|
Why not? I'm in.
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2019 01:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 22:02 |
|
|
I am sure the collective wisdom will give us the leader we deserve.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2019 02:42
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:Son of Canary burns bright This is someone who is trying to draw attention to himself by talking crazy. Who draws attention to themselves but capitalists trying to sell goods that are needed by everyone. Therefore Squiggly must be a capitalist. ##Vote Squiggly
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2019 13:26
|
|
|
A Sometimes Food posted:It is the duty and distinction of the communist state to care for the infirm and those who cannot care for themselves. This is but one of the many ways we are superior to the heartless capitalist. But what if it is a capitalist plot to drain resources from the state to take care of the capitalist.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2019 15:18
|
|
|
It is our duty to the state to be constantly on guard from them. I am in favor of your capitalhunter protocol assuming they have been approved by the state.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2019 15:23
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:Oh United Soviet States of Russia, my home and native laaaaaaaaaand Squiggly is making more sense, meanwhile...... Toalpaz posted:I think we need to kill everyone who says scum are capitalists because there's no evidence they aren't imperialists (czarists?) Are you saying Capitalists aren't scum? Imperialists are scum also and there can even be capitalist imperialists but trying to say that capitalists isn't scum is not communist. Change vote to ##vote Toalpaz
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2019 22:39
|
|
|
Nonsense, they are resting to be able to fulfill the requirements of the state tomorrow.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2019 03:22
|
|
|
Not participating is against party policy. He may have a point.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2019 14:29
|
|
|
Not changing my vote yet, just agreeing with him in principle.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2019 15:45
|
|
|
Being out of something in the communist state is not something to joke about.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 02:13
|
|
|
Ahhh, the joy of people trying to increase the post count to avoid the lurker label. I need more popcorn.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 15:01
|
|
|
But who is counting....(and yes, I was too)
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 15:08
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Also did not realize taste is in this game until I checked the post count after seeing Toalpaz spaz out for like 4 posts in a row just to vote a new player As the new player involved, if Toalpaz requires beating up on newbies to feel adequate to participate in the communist state, then he is not worthy of staying in the communist state. Still voting Toalpaz.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 20:55
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:##vote Leith Granted, but it is the closest so far.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 21:09
|
|
|
Beats me, I think he is trying to distract attention and confuse the hunt.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2019 21:31
|
|
|
It really was a sudden jelling of a toal vote, 40 minutes was a lot of time left and it went from 4 votes for Toal to 8 in about 5 minutes.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 00:33
|
|
|
I was against Toal early as a defense since he targeted me for some reason, so obviously I am not crying over the lynching but the self vote felt like a bluff, and then suddenly it was over.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 00:48
|
|
|
So Squiggly, why did you not cast your vote somewhere in the last hour? You were active and debating but not voting and I am wondering your thinking since you could have pushed for a majority somewhere.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 00:54
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:Because we had an hour? Just seemed like an unusual behavior but I didn't want to start an accusation if there was another way of thinking about it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 01:56
|
|
|
I think I am going to have to read this page about 6 times to understand all the rationale. I'm impressed.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 11:42
|
|
|
Well, that is escalating nicely.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 15:27
|
|
|
So Merk, do I understand from your post that you think we should vote Sandwolf? Would you like to explain your reasoning?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 16:57
|
|
|
My 2 cents, When Sandwolf said I'd vote Toal and then started making arguments why it people shouldn't vote Toal, and not actually voting Toal makes for a very confusing picture. I am not voting yet but I am suspicious.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 17:07
|
|
|
Okay, I am now completely confused. Hopefully it will be explained post game.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 17:46
|
|
|
Asking people to explain themselves or giving commentary without actively accusing someone makes me scum? By that logic, I will return to my original position that Squiggly is scum for being so nonsensical. After all he refused to believe Toal was bluffing that he wasn't scum. [b]##vote Squiggly [/b[
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
Correction ##Vote Squiggly
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 21:40
|
|
|
I am tempted to pull a Toal and let everyone lynch me just to see Squiggly explain himself when it turns out I am not. I'm not going to do that because I do believe in winning but it is a good side benefit.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 16:40
|
|
|
Actually, I am new at Mafia here, but enjoying it because this is honestly a much higher tier of play than the few times I have played it in RL. Squiggly won't believe that anyway so there is no point in arguing with him anymore. If I get lynched, then he will be next on the chopping block given how hard he is pushing for me to lynch. I don't want to be lynched but if it happens, people will learn a lot about him.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 19:42
|
|
|
Probably, and if so, then I have learned another lesson for the next game.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 19:59
|
|
|
I am not taking any of this personally. This group is playing at a higher tier than I am use to and that is how we learn. I actually think it is great, even if I get lynched in 5 hours, then I've had a great time. Feel free to ratchet up your game and call me a fuckface piece of poo poo scum, I'm a big boy. Honest. That actually is a fair request, I tend to watch vote movement and sudden switches. Now I will admit that this sets me up to discount potential scum in case they decided to sacrifice one of their own for cover. I also tend to snipe until I get more information. This is a list of my detailed thoughts so everyone can vote against me in good conscience now.  People I don't think are scum: Myself - obviously ASF - was an early Toal voter, he did got to b- for a little while but was pretty consistent and way early if scum decided to sacrifice one of their own. Of course he did go back and forth and the last vote was after Toal did his insanity. Mr. H - still in the suspect category because if they did decide to sacrifice one of their own for cover, this is when they would do it. Derp AA B- - still in the suspect category because if they did decide to sacrifice one of their own for cover, this is when they would do it. They did this vote right before Toal so it could have been coordinated. Tommu/Merk - still in the suspect category because if they did decide to sacrifice one of their own for cover, this is when they would do it. People who did not vote for Toal, and are very much suspected Scum Solas - he did a lot of debating with Sandwolf and then the crazy with Sandwolf happen, I am confused about I don't like being confused so therefore he is suspect E- = said he was really mad at Toal but still did not vote Toal, very suspicious to me Hal - don't think so, but then again I agree a lot with his thinking Squiggle- suspect because you are fingering me really hard, also because you were active when Toal flipped out and were still pushing for him not to get voted Retro - did not vote at all and is being pretty quiet, also suspicious
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 20:28
|
|
|
SolusLunes posted:are we doing phrasing Sorry, I was rushing to get the missive out before a meeting so Squiggly would have time to come up with another insane theory.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 21:07
|
|
|
It is more a level of people who have given me a reason to think they are not scum, and I admit that those reasons may be flawed. It is mafia after all.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 22:07
|
|
|
I suspect Retro is the only lurker you could get consensus on.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 22:54
|
|
|
In case you are able to get consensus on the lurker vote. ##Vote Retro Futurist
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 22:58
|
|
|
Oh? If you believe that lurking is a scum tactic and want to take advantage of the free kill, now is the time to do it. If a consensus isn't built before the deadline, then I can change my vote later.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 23:06
|
|
|
derp posted:what does that mean? That I suspect Hal more than people who voted for Toal, but that my gut tells me no because of his arguments. My gut maybe wrong.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 23:32
|
|
|
I am not requiring a lurker kill, just offering to help if there is a consensus it is a good idea. Lurkers give us no information either way.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2019 23:39
|
|
|
##vote Hal Looking at the 2 main voting blocks now and I trust the Hal voting block more than the ASF voting block.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2019 01:14
|
|
|
Recording for future analysis. Votecount for Day 2   Hal Incandenza (5): b-minus1, SolusLunes, derp, A Sometimes Food, Leith Maclaine A Sometimes Food (4): merk, Retro Futurist (1): Anomalous Amalgam, Leith Maclaine, b-minus1 (1): Anomalous Amalgam, Hal Incandenza, Retro Futurist, Squiggly (0): Leith Maclaine, Not Voting (1): SquigglyWith 12 alive, it's 7 votes to execute. The current deadline is October 11th, 2019 at 3 a.m. CEST -- that's in about 35 minutes.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2019 01:24
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 22:02 |
|
|
I may be wrong. But I am looking at the people who didn't vote Toal and 2 of those people are voting are voting for ASF, the other 2 voting for ASF are people who changed their votes after Toal went odd so if scum did decide to sacrifice one of their own, then those would be the people to switch. Meanwhile the people voting for Hal include 2 people who always suspected Toal.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2019 01:32
|
|