|
Fleetwood Crack posted:How would that even work? Like how do you inhale from your anus? don't google it
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 18:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 21:29 |
|
|
Fleetwood Crack posted:There is no wrong way to get high, friend. uh actually there is it's called those ecigs that destroy your lungs and kill you. that's DEFINITELY not the right way to get high
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 18:56
|
|
|
Hell Yeah posted:uh actually there is it's called those ecigs that destroy your lungs and kill you. that's DEFINITELY not the right way to get high
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 19:03
|
|
|
Fleetwood Crack posted:How would that even work? Like how do you inhale from your anus? Very carefully. It's like a fart backwards.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 19:04
|
|
|
Hell Yeah posted:who cares about edibles. if you're not smoking giant stinky joints of flower whats wrong with you. i agree dude, something about the smoke itself pushes marijuana that extra mile for me. even bongs seem too clean to hit sometimes and i'll just rip my little glass piece
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 19:05
|
|
|
Every single person here will be smuggling weed from Illinois in January.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 19:56
|
|
|
TLRY up 11%
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 19:57
|
|
|
the good fax machine posted:garden of the gods is probably the best thing colorado springs has, take a drive/hike through there I used to do a lot of rock climbing there about 40 years ago, when I was young and fit. I Recommend a trip through there. Avoid Focus on the Family. At all costs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 20:53
|
|
|
my best guess is anywhere between 4 to 10 years from now
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 21:00
|
|
|
Genesplicer posted:I used to do a lot of rock climbing there about 40 years ago, when I was young and fit. I Recommend a trip through there. Thanks I have a list of things to do after the show. It'll be Slayer with special guests Primus, Ministry and Phil Anselmo and the Illegals. So all the activities will be done with ringing ears. I've seen ministry live and even with foam ear plugs I still had ringing ears the next day. Also this might be our first interaction where I have gotten a probation from you. "Louis, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship."
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 22:34
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/1187735564369432576?s=19
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 17:31
|
|
|
This is the only weed I will ever need
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 18:14
|
|
|
feelin' that bern
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2019 00:10
|
|
|
burnin' one for Bernie
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2019 00:16
|
|
|
EorayMel posted:This is the only weed I will ever need Is that supposed to be Canada thistle? Defo not Canada and pretty sure it's bull thistle.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 07:19
|
|
|
super sweet best pal posted:Businesses in states where it's legal can still use the federal law as an excuse to fire you. as though businesses didn't already have a million other excuses to fire people with
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 07:26
|
|
|
OP the answer depends on how much of Congress is Republican
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 07:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 21:29 |
|
|
Squalid posted:Trying to guess the answer to this and there are a few barriers that need to be overcome, but there are definitely forces pushing things in that direction. Firstly Mitch McConnell is pretty opposed to legalization and right now he may be the biggest stumbling block. Before Federal legislation can move forward either he has to be replaced by someone pro-weed or there has to be meaningful pressure on him to take action. At 77 he is likely to be replaced as Senate Majority Leader within the next 10 years, beyond that interval legalization becomes much more likely. For anything to happen while he is still Majority Leader, the structure of the Senate means that effective pressure must come from within the Republican caucus. While getting a majority of Senate Republicans behind legalization in the next 10 years seems unlikely, even a relatively small bloc could apply enough pressure in cooperation with Democrats to force McConnell's hand. This is kind of what I was trying to get at and have suspected ever since the issue of statewide legalization was first introduced. The only difference being that yours was eloquently presented, contained reasoned analysis of the current and potential upcoming political and cultural landscape supported by facts, well-constructed hypotheses, and a set of constructive calls to action to achieve meaningful progress through a series of intermediate steps between the current political environment and one in which federal legalization could realistically occur. So, I guess what I'm getting at is 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 13:26
|
|
