|
Sharks Eat Bear posted:The answer is Phish Yeah its this
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2020 20:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 18:58 |
|
|
banned from Starbucks posted:Limp bizkit Serious replies only in this thread
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2020 16:38
|
|
|
hatelull posted:Isn't the answer Iron Maiden? No cuz their best stuff was before 1981, so the correct answer is Phish.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 2, 2020 21:36
|
|
|
I can’t tell queens of the Stone Age and foo fighters apart. Does that mean they have to share billing as the best band since 1981?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 7, 2020 16:45
|
|
|
MasqueradeOverture posted:Motley Crue sucks. Vince Neil solo is where it’s at
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2020 19:18
|
|
|
Santana
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 21:48
|
|
|
Cemetry Gator posted:Simple, the Traveling Wilburys. Bob Dylan, George Harrison, Jeff Lynne, Roy Orbison, and Tom Petty in one group? That's more talent than some concert tours. Plus, Handle With Care is a legit banger. Willburys 3 wasn’t very good though.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2020 03:06
|
|
|
Cemetry Gator posted:It was okay. But if you look at the other stuff they were doing at the time - Roy Orbison's Mystery Girl, Tom Petty's Full Moon Fever - that included the other Wilburys in some effect, that more than makes up for Vol. 3. I Won't Back Down, You Got It? All feature at least 3 of the Wilburys. Yeah but how does that hold up to Santana’s post-1981 output
|
|
#
¿
Jul 25, 2020 15:37
|
|
|
precision posted:Pixies is a better answer than Dinosaur Jr. imo unless you put the caveat "the only Dinosaur Jr albums that count are the ones with Barlow on them" Hard disagree
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2022 17:02
|
|
|
Frank black solo is better than pixies
|
|
#
¿
Mar 15, 2022 11:34
|
|
|
precision posted:i don't even know how to respond to this You could nod and put on your copy of The Golem
|
|
#
¿
Mar 15, 2022 20:13
|
|
|
The pixies had a couple of good albums. They’re not even the best rock band from Massachusetts post 1981.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2022 14:28
|
|
|
Disco Pope posted:I love Sonic Youth, or at least some of their stuff, but I don't think they have the mainstream appeal or consistency to take the best band title. Pixies are close, but they burned out too fast. Agreed, guess we have to give it to phish. Nice work everyone!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2022 13:44
|
|
|
Disco Pope posted:Like, this is pure pub music bore thinking on my part, but I think you need a level of critical acclaim, popular recognition, influence, consistency (you can't have been poo poo for 20 of the 25 years you've existed) and something of a myth and celebrity to be considered the best rock band. But by this rubric, that leaves, like Nirvana? I mean, sure, but what a boring answer. Maybe if they stopped after bleach.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2022 14:56
|
|
|
The answer is Type O Negative
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2022 23:27
|
|
|
That settles it then, Type O Negative.
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2022 19:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 18:58 |
|
|
precision posted:if we're going that direction, then it's The Cult The cult’s self titled record DOES NOT hold up well. Disqualified
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2022 21:21
|
|