Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Elukka
Feb 18, 2011

For All Mankind
There certainly aren't any physics reasons you can't build a big spaceship. They were going to build an entire fleet of the things during the Cold War, because of general Cold War insanity.

https://www.thespacereview.com/article/2714/1

quote:

In late 1959, Captain Mixon laid out the evidence for General Thomas Power, the commander in chief of SAC, and obviously convinced him. On January 21, 1961, General Power signed a SAC requirement for a “Strategic Earth Orbital Base” (SEOB) based on the Orion propulsion system and roughly following the space force deployment concept. The SEOB would be “capable of accurate weapon delivery” to “include the capability to attack other aerospace vehicles or bodies of the solar system occupied by an enemy.” The SEOB would also be able to orbit “extremely heavy useful payloads” on the order of 5,000 tons.

These are the ship roles they were planning:

quote:

STATIONED IN SPACE

Command/Control
Strategic Weapon Delivery ("Bomber")
Surveillance-reconnaissance
Space Defense
Orbit Logistics
Lunar Base Support
Space Rescue and Recovery
Satellite Support
R&D Laboratory

STATIONED ON THE SURFACE

Emergency Command/Control
Space Interceptor
Damage Assessment
Space Rescue and Recovery
Satellite Support



Some extremely pro classified concept art:



It might actually have been cool and good because there's no military reason to build a giant space fleet in the foreseeable future, so it would funnel military funds into something militarily pointless while opening up the way to the solar system. There were also civilian applications for Orion, of course. They wanted to fly to Mars and Jupiter and such.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Elukka
Feb 18, 2011

For All Mankind
A space warship (or a large civilian ship for that matter) probably wouldn't look a lot like the ISS because if you have something that's worth calling a space warship it kinda implies there are things in space to fight wars over which implies we probably don't need it to be launched in tiny self-contained modules on small rockets. It's an extreme level of modularity that's not necessarily the best choice for most things.

Elukka
Feb 18, 2011

For All Mankind

Conspiratiorist posted:

Absent perfect optics they'll diffuse into harmlessness after several dozen kilometers. With hypothetical sci-fi perfect optics you'd still be diffraction limited due to quantum effects, so the same would happen but take longer.

Optical weapons don't really miss, though.
Your spot size at a given distance mostly depends on the size of your focusing optic and the wavelength of your light. Increase the optic's size, or drop your wavelength, and you'll have the same size spot at a longer distance. Doesn't really need anything scifi. Either way you're right that eventually the beam will be harmless regardless.

Here's a mirror for a laser intended to shoot down Soviet nuclear missiles, and Reagan talking in front of a mockup of the full satellite.




This was part of the Star Wars program and is the kind of very stupid thing that could start a nuclear war.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply