New around here? Register your SA Forums Account here!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $10! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills alone, and since we don't believe in shady internet advertising, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Jazerus posted:

this is just a reformulated version of the knight bus problem, i.e. why does nobody just run voldemort over with the teleporting bus

If I was Voldemort I would simply apparate next to Harry while he was on his annual scheduled visit to Diagon Alley and use my instant death stick to instantly cause death at him.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Presto posted:

Sure but now you have 12 years to hunt around for horcruxes.

Nah just let him regen and farm him for XP.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Robot Style posted:

Apparently the player character can learn the killing curse and I'm guessing the game is still going to make them the hero at the end.

There's going to be a twist and the player is gonna turn out to be Grindlewald's grandad or some poo poo, I'm sure of it.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Cranappleberry posted:

Voldemort can't apparate and is in a weakened state for all of the books before the end of the 4th.

He could target Harry through Quirrel but there goes him getting his body back. He could use a minion but he doesn't have many followers besides Quirrel and then Pettigrew, neither of which are competent and they're the ONLY humans helping him.

Have Quirrel reveal himself to Lucius and give him a direct order to kill Harry at the earliest opportunity. In public if needed.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.




I cannot imagine how bad that film would be. It's straight up just the worst plot they could have possibly conceived and even people who still love this stuff would have a hard time swallowing it in film form. A lot of them forgave the play because it was more about the live performance and visual spectacle but a film wouldn't be able to hide behind that.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



josh04 posted:

I think she's bet someone at WB that she can be an absolute dipshit in the run-up to the new movie and not have it affect the box office.

I totally forgot she has a film out in like two weeks. It's wonderful how little anyone seems to care about it

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Or - hear me out on this - some of the characters could have married outside of their immediate friendship group at school. Meet someone at work you weirdos.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Cranappleberry posted:

The wizarding world is incestuous anyway but dipping the pen in company ink where everyone is working together, maybe closely, or might be a boss/superior or working under them might not be great. Now add in jealousy, bad break-ups and the fact that technically all of them have the ability to do real harm at range and maybe without it being noticed if they're good at magic (lol no). Also imagine dating someone in the wizangamot who literally makes the laws that affects your job. Recusing? Hahahahah

I guess people in separate departments could date but then they might try to arrest each other or cover for each other.

The people who date muggles or wizards from other countries are probably the sanest of the lot. If Mcgonagall had had kids with the muggle dude she loved she probably would have wanted them to train in a muggle profession like accountant or barrister.

Sure, they don't all have to work at the fascist civil service though. By all accounts there are a ton of magical trades and industries.

But yeah really it's just a symptom of their twisted little insulated society.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Can't wait for the new Fantastic Beasts movie (featuring zero beasts). I wonder if Dumbledore will visit a concentration camp and look sad about it.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Edgar Allen Ho posted:

A fourth fantastic beasts: the greatest joke this thread has produced in two years of brave posting

The fact that the third one is apparently real and coming very soon is astounding to me.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Cranappleberry posted:

Samuel L. Jackson would have defeated Voldemort in a single movie.

He couldn't even stop an elderly politician and his little nazi incel buddy in three movies.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Mx. posted:

Excuse you, Harry Potter is pro-slavery, he owns a slave and would like that slave to bring him a sandwich.

"But he freed that other slave" ah that was a youthful indiscretion. He was only 12, now his opinions have coalesced and slavery good

There are no bad slavery laws, only bad slave owners. Be nice to your slaves and it's all fine.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Alhazred posted:

The movie is written by Rowling, the game probably isn't.

No but whatever the devs say she definitely outlined the plot and had final say over it. Her and the alt right ex-lead dev.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



The idea that students have their brains magically scanned to ascertain their personality type is hosed up in itself even before you factor in that quarter of them get put in the nazi house.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



The bulk of the plot is a play on It's a Wonderful Life with some bad end twists thrown in. It's very fanficcy and is basically Shrek 4.

Some of the stagecraft was cool though. I remember a bit with some sort of hosed up bookcase being enjoyable.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



josh04 posted:

Voldemort fucks [...] Sheev

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



nashona posted:

Harry did worship his dad who was also abusive...

He was also a real prick to his friends from age 14-17 and blamed it on how special he was.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Pththya-lyi posted:

I just feel really bad for all the Khaleesis out there

that wasn't even the character's name, jfc loving casuals

The worst thing about that is that Arya is a genuinely nice name that no one can ever use without being associated with those kinds of parents.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Edgar Allen Ho posted:

Being an american kid circa 2000 and arguing about how to pronounce Hermione was a real blast.

Don't worry, British kids had no idea how to pronounce it either until the films came out.

Pretty sure I called her Hermy-wun for a good while.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



I only consider the scenes with Kenneth Branagh, Gary Oldman and Alan Rickman canon. The rest is EU fanfic bullshit. Including all of the books.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Alhazred posted:

If you have to read between the lines for it to be queer representation it isn't queer representation.

Yeah if the relationship is only implied that's... just more queerbaiting isn't it? Which is just what the last film did.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Beartaco posted:

I'm not left asking "Is Grindelwald right?", I'm left asking "Do the film makers support the holocaust?".

And the answer is: probably.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Feldegast42 posted:

Also what was Dumbledore's secret in the end?

He once kissed a boy. :ssh:

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Man I watched the latest Terf Magic movie... Possibly the most poorly conceived, nonsensical plot of the series. That's including the loving play.

The entire first half of the film is spent doing random poo poo that goes nowhere because... Grindelwald randomly sees the future sometimes, which has never come up before? But not in any way that's relevant to the movie or whatever the gently caress Dumbledore was doing. It's straight up just a way to give the characters something to do for an hour. And none of the characters that were part of Dumbledore's crack team (except Dumbledore and the lady with the scary smile) ended up doing anything even at the climax. But somehow Newt saved the day by standing there in the background.

And don't even get me started on the deer thing...

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



I personally would not vote for the guy who openly wants to start a race war regardless of his heart's purity.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



codswallop posted:

you’re not allowed to sell alcohol to people under eighteen.

Unless they're accompanied by an adult and also having a meal. (See The Inbetweeners pilot for more on this topic).

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Edgar Allen Ho posted:

That picture just reminds me that there is a Cormoran Strike tv show. Can someone from the UK confirm/deny if people actually follow it? Is it... good?

I got halfway through the first episode. It's really, really bad. I don't see it mentioned anywhere, it's probably only survived so long because JK demands it. And I sat through the first four turgid audiobooks.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Happy Landfill posted:

There is no way that book is over 1000 pages. Christ.

The worst part is that this will be a bestseller

I'd like to think she's finally found the line where her bullshit is no longer enjoyed even by her usual readers, and that it'll fall flat on it's face.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



It's not just that it's long - the last book was two years ago. That's a very short time to crank out 1,200 pages. It must be a barely edited, incoherant stream of consciousness.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Presto posted:

There was some hand-wavy bullshit at some point that hi-tech stuff doesn't work at Hogwarts for ~reasons~. I'm not sure what the cutoff is. Like, surely a pen or pencil would work, right? So why make everyone use ink quills?

Also, something I just thought of is, if you're from a muggle family, and your letter arrives that says you've been accepted at Hogwarts, do you have a choice in this matter? Do the parents get a choice? Can they say LOL, no, I want my child to have skills they can actually use, or do the wizards just wipe their memories and cart their kid off whether anybody involved wants it or not?

Well Harry's legal guardians sure as poo poo didn't get a say in the matter. Harry could've been a successful drill magnate by now if Hagrid hadn't kidnapped him.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Isn't it implied that people found guilty of blood impurity in kangaroo court would get the soul sucking treatment?

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Oh hey I thought Kings Cross had finally given up on the Harry Potter stuff aside from the lovely shop that's still there but apparently this is a thing.

https://twitter.com/bencsmoke/status/1565816525835194368?t=T1aKjrYAU9M8oBz_vuDSdA&s=19

Truly terrifying levels of cringe at play.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Even at the start it was idiotic shite, mostly just characters not doing what they want them to do.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



BigglesSWE posted:

I guess the avenue they haven’t tried yet is tv-series. Question is, what would it be about?

Surely something around James etc's school years and/or the original Voldemort war is the obvious one.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Happy Landfill posted:

I feel like a Marauders anything at this point would be just be the last grasp at relevancy.

We're well past that point

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



The Bee posted:

I could kinda get it with Spider-Man, considering the licensing snafu with Sony. But, man, this better not just be a trend for Sony going forward.

They've both been doing this since the PS3/360 days.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



bobjr posted:

We don’t even know how you get a house elf to serve your family, and there’s no answer there that isn’t messed up in some way.

You buy them from whoever owned them before. :shrug:

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Feldegast42 posted:

Not following the rules is punishment enough by JK's reckoning

Voldemort died not because of his crimes, hubris or quest for immortality, but because he failed to properly track and account for the legal ownership of a special stick.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



It's hard enough to tell what individual players are doing on a football pitch from the stands. Quidditch must be like watching a bunch of flies buzz around in the air, and you occasionally see one of them pass a ball to another.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Jazerus posted:

the whole point of harry's wealth is to be ambiguously large so that harry can be construed as part of any class and therefore have the broadest appeal. he grew up deprived and poor, inherited a bunch of money, but only spends it on necessities and small luxuries, therefore everyone can see some component of their own financial situation in harry's. it also allows her to write harry as getting whatever he narratively needs to get without uncomfortable questions about how the plucky orphan afforded it, yet also duck under describing him doing any rich person financial things. defining how wealthy harry is by comparing his bank account to the price tag on the firebolt in any way shatters the everyboy illusion

He eventually inherited a god drat house in Islington. That'll be a couple mil easy.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply