|
EmbryoSteve posted:I just dont think any of these QBs will work with the seahawks roster and that the roster will be in a better place next year and they should get a QB that works with the roster then. 2nd round doesnt matter much to me You’re going to be competing with 10 other teams who all decided to wait for next year when there are currently two decent prospects (young and stroud) and then a bunch of guys who have just as many question marks as the current crop. I don’t think the Seahawks are top 5 pick bad so you’re likely in the same boat all over again.
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2022 23:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 12:11 |
|
|
Ornery and Hornery posted:I am beaming with joy that Seattle got Cross. He’s so good, and young, with plenty of upside yet and he’s already an elite pass protector. I agree. Which means it won’t happen. I still want Minshew on the roster though so my credibility is poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2022 23:10
|
|
|
My predictions on who they actually take: Ridder and Ekibete. I bet they think Ridder with his height and established ability to go through progressions is plug and play Goff-style into Waldron's pseudo-Rams offense. The gamble is on fixing accuracy (which almost never happens!)
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2022 23:19
|
|
|
EDGE and a running back. Oh well, 2 good picks out of 3 aren’t bad. Wait, no, not an edge. God drat it, what the hell. Bob Socko fucked around with this message at 01:05 on Apr 30, 2022 |
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 00:52
|
|
|
I'll assume that means that Carson's neck is absolutely hosed and he's done. Bummer! Penny also can't stay healthy so the Hawks definitely need some RB help, would have rather they'd picked one in the 5th or something.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 01:08
|
|
|
Bob Socko posted:EDGE and a running back. Oh well, 2 good picks out of 3 aren’t bad. ? Boye Mafe is definitely an EDGE. Kenneth Walker is...sigh. The Seahawks are always, always on brand. He's supposed to be really good at least? https://twitter.com/mattyfbrown/status/1520193233405583361 Vhak lord of hate posted:I'll assume that means that Carson's neck is absolutely hosed and he's done. Bummer! Penny also can't stay healthy so the Hawks definitely need some RB help, would have rather they'd picked one in the 5th or something. And, neither Penny nor Carson are on contract past this season. But I'd rather they take a drat good center to set up the run.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 01:10
|
|
|
That's the Hawks drafting I'm used to, all right.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 01:42
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/1520204382188494848 Dude was the top TE in the draft. Cardinals TE room is very talented.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 01:58
|
|
|
shirts and skins posted:? Ok, sorry, you’re right. Phone posting over dinner, got a little confused.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 02:01
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:You’re going to be competing with 10 other teams who all decided to wait for next year when there are currently two decent prospects (young and stroud) and then a bunch of guys who have just as many question marks as the current crop. I don’t think the Seahawks are top 5 pick bad so you’re likely in the same boat all over again. The second tier of qbs in next years draft is pretty big, like 5 guys. It’s likely that at least a couple of them will cement themselves as good QB prospects. And the worst of that second tier next year will still be better than all the qbs this year. It’s widely acknowledged that next year is likely a strong QB class. Seattle will be bad and will have two first round picks to facilitate any needed trade up. Although I acknowledge that a trade up might be pricier than expected because Seattle’s second first round pick will be the 32nd overall because Wilson is gonna win the Super Bowl 
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 02:38
|
|
|
Still some good OL prospects left, fellow Seattle goons. I believe!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 02:39
|
|
|
I just want an OL or a CB. Give me one of those who doesn’t suck.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 02:46
|
|
|
the Seahawks did it  3 out of 4 ain’t bad
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 02:55
|
|
|
oh poo poo it’s this guy, hell yeah https://twitter.com/nfl_dougfarrar/status/1520220290332037120?s=21&t=rpSqYJ-qJ951vqsDaEJmIA
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 03:01
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/minakimes/status/1520219979609567232?s=20&t=E6Fzr6UvYiW4KHWyibjXDw
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 03:02
|
|
|
I'm super cool with the draft for the hawks now. I wanted Lucas at 41 and they got him anyway. Walker is good and they got the guy I wanted when they drafted him. Draft is good now
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 03:09
|
|
|
Ornery and Hornery posted:It’s widely acknowledged that next year is likely a strong QB class. People keep saying this but then it’s always Young and Stroud as obvious ones and then you have like Spencer Rattler and DJ Uigaleile as the next tier and they both loving sucked last year. Beyond that it’s random guys with “prototypical size” like Phil Jurkovec whose only real redeeming quality is that he’s large and white. If you want to draft the next Daniel Jones or Mitch Trubisky you’ll probably have your chance but outside of the top two, who also have questions marks, it looks like a bunch of guys that if you squint you can see how maybe they might not suck.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 03:29
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Cardschatter/status/1520231316939182080 https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/1520231460917202944
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 03:40
|
|
|
Ah yeah, there it is, as it were https://twitter.com/BradyHenderson/status/1520261690180263936?t=w1YmtLZTI4R-Uglaxsfnww&s=19 I still don't like taking a RB in the 2nd, but using it on a Doak Walker winner when your top RB might never play another snap is somewhat more understandable. B+ draft for the Hawks, all three other picks have been stellar. Now they'll take a bunch of CBs and see if Pete/Desai can make any of them work. E. Lmao https://twitter.com/mikebarwin/status/1520275975996526600?t=424zrlxzQ2kbgS4-spEA0w&s=19 shirts and skins fucked around with this message at 12:30 on Apr 30, 2022 |
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 11:56
|
|
|
shirts and skins posted:Ah yeah, there it is, as it were
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 16:57
|
|
|
Good on Pete for pooping on these poopy qbs. Also if taking a RB is the price to satisfy Pete so that we could build the trenches, then a-okay. Time to tank baby. Get some rookies some playing time baby. Get that new defensive scheme going baby. Love the hawks let’s go the hawks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 17:28
|
|
|
Gonz posted:https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/1520204382188494848 Yeah, between WRs and TEs, the Cardinals are at least giving Murray a lot of weapons. Of course, if only they could invest more in the OL...
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 17:32
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/1520436946106998784 Questionable RB pick aside they're really killing it this year, Jim Thorpe winner here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 17:52
|
|
|
Ravens drafted Daniel Faalele. The dream is dead. Good for him though I wish him the best
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 18:08
|
|
|
EmbryoSteve posted:Yeah carson is toast. Also lol agreed these qbs are not gonna be better then drew lock It would be a lottery win if any of the QBs in the 2nd round would be better than Drew Lock. That said, Drew Lock is still gonna suck lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 19:07
|
|
|
seiferguy posted:It would be a lottery win if any of the QBs in the 2nd round would be better than Drew Lock. That said, Drew Lock is still gonna suck lmao A guy with Willis running ability certainly has higher potential than a big armed statuesque idiot. I think one of Pickett, Willis or Ridder will turn out to be alright.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 19:24
|
|
|
Hawks pick up Tariq Woolen, super toolsy CB. That marks the second big cornerback added to the team! Delightful
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 19:25
|
|
|
I can't believe the oldest coach in the league is really signing up for a 2-3 year rebuild. Amazing. Embrace the suck.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 19:46
|
|
|
Bryant, Woolen. The lower you go, the more lotto-ticketish these players are, but those are two very nice looking lotto tickets. RB pick notwithstanding (and even that is understandable if not optimal), drat fine draft for the Hawks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 20:05
|
|
|
Agreed, my friend. Suspiciously good looking draft from the Seahawks. If they hit on a qb next year and actually spend FA monies on good players instead of a bunch of bad players, wild card doesn’t seem out of the question in 2023!
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 20:08
|
|
|
Given how well the late picks have gone, I'm starting to come around on the RB pick. Alone it was too early, but as a complete draft package they have ended up with 2 promising DBs, a promising EDGE, good tackles, and possibly the best RB. No weird trades or untested players, just filling needs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 21:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jourdanrodrigue/status/1520480858330697728?s=21&t=4JnZ6lYAr2MDdoYotjtcQA
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2022 22:25
|
|
|
Where the gently caress were these drafts the last five years gently caress
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2022 02:06
|
|
|
Like it's the same GM and all right?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2022 03:33
|
|
|
All I can think is that they tried for six years or so to patch holes and extend their window with Russ anyway they could, and paired with a lot of bad and reactive drafting. Everyone points to Scott Mcloughan as the difference maker for the 2010-2012 drafts, but maybe Schneider is just better at building up a bad roster than maintaining a good one. If basically the whole team's bad and you have no players necessitating a particular style of play, you draft the best player available. That seems to be basically what they did.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2022 03:52
|
|
|
The team also viewed picks more as trade assets than actual talent. Hell, Wilson might have viewed the weak OL as a challenge for him and pushed for improvement elsewhere thinking he could overcome it.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2022 04:00
|
|
|
I mean, we still haven’t actually seen any of these guys play so who knows how they work out. You can’t grade a draft before anyone sees the field.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2022 04:10
|
|
|
shirts and skins posted:All I can think is that they tried for six years or so to patch holes and extend their window with Russ anyway they could, and paired with a lot of bad and reactive drafting. That makes no sense though because a lot of past drafts were poopy because they didn’t address holes. This good draft is them addressing their biggest holes with premium picks. And a RB lol but whatever Walker looks neat. quote:Everyone points to Scott Mcloughan as the difference maker for the 2010-2012 drafts, but maybe Schneider is just better at building up a bad roster than maintaining a good one. If basically the whole team's bad and you have no players necessitating a particular style of play, you draft the best player available. That seems to be basically what they did. Until we are shown otherwise, Scot M is the simplest and most compelling reason that the first drafts were great and basically every draft after he left sucked.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2022 04:11
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:I mean, we still haven’t actually seen any of these guys play so who knows how they work out. You can’t grade a draft before anyone sees the field. That’s true but it’s tight seeing the hawks invest picks in positions of need, with acknowledged good prospects, in appropriate rounds. We avoided dumb poo poo like the hawks were going to trade back to the late teens and then take like a third around LB or some poo poo.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2022 04:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 12:11 |
|
|
Lifespan posted:The team also viewed picks more as trade assets than actual talent. Hell, Wilson might have viewed the weak OL as a challenge for him and pushed for improvement elsewhere thinking he could overcome it. Lol what
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2022 04:14
|
|