|
fritz posted:idlewords 9 minutes ago | prev | next [–]
|
#
?
May 27, 2023 14:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2023 06:19 |
|
|
the OP also seems to ignore the fact that when the federal/state/municipal government really really wants to do an infrastructure thing they'll just use eminent domain to bulldoze anything and everything. they've somehow blown straight past the fact that said governments are feckless and without the will to do poo poo and gone straight to "only force majeure, an act of God can solve this"
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2023 16:22
|
|
|
mystes posted:this is a dumb post
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2023 16:38
|
|
|
who?
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2023 16:44
|
|
|
Pile Of Garbage posted:the OP also seems to ignore the fact that when the federal/state/municipal government really really wants to do an infrastructure thing they'll just use eminent domain to bulldoze anything and everything. they've somehow blown straight past the fact that said governments are feckless and without the will to do poo poo and gone straight to "only force majeure, an act of God can solve this" On the other hand, in 2023 america, I doubt a state could even build a dense city from scratch after a megaquake. Even assuming that the existing landowners were paid enough to go away and not demand that their houses rebuilt exactly so you could start over from scratch, you would probably just end up with the new bay area being built into some dystopian nightmare like Phoenix, which seems to represent Americans' idea of the perfect city. If cities didn't already exist the US would probably just be one giant strip mall mystes fucked around with this message at 16:58 on May 27, 2023 |
|
#
?
May 27, 2023 16:55
|
|
|
mystes posted:On the other hand, in 2023 america, I doubt a state could even build a dense city from scratch after a megaquake. Even assuming that the existing landowners were paid enough to go away and not demand that their houses rebuilt exactly so you could start over from scratch, you would probably just end up with the new bay area being built into some dystopian nightmare like Phoenix, which seems to represent Americans' idea of the perfect city. imo they should do it like in NGE where japan said "gently caress it" and just built Tokyo 2, then Tokyo 3
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2023 17:03
|
|
|
mystes posted:In 2023 america, I highly doubt a state could successfully use eminent domain on a wide scale to try to densify a city and build transit (even incrementally) without being stopped by the courts we're about to see: https://www.courier-journal.com/sto...ry/70016013007/ https://www.townofclarksville.com/clarksville-celebrates-completion-of-new-main-street-corridor/ clarksville indiana decided they wanted a downtown, so they razed a bunch of industrial poo poo and a few old single family homes to start building out a little downtown of apartments and shops that isn't too terrible. this property is adjacent to the downtown project, and the developer has been dragging their feet on actually developing it
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2023 17:38
|
|
|
fritz posted:idlewords 9 minutes ago | prev | next [–] I agree with Maciej, there isn't a really incremental path to fixing the Bay Area
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2023 17:54
|
|
|
yeah the post is specifically that the bay area is incapable of building things, moreso than elsewhere in the US oh you want a train line? well that'll be about 20 years in california environment court facing a team of lawyers funded by atherton bart absolutely wouldn't be feasible today
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2023 18:35
|
|
|
yadaeno 13 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next [–] Ive never seen Star Trek, but lets say you had an infinite food machine. The machine would have limited throughput, and it would require resources to distribute the food. These are both problems that capitalism solves in a fair and efficient way.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2023 10:38
|
|
|
tell me you’ve never seen Star Trek by both expressly stating that and mistaking the fundamental lore
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2023 16:12
|
|
|
"lets say you had an infinite food machine. The machine would have limited throughput, and it would require resources to distribute the food" Motherfucker did you just rediscover farming?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2023 03:02
|
|
|
a socialist star trek society might build one food replicator, but would be stymied by the logistical challenges of making more and distributing them yes, i am very knowledgeable and insightful about economics
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2023 03:27
|
|
|
Internet Janitor posted:a socialist star trek society might build one food replicator, but would be stymied by the logistical challenges of making more and distributing them that’s simply because the emissary’s girlfriend stole them for the maquis
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2023 03:47
|
|
|
in a capitalist star trek society there would only be one food replicator, because the owner of it would correctly realise that wider distribution of the replicators would prevent them from seeking obscene rents from the outputs that it produces food would instead be magnanimously distributed for nearly free until all local food producers are out of business, at which point prices would be cranked up as much as possible
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2023 05:12
|
|
|
the bay area doesn't need fixing. it is the way it is because the people who own the land want it to be that way. if you want it to be different, you'd have to buy the land, and they ain't selling
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2023 06:12
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:that’s simply because the emissary’s girlfriend stole them for the maquis it's pretty wild that they still hooked up again after he sent her to prison for six months the 24th century dating pool of captains who like baseball is pretty small, but still
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2023 07:09
|
|
|
Internet Janitor posted:a socialist star trek society might build one food replicator, but would be stymied by the logistical challenges of making more and distributing them I simply can’t figure out how everyone doesn’t immediately understand and embrace fully automated luxury gay space communism
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2023 08:55
|
|
|
if star trek technology existed, fully automated luxury gay space communism would honestly be pretty easy to pull off
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2023 13:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2023 06:19 |
|
|
If it was really fully automated we wouldn't need to embrace it for it to work. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2023 00:08
|
|