Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Carlos Lantana
Oct 2, 2003

I spotted Provenzano dressed just like the mobster that got shot in the face in Irises room in Taxi Driver and suspect the film has a ton of callbacks. Who saw what?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Punkin Spunkin
Jan 1, 2010
This is a simple story about choosing dads. When given a choice between two dads, anyone that would choose old man joe pesci over solidarity pacino does deserve to die alone.
And on a tangent, im glad as gently caress Parasite beat DIRTY HIPPIE FEET: A QUENTIN TARANTINO FANTASY at Cannes, even if it promotes the righteous idea that every house in america should definitely have a big dog. Far preferred The Irishman and Parasite to that poo poo, even if Once Upon a Time was often amusing and clearly expensively made. N Word Dude's movies get more and more masturbatory as time goes on. Cant wait for the super tasteful film about 9/11 BUT WHAT IF THEY TOTALLY SHOT THE HIJACKERS IN THE HEAD AND PWNED THEM BEFORE THEY. COULD CRASH THE PLANES LOL!!! Also in the chaos some of the female passengers lose their shoes!! Aw damnnn!

Punkin Spunkin fucked around with this message at 09:39 on Nov 30, 2019

Qmass
Jun 3, 2003

hey man they are just movies ok

Terra-da-loo!
Apr 6, 2008

Sufficiently kickass.
Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood was easily one of Tarantino's strongest movies, in my opinion, but whatever, I guess.

What's kinda funny, though, is that the poster bemoans alternate history narratives while praising a movie that's essentially alternate history (the one the thread's for).

doomisland
Oct 5, 2004

Punkin Spunkin posted:

This is a simple story about choosing dads. When given a choice between two dads, anyone that would choose old man joe pesci over solidarity pacino does deserve to die alone.
And on a tangent, im glad as gently caress Parasite beat DIRTY HIPPIE FEET: A QUENTIN TARANTINO FANTASY at Cannes, even if it promotes the righteous idea that every house in america should definitely have a big dog. Far preferred The Irishman and Parasite to that poo poo, even if Once Upon a Time was often amusing and clearly expensively made. N Word Dude's movies get more and more masturbatory as time goes on. Cant wait for the super tasteful film about 9/11 BUT WHAT IF THEY TOTALLY SHOT THE HIJACKERS IN THE HEAD AND PWNED THEM BEFORE THEY. COULD CRASH THE PLANES LOL!!! Also in the chaos some of the female passengers lose their shoes!! Aw damnnn!

Finally a good 9/11 movie idea

The REAL Goobusters
Apr 25, 2008

Punkin Spunkin posted:

This is a simple story about choosing dads. When given a choice between two dads, anyone that would choose old man joe pesci over solidarity pacino does deserve to die alone.
And on a tangent, im glad as gently caress Parasite beat DIRTY HIPPIE FEET: A QUENTIN TARANTINO FANTASY at Cannes, even if it promotes the righteous idea that every house in america should definitely have a big dog. Far preferred The Irishman and Parasite to that poo poo, even if Once Upon a Time was often amusing and clearly expensively made. N Word Dude's movies get more and more masturbatory as time goes on. Cant wait for the super tasteful film about 9/11 BUT WHAT IF THEY TOTALLY SHOT THE HIJACKERS IN THE HEAD AND PWNED THEM BEFORE THEY. COULD CRASH THE PLANES LOL!!! Also in the chaos some of the female passengers lose their shoes!! Aw damnnn!

One last meltdown before the decade is over

Punkin Spunkin
Jan 1, 2010

Terra-da-loo! posted:

while praising a movie that's essentially alternate history (the one the thread's for).
It was okay.

zer0spunk
Nov 6, 2000

devil never even lived
The source material this comes from is generally regarded as complete bullshit right?

afatwhiteloaf
Oct 19, 2012
It’s bullshit but it’s true.

Incredible film, Frank at the end fondling his ring, a meaningless reward for a dehumanizing, monstrous life, as the shadows close affected me more emotionally than anything I’ve seen in years.

edit: Action Bronson as the vulgar, undignified casket salesman imaginable is a stronger indictment of valorizing men like Frank’s masculinity than anything anyone has ever said about how Goodfella’s is bad.

afatwhiteloaf fucked around with this message at 20:04 on Nov 30, 2019

Carly Gay Dead Son
Aug 27, 2007

Bonus.
Action can’t act for poo poo but I LOVE that casting decision.

zer0spunk
Nov 6, 2000

devil never even lived
a fun read

https://slate.com/culture/2019/08/the-irishman-scorsese-netflix-movie-true-story-lies.html

regardless i think the fate of hoffa was, he was rocking the boat too much and he was killed for it. who did it, where his body ended up being are sort of inconsequential relatively speaking

LesterGroans
Jun 9, 2009

It's funny...

You were so scary at night.

Budgie Jumping posted:

Action can’t act for poo poo but I LOVE that casting decision.

They should've cast Slaine.

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer

zer0spunk posted:

a fun read

https://slate.com/culture/2019/08/the-irishman-scorsese-netflix-movie-true-story-lies.html

regardless i think the fate of hoffa was, he was rocking the boat too much and he was killed for it. who did it, where his body ended up being are sort of inconsequential relatively speaking

Yeah, Frank probably didn't do it (and if he did he lied about the particulars for some reason), but one or more persons working on behalf of the mob did.

garycoleisgod
Sep 27, 2004
Boo
On thinking about the movie I think it's real strength is that all the mob stuff is pretty much over with half an hour left, and we are just left to watch people get old, be forgotten, be abandoned and die alone. It's actually one of the most effective horror movies I've ever seen. The matter of fact manner of it all just makes it worse. The coffin buying scene is so without sentiment because all that happens is you die, get put in a box and rot there for eternity.

There isn't much for the lady characters to do, but the one word of dialogue ("Why?") cuts through all Frank's bullshit and he has no answer, because Peggy has known from when she was a child what her father really was.

Punkin Spunkin
Jan 1, 2010
I forget if he did similar stuff with casino or goodfellas but i enjoyed the frequent *stop for a second to superimpose the brutal future death this random rear end in a top hat has coming to them*
Nice mob movie touch especially when they were all super hateable.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
Great movie, not going to rank it but definitely up there with Parasite and Hippie Feet this year.

It didn't feel as long as it is, although I had to stop it about half way through because it was getting waaay to late so maybe that had something to do with it. Certainly one thing that stands out the most is how unglamorous everything is. We see Frank go from driving meat trucks to being mafia's chief house painter and for what, a nice lincoln he goes to jail for and a family that hates him? In other gangster movies you see all the parties, mansions, and other cool poo poo, but here it's only the regrets.

I didn't find the de-aging too distracting, but it was sometimes difficult to keep up what time it was supposed to be. One thing I didn't quite get is the setup with the wedding meeting. Were they planning on killing Hoffa all along? Since Frank was supposed to be at that meeting, what's with all the poo poo about going/not going at the last moment, then flying to Detroit for some reason? Why have Frank kill him at all, and not the other guy's minion?


Punkin Spunkin posted:

I forget if he did similar stuff with casino or goodfellas but i enjoyed the frequent *stop for a second to superimpose the brutal future death this random rear end in a top hat has coming to them*
Nice mob movie touch especially when they were all super hateable.
I don't think he did, but it's been ages so it's possible. I definitely liked those too. "Sentenced to 100 years, died in prison. Shot 8 times in the face in his kitchen. Blown up by a nail bomb under his porch" :getin:

Darko
Dec 23, 2004

The future death stuff wasnt in any of his other mob movies.

wizardofloneliness
Dec 30, 2008

mobby_6kl posted:

I don't think he did, but it's been ages so it's possible. I definitely liked those too. "Sentenced to 100 years, died in prison. Shot 8 times in the face in his kitchen. Blown up by a nail bomb under his porch" :getin:

Yeah, those were great. I think my favorite was the lone “Well-liked by everyone, died of natural causes” in between all the murders.

I did think it was weird that Anna Paquin only had two lines. I get why the character was written that way, I just thought it was kind of strange to cast someone like her for just that, even though her two lines were pretty great. Maybe she just wanted to be in a Scorsese movie?

Basebf555
Feb 29, 2008

The greatest sensual pleasure there is is to know the desires of another!

Fun Shoe

mobby_6kl posted:

I didn't find the de-aging too distracting, but it was sometimes difficult to keep up what time it was supposed to be. One thing I didn't quite get is the setup with the wedding meeting. Were they planning on killing Hoffa all along? Since Frank was supposed to be at that meeting, what's with all the poo poo about going/not going at the last moment, then flying to Detroit for some reason? Why have Frank kill him at all, and not the other guy's minion?

At first Frank was setting it up as an honest meeting to make peace, but then at the last minute he was told that they wouldn't be attending after all, with the obvious meaning implied that the decision had been made to kill Hoffa. It seems that Russell or others then either reconsidered or didn't like the way Frank reacted to the decision(he was obviously unhappy), and they decided to test his loyalty by having him do the deed. They aren't sure if he is going to side with Hoffa. And he almost does, Russell warns him not to call to warn Hoffa and Frank is shown staying up all night in bed staring at the phone considering it.

That's why Frank doesn't want to sit in the front seat of the car, he thinks he might be killed as well.

Tart Kitty
Dec 17, 2016

Oh, well, that's all water under the bridge, as I always say. Water under the bridge!

Really enjoyed this. And it was a great reminder of how consistently funny Scorsese is as a director. He might be the best "edit as punchline" filmmaker out there next to like, maybe Edgar Wright.

porfiria
Dec 10, 2008

by Modern Video Games

wizardofloneliness posted:

Yeah, those were great. I think my favorite was the lone “Well-liked by everyone, died of natural causes” in between all the murders.

I did think it was weird that Anna Paquin only had two lines. I get why the character was written that way, I just thought it was kind of strange to cast someone like her for just that, even though her two lines were pretty great. Maybe she just wanted to be in a Scorsese movie?

I really liked how her casting (and the character's position in the story generally) leads us to expect some kind of final moment with DeNiro--which on some level would be cathartic. Instead we get a conversation with another daughter, and we realize that those quiet background characters have been equally hosed up by what he's done.

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer
Honestly I think part of the casting is just Anna Paquin does a really good disdainful glare.

minato
Jun 7, 2004

cutty cain't hang, say 7-up.
Taco Defender
https://twitter.com/nealbrennan/status/1200954519640690688

I think it works well in the above chunks.



The gutpunch scene for me was when Frank called Jo, sputtering the words, and as he hangs up we see the huge gold ring given to him by Russell.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Ariza posted:

I too would like to know the answer to this. I know they mentioned he ended up in jail, but he knew who his Dad was with the night he disappeared. You think he would've mentioned it to someone. Or got some revenge at least. I'm assuming I missed something. Originally I thought the guy with the glasses was going to take him out and bury him, but they mentioned at the end that he got pinched for something silly and went to jail for a bit.
The thing you're missing is that he never figured out what kind of fish it was, so no one believed his story.

Punkin Spunkin posted:

I forget if he did similar stuff with casino or goodfellas but i enjoyed the frequent *stop for a second to superimpose the brutal future death this random rear end in a top hat has coming to them*
Nice mob movie touch especially when they were all super hateable.
I liked how you later see one of the deaths, then find out the killing was ordered based on some other rear end in a top hat forgetting to inform the higher-ups.

Farm Frenzy
Jan 3, 2007

Punkin Spunkin posted:

I forget if he did similar stuff with casino or goodfellas but i enjoyed the frequent *stop for a second to superimpose the brutal future death this random rear end in a top hat has coming to them*
Nice mob movie touch especially when they were all super hateable.

the late 70s and early 80s seem to have been pretty rough!

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


Dante posted:

That's just part of the story that echoes the story from the book, and from the FBI Hoffa files. In the movie it's all weird because in one scene that's a devoted adopted son literally rushing a gunman for him and then he's helping him kill him...but then we learn he didn't know he was helping to kill him?? And then he disappears from the story, with no mention of how this might be an issue. This is part of the weird "movie can't decide what it wants to be" part for me. It wants to put in all these fun little pieces from the book, but the cast becomes so large it's impossible to tell it all in a coherent way even with a 3 hour + runtime.

It's probably because the book is based on a whole bunch of lies.

Tumble
Jun 24, 2003
I'm not thinking of anything!

mary had a little clam posted:

As a banal cis white dude from the suburbs, I remember growing up idolizing gangster films, or at least buying into the glamour and coolness of the wiseguy lifestyle. I'm in my late 30s now so I've kind of cooled off on stuff like that. I came into The Irishman really worried that a) I had grown apart from mobster movies and b) the 3.5 hour runtime was going to feel indulgent and wasteful.

Wrong on all accounts, I looooved this film. Didn't feel the runtime one bit. I think it made a big impact on me BECAUSE I was a dumb kid from the burbs fantasizing about being a gangster. The way the film strips away the cool factor and highlights the emptiness, the loneliness of a life of bloodshed and betrayal was heartbreaking.forever.[/spoiler]


Every guy has that part of them thinks maybe they're just a couple of steps away from being a bad mother fucker, maturity is realizing that there is a very good chance they're the ones that end up catching a bullet or getting chopped up themselves.

Scorsese's movies are always very good at portraying that: he never really has gun-fights, people die in split-second moments. I think his longest battle is in The Departed and even that is just a bunch of people dying in quick moments all in a row, there are no protracted fights with people jumping around. Bullets do not gently caress around in his movies.

Timby
Dec 23, 2006

Your mother!

Scorsese's longest gunfight is probably Taxi Driver.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Basebf555 posted:

At first Frank was setting it up as an honest meeting to make peace, but then at the last minute he was told that they wouldn't be attending after all, with the obvious meaning implied that the decision had been made to kill Hoffa. It seems that Russell or others then either reconsidered or didn't like the way Frank reacted to the decision(he was obviously unhappy), and they decided to test his loyalty by having him do the deed. They aren't sure if he is going to side with Hoffa. And he almost does, Russell warns him not to call to warn Hoffa and Frank is shown staying up all night in bed staring at the phone considering it.

That's why Frank doesn't want to sit in the front seat of the car, he thinks he might be killed as well.
Thanks, makes sense. I wouldn't have sent Frank to murder his friend but, that's just me and that's why I'll never make it as a mobster I guess.

Captain Jesus
Feb 26, 2009

What's wrong with you? You don't even have your beer goggles on!!
The CGI de-ageing was extremely distracting to me, especially in the first half of the movie. It gave me flashbacks to Joseph Gordon-Levitt's horrifying make-up in Looper. Somehow it just didn't look right. It also turns out that taking a man in his late 70s and making his face look younger is not enough to make him actually appear young. De Niro might have looked like a man in this mid 40s at best but he certainly didn't look like a man in his 30s. It's made worse by the fact that we know how De Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci looked like when they were younger and they certainly didn't look like the way they did in this movie.

Karpaw
Oct 29, 2011

by Cyrano4747

afatwhiteloaf posted:

Incredible film, Frank at the end fondling his ring, a meaningless reward for a dehumanizing, monstrous life, as the shadows close affected me more emotionally than anything I’ve seen in years.

This and when he's showing the photo to the nurse and speaking with fondness of someone he shot in the back is haunting.

Tart Kitty
Dec 17, 2016

Oh, well, that's all water under the bridge, as I always say. Water under the bridge!

Captain Jesus posted:

The CGI de-ageing was extremely distracting to me, especially in the first half of the movie. It gave me flashbacks to Joseph Gordon-Levitt's horrifying make-up in Looper. Somehow it just didn't look right. It also turns out that taking a man in his late 70s and making his face look younger is not enough to make him actually appear young. De Niro might have looked like a man in this mid 40s at best but he certainly didn't look like a man in his 30s. It's made worse by the fact that we know how De Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci looked like when they were younger and they certainly didn't look like the way they did in this movie.

The blue eye contacts on De Niro were really distracting in a couple of scenes. The worst of them made it look like he a was a host to Pazuzu or something.

Live At Five!
Feb 15, 2008
After the first few scenes the de-aging stopped bothering me but De Niro's blue eyes were distracting the whole movie. Made him look like a white walker sometimes. Otherwise the movie loving owned and the last 90 minutes is incredible and specifically the last 30 minutes is brutal to watch and very much does not glorify mobsters.

Punkin Spunkin
Jan 1, 2010
Yeah, based on the articles about the production/cost of the film and based on the trailer (and just the power of the human eye to suss things out) i kinda assumed it would be some rogue one type poo poo where it sticks out but....i didnt even really think about it???
I guess it helped that sometimes i wasnt sure if they were also making them look older, since i dont know how decrepit pesci/de niro/pacino are in 2019

Punkin Spunkin fucked around with this message at 06:28 on Dec 2, 2019

MrMojok
Jan 28, 2011

I thought this was brilliant.

Scorsese made his final statement on the mob films, much the way Eastwood made the final statement on the westerns with Unforgiven: by making a film that completely pokes holes in the previous glorification of the genre.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


Captain Jesus posted:

De Niro might have looked like a man in this mid 40s at best but he certainly didn't look like a man in his 30s.

hahaha I thought he was supposed to be in his mid 40s in those scenes oops.

Astrochicken
Aug 13, 2007

So you better go back to your bars, your temples
Your massage parlors!

Nothing I can really add except to say it's kind of brutal that he's got the rest of his days to figure out why Peggy cut him out of her life and you know he won't ever fully let himself understand. It'll just slightly gnaw at him until he keels over.

Frank never really seemed that bright at any point in the movie.

Davros1
Jul 19, 2007

You've got to admit, you are kind of implausible



There's a 23 min bonus roundtable called "The Irishman- In Conversation" on Netflix, with Scoresese, DeNiro, Pacino, and Pesci. If anything, it needs to be seen just for Pesci's hair and facial hair.

Clipperton
Dec 20, 2011
Grimey Drawer

Astrochicken posted:

Frank never really seemed that bright at any point in the movie.[/spoiler]

His beef-embezzlement plan appeared to hinge on his boss not being able to count to ten

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

LesterGroans
Jun 9, 2009

It's funny...

You were so scary at night.
Man, I keep thinking about Hoffa's death. Pacino is heartbreaking in that last moment.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply