|
anyone who thinks that liberty includes the freedom to starve does not care at all about whether humans are free. dig a little and you'll find that most "libertarians" are social darwinists. they champion freedom as a means to enable plutocracy, which in their minds is equivalent to aristocracy in its literal meaning--rule by the best. you cant find the ubermensch by measuring wealth but that wont stop hn from trying
|
# ¿ Feb 17, 2022 04:05 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 17:14 |
|
josh04 posted:it's in the middle of the other two buttons, graycat you cant know that until you know it, though, which means it's impossible to know whether you can know it until you actually do know it. at which point you know that you know it and also know that you can know it. therefore i am not owned
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2022 16:45 |
|
putin is gonna sneak out the back door with all of russia's natural gas while everyone is fighting in ukraine. the heist of the century
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2022 23:13 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:memetic SCPs are overused otoh there is no antimemetics division is a decent book
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2022 01:20 |
|
fritz posted:guess the topic: moral good is when you allocate resources efficiently and the more efficiently you allocate resources the more good it is. also economic rent is efficient now
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2022 21:00 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:i think it is hard to say from the outside if search is in its current state because it is impossible to make it better or if it simply doesn't make financial sense to make it better. as long as it remains useful to type things into google search and no competitors are clearly better, it's not immediately obvious that you'd expect a meaningful increase in revenue from investing heavily in improving search quality compared to things like continuing to invest in the knowledge base stuff. even if you concluded that spending $10b on paying humans to look at search results and manually filter out garbage would drive $11b of additional revenue, does that actually improve google's financials? software companies "aren't allowed" to do low margin things because their valuation is driven by insane gross margins. google employs a huge number of people (at least thousands) to manually curate its serps. it has done this for decades
|
# ¿ May 6, 2022 22:05 |
|
well obviously anything that the community generally regards as immoral or tasteless isn’t allowed. but nothing is taboo, we’re free thinkers here
|
# ¿ Sep 9, 2022 14:25 |
|
when rich people do have deep conversations it’s about how they’re going to ride out the decline of civilization without lowering their personal standard of living
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2022 19:01 |
|
i kickstarted some dice once and then the dice arrived and they were neat
|
# ¿ Oct 6, 2022 01:33 |
|
Jose Valasquez posted:spoils19 2 hours ago | root | parent | next [–] what believing in meritocracy does to a mf
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2022 02:03 |
|
SolTerrasa posted:imagine the horror of a website populated almost entirely by white noise posters talking past each other is this meant to be a dig on d&d or cspam or all of SA cause it works all three ways
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2022 02:34 |
|
it feels annoying as gently caress because my browser locking up for 30 seconds to load a lovely editor is never what i want
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2022 01:28 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 17:14 |
|
so to the extent that the future of the web is a popup div stamping on the content area forever, i suppose it does feel like the future
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2022 01:29 |