|
okay so let's say i do a search for something on google. bring up some results. if i hover over the link to a result i get the actual address: but if i interact with it at all - even by right-clicking - it instantly transforms to a bullshit google forwarder dealie:  how does that work?? thanks and "god bless",
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2020 18:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 12:07 |
|
|
there's an onmousedown event
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2020 18:54
|
|
|
it's javascript modifying the link, op
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2020 18:55
|
|
|
javascript is the worst thing to ever happen to computing
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 01:16
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:javascript is the worst thing to ever happen to computing no, that's your posting
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 02:06
|
|
|
it is the worst plang. they didn’t even get the naming convention right
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 02:19
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:it is the worst plang. they didn’t even get the naming convention right if they truly wanted to emulate trash, naming it after java was an inspired choice
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 02:24
|
|
|
javascript is fine, it's the idea that documents you're viewing in your HTML document viewer are allowed and sometimes even encouraged to modify themselves suddenly and without warning.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 04:18
|
|
|
when you click on an HTML element (like, say, a link), it's possible for javascript to intercept that click, block the default behavior of whatever was clicked on (for example, going to the linked website when you click a link), and instead substitute whatever new behavior it loving wants if you set some js to run when an element is clicked, that js will run before the normal behavior of that element is invoked, so you can do things like rewrite links the instant the user clicks on them
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 04:34
|
|
|
OP: a wizard did it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 05:05
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:javascript is the worst thing to ever happen to computing almost as bad as javascript "developers"
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 05:59
|
|
|
please explain some web magic to me: where is the yostop
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 06:06
|
|
|
the browser, your "user agent", is lying to you OP
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 06:08
|
|
|
loser agent
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 06:45
|
|
|
web browsers becoming the Universal Application Container is the best possible example of Worse Is Better.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 06:58
|
|
|
rotor posted:OP: a wizard did it. an evil wizard, right?
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 06:59
|
|
|
KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:please explain some web magic to me: where is the yostop check the yosmas thread, it got sent to someone for yosmas
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 06:59
|
|
|
im afraid you've been hijacked by a virus op. it's also making your posts bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 07:13
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:an evil wizard, right? on one hand, he destroys entire villages in flame, but on the other hand he overthrows kings from their gilded thrones, so it's impossible to say whether he's evil or not
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 07:13
|
|
|
or however the drill tweet goes
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 07:14
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:check the yosmas thread, it got sent to someone for yosmas
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2020 19:21
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:javascript is the worst thing to ever happen to computing
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2020 16:24
|
|
|
rotor posted:OP: a wizard did it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2020 16:30
|
|
|
rotor posted:web browsers becoming the Universal Application Container is the best possible example of Worse Is Better. its bad but for security I think evolving up from a document viewer to an app platform is better then trying to shove java/flash/activex/silverlight in the browser and trying to sandbox it after the fact
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2020 17:06
|
|
|
web browsers are same as java/flash/activex/Silverlight and the sandbox was also added after the fact.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2020 19:26
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:javascript in browser is same as java/flash/activex/Silverlight in browser and the sandbox was also added after the fact. there u go shags
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2020 19:28
|
|
|
those all have their own UI and aren't just editing the html dom so they're totally separate application platforms just like a browser, they just got surfaced within the browser. javascript/eczemascript being the worst language of the bunch.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2020 19:32
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:eczemascript hahaha
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2020 19:38
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:those all have their own UI and aren't just editing the html dom you could 100% gently caress around with the dom from all of those
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2020 19:55
|
|
|
yeah but that was never their primary purpose and was never encouraged.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2020 20:25
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:when you click on an HTML element (like, say, a link), it's possible for javascript to intercept that click, block the default behavior of whatever was clicked on (for example, going to the linked website when you click a link), and instead substitute whatever new behavior it loving wants thank you. this was a good explanation. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 04:18
|
|
|
i wonder how many millions of words all the current web specs add up to
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 14:37
|
|
|
including the ones nobody cares about like MathML or the semantic web?
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 16:12
|
|
|
animist posted:i wonder how many millions of words all the current web specs add up to less than a 80 meg react app that finds out which hogwarts house you belong to
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 16:47
|
|
|
rotor posted:or however the drill tweet goes the format is supposed to be bad thing compared to another bad thing but framed in a positive light. ideally the positive thing requires the reader to themselves make the connection to the original topic which then makes it bad, which is what makes it humorous. god bless i hope this post finds you in good health and spirit
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 17:10
|
|
|
animist posted:i wonder how many millions of words all the current web specs add up to good question! https://drewdevault.com/2020/03/18/Reckless-limitless-scope.html posted:The total word count of the W3C specification catalogue is 114 million words at the time of writing. If you added the combined word counts of the C11, C++17, UEFI, USB 3.2, and POSIX specifications, all 8,754 published RFCs, and the combined word counts of everything on Wikipedia’s list of longest novels, you would be 12 million words short of the W3C specifications.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 17:58
|
|
|
if there's one thing I know it's that nerds will always know how many words are in a document
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 19:07
|
|
|
what else are we supposed to do with these big hadoop mapreduce clusters besides count words huh
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 19:36
|
|
|
https://vimeo.com/95066828
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 20:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 12:07 |
|
|
vimeo doesn't just auto-parse??? loving radium
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2020 20:14
|
|