|
balls of steeeeeeelllll
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2023 00:54 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2024 02:34 |
|
blow it out your rear end.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2023 00:54 |
|
yeah the only reason i use amazon photos is because we already get it with our prime subscription. it’s just a cold storage backup for me anyway.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2023 01:03 |
|
also their ai search ain’t too bad
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2023 01:03 |
|
Mega Comrade posted:Until it doesn't suit them anymore. this is definitely something i keep my eye on. they’re actually killing off amazon drive very soon, but amazon photos is sticking around (for now).
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2023 13:19 |
|
i did some senior pictures and also some political campaign portraits a few years back that turned out well.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2023 23:44 |
|
HAIL eSATA-n posted:sure are a lot of descriptions of pictures itt picture this: kiss my b*tt!
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2023 03:27 |
|
ooooohh, bitchy!
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2023 16:17 |
|
bobmarleysghost posted:These digicams are popular again, if you don’t use it you can sell it for an easy $100 it’s amazing how trends come and go like this. maybe the stuff i want will be cheap again someday (lol)
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2023 16:03 |
|
before i got my rx-1005a i used one of these. a different league than the p&s stuff from the oughts but definitely still outdated by today’s standards. even though high iso performance was pretty rough it was a really nice camera. great build quality and good ergonomics.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2023 17:12 |
|
i loving love good compact cameras.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2023 17:12 |
|
accidentally sent some HP5+ through the checked luggage scanners at heathrow. poo poo was definitely affected but not completely ruined (except for the picture itself lol). had to zap the gently caress out of the image with dehaze though--with limited success--and the blacks have indeed suffered.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2023 20:44 |
|
nice, man
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2023 21:30 |
|
Beeftweeter posted:
woah is that 9/11?
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2023 23:10 |
|
1) open image full screen on computer 2) take picture of screen with cell phone with flash ON boom, sunny day in your pocket.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2023 15:52 |
|
Achmed Jones posted:last night i spent some time reading ken rockwell's site. here are my thoughts, more or less in order i like to think of him as “k-rock, the panchromatic shock, rockwell”
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2023 01:25 |
|
also mods namechange please to “Al Rokkor” tia
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2023 01:25 |
|
jesus WEP posted:
off to capture some correctly exposed pictures harnessing the power of the sun
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2023 11:12 |
|
shitposter|chronically confused|dilettante|father
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2023 11:15 |
|
been working in my editing skills. what do you all think?
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2023 16:13 |
|
loling
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2023 22:48 |
|
the native americans used every part of the camera
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2023 23:39 |
|
Megabound posted:It would be so horrendously complex that it would cost more than a digital camera and a film camera seperately. Also, you can just take a photo with your phone with one of the many apps that crops you equivalent focal length and apply a filter today. yeah but this way i get a bad digital image plus the film to later gently caress up in different ways.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2023 04:05 |
|
yeah but they have poor knobfeel
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2023 16:03 |
|
i have a canon 35mm SLR with this stupid rear end eye tracking autofocus setup. i mean it’s neat and all but the dam thing only has like seven af points and they’re all along the x axis.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2023 18:35 |
|
akadajet posted:I've always been curious about how accurate these are. the eye track thing? the functionality seems legit. you calibrate it to your eye and it responds well once set up.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2023 22:12 |
|
Megabound posted:People don't nt like to admit it but this is what peak camera viewfinder looks like if you know, you know.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2023 23:07 |
|
big scary monsters posted:"Wow!" drat, was thinking “ugh, this looks like that garbage people fling about on flickr” and then i looked closer. lol.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 02:00 |
|
Megabound posted:My reverse camera room got a big upgrade fuuuuck. very jealous.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 12:56 |
|
echinopsis posted:you literally know how to do things I do not dude, a little over $100 and you can develop in your bathroom or at your kitchen sink. it’s super accessible. if you do, and you stick with 35mm film, just drop a few hundred more and get a dedicated film scanner too though.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 12:58 |
|
seriously though. i tried all kinds of dumb, cheap, and jankety scanning setups before i finally pulled my head out of my rear end and bought a cheap and cheerful plustek 8100 and it’s one of the best equipment decisions I’ve made.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 14:24 |
|
i’d give my left nut for ad hoc darkroom access
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 16:20 |
|
I really would. i have two kids already and we don’t want any more. hell, take the right one too.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 16:21 |
|
echinopsis posted:over in the truck nuts thread we have a fine range of replacement nuts so you don’t need to feel like less tell the truth, they’re just the ones they make for dogs but repackaged, aren’t they?
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 17:19 |
|
big scary monsters posted:i get it, but if you do decide to give it a shot sometime b&w film is basically impossible to gently caress up and i think you'd probably enjoy the aesthetic. pull some hp5 and admire those lovely, grey blacks
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 17:19 |
|
get some cheap but excellent rodinal and go 2 town.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 17:20 |
|
echi don’t listen to sagebrush. use rodinal.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 17:28 |
|
I don’t have any of the finesse stuff down myself, tbh.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 17:33 |
|
i’ve done semi-stand but that’s about as weird as i’ve gotten.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 17:34 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2024 02:34 |
|
Achmed Jones posted:i have no idea what any of this means but would like to understand c41 chemical packs are still called “press kits”
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2023 19:54 |