|
If you are going to arbitrarily decide that you aren’t tolerating making fun of a hypothetical other users for hypothetically extremely embarrassing past and hypothetically pathetic behavior, then the appropriate action is to warn people about that or probe them, not to just ban them without warning after already probing them twice.
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2020 19:19
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 08:19 |
|
|
docbeard posted:My extremely helpful answer is that it depends. I don’t think you have thought this answer through, but I’m happy to queue up a few bans and test it out.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2020 19:56
|
|
|
docbeard posted:I think there's room for a conversation about when and how bans or other moderation actions are justified, certainly. No one is arguing that anyone should be immune from moderation. No one said anything yesterday when crusty buttsack or whatever handed out probes. Hell, I wouldn’t have said anything today if the cspam mods went and chain probed bloom for making fun of their friend. They tried to do that a few days ago to some fyad folks and no one made a fuss. Specifically making it a ban and specifically trying to make it seem like a real offense (as opposed to being mean to their buddy) is what caused all this. So don’t argue something else.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2020 21:04
|
|
|
Lmao
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2020 19:49
|
|
