benefit from knowing if there are other masonries out there? I don't see how. If there could be a reason why scum could benefit from knowing who masons are, then I could definitely see this as fishing, but I'm not coming up with any reason why a scum would care about masonries. I haven't played in a long time though, help me out yall
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 18:52
|
|
|
SolusLunes posted:man I can't believe I didn't make any jokephase posts at all, I'm frankly disappointed in myself i'm not, but you should make some real posts too. what are your thoughts on who the badguys are?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
i believe in a thing called gut just listen to the rhythm of your heart
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 23:16
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:how about you, derp, tell us who you think is scum while you are at it? toalpaz, which is why im voting them. Im ambivalent on binus. I don't think they shouldn't be considered because they are the post leader, I was only bothered by the weak rear end reasons people had for voting for him, which seemed to me to be tied to the fact that he's posting a lot, so there's a lot of things to build your weak rear end reasoning on. Epsilon seems to be the only one with a sincere reason to be voting binus, everyone else just seems lazy. give me ur reasons.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 00:14
|
|
|
nice, this is my kind of scum team
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 22:08
|
|
|
A Sometimes Food posted:Also I'm now leaning toward Binus being a loyal member of the party. a bluff? who was bluffing about what?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 22:15
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:this post is logically bad, but doesn’t seem like a very scummy thing to say either i want to know what they are talking about, what bluff?? what does that mean
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 22:33
|
|
|
A Sometimes Food posted:I felt like Toal voting themself was a bluff to try and get votes off them rather than an attempt to save Binus and so I'm leaning to Binus being town. At least for now. oh, okay, missed that thanks
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 22:34
|
|
|
sandwolf having some really weird posts and ideas rn lol
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 22:47
|
|
|
seriously sandwolf rushing in here like 'all these people who voted scum, that doesnt make them town! it doesn't!!' is offputting kind of agree with this: merk posted:Here's a bus vote. Leaves the door open to go back to b- (with literally no case whatsoever on b-).
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 22:54
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:Real question: does Toal have external beef with anyone in this game? a real weird question
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 22:55
|
|
|
that is classic scum thinking from squiggly, sad to say. a scum knows who the town is, so instead of looking for scummy posts they feel inclined to make these kinds of arguments based on game mechanics or outside information/meta/flavor/etc
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 23:06
|
|
|
sorry bro i play to win, hope its not tru but gotta call it like i see it
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 23:10
|
|
|
"stopped posting" being an entire 9 minutes. #wow #woah
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 23:12
|
|
|
am I defending merk? i thought i was attacking you. I think its v weird to try to say someone has 'stopped posting' when it hasn't even been ten minutes. in an internet forums game that's like taking a breath. v weird to try to call someone suspicious for that.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 23:17
|
|
|
lol. really digging in on this one huh, haha. i'll let it speak for itself next time you have to take a poo poo or eat dinner or talk to the wife or go to the store or any infinite number of things that are more important that an internet game and last longer than ten minutes. I know we talked about the odds of replacements being scum or town in the mason doc, it is something to think about, but i find it odd that you come out here and make a case about it right away. The town thing to do, imo, would be to read merk's posts and try to decide if they seem town or scum or not, and if they seem fishy, then you can add the fact that he is a replacement on top of it as more evidence. But you instead lead with the replacement theory, and then try to add to it this idea that not posting for ten minutes is some kind of tell. it just looks really bad, man
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 23:24
|
|
|
you see.. i thought we had agreed on the opposite conclusion, that he could just as easily be town and it wasn't a very good argument...
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 23:30
|
|
|
I don't trust merk, or anyone. i think your posts make sense now, after those last two posts
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 23:35
|
|
|
Makes perfect sense. I always kill the lowest post count as scum. Gives no info to the town and also improves the game for everyone, and makes mods happy
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 04:37
|
|
|
That is a completely stupid line of reasoning, no reasonable scum would kill an obvious lynch target like binus. I'm willing to vote him just so we can move on and talk about other people
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 06:05
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:I don’t see where anyone suggested binus was the intended night kill target? Why did you mention this? it was late and i misread this post: Epsilon Plus posted:b-minus if the kill was redirected, who was the intended target and why? thought he was saying the kill was redirected off of b so i'm the one who is stupid in this case
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 14:48
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:That’s fine? I wasn’t responding to you I was responding to merk. such bad posts from you but this is one of the worst. do you think solus is being scummy right now? he seems pretty genuine to me. it's two days before deadline and having someone having a different opinion than you is “actively and emphatically trying to derail the lynch of a scum” holy moly
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 16:41
|
|
|
all sandwolf's posting since the start of today reads like scum who is hoping for an easy lynch on someone who was really suspicious yesterday, and now just CANT BELIEVE that people don't really want to kill the guy anymore.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 16:43
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:That looks a lot like emphatically and actively trying to derail a lynch to me, yes. its just this word choice that bothers me. that you frame it this way seems ****disingenuous**** it's as if you are taking for granted that binus will be lynched, and here comes solus trying to "derail" it, a whole 2 days before deadline. and all this is happening while i (and others) are still struggling to understand what exactly about yesterdays lynch (and what even in the first place?) made binus look so bad.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 17:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 23:35 |
|
|
Sandwolf posted:
there's a million reasons why it could have happened that way. That you are trying to tie these two players together just because they both happened to be lynch candidates is also weird. Here, i'll create some sane scenarios: Maybe toal thought it would get votes off him (what some people were calling a 'bluff gone wrong') maybe toal was frustrated and giving up. maybe toal was bored and doing it for a laugh. maybe toal wasn't reading the thread closely and didn't realize someone else was close to being voted up. Maybe toal didn't want to play anymore. the contrived scenario that toal and binus were both scum, and toal was deciding to kill himself in order to save a scumbro who had a better role is just bizarre, and even more bizarre is that you expect it to be so obvious to everyone, and not the outlandish theory that it actually is. Have you ever known scum to do this? Especially a player who seemed to be so halfheartedly into the game like toal was? I just can't understand this thinking
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 17:29
|
|