|
           
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2022 00:37
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Mar 26, 2023 10:05 |
|
|
       
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2022 01:57
|
|
|
    
|
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2022 01:39
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2023 21:19
|
|
|
Your i phone
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2023 03:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2023 19:12
|
|
|
honest feedback is necessary when one wants to get better, and people with thin skin can't help themselves and conflate honest feedback with assholish feedback.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2023 22:06
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:i learned a long time ago that no matter how many artsy photos of abandoned swingsets and collapsing walls you take, the only pictures you'll want to look at later are the ones with people in them. i disagree completely. i could look at ruwedel or r adams for ever
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2023 22:11
|
|
|
i could look at chris killip photographs for ever too  
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2023 22:25
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:I share a lot of other peoples work on my instagram story and drat.. I’ve got some good taste you can't post this and not post what you post on your IG stories.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2023 03:55
|
|
|
bellows lugosi posted:you just like advertising. those images are selling you the idea of being cool, or skinny, or young, or sexualized, or the idea that you're the cool photographer taking pictures of women who want to undress in front of you. they're selling you a lifestyle, and we grow up in a society where we're sold that visual lifestyle our entire lives. i don't think it's a mystery or incomprehensible why you'd find them alluring. it also makes sense why that sort of photography is at the front of the IG explore page. it has the veneer of Good Photography, which is only the technical side, and eschews any deeper meaning other than "she is very good looking, look at her" horny sells, and you (echinopsis) bought it hook, line, and sinker bobmarleysghost fucked around with this message at 17:05 on Jan 24, 2023 |
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2023 17:02
|
|
|
as an exercise, echinopsis, i challenge you to not repost any horny posts on your story, post everything else that you get inspired from. see what comes of that.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2023 17:06
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:nah I have a lil bit of a clue but when you shoot full frame part of doing so is giving crop sensor peeps poo poo lmao i hope youre not serious? i can't really tell, what with your posting history
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2023 21:07
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2023 21:46
|
|
|
he's right though, your taste isn't refined, yet. maybe in the future you will dig yourself out of this male gaze hole you find yourself in.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2023 21:48
|
|
|
Ren Hang https://www.artnet.com/artists/ren-hang/
|
|
#
¿
Jan 25, 2023 01:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 25, 2023 16:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 26, 2023 23:09
|
|
|
thanks
|
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2023 02:10
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2023 02:27
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2023 20:20
|
|
|
This is just me playing around. I’ve pointed many cams at the sun and none have had problems with that, so maybe it’s an urban legend or it’s pointed at people that do time lapses pointed at the sun for some reason.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2023 21:14
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:Well to a point. Cell phone sensors genuinely do suck balls that's true, but you can really pull out great RAW files out of them. Of course model dependent. My old Nexus 6P had an amazing camera, have printed from it and you cannot tell it was from a phone. Here's a scan of a print from it.  My current phone is a pixel 6 or something and the lens is noticeably worse - distortion and blurryness around the corners. I've still printed from it and it's still serviceable. Moral of the story is print your photos.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2023 18:02
|
|
|
akadajet posted:iphones have consistently good cameras, op ...okay? did I say anything against them? I'm saying phone cameras/sensors are good enough, and you can print those photos. I don't give a poo poo if it's apple or android, who the gently caress cares
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2023 18:12
|
|
|
is yospos an apple enclave? brand loyalty is for dumb people
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2023 18:16
|
|
|
i'd rather not use a phone. i wish there was an eink phone that has maps and works with my car's nav system. slow tech.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2023 18:19
|
|
|
this is 100% crop of the RAW photo, it has a really good non-digital look to it
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2023 19:26
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2023 19:50
|
|
|
qirex posted:what should we call this, mavicacore? he wishes
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2023 18:03
|
|
|
my setup is also a nas + backblaze combo
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2023 14:00
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:lightroom is very bad at displaying noise (from the noise slider) as it would be if it was rendered out I remember my LR was doing something similar, it turned out the graphics card was adding sharpness, so I turned that off. Check your settings.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2023 14:31
|
|
|
Good poo poo
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2023 14:31
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:
These digicams are popular again, if you don’t use it you can sell it for an easy $100 https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/07/technology/digital-cameras-olympus-canon.html https://theconversation.com/amp/why-are-so-many-gen-z-ers-drawn-to-old-digital-cameras-198854 https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-64512059 https://casualphotophile.com/2022/01/04/digicams-are-the-new-film/
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2023 14:34
|
|
|
Those powershots are cool because you can put chdk on them and get RAW files out of them, which are surprisingly good, all they need is some color noise reduction
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2023 15:23
|
|
|
I got this one a little while ago, it’s got good color science for the jpegs but i use raws out of it. Except for low light, the high iso low light combo renders well in the jpeg.  
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2023 16:07
|
|
|
the solution is to have a small strip of instant film in front of the mirror that flips up just before you take the photo, that way you have a small preview of the image on paper.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2023 20:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Mar 26, 2023 10:05 |
|
|
bellows lugosi posted:
good poo poo slept on
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2023 03:45
|
|
