|
I just found this thread and it's too good to have died in August. How different do things shake out if the "Superman 2000" pitch with Grant Morrison, Mark Waid, Mark Millar, and Tom Peyer moves forward? Reading some of the pitch it seems like we would have gotten a Superman-scale "every story happened, every story matters" approach like the one Morrison brought to DC. Maybe his relationship with Millar doesn't turn sour. Maybe Waid and Peyer stick around DC for longer. The biggest change wouldn't be to DC, but to Marvel, since Morrison wouldn't leave DC to take on New X-Men and Millar wouldn't have taken Ultimate X-Men or The Ultimates.
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2021 01:44 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 01:45 |
|
FilthyImp posted:drat, I'd never heard of it. That's some drat fine line work. Quentin Tarantino got Miramax to option Modesty Blaise, but the film rights lapsed before he got around to it. In a timeline where the series was a bigger deal in the United States he might have done his Modesty Blaise adaptation instead of Jackie Brown or Kill Bill - its success heavily dependent on Harvey Weinstein not meddling in production. If this movie did well, we might have seen a bigger version of the early 2000s trend of independent comics getting smaller budget film adaptations.
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2021 22:20 |