New around here? Register your SA Forums Account here!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Frond
Mar 12, 2018
https://mobile.twitter.com/autosport/status/1339161682850029569


Uh, sure. I guess. Honda’s response is even more confusing.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
2019 and 2020 were much better than 2014-2018.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

a pipe smoking dog posted:

Yeah that's fair, whenever anyone does anything interesting in modern F1 it's always followed a few laps later with "my tyres are gone!"

Was 2007-2012 just the sweet spot between the end of "tyre wars" and the start of Pirelli trying to run races on balloons?


George Russell? Yeah I agree.

Bridgestone made the tires from 2007-2010. They were generally considered to be the best along with Michelin. Bridgestone is still the only company to go toe to toe with Michelin and actually beat them.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

Zeta Acosta posted:

The last good season was 2007

2008 and 2012 are all time great seasons.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
If you allowed NA along with Turbo engines again you would likely still end up with a grid full of V6, Turbo, Hybrid engines. V12s and whatnot were legal until 1985 and again from 1987-1988 along with Turbos but eventually basically everybody went Turbo by late-83/84. As early as 1980 the writing was on the wall for the Atmo engines.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

Custard Undies posted:

Remember that we ended up with Hartley for multiple seasons because they had no other good drivers in their program.

It was funny for a brief moment when their only eligible F1 caliber driver was a 31 year old Super Formula champion.


Remember Pato O’Ward?

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
Good choice in Perez. He deserves it.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

Tsaedje posted:

I like Albon as a guy, but he's broken and won't recover. I wish him well as a Sky analyst/future Le Mans winner

Perez deserves the seat and I hope he crushes Max's spirit.


They should send him to Japan, honestly. There have been/are a few Thai drivers that do well in their domestic series, and Super GT traditionally has a race in Thailand.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

the corona quid posted:

This is so stupid because you haven’t had good rice cooker rice so you don’t even know what you’re talking about.

My Zojirushi is the best culinary purchase I’ve ever made.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

POCKET CHOMP posted:

This is the dumbest poo poo, there's a reason every household in Asia has a rice cooker. Rice cookers own but also Ferrari owns too just FYI.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
My favourite lineup next year is definitely Leclerc-Sainz.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
I’m pulling hard for Tsunoda, hope he does well.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
Last Super Formula Championship round;


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqHFq7eaF2k


Pole time (Nojiri, 1:19.972 - nearly as fast as the tail end 2008 F1 cars.)

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

bgreman posted:

I paid the $3/month for the F1TV archives access and am working through the 1981 season now and it's interesting. Different cars are appreciably different looking and there's slightly more overtaking than now.

Circuit design seems to be actively hostile to driver, marshal, and spectator safety.

Coverage is pretty meh because the commentators are always scrambling to adjust to the video feed, which changes away from interesting things to irrelevant shots of Nelson Piquet lapping the field. No lap numbers and very infrequent timing graphics. The footage itself is surprisingly good for being 40 year old video.

It's a great season. Everything from 1980-1991 is excellent. But yes, early 80s safety standards sucked rear end, the most idiotic is the aborted first start of the Belgian GP that year.


Passing was also easier, which gives me a little bit of hope for new GE cars. Isn't in nice that they can follow?

Frond fucked around with this message at 18:21 on Dec 21, 2020

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

bgreman posted:

Jfc the start of the 81 Belgium GP. :stonk:

Edit: these cars slide around a whole lot more, wow

I see they left that in. Stohr had a bit of a breakdown after that and left racing.


It's funny when you see them bouncing. They had to be thrown into corners more or less - very physical to drive, which benefitted guys like Keke Rosberg, Gillles, and Arnoux. You can also watch Renault gently caress up repeatedly in real time. I'm of the opinion the RE20/RE30 could have been championship winners if Renault would pull it's head out of it's rear end and stop making repeated dumb mistakes.

Frond fucked around with this message at 18:24 on Dec 21, 2020

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
4 different tire manufacturers too.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

bgreman posted:

The older races basically all have a one hour "In Review" condensed race package. Some also have a misleadingly named "extended highlight" package, which is 20-40 mins. A few of the classic races have the full event available (81 Britain and 81 Vegas for example), which becomes more common as we approach the present. I think all seasons from 2008 on have all races fully available. The "In Review" packages get a lot shorter in later seasons (Australia 2005 is only like 15 mins).

I can't believe how often the marshals just leave retired cars at the trackside, and how there's no safety car, so marshals being passed at speed on the track happens all the time.

Service vehicles too. Cars being ditched was because it was safer to leave them off line/off track honestly - you don't wanted to be murked by a car going 300km/h+ while retrieving a stricken one.


Interesting. I've downloaded all seasons from 1980-1994 so I've got all the races, but they are variously in English, German, Portugese, Spanish, French, Italian or Japanese.

Frond fucked around with this message at 18:28 on Dec 21, 2020

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

the corona quid posted:

If they have full races from the 80s in English that’s a huge selling point for me

Yeah it's cliché but Murray/Hunt is great. Although sometimes it's pretty apparent he had it in for Italians - Patrese mostly but others as well.


Oddly enough though the best quality races I have are the Fuji TV ones. Nearly flawless

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
The South American broadcasts look like they are filmed in a fishbowl lol.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

Azza Bamboo posted:

I've watched 5 old Grand Prix races now and one thing I'm noticing about these 80s cars is that the drivers' legs are right at the front of their cars. I've seen one driver get their leg trapped after the front took a smash, and two drivers limping out of their cars after being stopped in the catch fencing. Watching this stuff back over with modern sensibilities is fascinating. Did they not think about this or did they deliberately and knowingly ignore the repeated incidents?

They didn't care, more or less. They only mandated the driver's legs be behind the front axle line in 1986 IIRC.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

bgreman posted:

Yeah it's wild how far forward they're sitting in these cars. Also how much more upright it seems like they're sitting compared to a modern F1 car, and how much that exposes their heads above the bodywork.

Watching Silverstone '81 now and it's cool to see the planes on the apron in the background of some shots. Also Piquet sure loves to crash out for someone who wins the season.

This race is also one of the full-full races available, so you get fun pit lane commentary with Colin Chapman when one of the borderline illegal Lotuses gets DQd.

Which team has the car with the front wing on top of the nose instead of underneath? It's very :unsmith:


Piquet was cool.


The Toleman maybe?






Several teams ran front-wing-over the nose during 1981 (Arrows, Williams, Toleman, Ferrari, Theodore.)

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

Theophany posted:

The greatest car ever made: https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-de...ius=1501&page=1


e: i mean this 100% unironically, those old 200s fuckin' owned as long as you weren't one of the idiots that bought one with a Rover (originally a British Leyland heap of clog iron) engine and instead opted for the Honda unit.

The Honda Concerto-based Rover 200/400 were legitimately good cars (they were related to the EF Civic/DA Integra, Honda's high water mark IMO.)

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

the corona quid posted:

Hunt inspite of his rampant racism against Italians (like most British people, who are all bigoted) he was the only real person who was vocal about the atrocious safety poo poo like Mclaren designing a car that Berger couldn’t fit in.


Neither Capelli or Gugelmin were capable of shifting the gears in the 881 in standard form so Newey himself just took a pair of channel locks and bent the shifter, telling the drivers to deal with it.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

the corona quid posted:

The whole Acura brand came from the tie up with Rover iirc. The Rover 800/Acura Legend was a joint venture and I think after that they had enough of the BL designers and told them to gently caress off and start rebranding civics.

The initial 800s were such a disaster, compared to the Legend, which was the most reliable near luxury/luxury brand and car. Evidently there was friction because the Japanese and European definitions of luxury are different - the former at the time meant lots of convenience/electronic features and usually a high revving 6 cylinder small displacement engine (anything over about 3 litres in Japan during the 70s to 1989 when the tax regime was restructured was prohibitively expensive to run for most people). The latter meant refined ride, smooth and linear power delivery and low NVH, which 80s and 90s Hondas didn't have (they were firm and had high revving engines).


BL/Rover also had a lot of pride which led to some very strange engineering decisions - the 800s electrics and interior were entirely different from the Legend.


The EU built 200/400 and Concerto also bizarrely used Macpherson struts at the front, as opposed to the Japanese built car which had double wishbones all around (Like it's platform mates Integra/Civc). It doesn't make very much sense to me.

Frond fucked around with this message at 17:54 on Dec 22, 2020

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

daslog posted:

Spending cap work around phase 1?

Or further integration with Ferrari as a B team...which I thought Alfa was.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

daslog posted:

Spending cap work around phase 1?

You were right!


https://racer.com/2020/12/22/ferrari-building-haas-facility-in-maranello/

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

the corona quid posted:

I think the whole thing was a marriage of convenience. BL/Austin/Rover/whatever couldn’t afford to develop a new platform on their own and Honda got hosed by the VRA in the states and needed to move up market without necessarily having a firm grasp on what the luxury market was in the west compared to Japan.

The McPherson thing is strange because as far as I was aware part of Honda’s reasoning for going for double wishbone was to lower the front hood line and made McPherson struts difficult to implement. Re-engineering that probably would’ve killed any cost savings from going to McPherson strut in my mind.


The LS400 was really the first World Luxury Car Japan got right, IMO.



And the decision is baffling - as both British built and Japanese built Concertos were sold in mainland Europe as well, so you had the exact same car with different front suspensions!

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

the corona quid posted:

There’s a good series of essays online somewhere that documents the whole BL odyssey and yeah it’s pure comedy gold.

Hearing stories of my mom’s TR7 always put that poo poo into some sort of mythic legend for me growing up. Then you read all the poo poo that actually went on in Longbridge and it’s absolutely jaw dropping.

I like the TR7, for what it's worth. BL actually had talented engineers but terrible labour relations and ridiculous, idiotic cost cutting and decision making.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

track day bro! posted:

this looks like poo poo

Yeah I don't like it. Unnatural.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

bgreman posted:

The one I was looking for was indeed the Theodore one.

Just finished the Zandvoort '81 and Prost definitely got in there on that one. Andretti with another "these cars are too short so my legs are messed up" wrecks. Also the "catch fencing" is making my eyes twitch. I can't believe this was an acceptable saftey measure (preferred and mandatory, even) in this era.




I think I read that during one accident, one of the catch fencing posts came loose and struck a driver in the head. Edit: It was Geoff Lees, who it happened to in South Africa '81 (which is not on F1 TV since it wasn't a WDC event that year). Reutemann also narrowly escaped being strangled by catch fencing at the same event.

Yeah it's nuts. Did you watch the Argentina race where huge ruts were being carved in the newly laid pavement?

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

bgreman posted:

I watched the Argentina race but didn't notice that. Talk about track evolution!

I gotta say I like the look of this Brabham so I guess I'm for Piquet.

This Vegas "street course" is wild. It's entirely contained within one casino parking lot.

That was 1980 sorry. Nvm.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

bgreman posted:

1981 Recap: Prost would probably have won the WDC easily if not for all the DNFs. Ferraris broke every other race. Piquet gets the WDC largely by finishing in the points most. Reutemann was ahead all season only to lose it in the last race by a single point.

The cars are intended to go the full race length on a single load of fuel and a single set of tires. Going to the pits was usually bad news.

These cars break down a LOT, especially the turbos. Ten cars finishing a GP seemed to be the average, out of 24-ish starting. Points only for the top six finishers seems pretty harsh. More turbos next season, I reckon.

No safety cars or red flags all season! :v:

Many of the interesting overtakes happened off camera with nary a replay.

The Jones/Reutemann drama in Brazil seemed prime to carry on throughout the season but it never really materialized.

Piquet being carried out of his car after the finale because a Vegas masseur jacked up his back pretty much sums up the season.

Lmao people keep tossing beers to Jones on his last time on the podium at Vegas.

Edit: the footage for 1982 is notably better, at least for Kaylami. Most of the 82 field has no front wings.



Reutemann's drive in Vegas is one of the more uninspired I've seen. Laffite had an outside shot so it would have been nice if he had actually been able to pull it off. And yes, the Turbos had atrocious reliability - also quite laggy.


The Ground Effect '82 cars had so much downforce most only needed rudimentary front wings, and on high speed courses like Kylami - none at all.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

Azza Bamboo posted:



Not to say that Piquet didn't deserve his championship win, but the fact he drove a machine that capitalised on a rules loophole always casts a shadow on his performance. He crashed out many times in the season, but perhaps the fact he clawed his way to the top spot in spite of this says something for his skill.




I would call this a competitive advantage, coupled to the fact that Renault blew it (quite literally) and Piquet was generally superior to the Williams pairing.


I mean, it’s kinda not Brabham’s fault that their car was much better designed than the others, at least initially. James Hunt having a meltdown during the Argentine GP because he couldn’t deal with the fact that Rebaque was simply faster than the cars in front of him was embarrassing.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

the corona quid posted:

Frond do you have that F1 engine website still? There’s some good reads on that and it’s really detailed on the different design philosophy of the different engine manufacturers. There’s a lot of good coverage of the turbo era on that site.

I’ll see if I can find it again.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

bgreman posted:

Austria '82 features the first pre-planned pit stop of the era, both Brabhams started on a half load of fuel and stopped to change tires and get fuel halfway through. They'd been trying to do this for the last several races but kept retiring before getting the opportunity. Piquet's stop was around 31 seconds because the crew weren't ready, but Patrese finished his stop in about 13s.

Instead of tire blankets they used big hot air ovens to pre-heat.

They both retired within a few laps anyway. These cars are so fragile.

Edit: Apparently (road) motor racing is banned in Switzerland?

Yes, it’s why the “Swiss GP” was held at Dijon-Prenois. Another good, fast, old circuit.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

the corona quid posted:

Ground effects got banned at the last minute which means a lot of people were just scrambling to put anything together.

The original TG183 was a GE car(it appeared at the end of 1982) and then it was hastily modified at the last minute. Byrne figured out basically by chance that you could put a wing...in front of another wing.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

track day bro! posted:

I always wondered, is team ATS pretty much the german wheel manufacturer called ATS?

It is. The same guy later went on to found the Rial F1 team.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
I think at one point every single car on the ‘82 grid was illegal in some way.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
I don’t have a lot of nice things to say about Ecclestone, but I love Murray. It could also be said too that Brabham was more or less a one car team from 80-85 aside from the 2 years they employed Patrese. They very clearly did not give a poo poo about the Non-Piquet entry.


I think it helped them to the WDC as they could focus all efforts on Piquet’s car (I also think it’s why Patrese left the team).

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply