A Sometimes Food posted:Yeah Epsilon Plus posted:merk was spicy chocolate all along, the fucker ##vote merk Inversely, these two votes seem really transparently indifferent, come one after the other, and keep merk up in the -1, -2, -3 to lynch range without much more talking from them.
|
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 20:09 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 18:19 |
|
Would vote EP, ASF, or Quid today. Need to reread but they are the ones that immediately jumped out at me as being fairly scummy during the merk debacle
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 20:11 |
Quidthulhu posted:So who do you think of those 4 players is the scummiest and why? this post strikes me as bad. Weird time to mafia coach after (someone I can’t remember I’m phone posting) talks about how 4/5 people voting for merk at that point had very little content. This is also like within 12 hours of deadline (when most of that deadline is nighttime for the game).
|
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 20:12 |
Mr. Humalong posted:Would vote EP, ASF, or Quid today. I think I agree with this but the order I like is: Quid -> ASF -> EP for now ##vote Quid
|
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 20:13 |
|
Oh mine wasn’t ranked. Definitely good with voting Quid ##vote Quid
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 20:17 |
|
“This guy says he won’t vote the guy we know will flip town, better mafia dad him”
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 20:19 |
|
Those are two scum votes in a row if I ever saw them lol Are we already in LYLO?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 21:35 |
Isn’t there a way to possess votefinder to post?
|
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 21:37 |
Quidthulhu posted:Those are two scum votes in a row if I ever saw them lol AND YET NOT A VOTE FOR EITHER OF US
|
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 21:37 |
|
Sandwolf posted:AND YET NOT A VOTE FOR EITHER OF US I'm sorry, do I need to vote immediately without reviewing yesterday and coming to informed conclusions? Didn't realize that was how we were playing this now
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 21:42 |
|
##vote sandwolf this whole shtick is a bad “gottem”
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 21:57 |
|
I still think Hum is scum based on his laissez-faire shotgun approach to day 1. The aforementioned merk walkback: Sandwolf posted:Hum, what do you think of merk Mr. Humalong posted:The more he posts the worse I feel Several hours but like only a few posts later, after merk returns: Mr. Humalong posted:I, personally, will not vote merk today and, furthermore, find it suspicious a bunch of players that have been exceptionally quiet have suddenly appeared to vote him. He also has been happy to float people as potential dunk candidates while not committing to anything: Mr. Humalong posted:AA you might be on to something Mr. Humalong posted:Would vote EP, ASF, or Quid today. ##vote Hum Sandwolf, what about Hum's D1 posting made you feel "good in your heart that he was town?" There's nothing to indicate that.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 22:20 |
|
Kashuno posted:##vote sandwolf this whole shtick is a bad “gottem” I am beginning to be in agreement with this too.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 22:20 |
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Would vote EP, ASF, or Quid today. "debacle" is a hell of a way to describe a day 1 lunch, mr. emotional appealalong
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 22:26 |
Quidthulhu posted:
lol you’re really not gonna like it and I’m being SLIGHTLY hyperbolic about that wording, but:
|
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 22:55 |
Mr. Humalong posted:Also I sure wish the mod would fix whatever makes the discord constantly show me there’s a new post even though I can’t see anything in the discord. I had the exact same problem as he said and I presume it’s because the scum page/spectator chat is being posted in but as another townie I have no access to chats but can also see notifications. I know it’s a bullshit reason and I debated not even talking about it but if it’s obviously dumb in some way I figured I could be talked out of it because tbh his play D1 around the merk lynch is kinda scummy
|
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 22:57 |
|
Kashuno posted:##vote sandwolf this whole shtick is a bad “gottem” It's not a gottem if there's posts and evidence backing it. It's just a case and one that's fairly reasonable. I don't actually see much wrong with the argumentation.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 23:01 |
|
Sandwolf posted:I had the exact same problem as he said and I presume it’s because the scum page/spectator chat is being posted in but as another townie I have no access to chats but can also see notifications. This is a really scummy post. Non-content reasons to retroactively justify a bad call that you could easily be talked out of is not a great look, Sandwolf...
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 23:03 |
|
Natural 20 posted:It's not a gottem if there's posts and evidence backing it. What’s reasonable about the case on me, specifically, when compared to my case on Hum or the suspicions people have voiced about Sandwolf? Why do you think I’m the best candidate for a dunk today?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 23:04 |
|
Quidthulhu posted:What’s reasonable about the case on me, specifically, when compared to my case on Hum or the suspicions people have voiced about Sandwolf? Why do you think I’m the best candidate for a dunk today? Where did I say you're the best dunk candidate?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 23:19 |
|
Natural 20 posted:Where did I say you're the best dunk candidate? You replied to Kashuno’s comment pushing back on Sandwolf’s case by saying you felt it wasn’t a gotcha and a reasonable case. Context clues there suggest you agree with the case?? Nitpicking on the semantics of my question aside, you want to explain why you think the case on me has merit??
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 23:29 |
Quidthulhu posted:This is a really scummy post. Non-content reasons to retroactively justify a bad call that you could easily be talked out of is not a great look, Sandwolf... Then vote me already dude, and I didn’t say I would be easily talked out about it, I said I was open to the idea of it because it IS a non-content reason. Your hesitation to vote me despite multiple posts tryna paint me as scummy makes me think you don’t actually want to commit to voting me!!
|
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 00:44 |
|
I feel like this didn't get mentioned whenmerk posted:Ackshully, reading again and less frustrated: It really should, Pmush's early vote on me was fine. Their later vote on me was completely hollow activity, scum trying to look like they were doing something while avoiding the at that time near certain lunch of someone they knew was town.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 02:42 |
|
Quidthulhu posted:You replied to Kashuno’s comment pushing back on Sandwolf’s case by saying you felt it wasn’t a gotcha and a reasonable case. Context clues there suggest you agree with the case?? I think you're being incredibly defensive over this which is interesting. If I was pushed, the Sandwolf case has merit because he's rightly pointing out your reluctance to settle on a vote across multiple days and situations which is typically scummy. The reality is I'm objecting to Kash describing the case as a gotcha when it's just a case that's relatively well argued and supported. If you don't buy it that's another thing but Kash claiming doesn't have a decent basis is wrong.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 02:48 |
|
I haven’t voted for Sandwolf because I find Hum more scummy than Sand. I would vote for Sand m, but alas, I have but one vote. I moved my vote to merk off of Hum to avoid a nodunk with an early rear end deadline. What about my posting makes you characterize my actions as anything but the above, Nat?
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 04:43 |
A bunch of people haven’t even posted this day yet
|
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 07:36 |
|
God remember that time Kash posted 1000 times? What happened to us man.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 13:30 |
|
Quidthulhu posted:I haven’t voted for Sandwolf because I find Hum more scummy than Sand. I would vote for Sand m, but alas, I have but one vote. I'm not. My issue with Kash is that he dismissed Sandwolf's case as one without merit. But to me, even if I don't agree with the thrust of the argumentation, it's still sound argumentation. What's far, far more interesting to me is just how defensive you've been around this. I've not even voted for you but you're going after me hard when the case I was making wasn't even one focused on you.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 15:58 |
|
##vote Pmush Thought I had honestly.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 17:16 |
|
Yeah I’m feeling even better about my vote. Quid is scum.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 17:52 |
Mr. Humalong posted:Yeah I’m feeling even better about my vote. Quid is scum. Agreed, he seems really eager to characterize his own actions as those of town
|
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 18:08 |
|
You’re welcome to call me defensive but back it up with casework. I think you’ll find it’s not there
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 19:38 |
I’m trying not to dominate this game day by just talking and talking and talking but it seems like no one really has much to say. I can do that casework if ya want me to though, Quid
|
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 19:48 |
|
I want you to
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 20:16 |
ok
|
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 20:26 |
Quidthulhu posted:I haven’t voted for Sandwolf because I find Hum more scummy than Sand. I would vote for Sand m, but alas, I have but one vote. The last statement here reads to me as an attempt to characterize his actions as purely those of town, when I don't agree with his own characterization or the implied conclusion. He can vote me OR Hum, there isn't some obligation to one or the other, he could vote back and forth post-to-post. But honestly, after he votes for Hum: Quidthulhu posted:##vote Hum he immediately jumps over to talk to me, where he then seems way more fixated on my scumminess/trying to find a market for my lynch: Quidthulhu posted:I am beginning to be in agreement with this [kashuno's vote on sandwolf] too. Quidthulhu posted:This is a really scummy post [one of sandwolf's]. Non-content reasons to retroactively justify a bad call that you could easily be talked out of is not a great look, Sandwolf... Quidthulhu posted:What’s reasonable about the case on me, specifically, when compared to my case on Hum or the suspicions people have voiced about Sandwolf? Why do you think I’m the best candidate for a dunk today? Just to clarify, while a few people voiced suspicions on me, they either dropped a vote (like Kash) or mentioned it offhandedly. Quid is continually trying to get players to consider my lynch, but no one's having it, so he doesn't drop a vote. If he actually cared about getting Hum lynched, wouldn't he be pushing on it just as hard as me? All this mounting suspicion on me (see his quotes above), but no willingness to vote me over Hum? It's inauthentic and his attempts to push this townie characterization of his play just strike me as scum who feels he's played sufficiently townie and is frustrated no one else feels that way.
|
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 20:34 |
|
I don’t feel like I’ve played sufficiently townie cause admittedly there hasn’t been a lot of engagement in this game. But my play has absolutely not been scummy. It’s been probing!
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 22:43 |
|
Hrm ##vote Quid I'm more convinced this is right now. We need to make sure we consolidate since deadline is set to be at like 3pm my time tomorrow and I'll be in work.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2019 01:55 |
|
Lol “I’ve done no case work but I’m convinced the bad case I’ve floated is correct” Good luck, y’all
|
# ? Nov 18, 2019 02:48 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 18:19 |
|
Votecount for Day 2 Quidthulhu (3): Sandwolf, Mr. Humalong, Natural 20 Sandwolf (1): Kashuno PMush Perfect (1): A Sometimes Food Mr. Humalong (1): Quidthulhu Not Voting (3): Epsilon Plus, PMush Perfect, SolusLunes With 9 alive, it's 5 votes to execute. The current deadline is November 19th, 2019 at midnight AEST -- that's in about 10 hours.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2019 04:59 |