Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I like the things they're trying to do with this show, but holy poo poo we're at episode 4 and the story hasn't moved on from 'Picard needs to find the girl'.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

FuturePastNow posted:

Everyone doing the Kobayashi Maru knows it's a training sim. But by that point, they're 3-4 years into the Academy (and Saavik was a Lieutenant, so she was in like a post-graduate command class), the cadets feel smart as hell, and have done hundreds of such sims with scenarios they could always resolve and "win." So you throw someone in a sim they can't beat and see if they get angry, if they give up and leave the freighter to die, if they go out guns blazing, etc. And nothing is really the wrong answer so much as a direction for further training and study.

Having worked with the military, I've realised that the real terror of the Kobayashi Maru is the cadets are being placed in a simulated command role that they might be expected to be ready for in twenty years, but their potential to reach that rank is being decided now.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

A GIANT PARSNIP posted:

Picard had been in Starfleet for over 75 years at that point. He didn't know how to function without Starfleet.

He still doesn't, to be honest - his first instinct was to go to Starfleet Command and ask for a ship from them, and he decided he liked Rios because he acted like a Starfleet officer.

I think the last bit is backwards. He susses Rios out immediately as someone playing at Han Solo but is really just acting out because they are bitter at something Starfleet has done.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I liked the bit on the casino planet where they achieved that thing that was relevant to the rest of the story

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

just another posted:

The Picard parts of the last episode felt very video game-y to me, like it's being written by people who learned about storytelling from playing World of Warcraft. I'm pretty sure I've played the "Absolute Candor" mission in many different games over the years.

Also "Society of Highly Trained Warriors who you've never heard of but they're the traditional enemies of one of the most notorious and powerful factions" is extremely fantasy RPG sequel-tier writing.

The show is currently a heist film, except where in Oceans 11 you have a montage with a 10 second cut introducing the crew members, here we get a full episode for each one.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Lizard Combatant posted:

I'd say aesthetics are the smallest part of it.

But to take your example of magic stone vs machine, already you can see the distinction.

The use of the machine inherently implies the time before its invention, the steps society took to allow for its invention and the changes that likely occurred as a result. But it will also say something about our own society in the process.

Take something as seemingly fantastical as the replicator. The concept of turning energy into matter (thought only theoretically possible back when the replicator was conceived) takes an improbable possibility and extrapolates that if we were able to realise this concept, the ramifications it would have on our world would be so profound as to usher in a utopia. The replicator doesn't just exist to feed our hungry space men, it radically shaped the societal structure they live in by removing those basic needs from their day to day lives. The fight over resources disappeared, and the growth and betterment of humanity arose as a new driving force. In this way it posits something about our own world, that the unequal division of resources denies us the potential contributions of those who must still fight for their next meal.

By contrast, the magic stone is static and unchanging. It's usage implies no causal chain of progress and it responds to ability or character of the individual.

Fantasy will also often deal with destiny and fate (though this isn't a requirement, plenty of fantasy eschews fate), that there is a natural order that inevitably reasserts itself when challenged.

One is not better than the other, they serve different narrative purposes.

That's what I see as the basic difference between even soft Sci fi like Trek and fantasy. It's not about elf ears and lizard men.

Is there genre overlap in Star Trek? Of course. But the show is predominantly framed as sci-fi and saying otherwise just to shut down an obnoxious poster is reductive.

I like this post and while I agree totally with it I've never quite had the words before to articulate what I think the difference between sci-fi and fantasy is so I'll be stealing these words in future.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I think they've dropped enough info on the cast that theres potential for all of them, but the show hasn't even begun to dig into any of them yet. Everyone is clearly haunted by the trauma of the loss of someone they cared about (the pattern is so clear that you can tell this week we'll learn about chakotay's death).

The story feels a bit like its moving at the pace of The Witcher - at the end of the season the only thing that will have been achieved is the cast being united.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I think it's more likely they bring back Soong than Lore.

But Brent Spiner is only credited one episode so its be a hell of a move.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I regret we never got a mirror universe TNG episode.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

RLM having 10 minutes on how Star Trek showed people can come out of the collective perfectly fine and traumatised only worked because they ignored that immediately after BoBW TNG had an episode that was just Picard crying and having PTSD on the family wineyard from his experience and 7 of 9's entire character arc was about trying to become a real person again.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I think I'll also say that I'm fine with Picard overtly or implicitly retconning past Star Trek. Firstly, inconsistent with past trek isnt necessarily a retcon, secondly every single series of trek has had a slightly different spin on things. The Borg have been different every time they show up.

In this case, I think the reclaimed Borg in Picard might represent Westerners who went off to fight for ISIS in Syria and are now in detention camps there because nobody is quite sure if deradicalisation works. They used to be us, they're damaged, we want to bring them back but arent quite sure if it would be safe.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

The moral of ST:Picard is not going to be 'actually you are right to be worried about the 5th column of people who live among us but you think could turn into terrorists at any moment'.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Snow Cone Capone posted:

Our sun is ~8 light minutes from the Earth. The next 9 closest star systems are between 4-10 light years from us. A supernova's blast radius is in the range of 30-40 light years.

A supernova's blast also travels at fractions of a the speed of light so you'd have centuries to get ready if you weren't on Romulus. If this were a real supernova. This is all trying to make sense of 'JJ Abrams doesn't understand how space works'
though but also this is star trek so there's nothing wrong with saying this was a special supernova for reasons.

The story requires us to accept that the Romulan Empire suffered a disaster damaging enough that it essentially caused total state collapse. The rest of the detail is irrelevant if it isn't important for the purposes of the story, which it isn't.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Senor Tron posted:


The physical matter erupted from a supernova expands much slower than light yes, but the energy burst literally expands at light speed. If it was a supernova threatening nearby star systems that would actually fit in that there was enough time for the Federation to start building an evacuation fleet from scratch.

Also for all his time/space scaling issues, can't entirely blame JJ for this one. Generations really messed it up as well. (Except for the funny part where they had to outrun a supernova so just did it at a leisurely Warp 1).

Still literally a decade. But it's a magic star trek supernova, they had some warning but not years of warning. It's something that's okay to accept given everything else Star Trek has us accept.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

'Nobody wrote an episode about this' is not inconsistency.

Maybe theres a story about how the federation has an advantage from being able to salvage and research two exploded cubes on Earth's doorstep and the Klingons and Romulans are upset about this, but nobody wrote that story and the star trek universe isnt a real thing that exists independently of the stories that have been written, so we'll never know.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I'm starting to get a bit of a Culture novel vibe from the series. A glacial plot, a couple of seemingly unconnected plotlines, a group of protagonists from a utopian society having to interact with their less than utopian neighbours. Feels a little bit Consider Phlebas, a little bit Hydrogen Sonata.

Not as good, but I think I can see how you could take the initial script treatment and instead make it a culture story.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

FlamingLiberal posted:

It drove me crazy that they did this in the recent Star Wars trilogy and it’s just as annoying now

No I think this is fine. The Romulan Empire suffered a massive disaster and is in collapse. The Federation suffered a disaster and turned inwards to deal with it. This isn't even actually new ground for Star Trek. The back story to ST:Picard is literally Star Trek 6, except this time the Admiral Cartwright faction in Starfleet wins.

That's massively different to Star Wars's 'oh you thought the good guys won? We'll just drop you into a world where the Empire is still around and the most powerful force without ever really explaining that'.


e: In fact actually: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqGnAIgzUTY

Star Trek 6 even establishes that something can blow up in space and because 'subspace' the shockwave can travel really fast and far.

Alchenar fucked around with this message at 21:44 on Feb 21, 2020

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I would not mind if in the penultimate episode where all is lost and Picard is about to give up hope, John De Lancie pops in for a quick scene. "I can't intervene in what's going on, but there's still hope"

Just that.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Eiba posted:

drat this thread moves fast. So many people are saying so many ridiculous things about this show that I want to address, but who's got the time?

I will say, with regards to Picard vs Seven and how the show made Seven look cool and Picard look naive- that's true, it did. Because Picard is naive in this context. He has always had massive institutional weight behind his justice, and so he has an institutional sense of justice. As a representative of a benevolent power, doing the right thing is doing things by the book.

"The rangers have too much power/too little accountability, even though they're trying to do the right thing, so I don't support them" comes out as "they act outside the law," and you can see why that rubs Picard the wrong way. The conflict between Picard and Seven at the end was the same conflict, couched in emotional terms, but Seven wasn't wrong even in moral terms. That lady was not going to be held accountable, and there was no other way to bring her to justice- she hadn't broken any laws in a region without laws.

Picard has to grow in this new setting. He doesn't just need to discover his old sense of purpose, he needs to figure out how to deal with the world when the government isn't on his side to bail him out, where he's not just the face of the Benevolent Empire, but an individual trying to make a difference. Essentially he needs to learn that rules, as a matter of principle, exist to support the established order, and if he doesn't respect the established order, he needs to stop respecting the rules, while staying true to his sense of justice.

It's a good story for Picard. And still a very positive one. It's not his belief in doing the right thing that's being questioned, it's his belief in the rule of law.

It's also important that Seven calls Picard out for deciding to step back and retire the moment he didn't have the option of massive institutional weight behind his justice.

Absolute best moment in the episode was the dialogue between Picard and Seven on whether it's possible to fully regain your humanity. This season is a bit messy in themes, but recovery from trauma is the big one and that was a well written and very well acted moment.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I'll say it again, the premise of Picard is 'what if the exact events of The Undiscovered Country happened again, except Starfleet goes with the 'let them die'' option'. Trek is inconsistent on lots of things depending on what series/film you are looking at, but almost every time the issue has come up the Federation has actually always been depicted as two missed meals away from 'gently caress it, genocide is now acceptable policy'.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Drink-Mix Man posted:

Well, for starters, I think they are ignoring movie-era Picard (as they should).

The only two anti-violence lectures that I remember are telling Elron he didn't need to chop that guy's head off, and telling Seven that gunning down an unarmed person in cold blood won't make her feel better. Am I forgetting anything? Given he also grieving the deaths of Data and all those millions of Romulans he feels he let down, it seems pretty motivated to me.

In both instances he arguably deliberately sets in motion both events. He sets up the confrontation at the cafe, and then, aside from going "yeah take those two phaser rifles you've told you me you need for... reasons" and looking right at Seven as she visibly charges them up, he's operating the transporter controls as he beams her back into the room where Bjayzl is.

It's weird because Stewart doesn't play either scene as if Picard is acknowledging responsibility for this violence, but the script absolutely makes it clear he has to know what he's complicit in.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Lizard Combatant posted:

Wait... So you do actually think when someone talks about how a character is framed they're literally talking about how the camera operator/DP composed a shot?

I'm being sincere here, if I've missed a whole bunch of posts where people are genuinely discussing camera angles, then simply quoting them would clear up any confusion.

Unless that's not what you meant by:


In which case you're going to have to rephrase.

Either you are being trolled or you are accidentally bullying an autistic person, either way I think you should probably disengage.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Open Source Idiom posted:



Edit: wait. Their plan is so create a time paradox by killing the younger version of a time traveller, thus forcing the time traveller to turn up and tell them the future, which they otherwise would not know.

So they're gonna threaten a time paradox in order to cause another, seperate time paradox. What?

It's worse because the whole premise of that plan turns out to be wrong. The Discovery Crew are loving morons.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Yeah the Klingon war was terrible despite having promise in the first two episodes ended up being the season B-plot.

The only 'war story' that's left for Star Trek to tell is the one that Enterprise was inching towards by the end, which is this idea that the genesis of the Federation comes from Starfleet forming a coalition to punch the Romulans hard in the face. There's a story there that's difficult to tell while being relevant and maintaining Star Trek's optimism, but there's some kind of WW2-leading-to-UN allegory you could draw out being forced to work together builds trust and so on and so forth.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Snow Cone Capone posted:


VVVVVVV I generally loathe anything he's in but he's so loving earnest and into it that I can put it aside. It also helps that his character has some major flaws, but they're kind of addressed head-on.

Yeah I was a bit two ways on this, but ultimately I think the earnestness gives the show that 90's tv show Star Trek feel to it.

I'm happy with a world in which McFalane is doing 'remember the optimism of the 90's?' and Stewart is also doing 'remember the optimism of the 90's' but in two very different ways.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Longbaugh01 posted:

No comment on the Orville or Disco ones, but just off the top of my head: Battle Of Sector 001, Battle Of Endor, Retaking DS9, Falcon Asteroid Field Pursuit, at least a few from new BSG, some from Babylon 5 (with the tech/budget they had), I’m sure there are other obvious ones I’m blanking on.

I'm going to pick out your first example to draw out 'what makes a good space battle?'. First Contact's space battle contains maybe 20 seconds of graphics of ships shooting at each other. It's good because the event is all about the effect the battle has on the characters. There's the excellent tension on the bridge of the Enterprise as they have to sit and listen to the battle start. Then we have a cut to the cube and it is clear that the battle is not going well. Worf is about to commit himself and his crew to a kamikaze attack. Picard asserts himself and we get some important exposition dump that his connection with the borg isn't psychosis, there's something lingering and real there. The cube blows up but even in successfully blowing it up we see some Federation ships get caught in the explosion

The point is that in the first 5 minutes of the film we establish that the Borg are an appalling existential threat that our heroes the Federation is willing to accept casualties it wouldn't accept in any other context to stop. The battle sets up the mood for the rest of the film.

The Orville battle sequence is just several minutes of laser beams.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Snow Cone Capone posted:

Sometimes space battles are shooty lasers, it happens

No it doesnt happens because none of these space battles are real, they are components of a story someone is trying to tell. If your space battle is minutes of shooty lasers then that means you are filling time because your story is crap and you are a bad storyteller.

Another example; theres that one battlestar galactica episode that's entirely based around one dogfight between starbuck and the scarred raider, but the space action bit isnt good because its shooty lasers, it's good because it's also invoking Starbuck's inner struggle on whether she wants to live.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Panzeh posted:

Battle damage is when everyone decides to sway a bit and Worf talks about what the percentage of shield it is.

They way I've come to rationalise it is that impacts on shields cause bits of a ship's energy grid to burn out as it surges to stop weapons fire getting through. So shield integrity dropping is really the underlying machinery burning out through stress (which is why it doesn't just immediately recharge to full). A big enough hit causes fuses to blow all over the ship, which is why your bridge console explodes. Hull armour isn't a thing, but if the plot doesn't require you to explode then in Star Trek a forcefield that keeps air in is apparently trivial enough to do that you don't actually need much of a hull to do it (see that early Discovery episode where Burnham's room gets blown up).

Obviously it's all just make believe, but I think it's actually pretty consistent that a direct hit to engines means suddenly exploding, whereas anything else is either superficial or disabling. That seems to be the writer's code.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

After that episode I'm still pretty much on the 'the ex-borg are an analogy for the ex-ISIS detention camps in Syria'. There're full of people who used to be part of a totalitarian regime, the rest of the world wants nothing to do with them and certainly isn't interested in seriously rehabilitating them, and their prison guards are themselves internally displaced persons in a near-failed state.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Lovely Joe Stalin posted:

I think a lot of people who consider themselves fans of Trek are managing to ignore that the Federation, and most of their neighbouring powers, were brought to their knees by the Dominion war.

It explains everything from planets saying "gently caress no we aren't giving our resources to the loving Romulans, they didn't want to help us, oh and also they are still a threat" to them needing to build an evacuation flotilla at Mars specifically for the the attempt. And also why a conspiracy would have been able to turn the synth uprising and loss of that flotilla into, to paraphrase the Rear Admiral from Dunkirk, "we need our ships back".
Without requiring endless exposition it is something that should be easily reasoned by anyone familiar with the setting.


The problem is the show doesn't say any of that, which is a bit unforgivable given they spent three entire episodes on Earth not moving the plot forwards an inch. There was plenty of time to have one scene between Picard and some Starfleet contemporary who stayed in where they argue the decision out. Picard talks about moral obligation and the other guy says there were a dozen crises within the Federation and the fleet had still been shattered by the Dominion War and when Mars burned and there were no more ships coming there were tough choices to be made.

It's a five minute scene at most. But it would have added conflict and nuance rather than make everyone who opposes Picard look like a dumb racist.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I'd buy that the producers want a show that anyone can start watching and doesn't rely on established knowledge of Star Trek continuity, except for each episode being absolutely crammed full of call backs to previous trek, to the extent of bringing back characters from decades ago that Picard never interacted with.

They spent three episodes clicking their heels on Earth, a single scene that says 'twenty years ago the Dominion war almost cost us everything' and actually putting some colour on what's happened to the Federation would not have been a problem.

e: and I don't mean do a full future-history info drop, the show just need to do more work to explain why android terrorists leads to gently caress-the-romulans.

Alchenar fucked around with this message at 11:17 on Mar 1, 2020

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

socialsecurity posted:

You uh aren't going to like this season then.

You also, ironically, won't like the season if you like science.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I oh totally buy this part of Star Trek. I presume that a replicator meal is a really good version of a ready meal that tastes homemade. But it's going to be one very specific version of that recipe and it'll be identical every time.

Sure there's Jambalaya in the database, but it won't be made the way Sisko's dad makes Jambalaya. Also maybe you like the experience of cooking, maybe you want the taste of cooking, maybe in a utopia of the future where nobody has to work someone wants to spend their time cooking good food for other people and other people want to eat out.

e: the culture series uses this as a touchstone example as well. In a future where nobody has to work, some people, possibly even most people will choose to spend time doing something that makes other people happy.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Lizard Combatant posted:

By contrast, the Mars workers aren't complaining about their pie not being quite how momma used to make or even getting coke zero instead of sugar, they're getting microwaved Hungry-Man Dinners #13B for some reason. No it's not a massive deal in isolation, but it could just as easily have been a scene where the small talk is about Chief What's-his-face adding his famous ragu to the menu or something. I'm more skeptical of this scene since all the characters in it are also framed as casually racist, blue collar schmoes, so maybe we're supposed to cheer (just a little) when the Android puts a mining laser through their necks.

The show has far worse issues with tone and setting but since we're talking about replicators, that scene had a number of the little things that are adding up to a cynical view of the future the franchise spent years establishing. Felt more like the space communism as envisioned by that chud in the Havana supermarket photo. I doubt it's all intentional, and this mixed messaging is probably more the byproduct of relying on familiar and cliche stock characters you'd pull out of the bag for a Law and Order or Hawaii Five-O cold open.

Yeah. The thing is, if the show just made the Dominion War a parallel to WW1 and had a couple of scenes to that effect in the opening episodes I'd be fine with it. Say that Starfleet lost 90% of the pre-war fleet, the professional core was hollowed out and a huge proportion of Federation citizenry who volunteered to fight because they're patriotic and the Fleet needed warm bodies are traumatised from having watched their friends get carved up by genetically engineered killing machines. The fleet is a shadow of what it once was, half the Federation core worlds have various Dominion-caused disasters that will take years to rebuild from, and nobody wants any more foreign adventures.

There, I can buy into the premise of Picard now.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

This show has a million threads in the background it isn't going to do any of the work to meaningfully pull together, Vulcan/Romulan secret unification is absolutely one of them.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I would consider it a good wink at the camera if O'Brian gets a cameo and he's literally the only character well adjusted and loving life.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

The saddest thing being that Season 4 is where they start to get a bit more serious with the character arcs, and you can start to feel the narrative arc of what the show should always have been about, which is how Earth went from being the new kids on the block to the centrepiece of this 'Federal UN in space'.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Lizard Combatant posted:

Yeah that's what I assumed they were going for. Except it's a wonky metaphor since there's no accompanying ethical debate.

Plus to every doctor not privy to the terrible secret of space it would seem totally bonkers.

Are they kicking down non Federation doors to enforce it?

Are they taking people already on device assisted living off their cybernetic supports?

e: lol can you imagine Crusher or Bashir going along with this?

Its wonky because the real metaphor is androids are the Muslim ban, except that analogy would be incredibly racist if you thought about it too much. The hamfisted point is that if you shut out immigrants then you lose access to the benefits their brains can provide you. In Star Treks case literally.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

This was the first episode where I really bought that Stewart was playing an old man Picard and not just himself.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Even though it's background filler that absolutely won't be followed up on, I like the idea that the secret breaks the minds of the Borg. It works that the collective would be unable to handle being confronted with knowledge that pursuing its biological/technological merging objective too far triggers a response from something so awfully powerful that resistance would be futile.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply