Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug
CONTENT WARNING: UKRAINE IS NOW AN ACTIVE WAR ZONE, POSSIBLE VIOLENT IMAGERY AND VIDEO AHEAD.
NO WW3/NUKES/CLANCY CHAT. THIS IS NOT HELPFUL. NATO AND US WILL NOT BE INTERVENING. If you insist, post about it in the Clancychat thread.
FOR MACHINE TRANSLATIONS USE DEEPL - https://www.deepl.com/translator
READ OTHER THREAD RULES BELOW.

:siren: Want to help Ukraine? Visit our donation drive thread.

CommieGIR posted:

Potential Gangtag by goon Loden Taylor


:siren: Extended thread rules below.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

:siren: Thread moderation update 9 :siren:

There also seems to be more confusion than I would expect to be on what I consider Clancychat. To me, Clancychat is any conversation on military particulars that is removed from the currently observed events by either a significant passage of time, or a lengthy chain of assumptions. What counts as current, significant, or lengthy here I leave to my discretion on an individual basis.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

:siren: Thread moderation update 8 :siren:

In the light of the recent debacle, I've given some thought to shoring up post quality in this thread. From now on:
  • Casual GBS-style (poo poo)posting, however well intended, is explicitly discouraged. Joke posts will also need to meet a higher standard of funny to survive.
  • Any uses “orc” to describe Russians, other than to express exasperation about Russian war criminals on a specific occasion, are explicitly forbidden. The exception is meant for one-off posts when you have a good reason to say so – use it at your own risk.

CommieGIR posted:

:siren: Thread moderation update 7 :siren:

Please avoid sharing videos of POWs, they are not to be made objects of public curiosity. If you wish to share a video of a POW, it must be relevant to an ongoing event in the war in such a manner that it adds unique context to the conversation.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

:siren: Thread moderation update 6 :siren:

Don’t discuss videos you won’t post, that is neither interesting nor helpful to anyone. Tag appropriately, consider putting the link into code blocks so it doesn’t embed in the mobile app, and get on with it - asking people to look up sensational poo poo on their own with the amount of propaganda going about is bad enough that I’ll genuinely start probating for posts like that going forward.*

*warning doesn’t apply to stuff like “Twitter is full of dead bodies from Bucha, scroll carefully”.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

:siren: Thread moderation update 5 :siren:

I've caught up with the thread since I went to bed, and I'd like to ask for 2 things:
  • Please shut up about a tankies or DSA, unless it's obviously relevant to the thread; that entire conversation was very tedious.
  • While this is a fast-moving thread with somewhat relaxed moderation, D&D rules still stand, and I'd like to politely remind people to put effort into your posts. If you want to meme, that's okay with me (to an extent), but, please, as we say here, combine "the pleasant" with "the practical", and post something thread relevant along your sometimes dubious one-liners. Find some examples of the posts I'd call out from the last night below.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

:siren: Thread moderation update 4 - TAG THE LINKS YOU SHARE :siren:

:nms: - visible gore, visible death (any target), likely death (any visible target), clear violence against civilians, cruel treatment of probable POWs

For instance - soldier with a hand blown off, charred corpses, Bayraktar shooting human convoy, that Kharkiv cruise missile hit, MLRS shelling residential buildings, beating up surrendered POWs

:nws: - light wounds, clear violence against military, particularly emotional moments, heavy language, massive fires

For instance - soldier with bloodied biceps bandage, entrenched military firefight filmed from a high-rise, that toddler screaming when jet fighter’s rocket blew up near the home, videos with more than just blyat and suka going on, Zhaporizhya cruiser missile hit scene on 95th base where everything was on fire

no tag - everything else (forums rules still apply), including violence against an unclear target, and violence against likely empty target

For instance - all those nighttime explosions, soldiers dumping RPGs around the corner, missile hit on TV tower

If you use a tag, you must explain why you use a tag. :nms: content must be spoilered or not embedded (preferably latter), and :nws: content with disturbing thumbnails must be spoilered as well.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

:siren: Thread moderation update 3 :siren:

Boring posting rules, wrt NATO, from now on, also apply to Geneva Convention, and no-fly zones.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

:siren: Thread moderation update 2 :siren:

Having also edited like 20 posts to clean up :nms: stuff, going forward the OPs may get more than 6 hours for posting that stuff inappropriately.

Also, if you quote incorrectly posted obvious :nms: poo poo like a giant rear end rocket hitting the ground floor of an office building, during office hours, while there are cars and poo poo around, I will also probate you for quoting it because I'm not spending another hour editing all the loving posts.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

:siren: Thread moderation update :siren:

Having caught up earlier in the day with 15 pages of posts made overnight, I must regretfully note that a lot of it was a tedious discussion centred on NATO, c.f. “Being boring” rule of D&D. This is not an individual indictment of any specific poster. Similarly, I don't intend to go back and gas everyone who mentioned NATO between 6am and 11am Latvia time, since we have had many new faces here in the last 24 hours, and their good faith participation in the thread is valuable. Instead, I'd like to give some advice over the types of conversations concerning NATO (in itself or on behalf of the U.S.) that have  already been rehashed multiple times, arguably ad nauseam:
  • NATO should have been dissolved when the USSR fell, and its continued existence is an act of Western aggression towards Russia. This includes the discussion on USSR-Russia succession.
  • NATO is not a defensive alliance. This includes multiple discussions on every armed conflict US has been involved in since 1990.
  • NATO did promise Russia to not enlarge eastwards. This includes discussion on whether if promise was binding or not, the kind of guarantees it bore, whether if it was ever offered or eventually broken, etcetera.
  • NATO did mistreat Russia during NATO-Russia accession talks. This includes discussion on whether if Russia as a member was realistic, or whether if NATO was to be restructured, or whether if Russian got baited into shock therapy or otherwise treated as lesser while moving these friendship discussions.
  • NATO did intentionally expand eastwards, as a long con attack on Russia. This includes both the fact of new members in general, and more granular discussion of each of the enlargement waves.
  • NATO's 2008 motions towards Ukraine and Georgia were an act of  aggression towards Russia. This includes whether if the 2 countries were interested, or were intentionally played by NATO like chess pieces.
  • NATO is the organizer of “colour revolutions” in countries neighbouring Russia. This especially includes foreign involvement in the 2014 revolution in Ukraine.
  • NATO improving its working relationship with Ukraine post-2014 is an act of aggression towards Russia. This includes discussions on if Ukraine wants a membership, if it can get a membership due to veto, and if the West is playing it like a chess piece for its own goals.
While I wish that people continuing these conversations would do their due diligence to review what has been already said previously, that's unrealistic. Consequently, I'd just like to ask people posting about NATO, which isn't the primary focus of the thread, to ask themselves 2 questions:
  • Is it likely that I am bringing a new viewpoint into the discussion, that will be found interesting by the majority of readers?
  • Have I clearly stated why I'm bringing NATO up, and what are the conclusions or prescriptions that stem out of what I'm saying? This especially applies to “Russian invasion a bad act, but” posts.
Conversations about NATO may continue, but for the duration of elevated posting volume, the boring rule will be more likely to be enforced, and by people who have been following EE politics for months, if not years. Posts careless about the 2nd point may simply be treated as threadshitting, to manage moderation workload and thread readability.


This thread is for Discussion of the ongoing Ukraine crisis and Russian intervention to help take the weight off the Eastern Europe thread, with a focus on current events.

This includes discussion of Ukrainian Nazis and justification of Russian intervention/invasion of Ukraine.
We're done with talking about the Azov battalion unless they've gotten murdered by the Russians or did something current. Jesus.

Cinci Zoo Sniper remains the thread IK since this remains an EE thread spinoff

Active toxxes

Silver2195 posted:

It will end by "Friday," i.e., within 18 months. :toxx:

Silver2195 posted:

Yes. The war will end (or at least be "re-frozen") before November 10, 2023.

Keisari posted:

It is done. This is the beginning of the end of this imperial misadventure.

:toxx:

Ukrainian flag will fly in Melitopol by September 9th 2023, or I will donate 50 euros to a charity or the Ukrainian state.
Cinci note: admins pick a charity if they’re paying.

Resolved toxxes

nurmie posted:

i propose the following conditions for my counter-:toxx: to HonorableTB:

  • six months time span - so, no invasion before the 24th of June, 2022 24th of July, 2022
  • only official or quasi-official invasion counts - so, Crimea scenario counts as an invasion, supporting DNR/LNR with "advisors" and sending communist internationalists weirdo russian nazis to fight CIA-backed weirdo ukrainian nazis or whatever does NOT count as an invasion
  • only invasion by Russian forces counts - Poland deciding to grab Lwow for itself or Turkey trying to reistablish itself within the land borders of the Byzantine empire does not count for the purposes of this toxx

HonorableTB posted:

I think these are reasonable and accept

Edit: assuming toxxes are still a thing on the forums, I know for a while they weren't allowed but with Jeff owning the site maybe that has changed. Unless a mod says otherwise I will assume the toxx stands in effect

Toxxes will not be acted upon until the entire D&D Mod Team and Koos review circumstances

- Referring to Ukraine as "the Ukraine" is broadly deprecated, what with it being the language of extreme Russian nationalism that rejects the idea of Ukrainians being a real people or a real language group. While we generally set a high bar for language policing these days, this is one of the few things that may be taken as a signal of bad faith engagement. - GJB

THREAD: We are aware there are Nazis in Ukraine. We do not constantly have to revisit this issue every 4 pages. Unless its something current events related to the Nazis in Ukraine, or the Nazis in Russia, or whatever: Shutup about it. :godwin:

P.S. If you're looking for media accounts to follow, this may be useful:

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Twitter accounts for Russo-Ukrainian war. This is just a compilation of accounts I'm aware of, rather than a recommendation to read all of this, or some kind of “allowed sources” list for the thread. My general suggestions are to use common sense:
  • Don't doomscroll. Make separate Twitter lists for different topics you care about. In general, I would also suggest siloing OSINT accounts to a separate Twitter list because they're spammy.
  • If Ukrainians says they blew up Russian Death Star, wait for tangible evidence.
  • Make sure “multiple sources” are not several people citing the same Twitter account.
  • If a tweet feels sensational, check their timeline to get a measure of the account.
  • “Proper” photo/video evidence is well lit shots from multiple people and angles, with publicly explained geolocation.
  • If you see a loud claim with a photo, consider using reverse image search. For this, Yandex is the best, followed by Bing, and only then followed by Google.
  • Check even numbers. If they align with whatever Wikipedia says perfectly (20 tanks in a landing ship, 1:3 dead:wounded ration, etcetera), be sceptic. In general, stuff like “100 trucks blown up” in a presser will tend to be rounded up to some “neat” number.

General analysis of the war
https://twitter.com/KofmanMichael
https://twitter.com/TheStudyofWar
https://twitter.com/JominiW

Master list on Russian economy
https://twitter.com/i/lists/1506669435612016645

OSINT aggregators
https://twitter.com/RALee85
https://twitter.com/girkingirkin
https://twitter.com/Liveuamap
https://twitter.com/MotolkoHelp
https://twitter.com/loogunda

Broader OSINT community
https://twitter.com/Nrg8000 (maps)
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons
https://twitter.com/COUPSURE
https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical
https://twitter.com/oryxspioenkop (Russian equipment losses)
https://twitter.com/bellingcat
https://twitter.com/CovertShores (boats)
https://twitter.com/christogrozev
https://twitter.com/HN_Schlottman
https://twitter.com/jmvasquez1974 (warfighter of some sort)

Variety commentary
https://twitter.com/SamRamani2
https://twitter.com/PhillipsPOBrien
https://twitter.com/BretDevereaux
https://twitter.com/Kateryna_Kruk
https://twitter.com/CITeam_en
https://twitter.com/olex_scherba
https://twitter.com/mhmck
https://twitter.com/WarintheFuture
https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch (some weird takes)

Commentary accounts with frequent weird takes :anttony:
https://twitter.com/kamilkazani
https://twitter.com/sumlenny
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko

Ukrainian journalists
https://twitter.com/olgatokariuk
https://twitter.com/lapatina_
https://twitter.com/IAPonomarenko (seems to primarily repost MoD stuff these days)

Foreign reporters in Ukraine
https://twitter.com/andersostlund
https://twitter.com/sommervilletv
https://twitter.com/nolanwpeterson
https://twitter.com/johnsweeneyroar
https://twitter.com/OzKaterji

Journalists reporting on Ukraine from abroad
https://twitter.com/KevinRothrock
https://twitter.com/ChristopherJM
https://twitter.com/maxseddon
https://twitter.com/yarotrof
https://twitter.com/maryilyushina
https://twitter.com/shaunwalker7
https://twitter.com/Andrew__Roth
https://twitter.com/michaeldweiss

Spammy, sensationalist accounts to be careful with :anttony:
https://twitter.com/nexta_tv
https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPR

Ukrainian news
https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent
https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPress
https://twitter.com/NewVoiceUkraine

Ukrainian government accounts
https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa
https://twitter.com/ukraine
https://twitter.com/oleksiireznikov
https://twitter.com/DmytroKuleba
https://twitter.com/Podolyak_M
https://twitter.com/StratcomCentre
https://twitter.com/GeneralStaffUA

Western government accounts
https://twitter.com/DefenceHQ
https://twitter.com/JackDetsch (actually just a journalist reporting from Pentagon)
https://twitter.com/armees_gouv
https://twitter.com/DaveKeating (actually just a journalist reporting from Brussels)
https://twitter.com/DanLamothe (another defence briefings journalist)

Somebody fucked around with this message at 15:56 on Sep 19, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Conspiratiorist
Nov 12, 2015

17th Separate Kryvyi Rih Tank Brigade named after Konstantin Pestushko
Look to my coming on the first light of the fifth sixth some day

Conspiratiorist posted:

Fact is one of the world's largest militaries has concentrated >60% of its fighting power along the border of a country it invaded less than 10 years ago and somehow we still have no loving idea what it's going to do or how they're going to do it.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

Nazis Against Territories for Others (NATO) is at it again:

https://twitter.com/RenieriArts/status/1492249342580830211?t=h8jPu2tPEjBhxxToXyg5Sg&s=19

Cpt_Obvious fucked around with this message at 19:44 on Feb 14, 2022

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Truga posted:

so they should have said "you're not getting in" then, and thus avoiding a bunch of suffering for ukrainians because by 2014 clearly russia felt like they can handle propping up an insurgency now

about 80%? russia's at fault here, but this could have been easily avoidable if bush admin didn't say the thing despite knowing full well ukraine is never getting in because not every nato ally wants them in. putin would have zero reason to do anything in ukraine if ukraine wasn't a nato candidate

e:

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/23/politics/ukraine-us-second-weapons-shipment/index.html
you mean this?

e2: well gently caress

I'm gonna answer this here: Weapons shipments can be saber rattling, but I don't think they are in this case. Ukraine is asking for military support, we've actually largely denied them that to avoid a possible US/Russia confrontation.

The only one who has stepped on Ukrainian soil with the intent of using military force, or threatened to do so, is Russia.

Cpt_Obvious posted:

The chief Nazis Against Territories for Others (NATO) is at it again:

https://twitter.com/RenieriArts/status/1492249342580830211?t=h8jPu2tPEjBhxxToXyg5Sg&s=19

Yes, she's a loving mess. Surprisingly common with Nationalists.

But jesus gently caress Cpt_Obvious, really? Impying NATO is a Nazi aligned org? You could've discussed this hosed up individual without implying all of NATO = Nazis.

CommieGIR fucked around with this message at 19:44 on Feb 14, 2022

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

CommieGIR posted:


But jesus gently caress Cpt_Obvious, really? Impying NATO is a Nazi aligned org? You could've discussed this hosed up individual without implying all of NATO = Nazis.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Heusinger


quote:

Adolf Bruno Heinrich Ernst Heusinger (4 August 1897 – 30 November 1982) was a German military officer, whose career spanned the German Empire, the Weimar Republic, Nazi Germany and West Germany. Heusinger joined the German Army as a volunteer in 1915 and later became a professional soldier. He served as the Operations Chief within general staff of the High Command of the German Army in the Nazi German Armed Forces from 1938 to 1944, before being appointed acting chief of the general staff for two weeks in 1944 after his predecessor (Kurt Zeitzler) resigned his post due to a nervous breakdown. He was then appointed head of the military cartography office when the war ended. He later became a general for West Germany and served as head of the West German military from 1957 to 1961 as well as Chairman of the NATO Military Committee from 1961 to 1964.

mmkay
Oct 21, 2010

Truga posted:


about 80%? russia's at fault here, but this could have been easily avoidable if bush admin didn't say the thing despite knowing full well ukraine is never getting in because not every nato ally wants them in. putin would have zero reason to do anything in ukraine if ukraine wasn't a nato candidate


Weird though that the support for joining NATO was still below staying away from it in 2014 when Russia invaded.

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009

Continuing the discussion from the other thread.

Truga posted:

so they should have said "you're not getting in" then, and thus avoiding a bunch of suffering for ukrainians because by 2014 clearly russia felt like they can handle propping up an insurgency now

about 80%? russia's at fault here, but this could have been easily avoidable if bush admin didn't say the thing despite knowing full well ukraine is never getting in because not every nato ally wants them in. putin would have zero reason to do anything in ukraine if ukraine wasn't a nato candidate

e:

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/23/politics/ukraine-us-second-weapons-shipment/index.html
you mean this?

e2: well gently caress

On the other hand could it not be argued that the root cause is due to Russia? Ukraine wouldn't have an interest in NATO if they didn't feel threatened by their neighbour. If Russia wasn't a threatening force then joining NATO would be of little interest. If one starts from the position that Ukraine has the right to self-determination and not to be anyone's pawn than it's only logical to seek aid if you feel threatened by another country.

There's a whole rabbit hole delving into what the West could have or should have done in the 90s that may have prevented Russia from developing as it has over the last 30 years but at the root of it is that a country has no reason to join a defensive alliance if they don't feel threatened by anyone else. Presumably the Baltic nations didn't join just for the fun of it.

BoldFace
Feb 28, 2011
Ukrainian President declares February 16th the National Day of Unity.

https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/532022-41357

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

CommieGIR posted:

I'm gonna answer this here: Weapons shipments can be saber rattling, but I don't think they are in this case. Ukraine is asking for military support, we've actually largely denied them that to avoid a possible US/Russia confrontation.

western state apparatuses and media are hyping this supposed invasion that's kicking off in 2 weeks, and how we should totally help ukraine (for 8 years straight now i might add), and just generally spreading stupid fear, almost like they're planning some kind of false flag themselves

you can't just decouple these things from the weapon shipments, they're connected. it's absolutely saber rattling. i mean, gently caress, try opening cnn or bbc front page, they're loving insane

i can't really speak for what putin's end goal is here, seeing how i'm not him, but i can say that as an EU citizen, our leaders absolutely are partially responsible for the bullshit going on

e:

Wistful of Dollars posted:

Continuing the discussion from the other thread.

On the other hand could it not be argued that the root cause is due to Russia? Ukraine wouldn't have an interest in NATO if they didn't feel threatened by their neighbour. If Russia wasn't a threatening force then joining NATO would be of little interest. If one starts from the position that Ukraine has the right to self-determination and not to be anyone's pawn than it's only logical to seek aid if you feel threatened by another country.

There's a whole rabbit hole delving into what the West could have or should have done in the 90s that may have prevented Russia from developing as it has over the last 30 years but at the root of it is that a country has no reason to join a defensive alliance if they don't feel threatened by anyone else. Presumably the Baltic nations didn't join just for the fun of it.

oh certainly, and hindsight is always 20/20, but i still feel like with how much our media portrays our leaders as some kind of beacon of democracy, diplomacy and just general eliteness, surely they could have easily navigated something even i could see coming

Truga fucked around with this message at 19:50 on Feb 14, 2022

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug
there's also the whole: We were very explicit that Georgia and Ukraine were not being considered for NATO....and then Russian invaded Georgia to support the separatists. Even if we again emphasized they are not being considered, Putin has made it clear through action it really doesn't matter.

Truga posted:

western state apparatuses and media are hyping this supposed invasion that's kicking off in 2 weeks, and how we should totally help ukraine (for 8 years straight now i might add), and just generally spreading stupid fear, almost like they're planning some kind of false flag themselves

you can't just decouple these things from the weapon shipments, they're connected. it's absolutely saber rattling. i mean, gently caress, try opening cnn or bbc front page, they're loving insane

i can't really speak for what putin's end goal is here, seeing how i'm not him, but i can say that as an EU citizen, our leaders absolutely are partially responsible for the bullshit going on

.....wait are now claiming this is all a Western false flag plot and that Russia didn't invade Donbass in 2014 or annex Crimea? At what point do you just totally absolve Putin of any action he takes by implying a false flag?

Of course they are insane: There's a fuckton of divisions Putin is stacking immediately on Ukraine's border, planning missile drills that block all their ports, and continue to keep adding more men and hardware to the pile? We haven't seen a buildup like this since the US prepped for Afghanistan/Iraq?

CommieGIR fucked around with this message at 19:50 on Feb 14, 2022

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincenz_M%FCller

quote:

Vincenz Müller (5 November 1894 – 12 May 1961) was a military officer and general who served in the German army, the Army of Nazi Germany, and after the war in the National People's Army of the (East) German Democratic Republic, where he was also a politician. Müller eventually became a member of the East German parliament, the Volkskammer, and served as chief of staff of the National People's Army.

mmkay
Oct 21, 2010

Truga posted:

western state apparatuses and media are hyping this supposed invasion that's kicking off in 2 weeks, and how we should totally help ukraine (for 8 years straight now i might add), and just generally spreading stupid fear, almost like they're planning some kind of false flag themselves

And yet there's only one side that can actually commit to an invasion or back off from it, so why are you blaming Ukraine or NATO for 'sabre rattling'

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth
Is the mere act of reporting on Russian troop movements and putting out statements saying "Don't invade Ukraine, we will react if you invade Ukraine" considered sabre rattling?

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013


Do you consider modern Russia a communist country because a lot of current leadership were members of the party some time ago (and are actually alive)?

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010


If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling
1-800-GAMBLER


Ultra Carp
Are Nazis in control of Ukraine's government? No.
Do they make up a significant or influential part of its legislature? As near as I can tell, no.
Do the root causes of Ukraine's conflict with Russia involve Nazis in any significant way? Absolutely not.

And with this being the case, my firm belief is that anybody who tries to point to the existance of Nazi militias in Ukraine or lovely individuals on the ground as some kind of gotcha is being both disingenuous and a shithead. Ukraine may have a problem with Nazis, same as many other places — but these problems have absolutely nothing to do with why Russia wants political control over the Ukrainian people and their territory.

Nilbop
Jun 5, 2004

Looks like someone forgot his hardhat...

Cpt_Obvious posted:

Nazis Against Territories for Others (NATO) is at it again:

This is the third post in this thread and it's already looking less like a discussion thread and more like a crazy relative's Facebook timeline, and now instead of discussing the article we're discussing one poster inferring that NATO is a Nazi organization. The link would have worked perfectly fine on it's own without this nonsense.

Danger
Jan 4, 2004

all desire - the thirst for oil, war, religious salvation - needs to be understood according to what he calls 'the demonogrammatical decoding of the Earth's body'

CommieGIR posted:

I'm gonna answer this here: Weapons shipments can be saber rattling, but I don't think they are in this case. Ukraine is asking for military support, we've actually largely denied them that to avoid a possible US/Russia confrontation.

The only one who has stepped on Ukrainian soil with the intent of using military force, or threatened to do so, is Russia.

Yes, she's a loving mess. Surprisingly common with Nationalists.

But jesus gently caress Cpt_Obvious, really? Impying NATO is a Nazi aligned org? You could've discussed this hosed up individual without implying all of NATO = Nazis.

Yea, it’s not like high ranking Nazi war criminals were recruited and welcomed into NATO leadership or anything.

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

https://twitter.com/mrsorokaa/status/1493279960424980481

this is in response to about a dozen MPs (out of 424) who have reportedly left the country. most of these MPs are from the pro-Russian Opposition Platform — For Life.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

CommieGIR posted:

Of course they are insane: There's a fuckton of divisions Putin is stacking immediately on Ukraine's border, planning missile drills that block all their ports, and continue to keep adding more men and hardware to the pile? We haven't seen a buildup like this since the US prepped for Afghanistan/Iraq?

until recently us/korea did bigger joint exercises every couple years on north korean border and it barely even got mentioned in the news lol

mmkay posted:

And yet there's only one side that can actually commit to an invasion or back off from it, so why are you blaming Ukraine or NATO for 'sabre rattling'

not blaming ukraine for anything, their communications have been one of the few voices of reason in this whole clusterfuck

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Truga posted:

western state apparatuses and media are hyping this supposed invasion that's kicking off in 2 weeks, and how we should totally help ukraine (for 8 years straight now i might add), and just generally spreading stupid fear, almost like they're planning some kind of false flag themselves


There have been people dying for 8 years, almost every day, from Russian artillery.


Truga posted:



i can't really speak for what putin's end goal is here, seeing how i'm not him, but i can say that as an EU citizen, our leaders absolutely are partially responsible for the bullshit going on


Oh, this part is absolutely true. They have continued bankrolling Russian army with idiotic energy policy, and continued selling them what they need to modernize it despite 2014. A good number of retired German politicians are literally on Russian payroll and continue influencing its policy. The response in 2014 from them and Obama was basically a green light... But I somehow think you don't mean that.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy
ah yeah, let's do more sanctions, those sure seem to hurt the militaries and oligarchs, not average people

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Truga posted:

ah yeah, let's do more sanctions, those sure seem to hurt the militaries and oligarchs, not average people

Your right, Russia is going for the more peaceful and less harmful route here.

Terminal autist
May 17, 2018

by vyelkin
Hopefully the war is quick and as bloodless as possible. Its increasingly clear the West and NATO only view Ukraine as a pawn in the most cynical chess game around.

ranbo das
Oct 16, 2013


Danger posted:

Yea, it’s not like high ranking Nazi war criminals were recruited and welcomed into NATO leadership or anything.

I mean by that logic can we point to the USSR version of operation paperclip and say that Russia is also a Nazi country? Seems fair

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

Terminal autist posted:

Hopefully the war is quick and as bloodless as possible. Its increasingly clear the West and NATO only view Ukraine as a pawn in the most cynical chess game around.

I think the desires of the people of Ukraine matter the most, here.

Conspiratiorist
Nov 12, 2015

17th Separate Kryvyi Rih Tank Brigade named after Konstantin Pestushko
Look to my coming on the first light of the fifth sixth some day

Truga posted:

western state apparatuses and media are hyping this supposed invasion that's kicking off in 2 weeks, and how we should totally help ukraine (for 8 years straight now i might add), and just generally spreading stupid fear, almost like they're planning some kind of false flag themselves

you can't just decouple these things from the weapon shipments, they're connected. it's absolutely saber rattling. i mean, gently caress, try opening cnn or bbc front page, they're loving insane

While the Western government's (and ghoulish media) messaging has been atrocious, their actions have been the opposite of saber-rattling: they're bending over backwards to avoid an escalation chain with Russia.

Removing instructors from Ukraine, diplomats, urging citizens to leave, declaring again and again that they will not send troops to defend Ukraine - that's all intended to make it clear that NATO (collectively or individually) will not get into a direct confrontation with Russia. Other than receiving the new buzzword lethal aid support, Ukraine is on its own. Moral support, though: may they fight the good fight against Russian imperialism down to the last Ukrainian.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Terminal autist posted:

Hopefully the war is quick and as bloodless as possible. Its increasingly clear the West and NATO only view Ukraine as a pawn in the most cynical chess game around.

Military force is okay if you are Russia, just be quick. Avoiding a confrontation and World War, there's the real troublemakers.

That's an....impressive shifting of goal posts.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Acebuckeye13 posted:

Are Nazis in control of Ukraine's government? No.
Do they make up a significant or influential part of its legislature? As near as I can tell, no.
Do the root causes of Ukraine's conflict with Russia involve Nazis in any significant way? Absolutely not.

And with this being the case, my firm belief is that anybody who tries to point to the existance of Nazi militias in Ukraine or lovely individuals on the ground as some kind of gotcha is being both disingenuous and a shithead. Ukraine may have a problem with Nazis, same as many other places — but these problems have absolutely nothing to do with why Russia wants political control over the Ukrainian people and their territory.

As other people have said, they Nazis in question came up when people uncritically passed around media reports that whitewashed the fact that they were covering literal Nazis. You can't post poo poo about heroic resistance fighters ready to stand up against Russian aggression and then get mad when people go hey that individual, not all Ukrainians or all Ukrainian armed forces, but that person, was a Nazi. The only reason to get angry when someone points that out is if you think "good" Nazis can and should be embraced as long as they have the right enemies. Which, coincidentally, is a view the West has often had about fascists.

Even outside of that specific context, I think it's pretty questionable to suggest it should be verboten to point out the existence of armed quasi-official Nazi organizations in a country. Hell even the US Congress stripped out provisions requiring that military assistance not trickle down to Azov Battalion until 2018, which seems pretty bad to me.

Dr Kool-AIDS fucked around with this message at 20:07 on Feb 14, 2022

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Terminal autist posted:

Hopefully the war is quick and as bloodless as possible. Its increasingly clear the West and NATO only view Ukraine as a pawn in the most cynical chess game around.

I would not hope for active mass invasion of Russian forces personally, but thats me.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Sinteres posted:

As other people have said, they Nazis in question came up when people uncritically passed around media reports that whitewashed the fact that they were covering literal Nazis. You can't post poo poo about heroic resistance fighters ready to stand up against Russian aggression and then get mad when people go hey that individual, not all Ukrainians or all Ukrainian armed forces, but that person, was a Nazi. The only reason to get angry when someone points that out is if you think "good" Nazis can and should be embraced as long as they have the right enemies. Which, coincidentally, is a view the West has often had about fascists.

Even outside of that specific context, I think it's pretty questionable to suggest it should be verboten to point out the existence of armed quasi-official Nazi organizations in a country.

Except literally nobody on the forums was posting any of those stories. It was just brought up out of nowhere to browbeat the thread into admitting that the fascist dictatorship is actually morally superior to the decadent west and shouldn't be resisted.

Unironically stanning for this worldview itt

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

steinrokkan posted:

Unironically stanning for this worldview itt



That's definitely not my worldview, and you're a bad person for casually suggesting it is.

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011

Acebuckeye13 posted:

Are Nazis in control of Ukraine's government? No.
Do they make up a significant or influential part of its legislature? As near as I can tell, no.
Do the root causes of Ukraine's conflict with Russia involve Nazis in any significant way? Absolutely not.

And with this being the case, my firm belief is that anybody who tries to point to the existance of Nazi militias in Ukraine or lovely individuals on the ground as some kind of gotcha is being both disingenuous and a shithead. Ukraine may have a problem with Nazis, same as many other places — but these problems have absolutely nothing to do with why Russia wants political control over the Ukrainian people and their territory.

Reposting from the other thread. The far right in Ukraine has absolutely had an influence in domestic politics beyond "some militias".

mila kunis posted:

Yeah man only the pro russians are ethnic supremacist, there's absolutely nothing going on in the ukrainian nationalist side.

https://jacobinmag.com/2022/02/maidan-protests-neo-nazis-russia-nato-crimea

The driver of this violence was largely the Ukrainian far right, which, while a minority of the protesters, served as a kind of revolutionary vanguard. Looking outside Kyiv, a systematic analysis of more than 3,000 Maidan protests found that members of the far-right Svoboda party — whose leader once complained Ukraine was run by a “Muscovite-Jewish mafia” and which includes a politician who admires Joseph Goebbels — were the most active agents in the protests. They were also more likely to take part in violent actions than any group but one: Right Sector, a collection of far-right activists that traces its lineage to genocidal Nazi collaborators.

[...]

Andriy Parubiy, the unofficial “commander of Maidan,” founded the Social-National Party of Ukraine — a barely even winking allusion to Nazism — that later became Svoboda. By January 2014, even NBC was admitting that “right-wing militia-type toughs are now one of the strongest factions leading Ukraine’s protests.” What was meant to be a revolution for democracy and liberal values ended up featuring ultranationalist chants from the 1930s and prominent displays of fascist and white supremacist symbols, including the American Confederate flag.

[...]

The same far right that had led the charge in toppling Yanukovych, including Parubiy, found themselves with plum roles in the interim government that followed, while the winner of the 2014 snap presidential election — Ukraine’s seventh-richest man, Petro Poroshenko — had a history of corruption. His interior minister soon incorporated the Azov Regiment, a neo-Nazi militia, into Ukraine’s National Guard, with the country now a Mecca for far-right extremists around the world, who come to learn and get training from Azov — including, ironically, Russian white supremacists who were hounded from their country by Putin.

Despite far-right parties ultimately losing seats in Parliament, ultranationalist movements successfully shifted the country’s politics to the extreme right, with Poroshenko and other centrists backing measures to marginalize the speaking of Russian and glorify Nazi collaborators. Even so, far-right candidates have entered Parliament on non-far-right tickets, and extremists like former Azov commander Andriy Biletsky have taken high-ranking law enforcement positions. While far-right vigilantism spread through the country, Poroshenko himself granted citizenship to a Belarusian neo-Nazi and engaged in some borderline anti-Semitism of his own.

[...]

In truth, the Maidan Revolution remains a messy event that isn’t easy to categorize but is far from what Western audiences have been led to believe. It’s a story of liberal, pro-Western protesters, driven by legitimate grievances but largely drawn from only one-half of a polarized country, entering a temporary marriage of convenience with the far right to carry out an insurrection against a corrupt, authoritarian president. The tragedy is that it served largely to empower literal neo-Nazis while enacting only the goals of the Western powers that opportunistically lent their support — among which was the geopolitical equivalent of a predatory payday loan.

https://jacobinmag.com/2022/02/us-russia-nato-donbass-maidan-minsk-war

The role of radical nationalists in Ukrainian politics is significant, via direct pressure on the government and dissemination of narratives. If you look at the actual policies that were taken by the post-Maidan government, you’ll see the program of radical nationalist parties, particularly decommunization, banning the Communist Party of Ukraine, and Ukrainianization, which means pushing the Russian language out of the Ukrainian public sphere. Many things that the far right campaigned on before Maidan were implemented by nominally non-far-right politicians.

Nationalist radicalization is very good compensation for the lack of any revolutionary changes after the revolution. If you start, for example, to change something in the ideological sphere — renaming streets, taking away any Soviet symbols from the country, removing Vladimir Lenin’s statues that were standing in many Ukrainian cities — you create an illusion of change without actually changing in the direction of the people’s aspirations.

[...]

The radical nationalist parties, by contrast, have ideology, they have motivated activists, and at this moment, they are probably the only parties in the real sense of the word “party.” They are the most organized, the most mobilized parts of the civil society, with the strongest street mobilization. After 2014, they also got the resources for violence: they got the opportunities to create affiliated armed units and a broad network of training centers, summer camps, sympathetic cafés, and magazines. This infrastructure perhaps doesn’t exist in any other European country. It looks more like 1930s far-right politics in Europe than contemporary European far-right politics — which doesn’t rely so much on paramilitary violence but is instead capable of winning quite a broad part of the electorate.

The "ukrainization" and "decommunization" drives, discrimination against russian speakers, the banning of eastern ukrainian parties, the suppression of opposition media, the selective prosecution of politicians (I absolutely loved Zelensky being ordered directly not to prosecute Poroshenko), the glorification of nazi and fascist collaborators, all of that has contributed to the polarization and splitting apart of the country.

After nearly 30 years as part of independent Ukraine, people in Donbass didn't suddenly decide they wanted out just for fun.

Red and Black
Sep 5, 2011

Acebuckeye13 posted:

Are Nazis in control of Ukraine's government? No.
Do they make up a significant or influential part of its legislature? As near as I can tell, no.
Do the root causes of Ukraine's conflict with Russia involve Nazis in any significant way? Absolutely not.

Does Ukraine have an entire battalion integrated into it's official armed forces that proudly and openly displays fascist insignia?
Ok yes, maybe but lets not forget Russia bad

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

Red and Black posted:

Ok yes, maybe but lets not forget Russia bad

I think the problem is Putin, not Russia as a country or the Russian people themselves. Putin is the one in control here, the one threatening an aggressive war of imperial conquest. He can end this with a word.

BoldFace
Feb 28, 2011
Pretty radical shift in tone.

https://twitter.com/jseldin/status/1493302440770379777

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

Truga posted:

until recently us/korea did bigger joint exercises every couple years on north korean border and it barely even got mentioned in the news lol
Yes, though only the US forces mostly consisted of units permanently garrisoned in South Korea. A better analogy would be if the annual Foal Eagle exercise also consisted of having a Marine division in amphibious boats 50 miles off of Namp'o and moved an additional three Army divisions to South Korea.

It's not the worst analogy, though: it's still only a cease-fire, and border incidents aren't uncommon (though mostly less common as time goes on).

Red and Black
Sep 5, 2011

How are u posted:

I think the problem is Putin, not Russia as a country or the Russian people themselves. Putin is the one in control here, the one threatening an aggressive war of imperial conquest. He can end this with a word.

Even if Russia were a perfect democracy, it would still oppose NATOs expansion into Ukraine. It would still oppose NATO troops in Ukraine. It would still oppose western missiles in Ukraine. (and it would still be called a dictatorship by the western media) This is a matter of a core security concern and not of the personal ideology of one man, who by the way probably isn't as all powerful as you've convinced yourself he is.

Danger
Jan 4, 2004

all desire - the thirst for oil, war, religious salvation - needs to be understood according to what he calls 'the demonogrammatical decoding of the Earth's body'

ranbo das posted:

I mean by that logic can we point to the USSR version of operation paperclip and say that Russia is also a Nazi country? Seems fair

Sure? Go hog wild. What you shouldn't do is divorce current ideological factors from their material historical antecedents.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
What made Zelensky do a 180 on downplaying the invasion's imminence? I'm sure this is just a reconciliation of his private and public positions but what prompted that?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Flavahbeast
Jul 21, 2001


Both countries have a big problem with fascist ideology but neither one is really dominated by it. I don't think Zelensky is a Nazi



I can tell you what would make things worse for them, though: a bloody war. Iran didn't go full psycho mode and start mass executions of communists until the Iran-Iraq war. A Russian invasion could make for extremely bad times in both Russia and Ukraine

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5