|
I would be happy to play in this game.
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2020 14:57 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 14:42 |
|
Rarity posted:Please can all players help me adjust back into mafia by filling in the following survey Still reading the thread but throwing in my answers to this as I'm reading to make Rarity happy.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 13:31 |
|
Amnistar posted:Still reading the thread but throwing in my answers to this as I'm reading to make Rarity happy. 2008 My bad. I reg'd for mafia I'm pretty sure.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 13:32 |
|
Oh wait, the 90's was middle school. Dragon Ball would definately be the top spot. God. I'm awful at these questions.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 13:34 |
|
Scientastic posted:Fixed now, thanks Tommu ##vote sci You are the kind of person to put something like this out there to be smug about later.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 13:44 |
|
Scientastic posted:My initial reaction to this was that I absolutely am that sort of person, but then I thought about it, and I don’t think I quite understand: what exactly am I going to be smug about? Softclaiming a "night vig" as scum at the beginning of the game.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 13:49 |
|
b-minus1 posted:I was looking forward to the tunnel on amni Me too!
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 14:15 |
|
I'm more focused on the second half, where you "definately don't have a dayvig" which is soft aiming a might vig.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 15:07 |
|
loving phone keyboard...
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 15:09 |
|
Toalpaz posted:I don't honestly believe bif is shooketh over day 1 interaction rarity. I agree with Toalpaz. Bif does not feel like scum to me.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 15:48 |
|
sandnavyguy posted:Good morning g— This, however, feels scummy to me.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 15:56 |
|
The feeling is fine. Postingit is white noise that is setting up for excusing themselves from reading.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 16:04 |
|
Scientastic, what do you think of SNG's entry to the thread?
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 16:09 |
|
Rarity posted:Can you say why you find that entrance to be scummy? I...did already...
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 16:40 |
|
Rarity posted:Ah sorry Amni, I missed it. I think you're reaching here. If you'd said this hours later and sandy still hadn't contributed then you'd be onto something but since posting he's been engaging with the thread so I've got no issues Naw, how people come into the game shows a LOT about where their mind is. SNG's entry to thread was functionally an excuse for not engaging, which is scummy in and of itself. Absolutely later activity is relevant to alignment, but the action itself stands alone. I don't think it's enough to move my vote off of scientastic, but I do think it's relevant. sandnavyguy posted:Thanks rarity! ...this post is the right response to what I'm doing which bothers me. I rarely see people acknowledge my superior Day 1 skills....my eyes are on you SNG...
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 17:45 |
|
b-minus1 posted:It’s day 3. And that’s when I solve the game You should do like me and solve the game Day 1. Rarity and Scientastic are on a scum team together.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 17:53 |
|
Scientastic posted:This is an 18 player game, surely you should be theorising 8 scum? 4 scum teams of 2, clearly.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 18:13 |
|
Scientastic posted:That would be very chaotic I see you too are a man of culture! So, which god do you serve Sciientastic? Hrrrrmm?
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 18:33 |
|
sandnavyguy posted:
Just the smug comment about potentially having a nightkill.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 19:07 |
|
Scientastic posted:Fixed now, thanks Tommu non-dayvig would be...a night vig... I sincerely believe that this is intended as a sneaky scum claim to point out after victory.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 19:43 |
|
Toalpaz posted:vigilante is still a town role, even at night. Sure, but I dont see vigilante sci making a hidden claim like that.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 19:52 |
|
Scientastic posted:Also, non-dayvig doesn't mean nightvig, it just means I didn't get a dayvig, this is dumb *shrug* its day 1, and I think you are a clever person. I doubt I'll get anyone to vote you over this, and will inevitably end up moving my vote. You might still get to be smug at the end of the game.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2020 20:06 |
|
hambeet posted:that's like getting super picky. True, but that's how you find scum day 1!
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 00:11 |
|
In ythe hambeet v Bif debate, bif looks good, hambeet looks bad.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 13:56 |
|
hambeet posted:lol Bif reads as geniune in their stance. You come across as someone that thinks you've found something and aren't actually interested in any of the responses given. I see this back and forth as scum hambeet seeing a wedge that can be driven and town bif trying to explain why that wedge is dumb and being ignored.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:34 |
|
Scientastic posted:In fact, I’ve just had a read of Amni’s posts, and it all looks conspicuously terrible I eagerly await your analysis! You have waited long enough for it not to look like an OMGUS.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:41 |
|
Also, in case it's unclear, because I know people are gonna make comments about being unclear in opinions: I think Sci is scum and I caught them in a deliberate scumslip, so I'm not moving my vote until it is clear they are not an option. I think Hambeet is scum, would vote for them. I think Rarity might be scum, but it's a weak read right now. I think Bif is town. That is my reads right now.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:44 |
|
tpink posted:No. I’m saying that in a game with 18 players, if I am scum, there’s like 5+ targets I would go after on day 1 rather than try to engage with the one poster who thrives on D1 analysis and will try to take apart everything I say (like what you’re doing with beet now). I don’t know what your past history with him is. I’m just telling you what I would or would not do in that hypothetical situation. So..you *are* saying that scum wouldn't want to tangle with Bif day 1, because there are easier targets.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:45 |
|
tpink posted:On Sci, I think that vig thing would have been an incredibly dumb scum slip so I dunno. Seems somewhat unlikely. Accidentally yes, but I think it's intentional so Sci can be a smug bug at the end of the game and I refuse to let them have that.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:47 |
|
hambeet posted:lol. i'm not interested in their responses?! yet have responded to nearly each and every one. Maybe "not interested" isn't the right phrasing then. You don't care about any answer given as an explanation. You are engaging to make Bif look bad, not because you think bif is scum. Basically, I read Bif as genuine and you as not genuine in the engagement.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:49 |
|
Rarity posted:Please can you explain this again cause I didn't see it at the time and I still don't now When I read the post I read it as "Before I read my role pm I could have had a dayvig or a non-dayvig (i.e. nightvig) and now I *definately* don't have a dayvig *wink wink*"
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:50 |
|
hambeet posted:no i'm engaging bif because her argument didn't make sense, her response to people picking at it doesn't make sense nor does it seem townie and the way she keeps trying to throw shade on my pushing her is super suss. Exccept her arguement does make sense. Which is why I don't think you're being genuine, I think you're being deliberately obtuse to push a narrative.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:53 |
|
Rarity posted:It's pretty clearly playing off his previous post though? I think Sci deliberately said "non-dayvig" instead of "no dayvig" not as a breadcrumb to be found but as something to point at after game and say "See look, I told you I was scum!"
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:54 |
|
hambeet posted:lol the sci scum slip is dumb. and what's your read on rarity. it's weak, but what is it? I think rarity is scum? That's the read? I'm not sure what you want beyond that. If you want reasoning, it's not very fleshed out. The content game bit, and how they're posting a lot, but mostly noise early in the day is probably what has me suspicious of them.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:55 |
|
tpink posted:I mean it’s literally the equivalent of posting “I have a night kill.” I don’t disagree that that’s a possible way of reading his post. I just refuse to believe that any scum would be dumb enough to post that. Again, maybe there’s some weird meta read going on where you are convinced that he just couldn’t help leaving that crumb to gloat later, but without knowing that meta, it seems far-fetched. I'll freely admit it's not a read I expect anyone else to buy into. I'm not expecting to convince people Sci is scum based on that. I am refusing to let Sci get away with what I see as a gloat post.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 14:57 |
|
Rarity posted:So he set up the dayvig joke on purpose just so he could breadcrumb a scum claim to mock us all for later? That is what I believe yes.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 15:01 |
|
Rarity posted:The Schrodinger's dayvig post was at 7:23 am BST. Sci joined the discord 7:35 am BST. How does this fit your theory? The other post is the one I think is the scum claim.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 15:06 |
|
hambeet posted:okay sorry, you are 100% right. i didn't phrase that correctly. i've only phrased it that way when i just responded to you, then though, never to bif. to bif i've pointed out solely that i disagree with her 'jab'. I dont know how many times you want me to say it but your posts don't feel genuine, bif's do.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 15:10 |
|
Rarity posted:You said he setup the joke on purpose so he could scum claim but he didn't know his role until after he setup the joke. How does this make any sense to you? No, I think hw took advantage of a joke made to slip in the claim. Also, im unsure why you're pressing so hard here. I have already acknowledged that no one else is going to beleive my conspiracy theory.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 15:15 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 14:42 |
|
DGK2000 posted:I uh... no. No. NO. It was very clearly him saying either is a dayvig or he isn't. A binary thing. And a science joke. You've latched on to something that isn't A Thing. Maybe, but now I've seen it and I can't unsee it.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2020 15:18 |