|
Oh man I thought you were just joking, now I gotta sign up for this
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2020 19:05
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 17:55 |
|
|
Please tell me Gacha Whale Grandma is a character in this
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2020 19:10
|
|
|
Oh whoops I forgot to explicitly state that I recognised the extra mechanic, yes that makes it even better
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2020 19:55
|
|
|
Great the whole scum team's here already
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2020 13:05
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:but trash anime wasn't enough to read the op, or the two reminder posts from OP... Let's NK this guy first
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2020 13:37
|
|
|
Hm y'know technically all Taste said was we'd be writing some "response" to a prompt, the bad fanfic angle could just be us assuming too much and displaying our biases, we might actually be prompted to write scathing opinion pieces about anime being a mistake for all we know 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2020 19:42
|
|
|
The only mistake I see around here is people not signing up, lookit all these pervs who just wanna watch
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2020 19:51
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:##vote nat20 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2020 23:57
|
|
|
Wait what do we have to post this poo poo publicly I thought we were submitting entries to Taste so there's at least a delay before everyone gets to point and laugh at it
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 01:44
|
|
|
sandnavyguy posted:Ah, gif mafia. ##vote SNG for sucking up to Nat too much
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 01:48
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:Bif was our first date getting drunk with goons? Chilling in a mason chat does sure meet the criteria for a low-cost date suited to socially anxious nerds! I'll just have to tell it better then hehehe
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 01:53
|
|
|
SolusLunes posted:so you're new, then Whoah whoah whoah he didn't say he was scum with me so he must have another secret scum traitor doc! ##vote Solus
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 03:56
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:But neither of you are scum with me?! How many scum teams are there? Trap sprung, you just confirmed us both as town, scumbo ##vote Grandi
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 04:30
|
|
|
Scientastic posted:This is the worst vote though If you're gonna kill jokephase at least don't make it suffer
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 07:52
|
|
|
Scientastic posted:Cagey. Afraid to answer the question directly for fear of being voted for it. Lol if you think Nat was actually trying to be cagey instead of making a joke when he is the biggest known trash weeb
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 11:37
|
|
|
I also wanna hear how this shockingly cagey behaviour, a sign of conscious forethought and evasion, still wasn't scummy enough to deserve a vote over my Grandi jokevote just puttin myself out there And which was quite hilarious if I do say so myself
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 11:56
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:I will admit I have also joined the Rent-a-Girlfriend discord and am stealing emotes from there as well now. But do you like anime, Nat, stop dodging the question!!!!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 11:57
|
|
|
Scientastic posted:My goodness, it's almost like accusing someone of being cagey and not answering the question when he had a loving anime image in his post was not entirely serious. Oh don't you start acting like you appreciate humor now mister
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 12:00
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:Gifs (with a j sound) Omfg don't drop this when I was just about to get serious and unvote you!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 12:06
|
|
|
Anyway, to get serious now for a minute, Scientastic thought this post of his should just be clearly taken as a joke: Scientastic posted:Cagey. Afraid to answer the question directly for fear of being voted for it. It could be some decent sarcasm I'll admit, but his joke sounds way more like an actual argument than what he's actually voted on: Scientastic posted:This is the worst vote though Which was ironically voting me for a post which was far more clearly telegraphed as a joke than his. I was building on a running setup, even. Back when Sci first cast that vote, I thought it was serious, which didn't make it scummy. I vaguely remember "Sci reading all my posts bad and wrong" being consistent with his town meta. But is it really serious? I had to assume it was, since there was no joke there to be found. But he gave less reason for it than he did in his shade on Nat. He's just veering from "hard early gut calls that need no further explanation!" to "sounding like I'm making actual arguments now, but actually don't take what I'm saying seriously please" Who's the one really being cagey here about their stances? ##vote Sci
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 12:32
|
|
|
Scientastic posted:No joke, voting Grandicap makes you a bad person The dude just invoked "jif", clearly your moral reality is a frightening place
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 12:42
|
|
|
Jeez y'all have been way too quiet this morning. Ghiblichat is nice and all but cmon people, not even gonna comment on the tiny little scraps of cases we got going here? It's not like the thread is all bogged down with pages and pages of new posts to catch up on
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 02:21
|
|
|
Thanks for the check-in Toal, wasn't actually thinking of you in that post since you hadn't bothered to show up to post about anime but not Mafia All this quiet makes me wanna vote Sci a bit less though, cause even if he's being sketchy at least he posts poo poo
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 03:44
|
|
|
Scientastic posted:This is very concerning: you are changing your play to benefit your scum game, not just to benefit the town. Ehhhh this feels a bit too preachy pearl-clutchy for my tastes, not liking this vote Would someone else besidesjust Scientastic show up to do something scummy though, sheesh
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 12:16
|
|
|
Q_res posted:sandnavyguy simply existing is pretty scummy imo drat, for your second game ever you catch on quick lol
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 12:27
|
|
|
Morning all, got a lot to catch up on now, nice! Scientastic posted:Yes, I agree, calling someone out for doing something scummy is preachy and pearl-clutching. What the gently caress It's just the attitude of "oh my word, trying to change up your playstyle overall (even though you're a relatively new player who's got good reason to experiment and see what works for you) isn't totally optimal so it's anti-town!" That is the definition of preachy and pearl clutching. Scientastic posted:I take it you don't agree that it's scummy to change your playstyle but only saying you are doing so after being challenged? Why is that? You are correct. I don't agree. I think having to announce HEY EVERYBODY JUST SO YOU KNOW I'M GONNA PLAY DIFFERENT THIS TIME OK before you dare try anything is obnoxious and unnecessary. Gumball Gumption posted:This feels performative considering every Sci post inbetween this one and the Bifauxnen post before it looks like a joke to me. Uhhh ok Biaga posted:Bif and sci are jumping at shadows pretty hard. It is like they are coordinating their actions to spread dissent and acuse others for their own benefit. ...... What. ok this is way more silly than anything else I've seen so far. You had me at "jumping at shadows", that sounded fair cause there was nothing else around for us to react to except each other, and Nat. But "coordinating our actions to spread dissent and accuse others?" What others? This is pretty fake ##vote Biaga Now to read more than like the first three posts lol
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 20:39
|
|
|
Biaga posted:The last few posts between them seem driven by the same goal of pinbing focus and votes on a single person. Their posts and opinions are empty and hallow in focus and drive and are less about finding value and more driven by removing someone cuse "lunch d1!!!". The fact that they are jumping on my so quickly without defending themselves doesn't help justifying their actions. The really funny thing about all this is until I woke up and saw Biaga's posts the only person I was focusing on was Sci
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 20:44
|
|
|
Biaga posted:Honestly, I didn't like the arguments for bif, I thought they were weak, and I challenged them. Wait whaaaat I thought me AND Sci were the scums all coordinating
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 20:50
|
|
|
Yeah just look at those two quotes I posted next to each other. That change in justification makes no sense at all.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 20:51
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:If anything I think the most interesting part of the entire thing is that SNG and Sci have both got votes on Biaga now after their exchange moments earlier suggesting the other was scum. I think if there is scum to be found it's one of them leaping away from that exchange to an easier area to pressure. Oooh I like this idea though Still think Biaga is scum but if he turns out not to be I will definitely remember this
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 20:56
|
|
|
SolusLunes posted:let's be fair I think you're scum this game Lol same
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 21:04
|
|
|
Ok finally caught up. Still think Biaga is scum, also got vague gutfeels about GG and Solus Sci could still be an effort scum which is the type to always get me, but now that there are actually other posters around that's fading
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 21:08
|
|
|
Biaga's stance made so little sense that when I was done I had to go back and make sure I hadn't totally hosed up my quotes, and that Biaga was actually still talking about me and Sci and not someone else by then. He was! It still makes no sense!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 21:11
|
|
|
I keep coming back to that first post that set things off: "coordinating our actions to spread dissent" is such a wild thing to come up with outta nowhere. There was no one around to even dissent with. Nat,you seem to think this is too out there for a newbie scum to drop on a townie and stick their neck out that much but I disagree. I think it could be a newbie scum overstepping by accident since they aren't experienced in making more subtle fakecases.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 23:30
|
|
|
Biaga posted:I still think Sci is as scummy as it gets and is taking the convent tactic of removing himself during the last few hours of voting. Sci is in UK timezone, as is Nat. I'm ok on my Aussie time since deadlines around lunch for me, but for them it'll be like 4am
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 23:36
|
|
|
Hm, while I see what you're saying about Sci's level of engagement giving more info, I think a Biaga flip would still provide us a lot to look at too. Especially with how things progress from here, now that you've left them tied at - 2 and it's anyone's game!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2020 00:47
|
|
|
If Biaga flips scum, wonder if all this "courtesy" from GG, and this misvote he hasn't fixed yet, is stalling and hoping to wait and see if the scales can be tipped slightly jn the meantime
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2020 02:59
|
|
|
Lol well good figures soon as I start typing that he gets it in
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2020 03:00
|
|
|
This is the final hour folks cmon the time is now
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2020 03:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 17:55 |
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Tbh between thanksgiving and the Pokémon game ending I haven’t paid much attention here. Will switch to avoid a no lynch idc Ok you got twenty minutes to get around to it
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2020 03:40
|
|