|
ready to blast
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2020 19:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 13:26 |
|
|
ok so basically im baby
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2020 23:11
|
|
|
Spokes posted:dmboogie shares his initials with Dave Matthews Band--an even stronger force of evil. Truly infallible logic bastard i voted you out once ill do it again ##vote spokes
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2020 04:14
|
|
|
Scientastic posted:This is dead boring, as a giant man-baby I demand attention and interaction, where the gently caress is everyone?! weh
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2020 15:33
|
|
|
i started a new job today so that is a partial explanation for my silence the rest of the explanation is me being lazy
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2020 20:49
|
|
|
hi sorry im busy and tired in the science vs. textbook conflict science looks worse to me imo but i want to reread before i decisively vote
|
|
#
¿
Jul 14, 2020 20:50
|
|
|
yeah sorry I think this was a bad time for a game to start for me lmao im gonna try to step it up ive just had like zero time today; I caught up with the thread on my lunch break but didn’t have time to like actually case fwiw textbook is extremely reminding me of myself when I go into “oh god they think I’m scum oh god” spirals as town, especially as a newbie (I think they’re a newbie right)
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 01:03
|
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 01:03
|
|
|
welp that was hammer
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 02:23
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I see Spokes is no longer voting dmboogie, why is he trying so hard to protect him??? lmao
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 20:06
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:Boogie, we haven't heard much from you so far in this game. i think textbook’s flip reflects poorly on science and i find it interesting that no one is bringing that up
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 22:38
|
|
|
Spokes posted:It’s not in response to you voting me, it’s in response to just how many of your posts are covering for boogie, who I absolutely suspect. He’s made useless post after useless post but made sure to be here for hammer so nobody had any further discussion. And then today he’s clearly reading the thread but is willing to stand aside (again) and let you try to start a train on me, just like he did yesterday on textbook and that worked out great for scum wait what are you even saying here posting the equivalent of the fukken hammer emoji was a deliberate scheme from me? like, if I hadn’t checked votefinder to see if hammer had happened, town would’ve had more time to post?????
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 22:40
|
|
|
calling my posting up to this point useless is a fair point spokes you don’t need to do fifth dimensional chess to try and explain everything I’ve done as a scum tactic
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 22:41
|
|
|
Spokes posted:I’m saying you were clearly watching the votes go on someone who flipped town while actively not posting (after being super-inactive in the first place and making equivocating posts), and any claim that you weren’t doing that falls flat *because* you immediately posted hammer i was catching up with the thread not mashing f5 man
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 22:48
|
|
|
honestly ##vote spokes people were apathetic towards lurker lunches last phase so here he’s trying to invent every reason in the book for me to be scummy instead of just bad so he can get town to play along with him and then when I flip town he’ll be like “well that guy was useless anyways”
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 01:30
|
|
|
Scientastic posted:I guess my point would be that that series of posts was something that happened that could have been commented on. Somber voted for it, and I know a lot of people dislike my stance on new players, and both of those could be comment-worthy. looking back on the scientastic vs. textbook poo poo i find i really dont like this case textbook obviously spiraled in a way that didnt help town but scientastic's entire case on him seems to be "hmm it's day one and you responded to someone calling you out, obvious scum" like scientastic gives a big list of things that textbook could have commented on, and like, thats valid, but it's also day one and i think its dumb to crucify someone for not being able to do that close a read in like their second ever game, like, c'mon, saying "you could have commented on the stance i have on new players, the stance i didn't actually say in this thread" is obvious bullshit
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 07:11
|
|
|
idk maybe i just relate to textbook, even as a more experienced mafia player im still very reactive in my play, i read and if theres anything that immediately jumps out to me i'll comment on that, but i still find it difficult to put my detective hat on and try to wring a case outta someone's ISO unsurprisingly enough people atting me on my twitter dot com account is always something that will jump out to me, that feels like a universal thing
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 07:14
|
|
|
Scientastic posted:DMB claiming my case was bullshit should have happened yesterday, he was happy to let two townies have a fight and sit back and not make any substantive comments yeah it shouldve but i was way less engaged with the game yesterday, what can ya do, cant cry over sunken deck chairs
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 15:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 13:26 |
|
|
y'all turboed me when i was at work smh
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2020 18:50
|
|