|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Ill be active and make good effort I will not. But I'm down to post 7 times a day for role craziness. If I live till late game I'll effort.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2020 08:00 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 02:47 |
|
Hi
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2020 04:18 |
|
##vote bminus
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2020 04:19 |
|
Mr. Humalong posted:this is scum KB Cute.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2020 04:50 |
|
Mr. Steak posted:does KB have a post restriction where he can only reply with 1 word....? Nope.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2020 17:40 |
|
Monathin posted:My incredibly hot take is that KB's continual sauciness over being expected to make it to Day 3 after he changed his meta is in fact dumb because every time he has to justify his meta he continually calls out people who "don't do near as much", which, lmao. This is a super odd post and I'm curious how you came to it. It seems like something you were discussing outside the game with someone(scum chat?), since it doesn't seem to spawn from anything in this thread. ##vote Monathin
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2020 23:17 |
|
CapitalistPig posted:I just realized deadline is tomorrow definitely a couple hours before I am even going to be awake so I'm going to have to make sure to have a vote on a scum before I go to bed tonight. Huh, that is an odd deadline. Thanks for calling it out. I like my Mona vote. Too dumb to be a scum post is never a reason to discard something. Scum make mistakes like everyone else. Leiths flipping on and off that vote does look weird. Would vote. Steak avoiding any possibility of being read by a lie detector role in a role madness game looks pretty weird to me. But haven't followed the link to whatever context there is.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2020 02:37 |
|
Epsilon Plus posted:Someone (can't remember who, not gonna look back) said that Leith's PR claim is an excellent way for scum to hide for a day, which is what I thought to myself when I first read it. This isn't a valid vote. Votecount for Day 1 Leith Maclaine (4): Mr. Steak, Crazyeyes, Hunt11, merk Monathin (3): King Burgundy, dmboogie, merk, Leith Maclaine, Ruggan (2): IllegallySober, Amnistar (1): SalTheBard, IllegallySober, Hunt11 (1): Amnistar dmboogie (1): Anomalous Amalgam Epsilon Plus (1): b-minus1 Mr. Steak (1): Mr. Humalong, Amnistar, merk (1): Squiggly King Burgundy (0): Mr. Humalong, Mr. Humalong (0): Mr. Steak, CapitalistPig (0): Leith Maclaine, b-minus1 (0): King Burgundy, Not Voting (9): CapitalistPig, Dragonatrix, Epsilon Plus, Mithross, Monathin, Nep-Nep, peramene, Ruggan, SalTheBard With 24 alive, it's 13 votes to execute. The current deadline is March 10th, 2020 at noon EDT -- that's in about 10 hours, 55 minutes.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2020 06:06 |
|
This seems like Hunts normal game play to me. He was town last time I saw him play like this. I'll vote leith. But you all could join me on Mona.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2020 16:25 |
|
Amnistar posted:If people really think both will flip town, who has the least posts in the thread? We can pivot to a lurker cuddle and just write off the day. This is also Mona, I believe.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2020 16:29 |
|
k, 20 minutes. ##vote Leith
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2020 16:37 |
|
Dragonatrix posted:I think that attitude would come from a scum who wants to appear like a doomed Townie, yes. It's too performative and I'd call the lack of a claim more damning, not less, if anything. He did this exact thing as town in our last game, didn't he? You were in that game.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2020 16:41 |
|
Amnistar posted:My retirement fund dropped in value by 15%.... I decided not to look at mine.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2020 19:02 |
|
I'm still happy with my vote from yesterday. Nothing at end of day changes that for me. ##vote Mona
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 21:59 |
|
xiw posted:For future reference I targetted merk and monathin and didn't get blocked etc. Why claim this?
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 22:03 |
|
Ruggan posted:What is everyone else's case against Mona? Mine is just based out of vote timing for Leith and some weirdness in their posts, but they also haven't posted a ton and reviewing their posts it feels like a weak case. For me it is still their post about me. It made me feel like they were talking about me in scum chat and decided to try and get me cuddled on a later day, so Mona came in to lay the groundwork for that but hosed it up by not establishing proper context for it. For additional context, they(Mona+buds) were doing this as scum in our last game together and planning to try and set me up as their vote on later days if they didn't night kill me. So upon reading that post, seeing it came out of nowhere and didn't make sense for the thread, I started to put the pieces together. I was potentially willing to be convinced otherwise if Mona came in and somehow dazzled me, but they never did. I know it may seem weak/tinfoil, but I'm feeling really good about this one. And I'm not the only one that saw how out of place that post was.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2020 00:00 |
|
Monathin posted:This an extreme bunch of bullshit. Just for the record. Yes, I was scum last game, but the idea that I'd so brazenly throw out my opinions of KB's meta (which are my genuine reads of KB's meta, in that it is a bad meta and they get salty when they think it is bad). It was being commented on if it was a post restriction and I gave my take in the moment. Monathin posted:No need to be loving harsh, merk, goddamn. Every part of this is nonsense. FYI. But I'll call out two things in particular. A)I literally just read your scum chat in that game with Pmush/etc. You did exactly what I said you did there. Its on the record. You can't lie about it. The only part that was theoretical was if you were doing it here. You kool-aid manning into the thread to talk about me, out of context for the conversation the thread was having, and vanishing, looks like it spilled out of scum chat. B) No one is saying you made a hard push on me. I specifically claimed the opposite. Laying bread crumbs early that you were thinking about me so that on a later day you could make a hard push. I assume this nonsense and aggression is an effort to throw me off the sent or something. It is not going to work. ---- Preview edit -- I see that you have revealed yourself, but not going to waste my typing. Sorry you keep getting scum.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2020 04:42 |
|
Monathin posted:It wasn't actually a spillover from scumchat and I actually do hate your meta with a violent passion. But okay. I like that you are continuing the tradition of not thinking the reasons I picked you out as scum were valid or worthy. In all seriousness, feel free to broach the subject of my meta again post game in discord if you like. FWIW, time is truly a factor for me nowadays, so it isn't worth me investing hard in early game since that isn't my strength any way/I might get instagibbed. But, even if I wanted to, I mostly can't. Too much going on. --- ##cintamani Ixtlilton --- Let's not end the day super early. I'd love it if Lurker rules activated.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2020 05:02 |
|
Mr. Steak posted:##unvote This is a very bad idea. This is a role madness game. Who knows what amazing poo poo Mona can do. Also, this game gives full flips, we'll find out what Mona had the ability to do which will help inform us about what other scum can do.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2020 05:05 |
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Why are you giving the item to the claimed cop in a game with apparently 3 night kills? You absolute buffoons. Maybe it will give him bulletproof or some other way to stay alive.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2020 05:06 |
|
Taking my vote off until after we hit the lurker thresh hold just to be extra safe. ##unvote
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2020 16:56 |
|
Steak. Who is the scum we should be cuddling instead of Mona today?
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2020 19:40 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 02:47 |
|
Mr. Steak posted:ruggan Mr. Steak posted:im also down for humalong, but nobody's gonna go for that, so Do you have a case for these? Convince us.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2020 19:44 |