Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Morbus
May 18, 2004

roomforthetuna posted:

Nice. That is indeed the exact same kind of thing, where it uncomfortably feels like an impossibly unlikely coincidence for the math to work out that way.

It's not a coincidence. The shell theorem is a mathematical consequence of the inverse square law, which is a consequence of energy conservation & the gravitational field being a conservative vector field. Energy conservation is itself a consequence of time translation symmetry and you can go on and on. These aren't coincidences so much as they are different ways of mathematically expressing the same relationship.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply