Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012

can there actually be politics that aren't left or right without being

* Third Positionism postwar fascism/neo-Nazism that cowardly hides its right-wing nature
* Third Way (neo)liberalism that cowardly hides its right-wing nature
* technocratic "neither left nor right" radical centrism that cowardly its right-wing nature
* the occasional libertarian that hides that cowardly his right-wing nature

this ain't a centrism thread but centrism both in its technocractic/populist incarnations and the no-labels "we need less partisanship and more decorum in politics" forms often does this

what about Green politics

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

paul_soccer12
Jan 5, 2020

by Fluffdaddy
there can not.

a few DRUNK BONERS
Mar 25, 2016

the conceptualization of politics as a two dimensional line (or euclidean plane) that we should place ourselves is a deliberate neoliberal invention and we would do well to free our minds from this cartesian paradigm. but how do we even think about this?

Tempora Mutantur
Feb 22, 2005

a few DRUNK BONERS posted:

the conceptualization of politics as a two dimensional line (or euclidean plane) that we should place ourselves is a deliberate neoliberal invention and we would do well to free our minds from this cartesian paradigm. but how do we even think about this?

well I drink a lot

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

where's Sun Ra fall on the facebook meme political compass

Impkins Patootie
Apr 20, 2017





a different kind of politics?

Jellidelic
Nov 28, 2011

adam curtis has joined the chat.

paul_soccer12
Jan 5, 2020

by Fluffdaddy
turd way

lumpentroll
Mar 4, 2020

The hotter, the wetter, the better
:synpa:

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

are there any perspectives that can truly be said to not fall on the spectrum that says liberals who want an app to give homeless people investment advice on the go and anprims who believe we should roll back the last fifty millennia and spend our days foraging for nuts and idly loving in a field like the bonobo are basically the same thing

Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012

Jellidelic posted:

adam curtis has joined the chat.

isn't he the rare example of not posing as left nor right, but is probably left-wing?

though I did read his avowed views and they sound like apolitical incoherence

quote:

Curtis will trenchantly defend his films and his arguments, but his personal politics are more obscure. Most people assume that he is on the left because of his long association with the BBC, his discerning taste in electronic music, and his sustained distrust of international finance and tech oligopolies. He likes the idea of a universal basic income. But when I asked Curtis if his depiction of contemporary Western citizens as atomized consumers, hooked on fictionalized versions of themselves, came from his own yearning for a more collectivist politics, he shook his head. “No. You can’t put individualism back in the box,” he replied. “I mean, I’m an arch individualist and I know it in myself.” Curtis often refers to himself as a creature of his time, which he sees as defined by the self-expression of the sixties and the go-go capitalism that won the Cold War and then markedly accelerated. Like other periods, it will come to an end. “It’s a moment,” Curtis said. “The way we live now is the product of hyper-individualism. . . . And it’s now become a sort of giant baroque thing, which you meet on Instagram and you meet on TikTok and you meet in my films.”

A Wizard of Goatse posted:

anprims who believe we should roll back the last fifty millennia and spend our days foraging for nuts and idly loving in a field like the bonobo are basically the same thing

anprimitivism is an umbrella ideology that can be subdivided into left and right groups, probably

jarofpiss
May 16, 2009

Maximo Roboto posted:

anprimitivism is an umbrella ideology that can be subdivided into left and right groups, probably

im currently on day 5 of being an anprim and it's not been great

Gods_Butthole
Aug 9, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 8 years!
I believe that Muammar Gaddafi showed us the way forward with The Green Book.

net work error
Feb 26, 2011

Hmm much to think about...

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

The concept of being "above" politics is always either an excuse for status quo apologetics or a cover for truly monstrous ideology that you would just prefer no one ask questions about

But that said if you're going to, call it z-axis politics and smugly tell others they're two dimensional thinkers like Spock in Wrath of Khan

Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012


OP already says no Third Way!!! triangulators gtfo

Finicums Wake
Mar 13, 2017
Probation
Can't post for 8 years!

a few DRUNK BONERS posted:

the conceptualization of politics as a two dimensional line (or euclidean plane) that we should place ourselves is a deliberate neoliberal invention and we would do well to free our minds from this cartesian paradigm. but how do we even think about this?

it goes back to the french revolution, so it's can't be a product of neoliberalism, which emerged much more recently

Bushiz
Sep 21, 2004

The #1 Threat to Ba Sing Se

Grimey Drawer
a politic's to surpass metal gear

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3
Nov 15, 2003
left/right politics exist as long as capitalism exists. after capitalism, there will be different politics.

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
the dialectic forbids this

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

Maximo Roboto posted:

isn't he the rare example of not posing as left nor right, but is probably left-wing?

though I did read his avowed views and they sound like apolitical incoherence



anprimitivism is an umbrella ideology that can be subdivided into left and right groups, probably

what characteristics would determine if someone is wanting to be a caveman in a left or rightwing way

A Wizard of Goatse has issued a correction as of 00:34 on Feb 20, 2021

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3
Nov 15, 2003
anprimitivism wants to revert to pre-capitalist conditions so sure they could be different but i dont see anyone in the modern world successfully breaking away like that

uncontacted tribes do not have left/right politics

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

Yes but what does it actually say to describe it in terms as vacuous as left/right, does that actually mean anything applied to the full spectrum of ideas humans can have about politics and not just the divide between republican capitalists who are willing to tolerate gay people vs. republican capitalists who aren't

All ideologies that don't hew extremely close to the center of that discourse have a "how do we get there from here" problem, I'm not sure how that's pertinent unless you're implying that politics outside of Trump v. Biden doesn't really exist

A Wizard of Goatse has issued a correction as of 01:10 on Feb 20, 2021

Farm Frenzy
Jan 3, 2007

people who are active and engaged and explicitly describe their politics this way are most likely lying but imo when your average normie adjacent joe rogan listener say they fall into this category they sincerely believe it

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

The Oldest Man posted:

The concept of being "above" politics is always either an excuse for status quo apologetics or a cover for truly monstrous ideology that you would just prefer no one ask questions about

But that said if you're going to, call it z-axis politics and smugly tell others they're two dimensional thinkers like Spock in Wrath of Khan

The Fourth Industrial Revolution

miniscule12
Jan 8, 2020

HAHA YEAH HE PEED IN HIS OWN MOUTH I'M GONNA KEEP BRINGING IT UP.

apologia for the status quo is fundamentally right wing so no op

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=df7jOd6HcIY

"I do not have a single constructive proposal!"

"The only thing we must do now is 'Scrap and Scrap"..."

"Annihilate everything that exists!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0

http://www.warewaredan.com/

"Anarchism + Nationalism = Fascism
Welcome to the Fascist Party, our group!"

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTOWIMJkKpc

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007
it is called space op

net work error
Feb 26, 2011

What is left? What is right? What is neither? Hmm...

WrightOfWay
Jul 24, 2010


It's about the price stabilité.

Big Mad Drongo
Nov 10, 2006

Druidism, op. Druids must be True Neutral or else they're posers

paul_soccer12
Jan 5, 2020

by Fluffdaddy
Just spitballing but what about like

Game of thrones

Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3 posted:

left/right politics exist as long as capitalism exists. after capitalism, there will be different politics.

errr there was Left Opposition, Right Opposition, and good ol' Stalin centrism centralization

A Wizard of Goatse posted:

what characteristics would determine if someone is wanting to be a caveman in a left or rightwing way

there would be people wanting to cosplay peaceful pre-agricultural societies built on mutualism and lack of hierarchy, and others who would cosplay barbarian warlords built on oppression and slavery

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
politics is a meta process created by society/civilization and the state of the means of production/ownership and its relationship to the masses, it's not a binary left/right, but more of a gradient between preserving and strengthening those relationships or seeking to abolish them and create new relationships, and everywhere in between the current base/superstructure. you can't abolish the superstructure (neoliberalism) without fundamentally altering the base (private enterprise). the means of production are meaningless without relationships to the people who own/control them, they're just capital, or dead labor. the base/superstructure also would seem to possess mechanisms that recreate itself and reinforce itself, even when assailed vigorously by abolitionists (communists). these are largely due to cultural inertia, socialization, ideological brainwashing through false consciousness, where the values of the benefactors of society are programmed into the masses, subtly, even sinisterly.

there are no relationships that exist outside of our global paradigm at this point, nor have there meaningfully existed any for hundreds of years now due to colonization (outside of defeated revolutions, latent revolutions, or.... whatever China is doing), so there are no politics that exist outside of what exists now, that's partly a reason why revolution is so hard to imagine and enact, you gotta start from scratch on a lot of things! if you DO get to that point though, I think competing ideologies/relationships/arrangements can form, there will absolutely be dissention about how to handle certain aspects of the new arrangements, but history tells us we'll probably get another dominant base and create another superstructure, we just have to create one that's more sane/rational/equanimous and vigorously develop it until we can rehab the species. there'll probably still exist a gradient of differing thoughts, but unless you gently caress up real bad and create a psychotic system of contradictions that immiserates a vast majority of people, it'd be difficult to create the conditions of another paradigm shift, because there'd be no incentive to fight and die for one

Bored Online
May 25, 2009

We don't need Rome telling us what to do.
everyone is guilty of liberalism in the first degree

Jabberlock
Nov 29, 2014



i think plants are the only true centrists

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

IMAGINE A NEW DIRECTION IN POLITICS

NOT LEFT

NOT RIGHT

BUT WEST!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Filthy Hans
Jun 27, 2008

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 10 years!)

Big Mad Drongo posted:

Druidism, op. Druids must be True Neutral or else they're posers

still defined in relation to the political spectrum


if the overton window shifts, do Druids shift with it

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply