|
Coming out of my extended retirement (1 whole hour) for this game.
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2020 00:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 11:09 |
|
|
I'm callin my peeps
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2020 00:39
|
|
|
I have one goal in every game, and that is to launch merk. This game will be no different ##vote merk
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2020 02:42
|
|
|
Tom Tucker posted:Everyone please weigh in about my post. How does it make you feel? It made me chuckle.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2020 03:29
|
|
|
yuming posted:I wanna vote merk but he’s not in this game, darn. Don't let that stop you
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2020 03:50
|
|
|
I saw Hamilton last year on my birthday and it was awesome, best birthday
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2020 04:56
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:it's nice to play Mafia sometimes uhh... is launch all liars still a thing?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2020 16:14
|
|
|
Nobody is posting! How am I supposed to solve the game like this? ##vote yuming for having the fewest posts
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2020 05:14
|
|
|
Votefinder should be fixed now but it lost all the votes for the last ~12 hours
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2020 16:40
|
|
|
Unlike apparently everyone else weekdays are worse for me than weekends. The ham and Grandi back and forth about what is or isn't a joke feels like DumbD1Stuff.txt
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2020 18:24
|
|
|
This "Nep-nep made one serious post so she's scum" bandwagon kinda skeeves me out. Especially stuff like this: sandnavyguy posted:Well, I guess joke phase is over. In that case I'll ##vote Nep, mostly because of their wordy posts and the fact I can't really argue with the position of those already voting them. Nep-nep has made one game related post, not a bunch of "wordy posts"
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2020 19:59
|
|
|
Oh crap, I lost track of time. Like I posted earlier, I think the wagon on nep-nep is the sketchiest thing to happen so far ##vote siv while I catch up, I'll switch to whoever is leading if I have to before the deadline
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2020 01:50
|
|
|
spacing in vienna posted:Did you mean me and typo and if not who is josev hi
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2020 01:50
|
|
|
hambeet posted:6 mins, what's the case on SIV again? Basically the bandwagon on Nep was kinda sketchy and siv was part of it
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2020 01:54
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:They only want to be the last one standing if they all die. So they get a partial victory if they lose. There is no benefit to bussing over a regular game, just a partial victory if the scum loses. Gotta get 2 points to not be a loser though
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2020 01:56
|
|
|
What's the amni thing?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2020 01:57
|
|
|
1 minute left, I guess it's amni or nobody ##vote amni
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2020 01:58
|
|
|
hambeet posted:oh wait forum says 59 minutes so maybe my end is screwy? I think votefinder rounds down?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2020 02:00
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:I haven't read most of D1 yet but I'm putting an early bet on SiV being scum, agreeing with me that nep wasnt town and therefore correctly pegging them as madness Aligned. Where did siv call nep madness? I'm not following your argument here
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2020 20:03
|
|
|
Spoonsy posted:This is a bullshit reason, but he was annoying me in Survivor and I knew he wouldn't be paying attention since he was coordinating things there.  this is so petty and dumb that I believe it and kinda love it
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2020 20:23
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Ok your whole thing yesterday was the "sketchy bandwagon" but I'm still unclear what the sketchy part was? It was really only a three vote wagon. Do you still think me/SiV/RF are sketchy? I don't think this case: Retro Futurist posted:Woods posting: TT has barely put in effort but that's still more than anyone else. I think one or more of these responses is from scum spacing in vienna posted:Dang, this is a good catch. Nep uses 20 words instead of 3, and it's overly careful in its phrasing. Hal Incandenza posted:Yeah that RF point about Nep is solid, that was a very crafted post by Nep, ##vote Nep sandnavyguy posted:Well, I guess joke phase is over. In that case I'll ##vote Nep, mostly because of their wordy posts and the fact I can't really argue with the position of those already voting them. I am not suspicious of Opop for the initial case, just the wagon that formed on it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2020 16:43
|
|
|
siv on nepspacing in vienna posted:Dang, this is a good catch. Nep uses 20 words instead of 3, and it's overly careful in its phrasing. Nep-Nep posted:This push on me is bad, I like this vote the least: siv responds with these two posts spacing in vienna posted:I don't actually think it's nebulous. You looked like you were self conscious about your phrasing. If you're saying you weren't, fine, you can say so. Just because something is hard to argue against doesn't mean it's an argument in bad faith. Besides, you didn't actually deny it anyway, just gave a meta defense, which fits the same vibe. spacing in vienna posted:A) ok but nep didn't, she retreated to weird meta commentary Then siv starts to waffle spacing in vienna posted:This isn't Nep Is Definitely Scum btw just that I didn't like something and am saying so and does a weird "here is how you defend yourself against me" post spacing in vienna posted:"I had a longer post and then realized part of it was wrong, so I cut out two paragraphs in the middle and it didn't staple together right" After being called out by a few posters she backs off. spacing in vienna posted:Ok, that's fair. It's not a slam dunk but I definitely have ~bad vibes~ about siv. She's my strongest scum read so far
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2020 17:07
|
|
|
sng on nep sng drops the 4th vote on Nep but then has a weird quick turnaround when he's called out on it sandnavyguy posted:Well, I guess joke phase is over. In that case I'll ##vote Nep, mostly because of their wordy posts and the fact I can't really argue with the position of those already voting them. Jose Valasquez posted:This "Nep-nep made one serious post so she's scum" bandwagon kinda skeeves me out. sandnavyguy posted:Actually... you're absolutely right. I mixed Nep up with TT for some odd reason and thought they were the one to make that interesting but flawed "All scum cometh unto me" post. looking back, she actually DIDN'T post... anything? except a couple shortlength posts a while back. So, ##unvote Then later defends nep sandnavyguy posted:I mean, the post is articulated well and thought out, but I dont see that as neccesarily inorganic. after all, there was an hour and 13 minutes between TT's post and Nep's response, plenty of time to assess the post especially as there wasn't much substance to chew on at that point. I'm on Nep's side with this one, just because the argument doesnt hold water. sng had the most concerning vote on Nep, but I'm honestly not sure how to read the turnaround. Maybe it was an honest mistake by town? Maybe it was a scum panic on getting called out? I'm not sure yet.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2020 17:12
|
|
|
Hal on nep Hal is the 3rd vote on Nep, which used to be considered a scum tell back in the day I think? Hal Incandenza posted:Yeah that RF point about Nep is solid, that was a very crafted post by Nep, ##vote Nep Hal Incandenza posted:I admit the Nep-Nep case is typical D1 shallowness but it doesn't help her case that she showed up and voted someone voting her and didn't say much else. Later: Hal Incandenza posted:Nep-nep's posting still doesn't feel great and seems self-conscious. Prefer her to grandicap still. Hal Incandenza posted:Nep's response to Tom felt cautious an inorganic, and since then she came back and basically OMGUS's the people voting her and those posts also felt, to me at least, forced and self-conscious. Based on the nep votes I'd go siv > snb > hal In conclusion, the nep bandwagon is a land of contrasts
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2020 17:26
|
|
|
I'll take another look at the rest of D1 after I get some work done.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2020 17:27
|
|
|
Spoonsy posted:JoseV: I'm glad you appreciate my explanation, but with me at the end of that Amni hammer, and I am suspicious of that And you would have been suspicious of me if I hadn't voted and we no-launched. There were less than 2 minutes left and the options were launch Amni or launch nobody. In that scenario I'll take Amni any day of the week.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2020 02:33
|
|
|
spacing in vienna posted:K. Still not me. I'm just low hanging fruit. No one appears to spot the contradiction inherent in "the case on nep nep was utter garbage" and yet "clearly SiV is scum who somehow knew nep was 3p." Based on the ... garbage case? If there was nothing there, how did hypothetical scum me spot a 3p?! sandnavyguy posted:I'm not quite sure I agree on a SiV push, I have them leaning town based on their level of activity and their scum hunting. Plus, they are right that we can't condemn them for BOTH pushing Nep and having a bad case.That doesn't make sense and in addition if SiV were scum they certainly wouldn't want to lunch someone else, nk Nep, and then have them flip presumably town and put SiV in hot water to defend the push. NK speculation is a dangerous game. Nep was one of the 3 votes on siv yesterday, that is reason enough for siv to kill her. It is also reason enough for a scum group that doesn't include siv to kill Nep, hoping that we read too much into it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2020 02:35
|
|
|
The Amni shift was really strange. I just spent the last hour+ analyzing it and I'm not sure I really got anywhere, but here's what I found This is where the vote sat until 10m left votefinder posted:Votecount for Day 1 Then this happens Jose Valasquez posted:Oh crap, I lost track of time. hambeet posted:##unvote yuming posted:##vote Amni hambeet posted:##vote amni Grandicap posted:##vote Amni Swing this execution spacing in vienna posted:Ok, I'm down. Hal Incandenza posted:##vote Amni Jose Valasquez posted:1 minute left, I guess it's amni or nobody Spoonsy posted:gently caress it ##vote amni xopods posted:FINAL Votecount for Day 1 The last time each player posted prior to the Amni rush (Opop and TT were just not around that day): none - Retro Futurist (He/him/opop) none - Tom Tucker 8:07 - Somberbrero (He/him) 8:24 - Hal Incandenza (he/him/hal) 8:38 - sandnavyguy 8:47 - Amnistar (7:49 before that, he was distracted by Survivor and was effectively absent) 8:48 - Nep-Nep (She/Her) 8:51 - Grandicap (He, Him) 8:53 - hambeet (he/him) 8:54 - spacing in vienna (she, her) 8:54 - yuming (she/her) 8:54 - Jose Valasquez (he/him/his) 8:55 - Spoonsy (he/him/his) One interesting thing that jumps out is that almost everyone was here, but we had a hard time killing anyone. It was not at all obvious that we had enough votes around to kill anybody at all. Narrowing it down to who was very obviously here and posting in the last few minutes before the switch, these were the votes hambeet -> Grandi siv -> Nep Grandi -> SiV yuming -> Grandi Jose -> SiV Spoonsy -> Nobody So 2 Grandi votes are present 2 SiV votes are present 1 Nep vote is present 1 free agent Grandi is at 4 votes SiV is at 3 votes Nep is at 2 votes Ultimately it is 2 of the Grandi votes that peel off, but why peel off of Grandi onto Amni instead of Nep or SiV? Obviously not to protect Nep, but maybe to protect Grandi or SiV? I could see yuming or beet (or both?) being scum with both Grandi and SiV, it seems pretty brazen though... and again, why not Nep instead? Hoping for a no-launch? Grandi and SiV vote Amni next, which makes sense, they know they are the other options so a self-preservation vote makes sense regardless of alignment. By this point there are 3 minutes left and the vote is: 4 Amni 2 Grandi 2 SiV Hal, Spoonsy, and I make the move to prevent a no launch. It is self serving to say but I don't think you can read much into these three votes, the options were vote Amni or no-launch, nobody regardless of alignment who has been actively posting is going to let a no-launch happen. I don't know, something doesn't add up here but I can't figure out what it means
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2020 03:53
|
|
|
It all happened in 4 minutes. hambeet and yuming, what were you thinking when you tried to swing the vote to Amni with 4 minutes left before the deadline? The most likely outcome was a no-launch
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2020 04:06
|
|
|
I kinda get it, if scum were convinced Nep was 3p they wouldn't want to launch her and give the town a bonus. Anyone being that confident on D1 is a stretch though
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2020 15:32
|
|
|
The kinda-cop claim doesn't sway me one way or another, I can see it being useful for either town or scum. This kinda feels like fishing for a counterclaim spacing in vienna posted:I imagine that I can catch scum in a lie if they claim to be VT. I think she's the best option today. I thought my vote was already down on her from earlier, but I guess it isn't! ##vote siv which puts her an -1
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2020 01:04
|
|
|
Spoonsy posted:Here's the thing - I don't think you're town. And I know you're not Ego. Spoonsy posted:Lunch all liars Ohh Ohhhhhhhhh.......
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2020 22:39
|
|
|
Spoonsy posted:I kept rereading trying to find a use for it and I really couldn’t see any. Just saying whether someone is superego or not doesn’t help the town and can give the scum help in hunting. Uhh... Spoonsy... this post feels weird now
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2020 22:42
|
|
|
Spoonsy, did you visit Grandi N1 or N2?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2020 23:30
|
|
|
Ok, so I'm the mason recruiter. I recruited Grandi last night, and I can confirm that he told me about his targets prior to Spoonsy announcing his result.hambeet posted:That plan is terrible is and the only reason you would float it is if you were sure of the other person a alignment. However, one thing I did not tell Grandi about my role is that I'm a cautious recruiter. I can only successfully recruit if I am the only one to target that person, so I know that Spoonsy did not successfully target Grandi last night. Given this either Spoonsy is lying, which doesn't make much sense (unless we are in lylo I guess) or someone messed with the night actions.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2020 01:15
|
|
|
Well this is something I guess?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2020 03:25
|
|
|
sandnavyguy posted:No, only N2, my actions succeeded, which means I prevented a death on a marked player, and marked the player who visited me with... a special action. But when I trigger it I’ll get ANOTHER empowerment. So effectively two in a row!  Did you protect yourself or something? I don't understand what preventing a death on a marked player means when you said someone tried to kill you
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2020 03:33
|
|
|
hambeet posted:so I think Spoonsy is an ego cop, basically the opposite of siv's Superego cop quote:Superego Cop: You may target one player each night to investigate them. You will be told whether or not they are Superego-Aligned. All other alignments (including Ego-Aligned) produce a negative result, so “not Superego-Aligned” does not necessarily imply “not Town.” He can tell if someone is VT or not
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2020 03:56
|
|
|
I think Somber is the only one who hasn't posted since your claim, so it's either him or someone that isn't going to claim it
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2020 03:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 11:09 |
|
|
hambeet posted:Okay thanks. Sorry, I meant town power role or not, SiV's power was VT or not
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2020 04:02
|
|